On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
Here's a short note on our status.
I've uploaded our RMI/IIOP mapping to JIRA (GERONIMO-1539) as
I
will get the code out.
Hope that helps
Carl.
-Original Message-
From: Kresten Krab Thorup (Trifork) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 8:54 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
On Jan 18, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera
Hello, I would like to contribute to this project. Please let me know what I can do to get involved.Thanks,AshOn 1/25/06, Trieloff, Carl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:The IONA contributions will be a full working version of
ORB and transport - the work will be on XML Schema - IDLtooling and
On Jan 22, 2006, at 2:02 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote, On 1/21/2006 5:09 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a
CORBA server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.
I understand it differently. In the Proper
: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:56 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Adi,
Is this a show stopper for you?
Technical decisions are taken after the community is bootstrapped. The
incoming code bases may be used or may even be thrown out completely
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a CORBA
server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.
I understand it differently. In the Proper usage of OMG trademarks and
logos section, it specifically states:
Do not use OMG Marks as all or part of a product
On Jan 21, 2006, at 5:09 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a CORBA
server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.
I understand it differently. In the Proper usage of OMG trademarks
and logos section, it
Anders Hessellund Jensen (Trifork) wrote, On 1/21/2006 5:09 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Its name isn't CORBA Server. It is being characterized as a CORBA
server, which IIUC is perfectly legal.
I understand it differently. In the Proper usage of OMG trademarks and
logos section, it
Trieloff, Carl wrote:
One thing I just realized is that we don't want the sub-project to
show up as being called CORBA Server. CORBA is trademarked by the
OMG and that would be an infringement. Thus we can't use CORBA in the name
of the project due to this trademark, so I would suggest
Hi AllI would like to work on this project. Please let me know how can I invilve in this.Best RegardsThushanthaOn 1/18/06, Alan D. Cabrera
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:That would be great.
Regards,AlanMatt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM: Are there any people on the Harmony project that might
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Adi,
Is this a show stopper for you?
Technical decisions are taken after the community is bootstrapped. The
incoming code bases may be used or may even be thrown out completely.
Certainly there is no diktat on having to use specific
5:56 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Adi,
Is this a show stopper for you?
Technical decisions are taken after the community is bootstrapped. The
incoming code bases may be used or may even be thrown out completely.
Certainly
I'm interested in working on the ORB. My specific areas of interest are in
object copying and marshalling. Alan, can you add me to the list of interested
parties?
Rick McGuire wrote:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
On 1/20/2006 4:57 AM, Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote:
Trieloff, Carl wrote:
One thing I just realized is that we don't want the sub-project to
show up as being called CORBA Server. CORBA is trademarked by the OMG
and that would be an infringement. Thus we can't use CORBA in the name
of the
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
I'm interested in assisting with this. I was wrote the adapter code
that allowed IBM's WAS CE product to work with the IBM JDK ORB. This
required developing a pretty good understanding of
Alan,
I do have a question about the initial committer list. Since I'm relatively new
to Apache my understanding was that commit was based on previous work. Many of
the names on the list are new to me so I have not had an opportunity to work
with them. Are all the suggested names currently
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished sentence in the document. In the Initial
Source section it says:
As a side benefit the XMLShema API will also
I'd quite like to be involved in this. I wrote the WebLogic ORB.
andy
At 01:31 PM 1/19/2006, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
Alan,
I do have a question about the initial committer list. Since I'm
relatively new to Apache my understanding was that commit was based
on previous work. Many of the names
@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished sentence in the document. In the Initial
Source section it says
Anders Hessellund Jensen wrote, On 1/19/2006 7:48 AM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished sentence in the document. In the Initial
Source section
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 10:48 AM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
There is a half-finished
This is a good question. Do we have any Apache sages to provide any
guidance?
IIUC, non-commiters get commit privs but must prove themselves during
incubation, i.e. they could get their commit privs taken away.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/19/2006 5:31 AM:
Alan,
I do have a
that this combination would
help get things started and also attract other developers to the
project.
Adi Sakala
-Original Message-
From: Alan D. Cabrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 3:11 PM
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: CORBA incubation proposal
When projects start in incubator, yes - anyone on the initial committer
list is given committer status on the incubating project. Because
Geronimo may/is sponsor/ing this as a subproject, when the incubator
project graduates, all committers become Geronimo committers.
You can see an example
On Jan 18, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
Looks fine to me.
Should this also get sent to the incubator list or do we wait until
after the vote?
On Jan 18, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 18, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
Looks fine to me.
agreed.
Should this also get
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
On Jan 18, 2006, at 2:39 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we vote on it?
Looks fine to me.
Should this also get sent to the incubator list or do we wait
Are there any people on the Harmony project that might (are) interested in an
ORB? Seems like prime territory for them.
Otherwise it looks good.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/CorbaProposal
Does anyone have any comments before we
That would be great.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM:
Are there any people on the Harmony project that might (are) interested
in an ORB? Seems like prime territory for them.
Otherwise it looks good.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
That would be great.
Regards,
Alan
Matt Hogstrom wrote, On 1/18/2006 6:29 PM:
Are there any people on the Harmony project that might (are) interested
in an ORB? Seems like prime territory for them.
Otherwise it looks good.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Here is the incubation proposal
30 matches
Mail list logo
