[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492573
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 533500
- Resolve relative java.io.tmpdir
: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: buildsystem
Affects Versions: 2.0-M6
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 2.0-M6
Related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3123:
-
Summary: Create a template/var directory for creating additional instances
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492581
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3123:
--
:)
If someone wanted to name their servers like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3123:
-
Attachment: asm.patch
This patch creates a GHOME/template/var and GHOME
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From a discussion in another thread
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Help-needed-with-geronimo.sh-p10200885s134.html
The emerging structure of GERONIMO_HOME (GHOME) is:
GHOME/instances/template/var/...
GHOME/instances/geronimo01/var
System-database is declaring dependency on connector-deployer
twice, once with scope 'provided' and once with test? Which one should
it be?
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to go back and see the directory layout your proposing. I
iki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/running-multiple-instances-of-geronimo.html
didn't see a specific proposal in the JIRA
Some information is here:
Some clarification (inline)...
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to go back and see the directory layout your proposing. I
iki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/running-multiple-instances-of-geronimo.html
didn't see a specific
+1
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The 2.0-M5 binaries are available at http://people.apache.org/
~hogstrom/2.0-M5-rc1
The binaries addressed a problem seen in 2.0-M4 which was
subsequently scrubbed where 2.0-Mn and 2.0-Mn-SNAPSHOT binaries were
included. Building
Do you remember what the problem/solution is? I'd guess that to make
it work you'd have to include a dependency on the system-database
module and not include any jar dependencies on derby. Is this even
possible using the db wizard?
Yes, that works. I tested it on 2.0-M5 from
From a discussion in another thread
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Help-needed-with-geronimo.sh-p10200885s134.html
The emerging structure of GERONIMO_HOME (GHOME) is:
GHOME/instances/template/var/...
GHOME/instances/geronimo01/var/... | --- default
GHOME/instances/geronimo01/deploy/ |
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:38 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
..
and then just die
quickly if the directory is missing with an informative error
message to that effect.
--jason
On Apr 24, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
The other option
are proposing please complain :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
--jason
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
On a closer inspection this alternative (2) does not look so
attractive. IIUC, The classes
normal startup path. If I've misunderstood what
you
are proposing please complain :-)
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 25, 2007, at 11:55 AM, Jason Dillon wrote:
--jason
On Apr 25, 2007, at 4:58 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
On a closer inspection this alternative (2
Could someone please help me with testing a unix version of modified
geronimo.bat? The patch for geronimo.bat is attached to
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011#action_12491001
The new geronimo.sh should create a geronimo/var and run geronimo
from it when bin\startup is used.
--- Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please feel free to document the evolving steps and issues in the
wiki
here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC20/multiple-repositories-and-server-instances.html
I am thinking about creating a new page titled 'Running Geronimo'.
It could contain the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is it making geronimo/var? Its usually much better to let Java
handle making directories and other complicated tasks and keep
platform scripts as simple as possible.
--jason
On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:51 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Could someone please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12490917
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 530592, and rev511311
- Do not allow creation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011:
-
Attachment: script.patch
- The script.patch will allow us to start
geronimo/var (not
var). This will make a pristine copy of 'var' available all the time
for creating new instances. This can be easily done by setting the
property org.apache.geronimo.server.name=geronimo by default.
Any other ideas are welcome..
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL
--- Ted Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like the notion of a pristine var to allow for easy instance
creation. When you say by default, are you suggesting that we ship
AG this way? If this is done, then we must have geronimo and
geronimo/var directories in the shipped image. I see those
+1
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-ws-
metadata_2.0_spec-1.2. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
+1
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
jpa_3.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
This vote
+1
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please review and vote on the binaries for geronimo-
annotation_1.0_spec-1.1. the binaries can be seen in:
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/spec-rc1
[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Do not release these binaries
Please ignore this. This is in my local copy...
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. I am also seeing this:
ERROR : unknown operation getUsers() and
ERROR : unknown operation getGroups()
Thanks
Anita
Does anyone know if disabling the ConnectorServer with service URL
/jmxrmi will affect activemq's functionality inside
geronimo. The ManagementContext has a flag isCreateConnector. Setting
this flag to false will prevent this ConnectorServer from being
created. This will free up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011:
-
Attachment: activemq.patch
activemq.patch disables creation of the second
Thanks James!
