Technically... its bad for a module to need to access bits from ../
(or ../../ or ../../../../../../). The proper way to do this would
be to add them to a new license module, then have each module depend
on it, using dependency plugin to download unpack and then antrun to
copy into place.
My non-binding, itty-bitty, wimpy, not sure its worth anything vote
is for org.apache.geronimo.daytrader
--jason
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:15 PM, Prasad Kashyap wrote:
OK. I don't have a strong preference to any single groupId name. I
believe Matt doesn't either but I'll see if I can get him
Man, you have some serious windows scars or you need to ease off on the
coffee :-)
John
Jason Dillon wrote:
Um... blah... lets go back 10 years and give everything 8.3 names with
mad cryptic names in one directory with a slew of meaning-deficient 3
letter suffixes to tell stuff apart.
HelloLooking into the classloader problems and knowing which classsloader loaded which class has always been a big problem in app servers. Same is the case with dependencies in Geronimo, We spend lot of time in knowing which components has what dependencies.
I think it would be nice if in our Web
ProxyMethodInterceptor doesn't handle finalize appropriately
Key: GERONIMO-2204
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2204
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
On 7/19/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we get some commitment from PMC members to review and vote in
these changes so that we can finally finish the move to Maven 2?
I'm on holidays in 2 weeks and would be happy to help out as much as
it requires to get it tested and merged
switch the C# code to use System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.SizeOf)
instead of sizeof() to avoid issues on .Net 1.1 (vs2003)
-
Key: AMQ-830
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-830?page=all ]
james strachan updated AMQ-830:
---
Description:
For background see
http://www.nabble.com/can-amq-dotnet-build-by-.net-framework1.1-%28vs2003%29-tf1958469.html#a5389861
switch the C# code to
This should do the trick:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/sandbox/
svkmerge/m2migration
cd m2migration
./bootstrap
gunzip -c m2-assemblies/geronimo-jetty-j2ee/target/geronimo-
jetty-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz | tar xf -
I'd like to see the work to integrate jetty6 go in. However,
we'd have to have some discussion about whether we wanted to
upgrade the whole of Geronimo to JavaEE5 at that time or
just have the web container (well, Jetty at least) support
servlet 2.5.
regards
Jan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
I'm working on
1) Adding additional providers for javamail beyond SMTP. POP3, NNTP,
and NNTP-POST are already in. IMap is in the works.
2) Creating a 1.4 version of the javamail API (already done).
3) Add Yoko support to openejb and do a general cleanup of the openejb
CORBA code.
4)
SecurityRealms portlet does not list stopped security realms
Key: GERONIMO-2205
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2205
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Hello,
I just want to know if there are existing some XML Schemas for Geronimo 1.1
already?
If so, then please paste the URL where I could find them.
Thanks alot
mika
--
Echte DSL-Flatrate dauerhaft für 0,- Euro*!
Feel free mit GMX DSL! http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
They're in the Geronimo distribution in the schemas/ directory. We
don't have them posted to the web site yet though I'm working on it.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 7/19/06, mika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I just want to know if there are existing some XML Schemas for Geronimo 1.1
already?
If
We have some code to show a dependency graph kicking around... We
could probably squeeze that into a portlet. Here's an example:
http://people.apache.org/~ammulder/classloaders.png
However, I'm not sure how useful it will be -- it'll show you
dependencies at the class loader level, but it
inline..
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good news... we are almost there. Bad news... it will probably take
another week or so get everything *fully* functional.
Right now we have a functional Jetty J2EE assembly, which almost all
components enabled. Tomcat J2EE assembly
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-474?page=all ]
Philip Dodds resolved SM-474.
-
Fix Version/s: 3.0-M3
Resolution: Fixed
Added validation to the DesriptorFactory
Add validation code in for jbi descriptor to enforce the inclusion of
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1967?page=all ]
Sachin Patel closed GERONIMO-1967.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Sachin Patel (was: Matt Hogstrom)
patch applied
/remote-deploy url link throws Error 404.
