Looks good guys, thanks for getting that setup.
-
Timothy A. Bish
Sensis Corporation
-
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Mittler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 6:14 AM
To:
I'm just investigating a Lingo test case (LINGO-22) submitted by Jim
Beattie which tests that we leave no threads around after shutting
down lingo ActiveMQ - which sounds good to me.
I've noticed that the Executor for all connections is a static and
shared across connections. I was gonna make
There is one in ServiceMix.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/servicemix/trunk/servicemix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/servicemix/jbi/security/login/
On 8/2/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/1/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
So far I've mainly been
On Aug 2, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Sepand M wrote:
Ok. So from what I've read, we're trying to separate the authorization
part from the SSL socket and let the broker handle it.
This sounds great. It would take more work (not so great since I have
a deadline), but it would be a proper solution.
From
On Aug 3, 2006, at 3:35 AM, ngcutura wrote:
I agree with this, I only think it will be a tough job.
I also have a deadline, so I suggest that we split the work.
I may take custom truststore and certificate authentication against
LDAP (I
already have idea how to do it) but I am open to
include javadocs inside the binary distro build
---
Key: AMQ-860
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-860
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: james
nightly snapshots to include source distro
--
Key: AMQ-859
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-859
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: james strachan
On 8/2/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm confused by the descriptions of this approach, and don't
understand what is being proposed. I would separate the steps of
1. validating the client certificate based on the presented
certificate chain, which in my experience can be done by
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for derby, at
least.
Also, the shell scripts in /bin are not marked executable when I
untar the tar distribution...
--kevan
On Aug 1, 2006, at 1:47 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some LICENSE file issues were found in the first
On 8/3/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Sepand M wrote:
Ok. So from what I've read, we're trying to separate the authorization
part from the SSL socket and let the broker handle it.
This sounds great. It would take more work (not so great since I have
a
Hi Kevan,
I wish you would have checked the notice file before I recut the
release again. lol! Do you know what needs to be included in the
NOTICE for derby?
Regards,
Hiram
On 8/3/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for
OK - thought so. Figured we could keep the singleton, but reference
count the connections so that when no more connections are open we
close down the threadpool. (e.g. so we don't leave threads around
after undeploying a WAR).
On 8/3/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah the idea was
Hi guys,
Here are a few things:
1) I cannot use LDAP. We don't use it now, and don't want to later. I
understand if you want to use it, but I can't.
2) From what I understand (and my understanding isn't too bad at this
point), SSL sockets with needClientAuth just verify the client's cert
Sepand,
Do what you need to to get you project done, you cand send us tidbit
as you get it done and we can work on merging it back to the main
branch. The great thing is that you have a use case that we want to
support, so if you put something together that work for you, I don't
see why it
Sounds good to me.
On 8/3/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK - thought so. Figured we could keep the singleton, but reference
count the connections so that when no more connections are open we
close down the threadpool. (e.g. so we don't leave threads around
after undeploying a
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
Hi Kevan,
I wish you would have checked the notice file before I recut the
release again. lol! Do you know what needs to be included in the
NOTICE for derby?
Yeah. It's lol in a painful sort of way. ;-) My apologies. IIRC you
posted the
Kaha DB files are not removed
-
Key: AMQ-861
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-861
Project: ActiveMQ
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Broker
Affects Versions: 4.0.1
Environment:
Thanks Hiram. That sounds great.
I guess my last question is: what branch do I work off of? Personally,
I would like to build my stuff on a stable release (4.0.1), but I've
looked at the svn logs and you guys seem to be pretty active around
the stuff I want to change so I'm not sure how my
Hi,
The DN will overwrite the client-provided username (if any) when the
SslTransport writes it.
On 8/3/06, Kelly Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sepand,
One possible gotcha I haven't heard anyone bring up that we should
address is to make sure that someone can't just fake the DN in the
Have you defined the property M2_REPO in Eclipse ?
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Resolved it... problem with classpath.
It created two eclipse related files
1) .project
2) .classpath
The problem is when I import this project into Eclipse it doesn't resolve
the
Yup.. the classpath variable in Eclipse. I am changing the classes to
BAMxxx
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 5:47 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI Component
Yeah, unfortunately, I don't think this is currently possible with maven
archetypes :(
Unless someone know a way to generate new files from velocity templates.