Anita
--- James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/19/07, Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know if disabling the ConnectorServer with service
URL
/jmxrmi will affect activemq's functionality inside
geronimo
The PropertiesLoginModuleManager should resolve all URIs relative to
GERONIMO_BASE. I am also seeing this:
ERROR : unknown operation getUsers() and
ERROR : unknown operation getGroups()
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12489909
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 530206 Resolve UsersURI and groupsURI relative
All jira issues have 'security level' set to 'public'. What are the
other possible values and how to set this field?
Thanks
Anita
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha resolved GERONIMO-2898.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0-M5
Can't edit Jetty SSL
We are creating two ConnectorServer:
1. JMXConnectorServer with serviceUrl
/jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/JMXConnector
2. JMXConnectorServer created by activemq with serviceUrl
/jndi/rmi://localhost:1099/jmxrmi
Do we need two of them?
Thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 14, 2007, at 6:42 PM, Rick McGuire wrote:
...
and I found I was unable to force the Geronimo configuration back
to 1099 with that change in place.
The problem I am
/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/ManagementContext.java
Thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
David B,
The activemq-core jar is being used by openejb-activemq. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011:
-
Attachment: GERONIMO-3011.patch
The change to 1098 broke many things because
I am trying to find why port 1099 appears to be hardcoded. This
message is generated by running two instances of G:
1. instance1 uses 1099 for rmi NamingPort
2. instance2 uses 1108
Both server start fine and have functioning console. JMXService is
running correctly.
message from instance2:
Thanks Kevan!
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying to find why port 1099 appears to be hardcoded. This
message is generated by running two instances of G:
1. instance1 uses 1099 for rmi NamingPort
2
David B,
The activemq-core jar is being used by openejb-activemq. I looked at
BrokerServer, but nothing jumped at me.. Any help will be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 8:37 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I am trying
/apache/activemq/broker/jmx/ManagementContext.java
Thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 13, 2007, at 11:59 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
David B,
The activemq-core jar is being used by openejb-activemq. I
looked at
BrokerServer, but nothing jumped at me
On Apr 11, 2007, at 8:43 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
In short, 1099 must be available to start other instances of
geronimo.
http://www.developer.com/java/ent/article.php/3455311
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we changing the port?
--jason
--- Donald Woods [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how does the portOffset relate to this? If you start with 1098,
isn't the next server instance going to use 1099 and the next one
1100?
If so, why not start with 1099 and let the next one use 1100 and
then
1101?
It's not clear to me
Kevan,
From our IRC conversation, it sounds like port 1099 needs to call to
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(port)
Assume the following server instances on the same box:
Server instance A with RMIRegistryService port set to 1079
Server instance B with RMIRegistryService port set to
I have reverted back to 1099 in rev 527918. Could you please provide
the stack trace?
Thanks
Anita
--- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anita,
Could we please switch the port default back to 1099 from 1098? Lot
of
things broke...
thanks,
dims
--
Davanum Srinivas ::
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 12, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
From our IRC conversation, it sounds like port 1099 needs to call to
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(port)
This is already being done in line 63. Should it be followed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2735?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488140
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2735:
--
rev 527596
- Updated config-substitutions.properties
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488144
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 527596 Added port configuration
The server now uses config-substitution.properties file. Please
rebuild assemblies.
Thanks
Anita
The fish are biting.
Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488236
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
rev 527746
- Changed default RMINaming port to 1098
David B,
Setting the system property admin.disabled (next to duct tape!)in
OpenEjbSystemGBean worked.
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:43 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote
In short, 1099 must be available to start other instances of
geronimo.
http://www.developer.com/java/ent/article.php/3455311
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why are we changing the port?
--jason
On Apr 11, 2007, at 7:33 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Don't the
be possible to override it
that way in config.xml.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 9, 2007, at 7:48 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Kevan,
The plan for activemq-ra config is using 61616:
resourceadapter
resourceadapter-instance
resourceadapter-nameActiveMQ
RA
at all related to this file.
--jason
On Apr 9, 2007, at 3:34 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks Jason! The jline.dll was extracted to i1/var/temp and
i2/var/temp for instances named i1 and i2. But the shutdown config
expects it in var/temp. If the default server, i.e. the one using
,
but any activemq resource adapter wrapper gbean instance should have
it.
thanks
david jencks
On Apr 10, 2007, at 6:25 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Thanks David! I could not find a ServerUrl attribute in
ResourceAdapterWrapper gbean. Do we need to add one? If yes, how
Hi All,
We need to make some additional [1] changes to the server to run
multiple instances of geronimo:
1. By default i.e. bin\startup will start the server with a name (i1 or
something).
