[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3577) Monitoring client needs basic graph creation/definition page

Monitoring client needs basic graph creation/definition page Key: GERONIMO-3577 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3577 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3578) Delta Replication of HttpSessions - Jetty Clustered Web-Applications

Delta Replication of HttpSessions - Jetty Clustered Web-Applications Key: GERONIMO-3578 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3578 Project: Geronimo Issue

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3578) Delta Replication of HttpSessions - Jetty Clustered Web-Applications

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gianny Damour closed GERONIMO-3578. --- Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Gianny Damour Checked in. Delta Replication of

[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-3573) monitoring plugin: collecting agent's EJB should not be spawning and monitoring a thread

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Viet Hung Nguyen updated GERONIMO-3573: --- Component/s: monitoring Affects Version/s: 2.1 monitoring plugin:

new Tomcat trunk

FYI -- the Tomcat team is planning to create a new trunk next week copied from the 6.0.15 tag. That tag includes the security fix for the Webdav servlet. IIUC they should also be agreeable to applying the annotation support patch developed by David Jencks and Remy to this new trunk,

Re: config.xml changes

Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the explanation David. I'll look into the geronimo-plugins.xml for Tomcat. I'll also try adding some comments in the geronimo-plugins.xml and see if it makes it into the config.xml. Well, I guess adding comments into geronimo-plugin.xml isn't going to work

Re: [VOTE] Release Devtools maven-plugins-1.0 RC1

+1, and a big Thanks for doing this !! Donald Woods wrote: The maven-plugins are build tools used by the Eclipse Plugin and J2G tools and are not included in either tool. A 72 hour vote is being called for the following:

Re: config.xml changes

On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the explanation David. I'll look into the geronimo- plugins.xml for Tomcat. I'll also try adding some comments in the geronimo-plugins.xml and see if it makes it into the config.xml. Well, I guess adding comments

Re: basic security review

Yes, that's a good idea. Also, excellent work with reviewing the LoginModules and adding tests!!! I just added two new LoginModules to look at. I'm particularly concerned about CertificateChainLoginModule since it always returns true in its login() function. But I'm not exactly sure how this is

[DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with these capabilities. They provide a more solid

Re: config.xml changes

David Jencks wrote: On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the explanation David. I'll look into the geronimo-plugins.xml for Tomcat. I'll also try adding some comments in the geronimo-plugins.xml and see if it makes it into the config.xml. Well, I

Re: config.xml changes

David Jencks wrote: On Nov 1, 2007, at 9:11 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: Joe Bohn wrote: Thanks for the explanation David. I'll look into the geronimo-plugins.xml for Tomcat. I'll also try adding some comments in the geronimo-plugins.xml and see if it makes it into the config.xml. Well, I

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3579) PluginInstaller and assembly should be able to construct all the server config files, not just the main ones (e.g. config.xml)

PluginInstaller and assembly should be able to construct all the server config files, not just the main ones (e.g. config.xml) -- Key: GERONIMO-3579

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3580) LocalAttributeManager should use jaxb

LocalAttributeManager should use jaxb - Key: GERONIMO-3580 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3580 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Improvement Security Level: public (Regular issues)

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good to get a release out,

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

Kevan Miller wrote: I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with these capabilities. They

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

I think the following two issues should be fixed for 2.1: 1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502 - this prevents a single assembly to have both cxf and axis2 installed (which we supported in 2.0.x) 2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3523 - can't do certain actions

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release. There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with

[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-3502) Module conditions when installed as a plugin

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-3502: -- Assignee: David Jencks Module conditions when installed as a plugin

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release

Yep. It's time ! I really want to see how flexibly the user community will actually build their servers. I also wish we'd all spend some extra time and effort to check for security issues in the server in general and in our individual domain of expertise, in particular. Cheers Prasad On

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

So shall we move the project out of the sandbox? Do we need an official vote for this? --jason On Oct 26, 2007, at 6:43 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: i think the subject is explicit. What do people think about that ? -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet Blog:

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3579) PluginInstaller and assembly should be able to construct all the server config files, not just the main ones (e.g. config.xml)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3579. -- Resolution: Fixed Implemented in rev 591154 PluginInstaller and assembly should be able

Re: Promoting GShell to a real subproject

No, not in my opinion. I haven't heard of any dissenters. There's been plenty of time for someone to raise an objection. I say -- have at it... --kevan On 11/1/07, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So shall we move the project out of the sandbox? Do we need an official vote for this?

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3527) Monitoring client needs default viewmode when selecting servers from the list

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12539505 ] Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3527: -- GERONIMO-3576 patch applied in rev. 591189.

[jira] Resolved: (GERONIMO-3576) Monitoring client needs ability to add/edit/delete views in the dbase

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3576?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erik B. Craig resolved GERONIMO-3576. - Resolution: Fixed Good after commit Thanks, Anita! Monitoring client needs ability

[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-3581) Default security relam name in ContextManager

Default security relam name in ContextManager - Key: GERONIMO-3581 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3581 Project: Geronimo Issue Type: Bug Security Level: public (Regular