On 15/11/2007, at 7:43 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Kevan,
Sorry for my late reply and thanks for raising this security issue.
I believe that the encryption of password attributes is not enough
in this case as password in this case is an XML JavaBean attribute;
based on a cursory review
On 17/11/2007, at 12:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Nov 13, 2007, at 9:36 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Joe,
After some investigations, here is my understanding of problem 1:
there are two deployments because by default, i.e. when no target
is specified, the distribute command executes
On 21/11/2007, at 7:55 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Regarding the list-modules command, it lists all the
configurations per target, i.e. configuration store.
As Kevan also pointed out, I think that we need to consider the
multiple configuration stores in the console when more than one is
present
Welcome on board Erik!
On 21/11/2007, at 3:45 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please extend a welcome to Erik Craig who is the latest committer
to be added to the Geronimo fold. Erik has had a sustained and
continued track record in working on the J2G conversion tool as
well as his recent work
Hi,
Some heads-up.
I will soon add gshell-remote-client/common/server, gshell-whisper
and mina dependencies so that we can remote control servers. In other
words, it will increase a little bit more.
This may still change, however here is a list of the new commands:
* alias: to create an
But overall... Cool beans that other folks are starting to help
with GShell!!! Perhaps we need a little more discussion on who is
doing what for now and the next release?
--jason
-Original Message-
From: Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2007 12:40:41
To:dev
Hi,
I quickly had a look to the monitoring components. I think it is
going well. Though, I have one comment: is it possible to increase
unit testing?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 04/12/2007, at 8:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ecraig
Date: Mon Dec 3 13:16:49 2007
New Revision: 600692
On 04/12/2007, at 11:45 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Dec 2, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
A bit harder to apples-to-apples compare the longer term growth.
lib/gshell accounts for a 5 meg growth (unpacked). So, that
would help account for most of the growth in the minimal
assembly...
Hi,
As described a couple of days ago, I have just added a couple of
commands to simplify the remote control of servers.
This is an excerpt of the commit message:
Add a couple of gshell commands to simplify the remote control of
servers.
The commands being added are:
* alias: used to
Congrats Jay!
Gianny
On 05/12/2007, at 3:26 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
Please join us in congratulating Jay McHugh as the newest member of
the Geronimo PMC. It's been great to have Jay working with us as a
committer on Geronimo. Even better to have him join us in providing
oversight
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 07/12/2007, at 1:43 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
The discussion thread has been out there long enough for comment,
and those who have responded appear positive about the prospect. I
think it's time to put this to a vote. The full proposal from Matt
Hogstrom is attached
Hi,
Thanks for having fixed this problem David. I may have introduced
this bug while working on the property editor stuff. So, I will have
a look at it and see if we can avoid this explicit registration of
property editors.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 11/12/2007, at 1:14 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Hi,
I have just checked in support for clustering of Tomcat Web-
applications over WADI. This works pretty much the same way Jetty Web-
applications are clustered over WADI.
For instance, to cluster a Tomcat Web-app, a tomcat-clustering-wadi
element, see
Ooops. I wonder how this happened. I must have move this folder by
dragging it unintentionally within my IDE to another folder. Thanks
for the fix.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/12/2007, at 4:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Tue Dec 11 09:33:48 2007
New Revision: 603314
URL:
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 11/12/2007, at 8:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Folks, a small change to Genesis was made to support a custom legal
resource bundle for the GShell release. I'd like to get this out
so we can get GShell out too.
+1 -Release it
+0 -Eh, whatever
-1 -Um, no no
All, Happy New Year 2008!
On 05/01/2008, at 9:10 AM, David Jencks wrote:
There are a couple code rearrangements I'd like to see before 2.1
goes out. I think they are somewhat related.
1. The plugin management code has been getting larger and more
complicated and I think it should be in
Hi Jarek,
Thanks for the creation of this bug. If you encounter another WADI
related problem, then please feel free to create a JIRA and notify me
by email as I do not systematically read the JIRA notifications (may
be I should).
