[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-734?page=comments#action_36274 ]
Rob Davies commented on AMQ-734:
the reason for the fixed client_id is durable topic consumers. The network
bridge amalgamates multiple durable subscribers on the same topic
Hi all,
I am New for this ActiveMQ. I wants to write c++ client and I wants to
attache a sever to ActiveMQ for acheving these thing I wants the
documentation for ActiveMQ. So please help me
Thanks in advance
Regards
Arashad Ahamad
add a vmstat agent to the maven activemq performance plugin so we can track
the CPU, IO, RAM use on the machine we are running the test on
Key:
Allow to provide a wsdl instead of generating one
-
Key: SM-448
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-448
Project: ServiceMix
Type: Improvement
Components: servicemix-jsr181
Reporter: Guillaume
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2096?page=all ]
John Sisson reassigned GERONIMO-2096:
-
Assign To: John Sisson
PluginInstallerGBean.updatePluginMetadata(..) may leave geronimo-plugin.xml
file open
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2096?page=all ]
John Sisson closed GERONIMO-2096:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
PluginInstallerGBean.updatePluginMetadata(..) may leave geronimo-plugin.xml
file open
On 6/8/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it will help to have the schedule of the release. No one can
claim IBM has a secret agenda if the time line is laid out there. And
it's easy to wink if no one has any idea what the deadlines we're
working toward are.
I agree with
Don't they have to have incubator as part of the file names and then
when they exit the incubator they can remove incubator from the name.
Sounds like it may create extra work changing Geronimo POMs to point to
the correct files at different stages. Are the groupIDs changing too?
John
Dain
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Final Items for 1.1
I would like to release Geronimo 1.1 on June 12th. Yes, that is three
days away. If we can't make that date then it will be 72 hours away
from each candidate build. Problem that are found need to be
addressed if they are deemed critical.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-731?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-731:
Fix Version: 4.0.1
4.1
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: james strachan
Patch applied with thanks!
Redeliveries don't work with
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-688?page=all ]
james strachan updated AMQ-688:
---
Fix Version: 4.1
(was: incubation)
updated fix version
Avoid blocking producers
Key: AMQ-688
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1638?page=comments#action_12415496
]
John Sisson commented on GERONIMO-1638:
---
Currently working on scripts as discussed at
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@geronimo.apache.org/msg22807.html . Have made
make it easier to debug log message flows in ActiveMQ in debugging mode with a
logging plugin
-
Key: AMQ-743
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-743
Project: ActiveMQ
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-743?page=all ]
james strachan resolved AMQ-743:
Resolution: Fixed
http://activemq.org/site/logging-interceptor.html
make it easier to debug log message flows in ActiveMQ in debugging mode with
a
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Final Items for 1.1
I would like to release Geronimo 1.1 on June 12th. Yes, that is three
days away. If we can't make that date then it will be 72 hours away
from each candidate build. Problem that are found need to be
addressed if they are deemed critical. Otherwise
Aaron,
Do you have any more information on the Ebay announcement the Apache PRC
has been asked whether we have any details on this?
The only public mention I have found (I didn't attend JavaOne) is on
page 42 of the The eBay Matrix slides from the JavaOne 2006, presented
by Ian Flint and
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2094?page=comments#action_12415500
]
Guillaume Nodet commented on GERONIMO-2094:
---
I have added the LICENSE and NOTICE files in spec jars.
All geronimo jars and distributions should include at
Hello,
I have launched Geronimo on Sun JDK.
Then Ive tried to run it with Harmony class library
and IBM VM j9. Ive got the
error log below. Also Ive got the same result when launched
Geronimo on Harmony and then - on
Sun JDK.