2.A pristine copy of var and deploy (empty directory) will be
maintained at G_HOME, which could be used to
without starting the default server? When
is the extraction done?
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 9, 2007, at 2:49 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
3. The shutdown config is using var/temp/jline.dll. We should be
able
to use a single copy of jline.dll. Where
/..
Any idea how to make this configurable?
Thanks
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I get following exception while starting an instance of g using
port
61626 instead of 61616
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2612?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12487259
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2612:
--
Applied the fix from trunk (http://svn.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011:
-
Attachment: assemblies.patch
1. This patch will allow us to run multiple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-3011:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0-M4)
2.0-M5
Affects
I also ended up using the same application. Here are my
observations:
1. The Pool deployment using deploy New after minor modification to
InventoryPool.xml worked. The App worked fine.
2. When the pool was deployed using DBPool wizard, the app deployed
fine, accessing /inventory threw the
--- David Blevins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 1, 2007, at 5:43 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
snip
You can configure it by adding the property admin.port=number to
the o.a.o.loader.SystemInstance or to the system properties
When running multiple instances of Geronimo an exception is thrown
during startup:
..
admin thread 127.0.0.1 4200: Service failed to start.: Address already
in use: JVM_Bind
.
Please see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-3044:
Assignee: Anita Kulshreshtha
Common Libs portlet does not split
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485883
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3044:
--
Fixed in trunk rev 524588. Thanks Jay!
Common Libs
Done in rev. 524055.
Thanks
Anita
--- Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do we still have both of these modules? Looks like geronimo-web-
builder is commented out of the build. Can we remove it?
--jason
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485506
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-2898:
--
This patch seems to be missing a java file.
Can't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485531
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3044:
--
some nit picking...
As you noticed the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha reassigned GERONIMO-2898:
Assignee: Anita Kulshreshtha
Patch Applied to trunk rev 524356. Thanks
Congratulations John!!! I wish you and your family the very best.
Anita
--- John Sisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 27th of March at 11am I became the proud father of our
first
child, a baby girl, Jasmine Mae Sisson, weighing 3.6 kilos ( 7.92
pounds).
Lisa and Jasmine are doing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485310
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011:
--
Openejb is using a hard coded value of 4200
Is this being used in Geronimo?
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12485310
]
Anita Kulshreshtha commented on GERONIMO-3011
Congratulations Rakesh!
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Rakesh Midha has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo
committer. Rakesh has contributed a number of significant
enhancements to our
Congratulations Donald!
Anita
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
The Geronimo PMC is pleased to announce that Donald Woods has
recently accepted our invitation to become an Apache Geronimo
committer. Donald has been a long-term contributor to the Geronimo
project and
On Mar 22, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I'm starting to look at the end of the month release. I wanted to
get some feedback on where everyone thinks we're at. I'm starting
to look at outstanding snapshots and the like. For the end of this
month I'd like to cut a branch on Mon
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, we're establishing this
internal connection to ActiveMQ without specifying a port number (and
activemq is defaulting).
This seems more likely... (rev 521546)
Or, we're using the wrong port number.
Server reports the correct port
I am trying to run G with a different set of ports. The RMI Naming
port is set to 1099 in config.xml by default. The following code in
RMIRegistryService appears to be causing some problems:
registry = LocateRegistry.createRegistry(port);
Even though the port is passed as a parameter, the
Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: ActiveMQ, naming, OpenEJB
Affects Versions: 2.0-beta1
Environment: All
Reporter: Anita Kulshreshtha
Assigned To: Anita Kulshreshtha
Priority: Minor
Fix
The org.apache.activeio.journal.active.lockMap is set to
GERONIMO-HOME\var\activemq\journal\control.dat. Should this be set to
GERONIMO_BASE\var\activemq\journal\control.dat? The GERONIMO_BASE is
now known as org.apache.geronimo.server.dir (?).
Thanks
Anita
I get following exception while starting an instance of g using port
61626 instead of 61616. Where is 61616 coming from?
Thanks
Anita
Starting Geronimo Application Server v2.0-SNAPSHOT
[* ] 34% 18s Starting
org.apache.geronim...10:27:08,953 ERROR [
CONGRATULATIONS PRASAD!