Jeff,
We also need to shorten the artifactId. It makes a good puzzle -
Come up with sensible groupId and artifactId such that this does not
exceed 256!
Example 2 -
D:\geronimo-1.2\configs\daytrader-tomcat\target\reposito
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1582?page=all ]
Sachin Patel resolved GERONIMO-1582.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Sachin Patel (was: Matt Hogstrom)
patch applied
NPE for EJB webservices.xml with bad jaxrpc-mapping-file
To tell you the truth, I was secretly hoping to spur a debate around
message normalization. :) The way I understand it, if I start changing
the message format put on the bus, it will most likely break other
components that expect the older format.
I'd be curious to hear what other think
Inline -
On 7/19/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
inline..
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is my opinion that we should probably start the RTC process now
for merging the svkmerge/m2migration branch to trunk and to deprecate
the Maven 1 build... and nuke its
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-483?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino resolved SM-483.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I exported all the pages and the sniplets are now working again.
Code snippets missing from soem static HTML pages
Anita,
Here http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067#action_12416236,
you said that you have uploaded a patch for uddi configs. I couldn't
find it in any of the patches in this JIRA.
Do you think you have the patch on your machine ? Or shall I go ahead
and work on it ?
Cheers
Prasad
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-7?page=comments#action_12422184
]
Piyush Agarwal commented on DAYTRADER-7:
I agree that Daytrader is in the Geronimo source tree and I am not trying to
promote the above change just so
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-7?page=comments#action_12422191
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on DAYTRADER-7:
-
I'm leaning towards Piyush's view (sorry Jason and Jeff), but on the other hand
it's got me thinking whether
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-7?page=comments#action_12422192
]
Scott Nicholls commented on DAYTRADER-7:
Another option would be to change the build process to bundle the needed jar
files into the war. Of course,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-7?page=comments#action_12422194
]
Jeff Genender commented on DAYTRADER-7:
---
Im leaning towards Piyush's view (sorry Jason and Jeff), but on the other hand
it's got me thinking whether
the Maven 1 build... and nuke its build files.
Is this necessary? It is a nice thing to have during bug fixes.
Yes this is necessary. We already have had several commits to trunk
that changed Maven 1 configurations and skipped Maven 2... the longer
we have both systems in place the
We should submit 3 patches for RTC -
1. One from the branch
2. One with packaging plugin and configs made from the trunk
3. One with assembly plugin and Assemblies made from the trunk
The patches 2 and 3 can be reviewed and tested independently
of 1.
IMO this is the only way to keep the
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-776?page=comments#action_36594 ]
Kevin Yaussy commented on AMQ-776:
--
Any reason why clearDownSubscriptions in DemandForwardingBridgeSupport is
uncoded? Or perhaps overridden in ConduitBridge?
I think that in general... the m2 repository using the m2 style of
artifactId and groupId names is not compatible with Windows.
Short of changing the way m2 works or altering the m2 naming
standard, I do not see any simple way around this problem.
And we are getting hit by this in two
Aaron Mulder wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~ammulder/classloaders.png
However, I'm not sure how useful it will be -- it'll show you
dependencies at the class loader level, but it won't tell you which
class loaders hold a particular class or which class loader you're
actually getting at
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2066?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2066:
Assignee: Prasad Kashyap
Openejb migration to M2
---
Key: GERONIMO-2066
URL:
Inconsistent property names for JbiConstants.PROTOCOL_TYPE and
JbiConstants.PROTOCOL_HEADERS
Key: SM-490
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-490
make the Subscription MBeans easier to view/navigate using jconsole
---
Key: AMQ-833
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-833
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-833?page=all ]
james strachan updated AMQ-833:
---
Fix Version/s: 4.2
Affects Version/s: 4.0.1
(was: 4.2)
make the Subscription MBeans easier to view/navigate using jconsole
Anyone know how to fix this:
snip
Booting Geronimo Kernel (in Java 1.4.2_09)...
log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
(org.apache.geronimo.system.main.Daemon).
log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
Module 1/18 org.apache.geronimo.configs/rmi-naming/1.2-SNAPSHOT/
FYI, modules/tomcat was not including the right resources. Thanks for the
hint Mr. Jencks :-)
--jason
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Tomcat-assembly-failure-tf1968742.html#a5404498
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
Small difference in sync order processing between Direct and EJB mode
--
Key: DAYTRADER-8
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAYTRADER-8
Project: DayTrader
Issue
Is this the change to call lookup(...) in addConsumer( )? Looks like its not
being called. I'd like to run the broker in debug, I'm having trouble
figuring out where exactly the lazy creation of destinations is happening.