There is a bug in HOWL repaired in
howl-1.0.1 by
Project: Apache Geronimo
Status: Resolved, Closed (25 items)
Updated In Last: Week (7 days)
** Bug
* [GERONIMO-2096] PluginInstallerGBean.updatePluginMetadata(..) may leave
geronimo-plugin.xml file open
* [GERONIMO-2095] Problem with attribute manager
* [GERONIMO-1425] access to
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1645?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha resolved GERONIMO-1645:
--
Fix Version: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Module migration to Maven2: tomcat
--
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1646?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha resolved GERONIMO-1646:
--
Fix Version: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Module migration to Maven2: tomcat-builder
--
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1693?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha resolved GERONIMO-1693:
--
Fix Version: 1.2
Resolution: Fixed
Module migration to Maven2: j2ee-schema
---
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1693?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha closed GERONIMO-1693:
Module migration to Maven2: j2ee-schema
---
Key: GERONIMO-1693
URL:
That's a good idea and it would be pretty straightforward. But now
that Dain has brought our attention to GERONIMO-1637 I'm concerned
about deviating from the G 1.2 activities where the full syntax of
maven version ranges will be introduced. I don't know much about
maven version ranges - there
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/8/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it will help to have the schedule of the release. No one can
claim IBM has a secret agenda if the time line is laid out there. And
it's easy to wink if no one has any idea what the deadlines we're
working
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-448?page=all ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SM-448:
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Guillaume Nodet
Author: gnodet
Date: Fri Jun 9 06:22:37 2006
New Revision: 413042
URL:
In the spirit of greater openness and communication, please elaborate
on 'thing have been quietly injected into Geronimo'.
As far as I can tell, the main source of the 1.1 delay was that the
module ID changes (new syntax, groupless or versionless dependencies,
etc.) caused a ton of problems, in
BTW, I think additional fixes are required in 1.1.1 before claiming
support for multiple concurrent server instances from a single
installation..
Awhile back I was able to start the server using an external var
directory (via -Dorg.apache.geronimo.server.dir). After changing all
the ports
Aaron Mulder wrote:
In the spirit of greater openness and communication, please elaborate
on 'thing have been quietly injected into Geronimo'.
Personally, I would rather we not get into details as I do not want to
see this thread degrade into a flame-fest. I would much rather that we
can
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2067?page=all ]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2067:
-
Attachment: configs.patch
modules.patch
pom.patch
The attached 3 patches are :
1. configs.patch -
--
A wiki page of the Road Map along with a rough timeline would be a
good start. I also think that tying the Road Map to a timeline will
cause people to more closely examine the time a particular feature
might require. But like the Linux kernel release schedule, determining
any kind of regular
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I would rather we not get into details as I do not want to
see this thread degrade into a flame-fest. I would much rather that we
can all agree that there is a communication problem, and definitely
enough of a communication problem,
Can someone with karma please add me (jdillon) to the GERONIMO developers group.I think I may have used 'user57' before... but have switched to use my apache id instead.Thanks,--jason
Can we create a new JIRA project for GShell? I've got a bunch of
task/todo items that I would like to track in JIRA so it is easier to
prioritize and plan.
Thoughts?
--jason
+1
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
David Jencks wrote:
I've uploaded
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12335128/geronimo-
deployment-plugin-RTC-VOTE.2.patch
incorporating most of your comments, see below.
Thanks for the review!
david jencks
On Jun 6, 2006, at 11:57 PM, Jacek
Aaron,
A flame-fest is counter productive...I prefer we keep this professional.
If folks want to see the issues, the mail lists are available for
people to read over the last several weeks and make their own opinion.
There is more than enough information there to clearly show there are
concerns
Application migration to Maven 2: remote-deploy
---
Key: GERONIMO-2098
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098
Project: Geronimo
Type: Sub-task
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2098:
-
Attachment: remote-deploy.patch
Application migration to Maven 2: remote-deploy
---
Key:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap reassigned GERONIMO-2098:
Assign To: David Jencks
Application migration to Maven 2: remote-deploy
---
Key:
Merged remote-deploy-lib with remote-deploy.
Migrated remote-deploy to M2.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098
I think SuSE-like would be a good idea too.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 09:34:39
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Frustrations of a Release Manager
In the spirit of greater openness and communication, please elaborate
Using the ADLER-32 makes much more sence than a hash code.
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Udovichenko, Nellya [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:32:43
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Geronimo doesn't startup if restart it using another JDK
Hello,
I have launched
Jason Dillon wrote:
Can we create a new JIRA project for GShell? I've got a bunch of
task/todo items that I would like to track in JIRA so it is easier to
prioritize and plan.
