This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
Thanks
Anita
dependencies
!--
This dependency is here to ensure that absolutely nothing
under the container module
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:03 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
I haven't investigate thoroughly, but I believe that this is an easy
way to make sure that if any container module references any
On Jan 26, 2007, at 11:45 AM, David Jencks wrote:
On Jan 26, 2007, at 8:03 AM, anita kulshreshtha wrote:
This is a fragment from openejb3/server's pom.xml. Could someone
please explain how this works?
I haven't investigate thoroughly, but I believe that this is an
easy way to make
On Jan 26, 2007, at 1:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
so whats the stacktrace with -X? is this geronimo or maven
complaining? Is this pom in your local repo? If so is it
timestamped or -SNAPSHOT?
Maybe... just maybe we're getting closer :-)
Sorry, was on my way out the door...
This
Thanks David! openejb-core still has dependency on
openejb-persistence:
dependency
groupIdorg.apache.openejb/groupId
artifactIdopenejb-persistence/artifactId
version${pom.version}/version
/dependency
The openejb-persistence module has been deleted from the source (rev
Here's what seems to be the relevant section from the -X trace:
[DEBUG] Artifact not found - using stub model: System is offline.
org.apache.openejb:container:pom:3.0-incubating-20070126.103431-20
[DEBUG] Using defaults for missing POM
Anita figured out that replacing ${pom.version} with 3.0-incubating-
SNAPSHOT in openejb server pom fixes this problem. It turns out that
jason dillon previously ran into this problem in geronimo and
replaced all ${pom.version} in our poms with our own defined variable
${version}.
I'm
I've opened http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-2796 to describe my
understanding of what's going on.
There are at least 7 other maven issues that describe similar
problems. I'd appreciate it if everyone affected by this problem
could vote on this issue and maybe add comments.
Now I'll
Now I've updated the openejb poms and attempted to deploy an openejb
snapshot.
The openejb deploy breaks when it gets to the samples but this is
apparently expected and means the deploy succeeded.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 26, 2007, at 3:53 PM, David Jencks wrote:
I've opened
Hi,
I have two CMPs with a 1:n relationship.
CMP1 - Order - PK = OrderPK which has a single field orderId
CMP2 - OrderItem = OrderItemPk which has 2 fields InventoryId and order_orderId
OrderId and order_orderId are mapped
When i do a setOrder_orderId in the ejbCreate of OrderItem geronimo
gives
Hi,
I am surpised that OrderItem.setOrder_orderId gives an error. Could you
please provide the stack trace (the TranQL part + the first OpenEJB
element) along with the DDs?
FWIW, there are a couple of integration tests for CMP and CMR overlap
scenarios in the OpenEJB tree:
sub-project:
Hi Aaron,
I'm happy to cut a 1.2.2 TranQL release tomorrow night. However, and as
pointed out by Manu, there was also an OpenEJB impact. So, it seems that
we also need to re-cut an OpenEJB release. So far, I have checked in the
fix to trunk and I will port the fix to the v2_0 branch if we
Hi Manu,
Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder,
which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the number
of primary key fields.
This is now fixed.
I will create a JIRA to track this issue tomorrow as it seems that JIRA
is down tonight.
Thanks,
Hi Gianny
Great to know its fixed. Will try it out after building geronimo from source.
Thanks
ManuOn 12/13/05, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu,Thanks for your debugging! This was a bug in IdentityDefinerBuilder,which was wrongly trying to identify a compound PK based on the
Gianny,
Did the fix go into TranQL? Geronimo 1.0 is not using a TranQL
snapshot right now, so someone would need to cut a new TranQL release
for us to get the fix into Geronimo 1.0.
Thanks,
Aaron
On 12/13/05, Gianny Damour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Manu,
Thanks for your debugging!
Hi Manu,
This was a simple TranQL fix. So, you simply need to build TranQL and
drop it in your repo (you do not need a full rebuild of Geronimo).
Thanks,
Gianny
Manu George wrote:
Hi Gianny
Great to know its fixed. Will try it out after building geronimo from
source.
Thanks
Manu
On
Hi Gianny,
I get it.But the problem is if I put this jar in the repo
of my existing Geronimo Instance it fails to start due to
de-serialisation problems.
org.apache.geronimo.kernel.config.InvalidConfigException: Could not extract gbean data from configuation
at
Hi Gianny,
I have done all that you mentioned. I am still getting the error.I have
replicated the issue in a simple EJB,the example CMP in Ed Roman's book Mastering EJB. I am attaching the stack trace
and the plans below
17:02:05,211 WARN [SystemExceptionInterceptor] Product
Hi Manu,
This method is always supposed to get a String value.
When a custom primary key is used, its type must be declared in the
ejb-jar.xml DD via the prim-key-class element. Also, the primkey-field
elements in both the ejb-jar.xml DD and openejb-jar.xml DD must not be
set; these elements
Hi,
I am facing a problem with some
CMP EJBs with custom PrimaryKey Classes. I am getting the EJBs deployed
but during invoking of the findbyprimarykey method I am getting a
TransactionRolledBack Exception. On investigating the cause of this I
found that it was due to a ClassCastException that
Hi,
In the class org.openejb.deployment.AbstractContainerBuilder there is a method
protected SoftLimitedInstancePool createInstancePool(InstanceFactory instanceFactory) {
return new SoftLimitedInstancePool(instanceFactory, 1);
}
What pool is this? Is this the pool of Enterprise bean
On Nov 17, 2005, at 4:35 AM, Manu George wrote:
Hi,
In the class
org.openejb.deployment.AbstractContainerBuilder there is a method
protected SoftLimitedInstancePool createInstancePool
(InstanceFactory instanceFactory) {
return new
22 matches
Mail list logo
