Hey Dave,
for some reason my reply never went out.
This is great, let's keep it here on GMOxDEV while you still working on it and
then we'll see how to include/move over the 2.1 doc.
Cheers!
Hernan
David Jencks wrote:
I started a page on new plugin stuff over here...
On Nov 10, 2007 2:42 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I started a page on new plugin stuff over here... http://
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Plugin+Guide
Yay! I just meant to ask about such a guide. Awesome.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
I thought I'd tried this but now it works!!
thanks
david jencks
On Nov 9, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
Try $\{foo\}
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:42:35
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release
On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:17 PM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Hey y'all,
I started to map some of the new features/functions to the 2.1
documentation.
I just created a new wiki space http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21
and created some initial entries. Pls chime in with your ideas for
topics to cover
I started a page on new plugin stuff over here... http://
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Plugin+Guide
(next time maybe I'll look at where you want it :-( )
I can't figure out how to get ${foo} to display without confluence
thinking its a macro so any help there would be great.
Try $\{foo\}
--jason
-Original Message-
From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 17:42:35
To:dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] 2.1 Release
I started a page on new plugin stuff over here... http://
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDEV/Plugin
Hey y'all,
I started to map some of the new features/functions to the 2.1 documentation.
I just created a new wiki space http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC21
and created some initial entries. Pls chime in with your ideas for topics to
cover but don't stop just there,
feel free to start working out
On Nov 6, 2007, at 1:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/
improvements
- GShell
I thought of a couple more things we might consider trying to get
into 2.1.
1. get rid of gbean proxies in gbean references. IIRC Dain did some
experiments long ago and this resulted in a noticeable speedup. The
problem at that time was that it broke the admin console. I think
the
On Nov 6, 2007, at 11:35 AM, David Jencks wrote:
1. get rid of gbean proxies in gbean references. IIRC Dain did
some experiments long ago and this resulted in a noticeable
speedup. The problem at that time was that it broke the admin
console. I think the main breakage was that attribute
On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/improvements
- GShell
Are there any other GShell-related bits which we want to get into the
release?
--jason
On Nov 6, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
On Nov 5, 2007, at 6:45 AM, Hernan Cunico wrote:
Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/improvements
- GShell
Are there any other GShell-related bits which we
On 11/1/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release.
There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure.
There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good
to get a release out, with
Agreed, we seem to have enough new stuff to call for a release.
Here is a list trying to consolidate these new functions/improvements
- GShell
- Console enhancements (dep plan generation, grouping/collapsing?)
- Monitoring
- Plugin infrastructure
- Pluggable console
- Security
- Configuration
Gianny,
Since there are multiple clustering implementations going on at the same
time, could you please keep us aprised of what you are doing so we don't
clash?
Thanks,
Jeff
Gianny Damour wrote:
Hi,
I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think this
will be completed
Hi,
I resumed this week-end some work on clustered deployment. I think
this will be completed in about 2-3 weeks. This will allow
distribute, uninstall, start, stop, et cetera of configurations to a
cluster as a single logic operation. I am keen to get this change in
for 2.1, if it does
Hi,
What I am doing does not rely on any clustering implementation. This
is how it will work:
1. User configures a cluster and a set of nodes belonging to it. You
can expect this type of GBeans:
!-- Cluster confuguration --
gbean name=ClusterInfo
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release.
There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure.
There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good
to get a release out, with these capabilities. They provide a more
solid
On Nov 1, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1
release.
There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin
infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console
enhancements. It would be good to get a release out,
Kevan Miller wrote:
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1 release.
There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin infrastructure.
There's also been the pluggable console enhancements. It would be good
to get a release out, with these capabilities. They
I think the following two issues should be fixed for 2.1:
1) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3502 - this prevents
a single assembly to have both cxf and axis2 installed (which we
supported in 2.0.x)
2) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3523 - can't do
certain actions
On Nov 1, 2007, at 1:00 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:
I think it's time to start discussing the particulars of a 2.1
release.
There's been a lot of advancements made in our plugin
infrastructure. There's also been the pluggable console
enhancements. It would be good to get a release out, with
Yep. It's time !
I really want to see how flexibly the user community will actually
build their servers.
I also wish we'd all spend some extra time and effort to check for
security issues in the server in general and in our individual domain
of expertise, in particular.
Cheers
Prasad
On
23 matches
Mail list logo