--
View this message in context:
examples configs [jsp-examples, servlets-examples]
--
Key: GERONIMO-2206
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Sub-task
Security Level:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2206:
-
Attachment: examples-configs.patch
examples configs [jsp-examples, servlets-examples]
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-2067.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Individually handled by
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2201
On 7/19/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not plan on submitting a patch for RTC. I can produce a rather
nasty diff of the trees for review if that is what the PMC wants, but
IMO that would be a waste of time for them to review. Instead I
suggest that the review be done by
What I expect is to check out the svkmerge/m2conversion branch and
diff it against the trunk, then review the changes, apply them to my
local trunk copy and give it a whirl. If it works, it will receive my
+1.
Good luck ;-)
I would encourage you (and others) to try the build from the branch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=all ]
Jason Dillon updated GERONIMO-2206:
---
Description:
patch enables the following configs
- jsp-examples-jetty
- jsp-examples-tomcat
- servlet-examples-tomcat
It also puts geronimoPlugin
snip
log4j: Parsing for [root] with value=[WARN, LOGFILE].
log4j: Level token is [WARN].
log4j: Category root set to WARN
log4j: Parsing appender named LOGFILE.
log4j: Parsing layout options for LOGFILE.
log4j: Setting property [dateFormat] to [ISO8601].
log4j: Setting property [contextPrinting]
On 7/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would encourage you (and others) to try the build from the branch
first. If you feel the need to diff that is fine, though we will
probably be merging this change back, not patching.
That's exactly what I had in mind, I believe. I'm going
On Jul 19, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 7/20/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would encourage you (and others) to try the build from the branch
first. If you feel the need to diff that is fine, though we will
probably be merging this change back, not patching.
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-794?page=comments#action_36595 ]
Brian Madigan commented on AMQ-794:
---
I tried this in the broker config and by defaulting advisorySupport to false in
BrokerService. I hard coded
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=comments#action_12422279
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2206:
I need to know where
{{geronimo-samples:geronimo-jsp-examples-tomcat:war:5.5.15}} comes from before
I can
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=comments#action_12422282
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2206:
NM, I found it here:
* http://people.apache.org/repo/m1-snapshot-repository/geronimo-samples/
Was having
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=comments#action_12422284
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2206:
When I try to install the plugin from the webconsole it barfs with:
{noformat}
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I am referring to the modules. What I meant was if we have 25 modules
and everyone has its own license and notices file I'm pretty confident
they'll get out of sync. It would be nice to have a central place to
pull the content from which should be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=comments#action_12422289
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2206:
I also see these in geronimo.out, which has the wrong groupIds:
{noformat}
I noticed the scout.log entry below. I looked in
geronimo-1.1\repository\scout\scout\0.5\scout-0.5.jar in the
log4j.properties file and it has log4j.debug uncommented!
I think that is the culprit. May want to send a mail to the scout
project http://ws.apache.org/scout/
John
Jason Dillon
Hrm... wonder what other jars have their own logging configs...
I mailed their list... though we might want to implement some build
fluff to strip these unwanted files out of jars.
--jason
On Jul 19, 2006, at 4:34 PM, John Sisson wrote:
I noticed the scout.log entry below. I looked in
Sorry for the slow response.. comments inline.
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 8:53 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Whilst testing the geronimo eclipse plugin, eclipse prompted me to
acknowledge the Sun license at
Is anyone else seeing random failures due to problems downloading
artifacts from the new locations of the Apache repos?