Thanks,
Gianny
On 07/01/2008, at 4:56 AM, Jarek Gawor
Hi,
Is it actually used in Geronimo? If not, then I would prefer this
utility to be say part of http-client.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/01/2008, at 6:45 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
There has been a lot of ongoing work by Jeff, Prasad, Rick, Sangjin
and others on the AsyncHttpClient (aka. AHC) code
On 11/01/2008, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote:
Could you update us on your guess for a time frame for the SFSB
clustering? Will this require OpenEJB changes? Is it realistic to
get this into 2.1?
Hello David,
I still target to complete SFSB clustering over the week-end. If this
is not
Hello Tim,
I am pretty sure the Eclipse plugin is deploying to all the Targets
returned by DeploymentManager.getTargets(). It should instead deploy
to the first returned Targets. By convention, this first Target is
the default Configuration store, which is explicitly configured by
users.
On 17/01/2008, at 1:30 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008, at 7:48 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Wed Jan 16 04:48:37 2008
New Revision: 612439
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612439view=rev
Log:
Move farm related classes to new sub-project geronimo-farm. Add
On 17/01/2008, at 9:01 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I am now integration testing the OpenEJB clustering support and it
appears I will need to do some minor adjustments. As part of the
change, four sub-projects/dependencies are added: geronimo-openejb-
clustering-wadi,
Matt, many many thanks for your hard work and long hours/nights you
spent working on Geronimo as our PMC Chair and more. I assume you
will no more produce the project reports for the Board; however, we
are still expecting your performance reports :)
Kevan, congratulations and thanks for
Hello,
David B. kindly reminded me I should mention the SFSB clustering work
I am currently working on on the OpenEJB dev. list - so far, I only
mentioned this work on the Geronimo dev. list.
Firstly, apology for only mentioning this work now.
Now, let me talk a little bit of this work: I
Congrats Viet!
Thanks,
Gianny
On 31/01/2008, at 2:47 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
I'd like to welcome Viet Nguyen as a new committer on the Geronimo
project. Viet has made a number of contributions to Geronimo,
including our new monitoring capabilities, the J2G conversion tool,
as well
Hi Kevan,
concurrent is a WADI runtime dependency. The server starts fine
because wadi-clustering is not started by default and, assuming this
was the case, this dependency is only used when an invocation is
contextualized.
So, could you please rollback this change?
Thanks,
Gianny
On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 3, 2008, at 5:34 PM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi Kevan,
concurrent is a WADI runtime dependency. The server starts fine
because wadi-clustering is not started by default and, assuming this
was the case, this dependency is only used when an invocation is
contextualized
On 07/02/2008, at 2:54 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
All,
In preparation for our 2.1 release, please hold off on any commits
to branches/2.1.
If you have something that you feel absolutely *must* be fixed,
please check with me.
I'll be working on generating a 2.1 release
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Agree with 1a, all of #2 and 3b.
- Creating documentation when new features go into svn instead as
an after thought when we are trying to close out a release.
- Samples become a prerequisite of each new release.
- Project mentoring - have
On 12/02/2008, at 3:05 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/02/2008, at 12:43 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
- Continued work on enable full clustering of all components
Hello Donald,
Could you please list the top two components you would like to see
clustered?
JMS and DataSource
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 14/02/2008, at 2:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
+1
I tested the Tomcat JEE version and was able to deploy DayTrader
2.0 and run through all scenarios.
pgp signatures verified ok
gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 10 15:21:19 2008 EST using DSA key ID
86859358
gpg: Good
Hi,
This is really great news.
I very quickly browsed the specifications and I have a couple of
questions:
1. Is there a way to define task dependencies? For instance, I should
be able to queue a task B which will only be executed after the
execution of task A as task B depends on task
Hi,
Thanks for reporting this problem.
This is an embarrassing bug. Is the problem already identified? If
this is a Geronimo regression, then it seems to me that we need to be
improve our testing approach. For instance, along with each bug fix,
I would expect the addition of new tests to
Hi,
Geronimo trunk declares 3.0.0-SNAPSHOT as the OpenEJB SNAPSHOT
version. OpenEJB trunk defines 3.0-SNAPSHOT as the version. Which one
is correct?