Thoughts?
--jason
IMO, if it gets out of the sandbox, it deserves a Jira project.
Regards,
Alan
Aaron,
Since you asked. First, Can you respond below if you will allow anyone that you have sent a private
e-mail to to cut and paste the contents of those messages into other posts on this thread. I think
that will help.
Second, the geronimoplugins.com which was injected into Geronimo is
Cool. :-)
--jason
-Original Message-
From: J. Stan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 14:14:22
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: DayTrader: Dynamic Ajax-based Web frontend --- update
Hey,
I just wanted to send a quick follow up on previous note I sent out
about adding
So far I have not had time to look into this further.
I personally want to get a daily email, so when I have time I will set this up.
At that time we can discus having it also go to the dev list or not.
No worries about tardy replies :-)
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Alan D.
If you want to start a new list, that would be cool. I would prefer
not to have the posting on the dev list.
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
So far I have not had time to look into this further.
I personally want to get a daily email, so when I have time I will set this up. At that
I like that model too, as long as we can still deliver more than one
release a year and we allow more people to have commit access to the
sandbox area for more collaboration on major enhancements and changes...
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
I think SuSE-like would be a good idea too.
I don't think this is quite ready for a vote yet, and I'm not
convinced it requires a vote.
First, it really should include more of a description of what the
purpose of the change is, such as:
Due to bugs in the web app classloader in 1.0, the remote deploy war
was split into 2 modules.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2098:
-
Attachment: remote-deploy-v2.patch
Instriuctions:
-
1. svn mv
On 6/9/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron,
Since you asked. First, Can you respond below if you will allow anyone that
you have sent a private
e-mail to to cut and paste the contents of those messages into other posts on
this thread. I think
that will help.
Sure.
Second,
Here's an attempt to do two things:
- demonstrate plugins in action
- provide easier access to the Oracle XA driver
This will only work on 1.1, specifically
http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.1-412854 or a future
1.1 build, and you'll need the full J2EE distribution because Little
Good point. Maybe we should wait till we graduate. Who knows, Yoko
could be a TLP as well.
Regards,
Alan
John Sisson wrote:
Don't they have to have incubator as part of the file names and then
when they exit the incubator they can remove incubator from the
name. Sounds like it may create
Can we modify the Sandbox ACL so people in the contributors group can
have svn write authority? It seems that allowing contributors into the
sandbox would be a great way for us to provide more complex patches and
enhancements while proving our worth towards becoming a committer
-Donald
Sigh! :( Looks like all efforts are down the drain.
On 6/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with a group of folks interested in Gernoimo
getting together to talk about Geronimo. So long as it's positioned
as discussion not decision-making, of course -- which,
Source for Console Oracle XA plugin
---
Key: GERONIMO-2099
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2099
Project: Geronimo
Type: New Feature
Security: public (Regular issues)
Components: Plugins
Versions: 1.1
Inline below.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/8/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW - How can we add new Plugins to the geronimoplugins website? Are we
going to setup a Geronimo subproject (like Daytrader) with the site
framework checked into svn, along with any scripts needed to build
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2099?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2099:
---
Attachment: console-tranql-oracle-xa-plugin.zip
Source for Console Oracle XA plugin
---
Key:
Sourceforge is kind of slow, which is my main objection. But perhaps
we can use it as a start. What's Javaforge?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/9/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Inline below.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/8/06, Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW - How can we add new
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2099?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2099:
---
Description:
Here's the code used to create the console TranQL/Oracle XA plugin. I'm not
sure where it should go, perhaps we should create
On 6/9/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh! :( Looks like all efforts are down the drain.
I'm not sure what this means. Can you elaborate?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with a group of folks interested in Gernoimo
I have entered my own comments below...
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron,
Since you asked. First, Can you respond below if you will allow
anyone that you have sent a private
e-mail to to cut and paste the contents of those messages into other
On 6/9/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh! :( Looks like all efforts are down the drain.
