[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-716?page=comments#action_36224 ]
klaus terjung commented on AMQ-716:
---
bug with javax.jms.Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE in ActiveMQ ?
When I use createQueueSession(false, javax.jms.Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE)
the
Re-posting to the dev list...
-Original Message-
From: Mittler, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 7:21 AM
To: activemq-users@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Stomp and TextMessage
So, here's my impression of what we need to do (feel free to make
mods)...
1)
We finally have it! Who wants it? :)
geir
I've been trying to get the code setup in an Eclipse project and have been
following the guide on the site. When I run
mvn eclipse:eclipse
I get a whole bunch of problems trying to get the dependencies:
Here are just a few of them, there are hundreds of these.
Downloading:
Error viewing Web Access Log Viewer portlet on G 1.1 with Tomcat
--
Key: GERONIMO-2075
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2075
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041?page=comments#action_12414385
]
Laurent CELLA commented on GERONIMO-2041:
-
Hi Rick.
I tried with this one : geronimo-spec-javamail-1.3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar , wich i
found there :
Laurent CELLA (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041?page=comments#action_12414385 ]
Laurent CELLA commented on GERONIMO-2041:
-
Hi Rick.
I tried with this one : geronimo-spec-javamail-1.3.1-SNAPSHOT.jar , wich i
found
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2041?page=comments#action_12414389
]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-2041:
Definitely not. That one is even older than the others you were trying. Try
this one:
Hi,
I believe that OSCON is offering free booth space to the ASF. The
registration deadline for the next OSCON in Portland (end of July) is
this Monday, June 5.
IBM is offering the PRC logistical and financial support, e.g. t-shirts
et cetera, for this upcoming event. IBM wants to help as
Dear ActiveMQ developers,
To satisfy the request of some of our customers, we have decided to open the
sources of AMQ4NET, our pure C# client for ActiveMQ version 3.x.
AMQ4NET is now an open source project released under the BSD License.
Do not hesitate to download it at: HYPERLINK
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1849?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1849:
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Aaron Mulder
I think we fixed the most important parts of this (removing the junk text from
the XML file,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=comments#action_12414418
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-1492:
I have two issues with this patch.
1) In the patch for the startup monitor, it removes the logic that avoids
listing the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1972?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder resolved GERONIMO-1972:
Resolution: Fixed
This appears to have been fixed via using a provided artifact resolver instead
of manually consulting repositories when
Several people have asserted the claim in the subject above and
AFAICT no one on the board or PMC have argued with it. I'm going to
assume there are no objections.
In particular I plan to check that the m2 patches don't break the
trunk build and apply them.
thanks
david jencks
Must edit config.xml to provide custom plugin install source
Key: GERONIMO-2076
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2076
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2071:
-
Attachment: pom.xml
Latest pom.xml with codehaus reppo for tranql and dwrVersion set to 1.1.1
Move Geronimo build to M2 (new 1.2 trunk)
It seems that there are now +1's from 3 committers for this change.
Although I also support the change (once copyrights are corected), I
cannot offer a +1. Apologies for being a pedant, but to my knowledge
the current RTC rules we are living under are:
'I have applied this patch and
On Jun 2, 2006, at 7:14 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On 6/2/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Several people have asserted the claim in the subject above and
AFAICT no one on the board or PMC have argued with it. I'm going to
assume there are no objections.
+1
In particular I plan
FYI, I've already committed the change, and was gonna just run
thought the entire source tree to update all copyrights for any file
created this year.
On Jun 2, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
It seems that there are now +1's from 3 committers for this change.
Although I also
One option is if we could allow non-committers to vote if they
declare that they have applied AND tested the patch.
On Jun 2, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
It seems that there are now +1's from 3 committers for this change.
Although I also support the change (once copyrights are
I plan on being there. I'll look to get the registration completed today.
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I believe that OSCON is offering free booth space to the ASF. The
registration deadline for the next OSCON in Portland (end of July) is
this Monday, June 5.
IBM is offering the PRC
I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1. There was only one response
from Jason so I will take the silence as acceptance of the plan. Today I will:
* be moving all JIRAs out from 1.1 and moving them to 1.2.
* Cutting a release build for review and will post it
After some recent commits I seem to be running into out-of-memory
during the build, and its partially my fault with whats happening
within the build like the launching of a headless eclipse. I found
out that the Tuscany project is doing alot of EMF generation in their
build without
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2071:
-
Attachment: openejb.patch
This patch has the openejb-builder
Move Geronimo build to M2 (new 1.2 trunk)
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1.