Cheers
Anita
On Mar 22, 2007, at 10:22 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hi All,
Please welcome Prasad Kashyap as the newest member of the Geronimo
PMC. We're very happy to have him joining us to help with the
oversight of the Geronimo project.
Way to go
If multiple instances of geronimo share the same domain name should
they be registered with J2EEDomain?
Thanks
Anita
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo!
--- Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 22, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
I get following exception while starting an instance of g using
port
61626 instead of 61616. Where is 61616 coming from?
Hi Anita,
61616 is the ActiveMQ's default port. So
Is anyone else seeing this portlet error upon starting the console
(rev 521546) ? The Exception trace is below.
Thanks
Anita
Geronimo Application Server started
21:12:47,750 ERROR [welcomeNormal_jsp]] Servlet.service() for servlet
jsp.WEB_002dINF.view
.welcome.welcomeNormal_jsp threw
:25 PM, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
Is anyone else seeing this portlet error upon starting the
console
(rev 521546) ? The Exception trace is below.
Thanks
Anita
Geronimo Application Server started
21:12:47,750 ERROR [welcomeNormal_jsp]] Servlet.service() for
servlet
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think we've been specific enough about what goes where for
jason's proposal to make sense yet, as gianni points out.
I'm sure we don't want all 100K artifacts we produce all under o.a.g
or o.a.g.server
I do not see why
One of the places it happened was in daytrader config. The following
path is 256 + 5:
C:\geronimo\geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.2-SNAPSHOT\repository\org\apache\geronimo\daytrader\day
trader-jetty-streamer-client\1.2-SNAPSHOT\daytrader-jetty-streamer-client-1.2-SNAPSHOT.car
Congratulations Jarek!
Anita
--- Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Sorry Jarek! Mea Culpa!
Folks, We're pleased to let you know that we have a new committer in
our midst. Jarek Gawor has been active on the Web Services
integration
for Geronimo for quite some time and has
--- David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks to me as if we are well on our way to use the groupId of
org.apache.geronimo.plugins for both maven plugins and geronimo
plugins. This might not be the wisest thing we ever did.
What if we changed the maven plugins to use
, Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
1.0 is coming from tranql (see below).
Thanks
Anita
Path to dependency:
1)
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-connector-builder:jar:2.0-SNAPSH
T
2) org.tranql:tranql:jar:1.4.1
3)
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-j2ee
1.0 is coming from tranql (see below).
Thanks
Anita
Path to dependency:
1)
org.apache.geronimo.modules:geronimo-connector-builder:jar:2.0-SNAPSH
T
2) org.tranql:tranql:jar:1.4.1
3)
org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-j2ee-connector_1.5_spec:jar:1.0
--- Jason Dillon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2916:
-
Fix Version/s: 2.0-beta1
Assignee: Anita Kulshreshtha
Fixed in trunk
I would love to be there.. You probably don't want me to hack ws
related code :)
Thanks
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's excellent. Let me see what I can drum up for a place to do
this. Anita, are you up for a few days next week ?
On Mar 14, 2007, at 9:34
I have found that a car is being used twice as a dependency once with
a scope test and once with provided. An example is connector-deployer
car in system-database config. Is this necessary?
Thanks
Anita
The Database Pool wizard generates console.dbpool as groupId for the
generated rar. The version is always 1.0. I think the groupId should be
o.a.g.something and the version should match geronimo's version.
Suggestions?
Thanks
Anita
David J,
I want to make sure that I have not overlooked anything.. Things seem
to be working with these changes. They are waiting for your blessing..
Thanks
Anita
--- Anita Kulshreshtha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I added connector-deployer as a 'import classes' dependency of
jsr88-rar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anita Kulshreshtha updated GERONIMO-2916:
-
Attachment: configs.diff
David J, I am attaching the patch. I have tested
I have seen this while building geronimo-kernel...
Anita
--- Sachin Patel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have people noticed this message during the build (though it doesn't
cause a build failure).. I also get it every time when deploying
projects to G2.0 using the eclipse-plugin.
Should geronimo-axis2 be using this?
dependency
groupIdjavax.activation/groupId
artifactIdactivation/artifactId
/dependency
Thanks
Anita
--- Joe Bohn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is the problem that's been
301 - 400 of 1462 matches
Mail list logo