--jason
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1738?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-1738.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Let's mark this fixed. The patch has gone into the
sandbox/svkmerge/m2migration. The whole branch
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1737?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-1737:
-
Summary: geronimo-assembly-plugin + Jetty J2EE Assembly (was: Plugin
migration to Maven 2: geronimo-assembly-plugin)
geronimo-assembly-plugin +
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1737?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap resolved GERONIMO-1737.
--
Fix Version/s: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
This JIRA introduces a new geronimo-assembly-plugin for M2 and migrates the
Jetty J2EE assembly to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2206?page=comments#action_12422312
]
Jason Dillon commented on GERONIMO-2206:
Applied (#423692) please post patch for fix for jetty servlets when you can.
examples configs [jsp-examples,
On Jul 19, 2006, at 2:12 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Technically... its bad for a module to need to access bits from ../
(or ../../ or ../../../../../../). The proper way to do this would
be to add them to a new license module, then have each module
depend on it, using dependency plugin to
Hey, I used to have a TRS-80. 32k of RAM...yup, those were the good 'ol days.
I agree that shortening the DT artifacts is only moving the bubble around. The fact is that for all
of its issues there are a lot more Windows users out there than the *nix OS's.
One area to improve things is to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2204?page=comments#action_12422323
]
Matt Hogstrom commented on GERONIMO-2204:
-
I think its worth fixing given that it pops up frequently and doesn't help
developers.
Serializable Noop
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1582?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-1582.
---
Sachin applied the patch:
URL:
On 7/19/06, bmadigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the change to call lookup(...) in addConsumer( )?
Yes
Looks like its not
being called.
Damn - sorry about that. I knew I should have taken the time to write
a test case :). Lemme see if I get chance to write a little test case
use the clientID rather than connectionID for the name of subscriptionIDs in JMX
Key: AMQ-834
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-834
Project: ActiveMQ
I agree that shortening the DT artifacts is only moving the bubble
around. The fact is that for all of its issues there are a lot
more Windows users out there than the *nix OS's.
Part of me thinks it is my duty to bring down the evil giant maker of
crappy software... for the common good
TransactionCachingInterceptor is returning the same ManagedConnection despite
different ConnectionRequestInfo
-
Key: GERONIMO-2207
URL:
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-818?page=all ]
Timothy Bish updated AMQ-818:
-
Attachment: activemq-cpp-0-0-2-071906.zip
Version 0.0.2 of the activemq-cpp source code is attached.
Changes:
New Features:
* Destinations now support the
Hi Sepand!
On 7/18/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the info James.
Please tell me what you think of the following:
I plan on having a new transport class that will do SSL client
certificate authentication and then override the ConnectionInfo
class's username field (we don't
How about to avoid breaking backwards compatibiility (or introducing a
new OpenWire version) just adding a new derivation of a ConnectionInfo
which could take additional fields like the certificate token etc?
On 7/19/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sepand!
On 7/18/06, Sepand M
Adding a transient field to the ConnectionInfo would not cause a wireformat
change.
I'd rather keep it simple and do it in our current one.
On 7/19/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about to avoid breaking backwards compatibiility (or introducing a
new OpenWire version) just
Yep.. that's what I was thinking.
On 7/19/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I could be mistaken, but the transport class would have access to the
transient field and, in the case of ssl, could attach the cert to it
as the connections come in.
On 7/19/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/17/06, ngcutura [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks!
The patch is not coomplete yet. I still need help with integration into AMQ
(Spring style properties) to be able to use it.
(copied from previous post)
I am not familiar with Spring and I was not able to deduce how to specify
module
OK I've just added a test case that seems to show that the
destinations are being created lazily when a consumer is added...
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/usecases/NewConsumerCreatesDestinationTest.java
I've tried to
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-789?page=all ]
Hiram Chirino reopened AMQ-789:
---
This should also be backported to 4.0 branch
WireFormatNegotiator could hang a client or server connection if the peer
disconnects before sending
80 matches
Mail list logo
