Team,
I had a question regarding the code below - doTimeKeepingServices() is
called the very first time and
then it is waiting on mcast.receive - so it will advertize itself after
hearing from another broker, assuming keepAliveInterval
has elapsed.
Should we instead run doTimeKeepingServices on
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-570?page=all ]
Work on AMQ-570 started by Fritz Oconer.
Create sample activemq.xml files under assembly/src/sample-conf similar to
what we had in 3.x
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-37?page=all ]
John Sisson closed XBEAN-37.
Resolution: Fixed
Compile error in QdoxMappingLoader introduced in XBEAN-27
-
Key: XBEAN-37
On Aug 5, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Currently, the application client plan has both a client-environment
and a server-environment. These can have separate module IDs and
separate classpath modifiers.
The client-environment is used for when you run the application client
in the
On Aug 5, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
Hi,
I have a web application that has the following security-constraint
in the web.xml
security-constraint
web-resource-collection
web-resource-nameSecure/web-resource-name
On 8/6/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 5, 2006, at 11:09 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote: Hi, I have a web application that has the following security-constraint in the web.xmlsecurity-constraint
Hi Dave,The current deadline for the new policy is for releases distributed after Sept 1. See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html. Some people are questioning that deadline. However, I'd guess that 1.1.1 will be our last release under existing policy...--kevanOn Aug 5, 2006, at 11:19 AM,
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=comments#action_12426055
]
Vamsavardhana Reddy commented on GERONIMO-2271:
---
Meaning.. if you can find it, you can use it!! Does the same apply for other
artifacts like
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2271?page=comments#action_12426056
]
Aaron Mulder commented on GERONIMO-2271:
The intent was to offer edit, start, stop etc. actions for each of the listed
resources on the screen (realm,
Jason and others,
The car-maven-plugin (trunk rev 429115) still does not add the
geronimo-plugin.xml file to the generated car. I had submitted a
working patch for the m2migration branch rev 425727 to include
geronimo-plugin.xml file to the zipped archive car. The patch was not
used, instead the
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 5, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Currently, the application client plan has both a client-environment
and a server-environment. These can have separate module IDs and
separate classpath modifiers.
The client-environment is
BTW the discussion is taking place on legal-discuss@apache.org
-dain
On Aug 6, 2006, at 5:21 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
Hi Dave,
The current deadline for the new policy is for releases distributed
after Sept 1. See http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html.
Some people are questioning
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Affects Version/s: 1.0
Many org/apache/geronimo configIds still live in source tree
--
Key: GERONIMO-1492
URL:
David Jencks,
Can I open a JIRA to update to XMLBeans 2.2 and assign it to you (since
you offered)?
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'd like to see us damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead with M2. +1
for moving to XMLBeans 2.2
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/5/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
David Jencks,
Can I open a JIRA to update to XMLBeans 2.2 and assign it to you
(since
you offered)?
How about adding some comments to GERONIMO-2082?
thanks
david jencks
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'd like to see us damn the torpedoes
On Aug 6, 2006, at 9:59 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 5, 2006, at 5:49 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
Currently, the application client plan has both a client-environment
and a server-environment. These can have separate module IDs and
On 8/6/06, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do we install the required yet idiotic jsr-77 gbean that
represents the app client without a module to put it in?
So as far as I can tell, it doesn't matter at runtime if the JSR-77
GBean module and the app client module had the same module
Done.
David Jencks wrote:
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:06 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
David Jencks,
Can I open a JIRA to update to XMLBeans 2.2 and assign it to you (since
you offered)?
How about adding some comments to GERONIMO-2082?
thanks
david jencks
Jeff
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'd
So I've discovered a couple things about the M2 build:
* If a Geronimo server is running on the same machine, the bootstrap
will fail due to test errors. It failed before OpenEJB was checked
out.
* There does not seem to be a way to get bootstrap to skip tests. I
think it should skip test for
A couple more to add:
* It's not possible to run mvn clean from the thirdparty/specs
directory -- it complains that there's no valid version of the clean
plugin
* At one point it was claiming it was going to blacklist various
repositories because of problems getting an updated version of the
And...