Thanks,
Gianny
Hi,
We have now some basic support for SFSB clustering. If you would like
to give it a try then here are some instructions.
1. Create a clustered EJB module.
* SFSBs must implement Serializable even if they are EJB3 SFSBs.
* In the geronimo-openejb DD, include the 'openejb-clustering-wadi'
On 28/02/2008, at 7:19 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
Oh boy where have you been? :)
2.2 = 2.2-SNAPSHOT = trunk
2.1.1 = 2.1-SNAPSHOT = branches/2.1
2.0.3 = 2.0.3-SNAPSHOT = branches/2.0
So, if you see 2.1.1 in subject of these emails, it really refers to
2.1.1-SNAPSHOT version as defined in the
On 29/02/2008, at 6:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I went to a selenium get together Monday and think we have some
great opportunities for improving and speeding up our testsuite.
The bits I think would be of most benefit, from my perspective as a
non-test-engineer, are:
selenium grid. This
Hi,
I believe the external app version is quite important from an end-
user perspective; so, I'm inclined to go for B then C. For instance,
users clearly see the external app version while browsing plugin
repositories. Furthermore, this allows the clear versioning of two
plugins for
?
-Donald
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
A problem has been identified with WADI 2.0-M8 used by Geronimo
2.1 causing the failure of clustered applications when a specific
node (the node hosting the singleton partition rebalancing
service) is killed (a normal shutdown is fine). WADI 2.0-M9
addresses
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/03/2008, at 5:37 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Hi,
Changes in v5:
legal files in all the jars (I hope)
fix a typo in the NOTICE template
make the generated site work better (parent link, maven feather)
remove logging-config and checkstyle-config per jdillons advice.
move
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is tomcat-clustering-wadi for
tomcat and not clustering-wadi. As a matter of fact, I have on my to-
do list a task to refactor substitution group element builders for
Tomcat,
Hi,
There was a typo in the way node2 was started. It used to be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=node2 -G server.name=yellow -b
It should actually be:
geronimo/start-server -D node.name=yellow -G server.name=node2 -b
Though, I am not sure that this can explain the problem. What does
the
Hi,
Also, I just deployed a new 2.0-SNAPSHOT which defines a context-root
and use standard (versus delta) replication. You may want to grab it
as the context root is less cryptic with this latest version.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 19/03/2008, at 12:08 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi
Hello,
Nope. It seems wadi-clustering dependencies have been cleaned up too
much for the 2.0.2 distribution. I do not think there is an easy work-
around, except the issue or a 2.0.3 wadi-clustering configuration
with the right runtime dependencies.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 18/03/2008, at 9:42
18, 2008 at 6:11 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This is a problem with the deployment descriptor. You name of the
clustering substitution group element is tomcat-clustering-wadi for
tomcat and not clustering-wadi. As a matter of fact, I have on my to-
do list a task to refactor
Hello Vamsi,
If the applications display distinct numbers, then the nodes do not
see each other. I think this is a problem with multicasting.
Could you please confirm that you have uncommented the last line of
etc/rc.d/start-server,default.groovy which sets the system property
On 21/03/2008, at 4:53 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Mar 20, 2008, at 10:28 AM, newbie-gero wrote:
Hi lists,
i have read up about the Geronimo and it seems to be a very good
application
server. However i like to check the performance of Geronimo.
So i like to ask all of you what are the
Hi,
I am working on the declaration of GBeanInfo via annotations.
This is an example GBean with all the possible annotations (note that
some annotation properties have default values so you do not see all
of them in the example):
@GBean(j2eeType=type, name=name)
@GPriority(priority=123)
Hi,
Sorry for starting another thread (I deleted the initial thread and
had to start another one).
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks cool. Only question I have is why the G prefix on
annotations other than GBean?
I will drop the G prefix on annotations other than GBean; it is
On 01/04/2008, at 7:52 AM, David Blevins wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 5:37 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1. I think we should try harder to separate the identification of
a constructor parameter as attribute or reference from
identifying its name. So, I
Ooops. Sorry for that and thanks for your gentle nudge. This is now
fixed.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 10/04/2008, at 3:08 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Jarek Gawor wrote:
Gianny,
Can you please take a look at these failures? The tests have been
failing since your commit on the 5th.