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not a good idea to refactor the class names, like I said - changing to
BAMxxx,
The servicemix-jms component should support the ability to set jms message
properties
--
Key: SM-510
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-510
Project:
+1
Regards,
Alan
Hiram Chirino wrote:
Some LICENSE file issues were found in the first release candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 2 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes
and it's
available here:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't work oustide of Geronimo since both depend on obtaining the
current caller's subject from
On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
history length=too long
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing list
regarding the TransactionContextManager. In OpenEJB 3 we removed
the use of the TCM from Geronimo and replaced it with just a
RepeatedFailureLockoutLoginModule: Does not function
Key: GERONIMO-2267
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2267
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level:
Security Realm with more than one LoginModule does not function as expected
---
Key: GERONIMO-2268
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2268
Project: Geronimo
+1
On 8/1/06, Hiram Chirino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some LICENSE file issues were found in the first release candidate of the
4.0.2 build. I have cut and RC 2 of the 4.0.2 build with the fixes and
it's
available here:
Hi Guillaume/All,
Tried creating a standard JBI Component using servicemix-common module.
I followed the steps written in
http://servicemix.org/site/creating-a-standard-jbi-component.html
On executing the command
mvn archetype:create \
-DarchetypeGroupId=org.apache.servicemix.tooling \
We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
Even in this case, as they are not on public repositories, I'm not
sure it would work.
The best way would be to build ServiceMix from sources, as
the archetypes will be in your local repository.
On 8/3/06, vikas kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2255?page=comments#action_12425474
]
Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-2255:
-
I agree and understand now why its a bad idea to manually add the dependencies.
Unfortunately I did not
Thanks.
Can you send me the steps to do it. i am a newbie.
~Vikas
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
Even in this case, as they are not on public repositories, I'm not
sure it would work.
The best way would be to build
You can also download the archetype from
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/servicemix/tooling/servicemix-service-engine/1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT/servicemix-service-engine-1.0-incubating-20060803.064327-5.jar
and put it in your local maven repo under
See http://servicemix.goopen.org/site/building.html
On 8/3/06, vikas kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks.
Can you send me the steps to do it. i am a newbie.
~Vikas
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have problems uploading snapshots.
Even in this case, as
On 8/3/06, David Jencks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UserTransaction --- TransactionManagerImpl now implements UserTransaction to ease integration with third party libraries such as SpringWhy is this a good idea?This strikes me as a bad idea since a user
can successfully cast
Guillaume,
I guess I got past this by re-building smx. What I am stuck with now is that
eclipse is complaining that the project that was created using the command
mvn eclipse:eclipse is not OK.
Have you tried doing it lately?
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1476?page=comments#action_12425475
]
Chris Cardona commented on GERONIMO-1476:
-
Donald,
I wasn't able to replicate this problem. I modified the root logger level from
What do you mean by not OK ?
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guillaume,
I guess I got past this by re-building smx. What I am stuck with now is
that
eclipse is complaining that the project that was created using the command
mvn eclipse:eclipse is not OK.
Have you tried
Resolved it... problem with classpath.
It created two eclipse related files
1) .project
2) .classpath
The problem is when I import this project into Eclipse it doesn't resolve
the classapth.
Do I need to do anything else?
Thanks
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet
Awesome! Thanks.
On 8/3/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/3/06, James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There you go...
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/activemq/site/cms/
hopefully in an hour or so it should show up here
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-854?page=all ]
Nathan Mittler resolved AMQ-854.
Resolution: Fixed
The documentation has been added to http://activemq.org/site/javadocs.html
Update to activemq-cpp source to enable documentation
I agree with this, I only think it will be a tough job.
I also have a deadline, so I suggest that we split the work.
I may take custom truststore and certificate authentication against LDAP (I
already have idea how to do it) but I am open to suggestions.
Regards,
NGC
Sepand M wrote:
Ok.
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and
MyPrincipal classes. I have configured a simple web application
to authenticate against this realm. Even though the login
succeeds, I am getting an HTTP 403 Forbidden error. But
everything works fine if I change MyLoginModule to
Does the environment for your web app list a dependency on the security realm?
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and MyPrincipal
classes. I have configured a simple web application to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2264?page=comments#action_12425533
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2264:
I guess we also need to:
- create an OpenEJB 2.1.1 branch
- update the Geronimo 1.1.1 branch to refer to the
On Aug 3, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a Custom Security Realm using MyLoginModule and
MyPrincipal classes. I have configured a simple web application to
authenticate against this realm. Even though the login succeeds, I
am getting an HTTP 403
Web app adds a dependency to myloginmodule-1.0.jar in the repository but not the security realm.