There was only one response from Jason so I will take the silence as
acceptance of the plan. Today I will:
* be moving all JIRAs out from 1.1 and moving them to 1.2.
* Cutting a release build
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=comments#action_12414442
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-1492:
re
2) There are sections like the one below in many of the files. I'm not
convinced this is correct syntax. Is it legal
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1135?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1135:
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Keystore password in System.properties
--
Key:
Can everyone add a reply to this email thread as the dependent SNAPSHOT
projects (like OpenEJB, TranQL, ActiveMQ, ...) have created a release
version and its available on one of the default Maven repos? Given how
interdependent Geronimo, OpenEJB and TranQL are on each other, those
need to all
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-348?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-348:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Invalid module path or references in plan should result in failed deployment
or warning
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-411?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-411:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Add Hash Password Rewrite to File Realm
---
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1383?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1383:
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Connector DConfigBeans don't load correctly from XML
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-454?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-454:
---
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Support Group Name = Role Name Role Mapping
---
Matt,
By the way, are there any plans to make TranQL an Apache project, or
even a Geronimo component?
Vasily Zakharov
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 6:54 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-897?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-897:
---
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.1)
Finish implementing JMS Broker portlet
--
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-927?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom closed GERONIMO-927:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Completed in TranQL Connector 1.2 and TranQL Vendors DB2 1.0
Provide a statement cache for TranQL for JDBCs drivers that don't
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1176?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1176:
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Bad resource reference is not caught at deployment time
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1023?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1023:
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.1)
Web DD option to disable directory listings
---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-960?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-960:
---
Fix Version: 1.x
(was: 1.1)
NPE related to EJB while deploying EAR
--
Key:
Change transaction semantic and improve support
---
Key: SM-443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-443
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-core
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1079?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1079:
Fix Version: Verification Required
(was: 1.1)
Better error for missing primkey-field
--
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-443?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-443:
Resolution: Fixed
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Jun 2 08:59:39 2006
New Revision: 411195
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=411195view=rev
Log:
SM-443:
We'll have an idea later today. I think its critical and I am opening a JIRA
for it.
Jeff Genender wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I posted a note a few days ago with my proposed plan for releasing 1.1.
There was only one response from Jason so I will take the silence as
acceptance of the
That will happen as we close out the final bugs Donald. The transaction problem will most likely be
in one of the components you named below so they haven't been requested to version yet. Hopefully
soon :)
Donald Woods wrote:
Can everyone add a reply to this email thread as the dependent
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1560?page=comments#action_12414455
]
Bryan Noll commented on GERONIMO-1560:
--
I believe jgenender fixed this somewhere along the way. I don't know if it was
associated with a JIRA and the patch was
All,
After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring pattern of bugs that
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore. To separate these from
the other bugs that can be worked on directly I created a new Version called Verification
We've talked about it in the past. There are a number of projects that are already DB focused.
OpenJPA (if there is ever a code commit) will likely displace the TranQL persistence piece. The
connectors are still valid and may find a home here. I think we need to let the dust settle before
we
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1082?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1082:
Fix Version: Verification Required
(was: 1.1)
Deployment doesn't ensure queries defined for ejbSelect methods
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1674?page=comments#action_12414459
]
Bryan Noll commented on GERONIMO-1674:
--
Can you please give some specifics on what exact action you are taking in the
gui to get this to occur? Are you running a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1173?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1173:
Fix Version: Wish List
(was: 1.1)
Make DatabaseInfo load from file; separate JDBC and XA portlets
Works for me.
Aaron
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a recurring
pattern of bugs that
are reported and are so old that we don't know if they are issues anymore. To
separate these from
the other bugs that
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1560?page=all ]
Jeff Genender closed GERONIMO-1560:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Yep...I had fixed this. Please re-open if you still have issues.
[DayTrader] EJB spec violations
It sounds great. Actually I received a bunch of questions about writing tests cases, this would be
just the right place to start.
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a
recurring pattern of bugs that are reported and are
I would be happy to help out.
Jeff
Hi,
I believe that OSCON is offering free booth space to the ASF. The
registration deadline for the next OSCON in Portland (end of July) is
this Monday, June 5.