Jarek
BTW, the same is
Hello Hernan,
I will work on WADI clustering over the week-end. FWIW, this WIKI
page, http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDEV/clustering-configuration-for-
jetty.html, describes how to set-up WADI clustering. I will also
address farming and remote node management features.
Sorry for not having
Hello Joe,
It is a change intended for the 2.1 branch as I would like G 2.1.1 to
use WADI 2.0-M10.
It fixes a replication bug: the dirty flag of a session is reset when
a null value is retrieved from a session. As a consequence, session
state updates are not pushed to replication peers
Sorry for this mistake. It is now fixed.
Thanks for having reported it.
Gianny
On 15/04/2008, at 5:04 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Is there a reason you only updated wadi-aop to 2.0-M10 and not the
rest of the WADI artifacts?
-Donald
I am supportive of Erik's suggestion. I am absolutely against a
process involving the submission of an iCLA.
Is a checkbox really required? Isn't a disclaimer enough to protect
IP rights?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 17/04/2008, at 4:01 AM, Jason Warner wrote:
I'd be more inclined to do something
Hi,
It would be great to have only one TCP/IP connection opened between
an EJB client and the EJB server and this across multiple requests.
My understanding is that at the moment a TCP/IP connection is
negotiated for each EJB request which is very expensive especially
based on the rather
Hi,
I would like to port the change set -r 650083:650084 https://
svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/trunk to 2.1.1. This is a
very minor change.
If no one object, I will check-in in 24 hours.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/04/2008, at 4:20 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
I'd like to branch later today
Hello Jason,
These two folders are used by the farming feature. They are the
MasterConfigurationStore and ClusterStore repositories respectively
(see http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21/farming.html for description
of these two repos.)
If need be, we can easily move them. Is the following
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 24/04/2008, at 9:41 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a second release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.1
for your review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.1 release currently resides
here:
No.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 24/04/2008, at 2:11 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
Is this needed as part of the fix for GERONIMO-3970?
-Donald
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gdamour
Date: Tue Apr 22 02:46:42 2008
New Revision: 650430
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=650430view=rev
Log:
Move
On 23/04/2008, at 4:21 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Test is there:
org.apache.geronimo.commands.RemoteServerControlCommandTest
Documentation, talking about use-cases, would have been coming
this week-end (I slowly started posting docos two weeks ago with
farming followed by WADI
The same goes for many many logs no?
Thanks,
Gianny
On 27/04/2008, at 8:20 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jdillon
Date: Sun Apr 27 03:20:35 2008
New Revision: 651912
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=651912view=rev
Log:
Make loggers static again
Modified:
Hello Rick,
Sorry, this is not directly related to your question. What kind of
integration with ObjectGrid have you been working on? FWIW, I am
working on a hierarchical, transactional, distributed, partitioned
and replicated cache and data-grid solution as part of WADI and I am
quite
Hi,
It would be preferable to have tests instead of in-lined comments.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/05/2008, at 8:46 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: gawor
Date: Mon May 5 15:46:11 2008
New Revision: 653620
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=653620view=rev
Log:
pass the right filename when
Hello Yun Feng,
Are you currently using the execute-alias command?
If yes, then Jason you will have to plug-in native gshell support
before 2.1.2.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 06/05/2008, at 7:25 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Aliases where never intended to be invoked via a command, instead
alias, as
, Gianny Damour /
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/* wrote:
From: Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No longer provide gshell command execute-alias in
Geronimo v2.1.2?
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 2:32 AM
Hello Yun Feng,
Are you currently using
Hello,
Can someone add me? gianny.damour at gmail.com
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/05/2008, at 4:32 PM, David Blevins wrote:
Setup google analytics on all our spaces and added everyone who's a
committer who I could easily find a gmail address for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL
+1
I hope that the ASF Infrastructure Team has a good idea of the type
of rather heavyweight testing involved by the TCK to warrant such a
configuration.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 20/05/2008, at 10:22 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
If we are to take this proposal forward to the ASF Infrastructure
team,
Hello,
I am back from holiday; A quick scan of the mailing lists tells me
that the upgrade to WADI 2.0 is causing classloader clashes.