Thanks,
VamsiOn 8/3/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does the environment for your web app list a dependency on the security realm?Thanks, AaronOn 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL
Error after failed redeploy with no version in module ID (branches/1.1.1)
-
Key: GERONIMO-2269
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
Project: Geronimo
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2269:
---
Summary: Error after redeploy (with no version in module ID)
(branches/1.1.1) (was: Error after failed redeploy with no version in module
ID
Redeploy broken in 1.1.1
Key: GERONIMO-2270
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: deployment
I thought the NOTICE file for Derby was just that its ASF code? Or is
the specific Deby stuff that needs adding to the NOTICE file?
On 8/3/06, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Hiram,
Is the NOTICE file correct? I believe you need a NOTICE for derby, at
least.
Also, the shell scripts in
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
Dain or David Jencks, any chance you could look at the without a
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2237?page=comments#action_12425558
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2237:
I tested a web application WAR using Spring 1 and Hibernate 2 with the
branches/1.1.1 build and it worked
Is this a regression or is the first test?
Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
Dain
I am using HotDeployer extensively. After repeated use, the server is running into memory problems.
I have built the server from branches/1.1. The last time I
updated my source tree is two days ago. Has this problem been
addressed in the past two days?
Regards,
Vamsi
Hi,
I have deployed a web application with its own security realm.
The new security realm is shown as Serverwide in Security Realms
portlet. Is this the way it should be or is it a bug?
Thanks,
Vamsi
Sounds like a bug to me.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have deployed a web application with its own security realm. The new
security realm is shown as Serverwide in Security Realms portlet. Is this
the way it should be or is it a bug?
Calls for a JIRA.
VamsiOn 8/3/06, Aaron Mulder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like a bug to me.Thanks, AaronOn 8/3/06, Vamsavardhana Reddy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,I have deployed a web application with its own security realm.The new
security realm is shown as Serverwide in Security Realms
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2270:
---
Description:
Tried to redeploy a WAR in 1.1.1. Got the following (note, I did actually
redeploy):
No ModuleID or TargetModuleID provided.
On 8/3/06, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a regression or is the first test?
It looks like 1.1 has the same problems for the same test application.
I haven't tried this particular application before -- it is a Spring
app I pulled off the shelf to make sure 1.1.1 didn't have
Security Realm deployed as part of a web app listed as Serverwide
---
Key: GERONIMO-2271
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:57 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jul 31, 2006, at 4:09 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
history length=too long
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing
list regarding the TransactionContextManager. In OpenEJB 3 we
removed the use of the TCM from
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:29 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't work oustide of Geronimo since both depend on obtaining
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
I think this is a blocker.
I tried redeploying a web application, both with and without a version
in the module ID. It failed both ways, though differently for each.
Matt, do you mind if we work on this in the 1.1.1 branch?
I'd say it should
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=comments#action_12425567
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2271:
---
And I could deploy a second web application that authenticates against the
security realm in
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
My guess is this one is a side effect of the next one, so I'd fix
2270 first and rerun this test case.
I will, though I disagree with your guess -- 2270 is a problem before
the call ever
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
My guess is this one is a side effect of the next one, so I'd fix
2270 first and rerun this test case.
I will, though I disagree with your
OK, well, I'm working on it. :)
Thanks,
Aaron
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006, at 10:11 AM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/3/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269
My guess is this one is a side
Ok then for the time being, let me then follow the same dir structure and
use ant to get things moving.
Are you ok with that?
Soumadeep
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:15 PM
If you have renamed the file, where is your problem ?
Using eclipse, you can easily refactor the code and it will change
everything needed
(at least in java files).
I don' t how using ant will help you on that.
On 8/3/06, Soumadeep-Infravio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok then for the time being,
I believe the only XML change after refactoring the class names is to change
the pom.xml entries for the component class name (towards the end)
P
On 8/3/06, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have renamed the file, where is your problem ?
Using eclipse, you can easily refactor
Refactoring is done... no issues... just wasn't sure about the xmls...:-)
Will give it a try if mvn install still works then I guess all is OK
- Original Message -
From: Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:03 PM
cool... let me change and see...
- Original Message -
From: Philip Dodds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: servicemix-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: creating a standard JBI Component using servicemix-common
module
I believe the only XML change
Aaron,
I missed the cut off for 1.1.1 on the three JIRA's I had. I'll move the remaining 1.1.1s to 1.1.2
and then we'll cut a 1.1.2 a few weeks after 1.1.1. Perhaps this is the start of the fast and
furious release cycle that Hiram loves so much :)
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 3, 2006,
Yes,
Kevan addresses a memory leak within the last two days. Try it on branches/1.1.1 or the current
branches/1.1 (which is now 1.2-SNAPSHOT).
Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
I am using HotDeployer extensively. After repeated use, the server is
running into memory problems.