IBM is offering the PRC logistical and financial support, e.g. t-shirts
et cetera, for this
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1674?page=comments#action_12414470
]
Kevan Miller commented on GERONIMO-1674:
I recall getting an NPE if I forgot to initialize Daytrader (create the DB,
setup the users, # of issues, etc). I believe
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1764?page=comments#action_12414475
]
Bryan Noll commented on GERONIMO-1764:
--
Went back and looked at the createDB.sh script I attached (first of all, it
should've been a patch, so whoops there by me)
Having done two releases I have some thoughts on how we are using JIRA. I imagine that there are a
number of thoughts on how we can manage JIRA.
Currently we create a release and then pretty much dump most everything into it. What ends up
happening is that we end up with more JIRAs than we
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1182?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1182:
Adding to 1.2 we need to verfiy that this works or clsoe this JIRA
Connector portlet improvement (delete connector confirmation, more form
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1182?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1182:
Fix Version: 1.2
(was: 1.1)
Connector portlet improvement (delete connector confirmation, more form
buttons)
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having done two releases I have some thoughts on how we are using JIRA. I
imagine that there are a
number of thoughts on how we can manage JIRA.
I tend to do release management tasks too, so thought I'd offer thoughts.
Currently we create a
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1436?page=all ]
updated GERONIMO-1436:
---
Attachment: readme.patch
[daytrader] Build instructions in applications\daytrader\README file out of
date
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1764?page=all ]
Bryan Noll updated GERONIMO-1764:
-
Attachment: createDB-cygwin.patch
Ignore the first attachment (createDB.sh), this is the appliable patch. The
patch was created from the following dir:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1436?page=all ]
Scott Nicholls updated GERONIMO-1436:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Updated README with build instructions for Maven 2.
[daytrader] Build instructions in
Have we considered using the voting system built into JIRA to figure
out which JIRAs should really get attention? Sometimes when I have a
few spare cycles I'll go looking for JIRAs to fix and this additional
metric would help me choose. It would also give us an additional way
to listen to the
Okay, well so far no one objected... so I am going to look into how we
can get this setup.
--jason
On 5/31/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Apache tends to prefer mailing lists... but IRC is so convent
for effective communication. Maybe we should have a daily post of the
last
On 6/2/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm applying patches from GERONIMO-2071, and consulting on IRC with
Anita and Prasad to make sure I'm getting the right ones. You've
worked with m2 much more than me, so if you would like to apply them
let me know, I will stop :-). I'd like to
Can we mark some of the older M* builds are archived? That will help make the "Raised In Versions (non-archived))" portlet more useful.I'm curious... has everyone setup their JIRA home/dashboard to show more details specific to Geronimo... if not, I'd recommend creating a new "Geronimo" portal
Hi,
After much longer than anticipated pause I'm revving up and am almost
ready to help with the M2 migration. I wonder however how to apply RTC
principles to M2-related changes. There're two active non-committers -
Anita and Prasad and I wonder whether their votes are binding in this
matter
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure how to handle assignment of JIRAs as they generally fall into
someone's area of
expertise but I think the fact their assigned to someone might scare someone
away from looking at it
. Thoughts?
What I wish to happen is to
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-731?page=comments#action_36226 ]
Christopher G. Stach II commented on AMQ-731:
-
Okay, here's a bit more information. While stepping through a rollback, I've
found l.elementData in
So... an observation from a non-committer. If there's a JIRA that a
non-committer would like to fix, can that non-committer be assigned the
JIRA? I ask because the prospect of diving into something, spending
several hours on it, and submitting a patch only to find out that in the
meantime,
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm moving several JIRAs in there today. If there is strong objection then
they can easily be moved
out and put into some version number. I'm trying to change some of the way we
look at JIRA because
there are a large number of the open ones
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
All,
After moving some of the JIRAs for the third time today there is a
recurring pattern of bugs that are reported and are so old that we don't
know if they are issues anymore. To separate these from the other bugs
that can be worked on directly I created a new
What about creating a new issue status of the same name instead of using
versions... Which I think is a bit misused in this context.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 12:08:23
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: New JIRA Version
On 6/2/06, Bryan Noll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess the downside to assigning JIRA's to non-committers is that who
knows whether the person asking to have the JIRA assigned to him/her is
someone who will actually resolve it, or someone who thinks that they
would like to and then it doesn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-731?page=comments#action_36227 ]
Christopher G. Stach II commented on AMQ-731:
-
Oh, I should add, that once the redeliveries are exhausted, it ends up getting
a ConnectionClosedException and
Here's what I'd like:
- a prioritized list of stuff I plan to work on for a release (where
the priorities are priorities on my list, not necessarily
corresponding to severity of problem, etc.)