On 6/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with a group of folks interested in Gernoimo
getting together to talk about Geronimo. So long as it's positioned
I just saw this thread and want to say my 2c, I haven't yet read the
other threads and have to run out so sorry if this statement has been
repeated. The most important thing we can do to make the project
succeed is to ship, and to ship often. Moving forward we need to
have a fixed
Aaron,
Sure. I assumed for a bit that the RTC [1] and PMC Changes [2]
instituted by our pmc chair had sent a strong signal and wrongfully
thought that had its desired effect, which is to help improve
collaboration and make sure there are no exclusionary walls w.r.t
participating in Geronimo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2098?page=all ]
Prasad Kashyap updated GERONIMO-2098:
-
Attachment: remote-deploy-v3.patch
Please apply remote-deploy-v3.patch. It takes care of the configs too in an m1
build.
This has been deployed
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought this up as an issue originally as it bothered me. This has
nothing to do with Erin, so let's not obfuscate the issue. The point
here is there was absolutely no discussion about this, as this was
clearly a fairly large decision that
So as I understand this, the plan is:
- new release candidate today, no more non-critical patches
- begin voting for that release candidate today
- if critical bugs are found within 72 hours, someone will -1 the
vote, we will fix and cut a new release candidate, and start a new
72-hour vote
I'm
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought this up as an issue originally as it bothered me. This has
nothing to do with Erin, so let's not obfuscate the issue. The point
here is there was absolutely no discussion about this, as this was
clearly a
Sounds good. As per your comments I have attached instructions in the
comments and a patch (remote-deploy-v3.patch) that will also take into
account m1 build.
Please review and vote.
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/9/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think this is quite ready for a vote
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no obligation for you to consult me to take the Directory
integration, re-package it, and place it on geronimoplugins.com. But
out of basic respect, opening up the discussion of others on the idea,
and then yes, as your friend, and
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no obligation for you to consult me to take the Directory
integration, re-package it, and place it on geronimoplugins.com. But
out of basic respect, opening up the discussion of others on the idea,
and then
Create a set of annotations for a JBI binding for jaxws
---
Key: SM-449
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-449
Project: ServiceMix
Type: New Feature
Components: servicemix-jsr181
Reporter:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no obligation for you to consult me to take the Directory
integration, re-package it, and place it on geronimoplugins.com. But
out of basic respect, opening up
Comment below...
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no obligation for you to consult me to take the Directory
integration, re-package it, and place it on
As jason pointed out using a hash code isn't portable. This is a
known problem in Howl and IIRC they added an optional flag in howl to
use a specified hash algorithm. Anyway, please create a JIRA (http://
issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO) for this issue.
-dain
On Jun 9, 2006, at
On Jun 9, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jason Dillon wrote:
Can we create a new JIRA project for GShell? I've got a bunch of
task/todo items that I would like to track in JIRA so it is easier
to prioritize and plan.
Thoughts?
--jason
IMO, if it gets out of the sandbox, it
FYI, I plan to address
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1873 as soon as possible
in 1.1.1. I'd like plugins to be able to define new deployment unit
formats (e.g. JBI service assemblies, a Spring deployment unit, a
Quartz job as a deployment unit, or a Jasper report as a deployment
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Bruce, thats not it at all. Its simply discussing what he was going
to do. This all comes back to the lack of communication issue.
So you would have preferred that he send an email to the list
explaining the work he was doing on the code?
Changing a released jar in the repository is a bad idea. There is no
real down side to having some old releases with incubator in the
name, and we when the project graduated we would just update the poms
to their new name.
Anyway, as Alan pointed out, it most likely isn't worth the effort
Hello all,
I don't know if anyone has had any issues creating database pools with
the snapshot from Wednesday. But, began testing today and I cannot
create a new database pool using the wizard (mySQL connection)
Log output for 'show plan' and 'deploy plan' below.
If anyone has a patch that
FWIU, having commit access to svn at apache requires you to have an
apache account which means you need to be a committer on some apache
project. I believe that apache only has the one process to get
committ access.
Sorry,
-dain
On Jun 9, 2006, at 11:04 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Can we
On 6/9/06, Bruce Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Bruce, thats not it at all. Its simply discussing what he was going
to do. This all comes back to the lack of communication issue.