* OpenEJB downloads specs instead of using the ones build during the
prior spec build phase
* One of the applications (I think it said Demo, but I'm not sure
which that is) downloaded Servlet and JSP specs that weren't from the
Geronimo specs project at all
* I swear I'm running
Hey,
How long in total has it taken you to do the whole conversion?
Jason.
On 4 Aug 06, at 8:25 PM 4 Aug 06, Jason Dillon wrote:
I have finished merging svkmerge/m2migration to trunk. Now it is
time for everyone to start using the m2 build... and avoid using
the m1 build.
I updated the
On Aug 6, 2006, at 12:04 PM, David Jencks wrote:
How do we install the required yet idiotic jsr-77 gbean that
represents the app client without a module to put it in?
Easy, just toss it into the parent ear configuration.
-dain
How the heck did Anonymous make this change?
--jason
On Aug 6, 2006, at 10:34 AM, Anonymous (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-1492?page=all ]
Affects Version/s: 1.0
Many org/apache/geronimo configIds still live in source tree
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-859?page=worklog#action_36687 ]
Fritz Oconer logged work on AMQ-859:
Time Spent: 2 hours
Time Spent: 3 hours (was: 1 hour)
Added profile to include the source distro when building. eg mvn install
Okay, thanks I will take a look.
--jason
On Aug 5, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Bill Dudney wrote:
Hi Jason,
Thanks again for all the hard work!
Build works fine, I get an assembly that I can install and run.
However there is a problem deploying.
I filed;
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2281?page=all ]
Jason Dillon reassigned GERONIMO-2281:
--
Assignee: Jason Dillon
Deploy tool does not work (built from new m2 build)
---
On Aug 6, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
* If a Geronimo server is running on the same machine, the bootstrap
will fail due to test errors. It failed before OpenEJB was checked
out.
Is this specific to the m2 build? What are the specific errors, in
which modules?
* There does
On Aug 6, 2006, at 2:09 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
* It's not possible to run mvn clean from the thirdparty/specs
directory -- it complains that there's no valid version of the clean
plugin
Why are you trying to clean from there? That is only used by
bootstrap... never intended for any other
I'm not sure how long that this effort has been going on before I
started actively working on it (for about 3 weeks or so I think).
--jason
On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:58 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
Hey,
How long in total has it taken you to do the whole conversion?
Jason.
On 4 Aug 06, at 8:25 PM
Anita, I am aware of this issue. I have not had time to resolve it
completely.
More comments below...
On Aug 6, 2006, at 9:31 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
The car-maven-plugin (trunk rev 429115) still does not add the
geronimo-plugin.xml file to the generated car. I had submitted a
working
[
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-859?page=worklog#action_36688 ]
Fritz Oconer logged work on AMQ-859:
Time Spent: 45 minutes
Time Spent: 3 hours, 45 minutes (was: 3 hours)
Test both generated src distro when deployed in the
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-859?page=all ]
Fritz Oconer resolved AMQ-859.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Done, if the user wants to include source distro then a profile assembly-sr'
must be included in the build. e.g. mvn install -P assembly-src.
If we can get them to make an SNAPSHOT or official release for us
then I'm down to use it...
--jason
On Aug 5, 2006, at 5:58 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'd like to see us damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead with
M2. +1 for moving to XMLBeans 2.2
Aaron Mulder wrote:
On 8/5/06, David
Ya... the xmlbeans plugin does not really play well with m2 :-(
--jason
On Aug 5, 2006, at 8:43 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
This is a small work around...
Jason was awesome enough to copy the nasty classes out into the
target/clover/classes directory, so by adding that to the src in the
IDEs,
Huh, I see you and Jason working *together* on the code. I know
you're not saying you don't want to work collaboratively with Jason
and co, so maybe you can give some suggestions on how you both might
collaborate better?
Just a comment about the whole no justification concept, that's
36 matches
Mail list logo