- a list of bugs that *someone* ought to look at for a release
- features (and more rarely, bugs) that
Hi,
Just a thought that sprung to my mind. I must admit that I haven't
followed the progress on 1.1 branch carefully enough and most likely
lost track. I'm going to get up to speed with the latest whistles and
bells and thought to take a look at the unit tests and how much we've
got them so far.
Do you happen to know of any examples where Retrotranslation fails?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 12:03:44
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Retrotranslator KICKS ASS!!!
On 5/31/06, Jason Dillon
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1860?page=all ]
Paul McMahan reassigned GERONIMO-1860:
--
Assign To: (was: Paul McMahan)
Chris Cardona (ccardona) has been investigating this JIRA and has provided some
test results. He requested
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1860?page=comments#action_12414506
]
Jacek Laskowski commented on GERONIMO-1860:
---
ccardona is in geronimo-contributor group. He can assign the issue to himself
whenever he intend to. Welcome Chris!
On 6/1/06, anita kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacek, David J, Guillaume, and others
I would like a clarification regarding this work. This patch
includes work that was already part of the old trunk. There were minor
modifications to accommodate 1.1. Should this code be reviewed
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-731?page=comments#action_36228 ]
Christopher G. Stach II commented on AMQ-731:
-
Okay, this is the stack trace with a breakpoint put at TransactionContext line
560. It happens over and over and
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-731?page=comments#action_36229 ]
Christopher G. Stach II commented on AMQ-731:
-
So, with that being said, should endedXATransactionContexts actually be a Map
of LinkedHashSets?
Redeliveries
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1492:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-1492-1.patch
Thanks for the feedback. I am attaching a new patch that addresses your
concerns. Following David Jencks'
Just before v1.0, the % of code we had covered in our unit test were
about 30%. I don't know expect that to have gone up significantly
higher since then.
Check out this site -
http://developer.spikesource.com/testresults/index.jsp?show=component-resultscategory=allcomp-id=197086#pkgtest
But I
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1423?page=all ]
Matt Hogstrom updated GERONIMO-1423:
Fix Version: Verification Required
(was: 1.1)
log4j.properties's category is ignored
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1182?page=all ]
Paul McMahan updated GERONIMO-1182:
---
Attachment: GERONIMO-1182-1.patch
ported the patch to v1.2 (no code changes, just rearranged the patch metadata).
tested the patch and it works as
Under load receiving Null Pointer Exceptions in CMPGetter
-
Key: GERONIMO-2077
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2077
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Deployment errors can lead to directories and other artifacts not being cleaned
up in the repo
--
Key: GERONIMO-2078
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2078
Project:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2077?page=all ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-2077:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in openejb rev 2662.
Moral of story: be sure to clean up pool entries BEFORE returning them to the
pool, not after they
Hi,
Just pulled down the sources and upon building it I'm getting the
following error message:
+
| configurations Geronimo Configuration for performing service deployments
| Memory: 44M/51M
+
DEPRECATED: the default
No methodProxy in EJBInvocation at startup under heavy load
---
Key: GERONIMO-2079
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2079
Project: Geronimo
Type: Bug
Security: public (Regular issues)
Geir,
Can you grant me SVN Karma to add contributors? Dain is on vacation.
Thanks
Matt
Do you mean JIRA?
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Geir,
Can you grant me SVN Karma to add contributors? Dain is on vacation.
Thanks
Matt
Project facet Utility Module 1.0 is not supported by target runtime Apache
Geronimo v1.0
Key: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-82
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-82
Project:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2071?page=comments#action_12414538
]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-2071:
I've applied parts of some of these patches:
openejb.patch dated 02/june/06 applied in openejb rev 2663
geronimo.patch
Matt,
Could you please update the events page (
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/site/xdocs/events.xml ) when
you have the details.
Thanks,
John
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I plan on being there. I'll look to get the registration completed
today.
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I believe
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 6/2/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having done two releases I have some thoughts on how we are using
JIRA. I imagine that there are a
number of thoughts on how we can manage JIRA.
I tend to do release management tasks too, so thought I'd offer thoughts.
David J,
I have been working with rev 409296, and openejb 2659. Today I
updated to rev 411279. There have been changes in o.a.g.kernel that
affect PackageBuilder, MavenConfigStore, and MavenAttributeStore. I
need to incorporate these changes into m2 plugin and retest everything.
:( I am
Prasad Kashyap wrote:
Just before v1.0, the % of code we had covered in our unit test were
about 30%. I don't know expect that to have gone up significantly
higher since then.
Check out this site -
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