As identified by Jason W. and Kevan, a Tribes class is loaded by two
distinct classloaders (tomcat6 and wadi-clustering configuration
classloaders),
solution, which is backward compatible: I simply added a
tomcat6-no-ha that hides the Tribes classes and upon deployment of
WADI clustered applications I replace tomcat6 with tomcat6-no-ha,
which avoids the identified classloader clashes.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 03/07/2008, at 7:10 PM, Gianny Damour
On 06/07/2008, at 7:16 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
...
The following are a mix of features that have been discussed
previously, by me and others, and a few new brainstorming ideas.
I've placed in categories, to help me think about them...
...
Potential new function:
- XML-based
Hello Peter,
This is great news for Liferay developers!
IMHO, one of the pain points with Liferay development is the time it
takes to build, pack and deploy a WAR to Liferay. Even if Liferay is
not so bad on this front when compared with other portals, a typical
build-deploy-test cycle is
On 14/07/2008, at 5:17 PM, Peter Petersson wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hello Peter,
This is great news for Liferay developers!
IMHO, one of the pain points with Liferay development is the time
it takes to build, pack and deploy a WAR to Liferay. Even if
Liferay is not so bad
+1
Thanks,
Gianny
On 31/07/2008, at 12:52 PM, Joe Bohn wrote:
All,
I've prepared a release candidate of Geronimo Server 2.1.2 for your
review and vote.
The source for the Geronimo Server 2.1.2 release currently resides
here:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/branches/2.1.2
My bad, I was so used to release milestone releases that when I
published 2.0 I simply forgot to move the snapshot version of WADI to
2.1.
I am publishing 2.1-SNAPSHOT right now.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 15/08/2008, at 7:34 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:54 PM, [EMAIL
Hi,
I also do not see a lot of room for improvement in Grails
integration. FWIW, in addition to the sample Grails application of
the IBM article, the WADI administration console, a Grails Web-app,
can be deployed out-of-the-box to Geronimo to introspect WADI clusters.
I believe there is
Great! It seems that it is not yet enabled thought.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 11/10/2008, at 4:34 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Oct 11, 2008, at 7:07 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
I also do not see a lot of room for improvement in Grails
integration. FWIW, in addition to the sample Grails application
On 15/10/2008, at 4:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
That's one of the main missing bits of functionality. Right now
the only way to get the g-p.xml is to use c-m-p or to export the
plugin from a server it's been deployed into, or to do something by
hand with jar packing and unpacking.
The
next week but might keep thinking
about this anyway.
thanks!
david jencks
On Oct 15, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
On 15/10/2008, at 4:16 AM, David Jencks wrote:
That's one of the main missing bits of functionality. Right now
the only way to get the g-p.xml is to use c-m-p
it be as simple as a definition in config.xml?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:08 AM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
You are correct: the underpinning philosophy of these approaches is
to make it easier to modify pre-canned plugins through extension
points.
This may be a good
On 17/10/2008, at 12:42 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I also do not see a lot of room for improvement in Grails
integration. FWIW, in addition to the sample Grails application of
the IBM article, the WADI administration console, a Grails Web-
app, can be deployed out
Hi,
I am not able to build trunk due to xbean-3.5-SNAPSHOT being missing
from the apache.snapshots Maven repo: http://people.apache.org/repo/
m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/xbean/
Snapshots have been deployed to this repo on Oct 23rd. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Gianny
, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am proposing the following implementation to start with:
1. In the META-INF folder of a config, we scan for files matching
the patterns dependencies-(.*).groovy and extentions-(.*).groovy.
2. We execute the scripts dependencies
if you need any help testing or coding any
of this. As I said, I'm not too familiar with the classloader, but
if I flop around in the code enough I might be able to make a few
small waves ;)
Thanks!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jason
On 12/11/2008, at 10:04 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
It has been mentioned several times that we should be looking to
release Geronimo 2.2 before the end of the year (preferrably mid-
December).