I have built the
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
Issue Type: RTC (was: Improvement)
Support for non-plugin archives for installable runtimes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=all ]
Sachin Patel updated GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93:
-
Attachment: GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93.patch
Support for non-plugin archives for installable runtimes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2270?page=all ]
Aaron Mulder updated GERONIMO-2270:
---
Attachment: 2270-fix-redeploy-no-type.patch
Here's a patch that can be applied to branches/1.1.1 to fix this problem
Already applied to branches/1.1
Fix bad javamail version in
Key: GERONIMO-2272
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Affects Versions: 1.2
Dain,
I fixed GERONIMO-2270 (redeploy when module ID includes version but
not type) but this did not fix GERONIMO-2269 (redeploy with
resource-ref when module ID includes artifact only). There's a stack
trace in the Jira -- any suggestions on how to pursue it?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=comments#action_12425585
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2269:
Maybe caused by the JNDI reference (a ConfigurationAwareReference) having the
wrong Configuration set on it?
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272?page=all ]
Kevan Miller resolved GERONIMO-2272.
Resolution: Fixed
Updated explicit_versions.properties to specify 1.2-SNAPSHOT as the appropriate
version for the javamail spec.
Fix bad javamail
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2272?page=all ]
Kevan Miller updated GERONIMO-2272:
---
Summary: Fix bad javamail version in explicit_versions.properties (was:
Fix bad javamail version in)
Fix bad javamail version in
Hi Sepand,
4.1 and 4.0 branches are not that different yet. If you need your
solution for 4.0, go ahead and do it. Chances are we will only apply
it only to 4.1 (since this a new feature).
On 8/3/06, Sepand M [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Hiram. That sounds great.
I guess my last question
Hi All,
I've been reviewing the content we have in the Moin Moin wiki and it is
way more out of date than I thought it would be.
I initially thought that it would be easier to do the housekeeping
once we had the content migrated to Confluence but after a more detailed
analysis of the actual
I don't seem to have the permissions to view that space.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:34 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
I've been reviewing the content we have in the Moin Moin wiki and
it is way more out of date than I thought it would be.
I initially thought that it would be easier to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1700?page=comments#action_12425589
]
Manu T George commented on GERONIMO-1700:
-
This error occurs because two different apps (with different configIds) have
the same context root.
If you
+1 great job dain. This is a great move toward making geronimo
components more decoupled and more re-usable.
On 7/31/06, Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
history length=too long
About a week ago there was a discussion on the OpenEJB mailing list
regarding the TransactionContextManager.
Good idea ... I'll take care of that this evening.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Hiram Chirino
Sent: Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:25 PM
To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: auto-generating documentation for C++
Hi,
While working on some classloader code I noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/
org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/
Do you think that could be put in a separate module so that I could
use it in ClassWorlds?
Thanks,
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL
Looking at the examples in the Jencks project, I see the use of the
following namespace:
xmlns:amqra=http://activemq.org/ra/1.0;
but I can't seem to find which jar/version contains that namespace.
Anyone know which published jar has that ns?
Thanks,
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hi,
While working on some classloader code I noticed this:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/trunk/modules/kernel/src/java/
org/apache/geronimo/kernel/classloader/
Do you think that could be put in a separate module so that I could
I wouldn't need a fake truststore. I would use a custom truststore that would
use a custom login module to authenticate the client via certificate (LDAP
would be just one of the login modules) and return authenticated subject and
principals.
This return seems complicated so fake truststore was
On Aug 3, 2006, at 9:55 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 11:29 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 2, 2006, at 10:53 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I'm working on the Jencks project again and have discovered that
the container managed security and pool partition by-subject
doesn't
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2269?page=comments#action_12425601
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2269:
OK, the exception above is actually a problem *trying to restart the old web
app* after the deployment of the
yeah, not sure why that is happening. What worked for others was to log
out and log in again. It must be a caching thingy.
Let me know if that doesn't work.
Cheers!
Hernan
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I don't seem to have the permissions to view that space.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 11:34 AM,
I doesn't work for me. Is there any reason not to open read access
to everyone?
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:19 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
yeah, not sure why that is happening. What worked for others was to
log out and log in again. It must be a caching thingy.
Let me know if that doesn't
Scratch that. It will let me view the site as long as I am NOT
logged in. As soon as I login in, I the space is removed from my
dashboard.
-dain
On Aug 3, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
I doesn't work for me. Is there any reason not to open read access
to everyone?
-dain
I would like an RTC for the following change in devtools trunkhttp://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMODEVTOOLS-93?page=allthx -sachin
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