So you would have preferred that he send an email to the
Very cool example of what can be done with plugins :-)
Can we use G2099 to start creating a new subproject space for ASL 2.0
based Samples and Plugins in SVN? Something that fits into the normal
Maven model of -
/geronimo
/samples
/trunk
/modules - dir would contain
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No Bruce, thats not it at all. Its simply discussing what he was going
to do. This all comes back to the lack of communication issue.
So you would have preferred that he send an email to the list
explaining the work
If we really need it, I think the syntax 1.1.* would be ok since it
would easily be parseable and translated to [1.1-1.2) in a formal
version syntax. For the patch, I'm thinking of something like
if (version.equals(gerVersion) ||
(gerVersion.endsWith(.*
Thanks for testing the pre-release! This bug was identified and fixed
after the Wednesday build. You can get a build incorporating the fix
here: http://people.apache.org/dist/geronimo/unstable/1.1-412854
(though that's an unstable build and I understand another release
candidate will be coming
My main objection to that is then there's no way to say 1.1 only.
We would have to call 1.1 1.1.0 so that 1.1 and 1.1.* would be
different. Or, I suppose, change your patch to gerVersion.length()-1
and encourage 1.1* not 1.1.*
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/9/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:02 AM, John Sisson wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Final Items for 1.1
I would like to release Geronimo 1.1 on June 12th. Yes, that is
three days away. If we can't make that date then it will be 72
hours away from each candidate build. Problem that are found need
to
On Jun 9, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
If I'm right about the release plan, I think we should create a SVN
home for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT now so there's a place to put non-critical
patches. It will be annoying to put critical patches into 3 places,
but we're hoping there aren't any of
http://www.javaforge.com/ - It's another opensource based *forge
hosting site, which seems to be open to anyone to use. The only reason
I found it, was the Luntbuild project we use for building
(http://www.javaforge.com/proj/summary.do?proj_id=70) started using it
awhile back. I would
Okay, after reading the e-mails thus far ( I haven't read through all of them yet ) here are my
responses inline.
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aaron,
Since you asked. First, Can you respond below if you will allow
anyone that you have sent a private
BTW migrating to howl 1.0.1 is waiting on a maven upload request...
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MAVENUPLOAD-930 As of a couple days
ago these were stalled indefinitely.
thanks
david jencks
On Jun 9, 2006, at 1:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
As jason pointed out using a hash code isn't
On Jun 9, 2006, at 1:51 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
FYI, I plan to address
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1873 as soon as possible
in 1.1.1. I'd like plugins to be able to define new deployment unit
formats (e.g. JBI service assemblies, a Spring deployment unit, a
Quartz job as a
On Jun 8, 2006, at 5:44 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I propose for 1.2 we drive it more by time than by features. That is,
we lay out a schedule including builds every 2-3 weeks, initially
milestone builds, becoming beta and RC builds. We try to get people
to test and provide feedback on the
On Jun 9, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
My main objection to that is then there's no way to say 1.1 only.
We would have to call 1.1 1.1.0 so that 1.1 and 1.1.* would be
different. Or, I suppose, change your patch to gerVersion.length()-1
and encourage 1.1* not 1.1.*
I guess my code
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sigh! :( Looks like all efforts are down the drain.
On 6/9/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see what's wrong with a group of folks interested in Gernoimo
getting together to talk about Geronimo. So
Heh heh... you're right.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 6/9/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 9, 2006, at 2:13 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
My main objection to that is then there's no way to say 1.1 only.
We would have to call 1.1 1.1.0 so that 1.1 and 1.1.* would be
different. Or, I
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I brought this up as an issue originally as it bothered me. This has
nothing to do with Erin, so let's not obfuscate the issue. The point
here is there was absolutely no discussion about this, as this was
clearly a fairly
Would it make any difference to anyone if IBM proposed that we put http://www.ibm.com/wasce/plugins
as the default option. I think there would be many eye brows raised at that one. Let's be
consistent in our interpretations.
Jeff Genender wrote:
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 6/9/06, Jeff Genender
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