Before we can consider a release there are a large number of
snapshots that need to be
On 13/11/2008, at 10:08 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of deploying SCA enhanced Web Applications in Geronimo
with Tuscany Plugin, I am looking to add a ModuleBuilderExtension
(MBE) to TomcatModuleBuilder and a NamingBuilder. The
Hi,
The feature is still available. However we do not provide a XML
configuration style for it. We only provide a script configuration
style. For instance, by dropping a file named:
DependenciesPrivateClass.groovy
in the folder of the plugin to update and with a content looking like
Set
/reference
/gbean
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Gianny Damour
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 13/11/2008, at 10:08 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 12, 2008, at 1:07 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy wrote:
As part of deploying SCA enhanced Web Applications in Geronimo
with Tuscany Plugin, I
On 13/11/2008, at 5:13 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 12/11/2008, at 10:04 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
It has been mentioned several times that we should be looking to
release Geronimo 2.2 before the end of the year (preferrably mid-
December).
Before we can consider a release
On 15/11/2008, at 5:08 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 14, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
The definition of mark-up interfaces may require the definition of
a specific mark-up interface for each deployer type. For instance,
a MBE may be specific to Tomcat and not to Jetty
MPCL.getResource rather than super.getResource?
I guess the other possibility is that the parent isn't what I
think it should be ... still investigating.
Joe
Joe Bohn wrote:
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 19/11/2008, at 5:19 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
Joe Bohn wrote:
Just a heads up that I *think* there are still
Congrats David!
Gianny
On 24/08/2006, at 3:41 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Please welcome David Blevins as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. David recently accepted the invitation to join the PMC.
David is part of the OpenEJB project that we depend on so heavily
and that is joining
Congrats Anita!
Gianny
On 29/08/2006, at 4:31 AM, Jeff Genender wrote:
All,
We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in our
midst.
Anita Kulshreshtha has recently accepted an invitation to join the
Geronimo project. Anita has been active on Geronimo for quite some
+1
Gianny
On 28/08/2006, at 3:42 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
This weekend I cleaned up Genesis and made an initial release of
1.0 to the m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository.
In order to release other projects, like specs, xbean, gbuild,
gshell, javamail and server... we need to have genesis 1.0
I support that. If Selenium is chosen as the tool to automate the
integration testing of the Admin console, then I am happy to
bootstrap the effort. On my current project, we are using Selenium
with script generation via Ruby and it rocks. Our build system is
Ant, thought, I think that I
Congratulations Joe!
Gianny
On 09/09/2006, at 12:51 AM, Sachin Patel wrote:
The Apache Geronimo PMC would like to announce that Joe Bohn has
accepted the invitation to join the Geronimo PMC. In addition to
his technical contributions to Geronimo, we are extremely excited
to have Joe
On 09/09/2006, at 2:30 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Third one tonight...must be important :)
Ibiblio is down :(
Cool... Also, it seems that JIRA attachments are not working for me.
Can someone confirm?
Thanks,
Gianny
Jeff Genender wrote:
Little reminder ;-)
Jeff
--
Matt Hogstrom
Reddy wrote:
?? Did not get you Gianny.
Vamsi
On 9/9/06, Gianny Damour (JIRA) dev@geronimo.apache.org
wrote: [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2382?
page=comments#action_12433550 ]
Gianny Damour commented on GERONIMO-2382:
-
test
On 9/1/06, Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also peeked at the server's JMX tree via jconsole and I
don't see
any attribute or operation that matches up to
kernelFullyStarted.
There is also a strange null element of the tree, but I
will leave
that for another day.
Hi,
This
Thanks for your reply. It seems that I can now upload files. Maybe
some network problems.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 09/09/2006, at 3:13 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Worked for me earlier Gianny. At least I got Jeff's patch and got
it applied. Is that what you meant?
Gianny Damour wrote:
On 09/09
201 - 300 of 665 matches
Mail list logo
