Re: Changing the httpd security process

+1 > On Aug 20, 2020, at 9:24 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 12:08:35PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: >> This roughly reverts the httpd process to what we used prior to adopting >> the Tomcat-esque policy for the whole ASF. We would have to document >> this and possibly need it ap

Re: [Vote] Overhaul modules.apache.org

On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:21 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > [ ] +1: I support this proposal +1 ...and whatever you want to do with the old site is fine by me. What level of traffic are we seeing on it? Shouldn't we just make a clean break and respond to any URL into the old database with a 410 Go

Re: [VOTE] accept mod_macro as standard module in httpd

On Jan 2, 2013, at 6:06 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > Pending IP clearance... > > [+1] accept mod_macro as a standard module and responsibility for its > maintenance > [ +/- 0] don't care won't help > [ -1] don't accept mod_macro as a standard module +1 S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp:

Re: [RE-VOTE] adoption of mod_firehose MODULE

On Mar 1, 2012, at 10:11 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Let's simply reset this whole mess. > > A proposal to adopt mod_firehose is attached. > > [X] Option 1: adopt as trunk module > [ ] Option 2: adopt only as subproject > [ ] Option 3: do not adopt Dimpled chad: I would support option

Re: ******** Interesting server-status at w.a.o

On Feb 24, 2012, at 3:50 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: > On 24.02.2012 12:12, Steffen wrote: >> Looks like the hanging "L"'s, which I reported way back, which was >> investigated by Stefan > > Could be but not necessarily. It depends on your MaxConnectionsPerChild > setting. The situation at w.a.o is

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

Remember the CHIL engine cleanup was fixed to prevent a dangling cleanup function pointer... I forget which OpenSSL version got that fix but in any case RH only recently backported it. I'm sure I didn't test with any proxy config at the time. S. -- Sander Temme san...@temme.net

Re: Segfault in openssl's err_cmp when using SSLCryptoDevice and new SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile

On Jan 18, 2012, at 8:40 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > All; > I stumbled across this yesterday and was hoping some of our more > experienced openssl developers may be able to offer suggestions on how I > can track this down. I've been testing on 2.2.21 though the code should > be the same in trun

Re: Time for 2.4.0 GA??

On Jan 12, 2012, at 2:24 AM, Steffen wrote: > We have at least 4 hard bugs in 2.3.16. Known for a long time, and no need > to exposure more for these. Are they listed in STATUS under the Release Showstoppers section? That currently only lists the need to remove undocumented modules as show

Re: Style violations

On Jan 9, 2012, at 11:35 AM, André Malo wrote: > Here it's 80 chars (actually I'm use 78 personally) both about putting > multiple editors side by side and keeping diffs readable by email clients. I'm in much the same mode: multiple 80 char wide windows side-by-side. I would favor keeping th

Re: svn commit: r1228700 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs: STATUS manual/mod/mod_heartbeat.xml manual/mod/mod_heartmonitor.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml.meta

On Jan 7, 2012, at 1:08 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> hook handler prototypes are? That's more like developer documentation. >> Thoughts? > > I don't know about the history of similar decisions, but IMHO what you wrote > is good enough for 2.4.0. Sounds good. >>> +The interval of 1 seconds is

Fwd: svn commit: r1228700 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/docs: STATUS manual/mod/mod_heartbeat.xml manual/mod/mod_heartmonitor.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml manual/mod/mod_watchdog.xml.meta

Folks, I've put in some updates to the mod_heart* modules, taken from the README supplied with the modules and some perusal of the source code. I have not run these as I'm too lazy to set up the servers. Review would be appreciated, especially by the original authors (Cc), before backport to

Re: remove mod_heart* from 2.4?(was: 2.4.0 GA This week?)

On Jan 2, 2012, at 8:09 PM, Eric Covener wrote: > I will crank out docs for these tomorrow and ping paul to review. Thank you for getting this going: it seems to be the most constructive way to resolve this issue. S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: FC

Re: Time for httpd 2.4.0-RC1 ??

On Dec 11, 2011, at 6:01 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Now that apu-1.4.1 is close to release, it looks like we are > close to being able to have our 1st RC for 2.4.0... > > My plan is to T&R sometime this week... +1, let's do it. S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander

Re: Proposal: adoption of mod_firehose subproject

On Dec 13, 2011, at 7:19 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: > - mod_firehose: "tcpdump for httpd" +1 on adopting. S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp://www.temme.net/sander/ PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: BRANCHED : httpd 2.4.x

On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:42 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > The 2.4.x httpd branch was created from the r1200449 point of > trunk… I've tried to backport pretty much all non-apreq patches > from trunk. I have added version 2.4-HEAD to Bugzilla. As well as 2.3.15-beta... S. -- scte...@apache.org

Re: Server Process Pool Behavior

On Nov 11, 2011, at 1:21 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> 2011/11/11 Torsten Förtsch : >>> On Friday, 11 November 2011 20:09:09 Jason Gionta wrote: While I expect the count to increment by one after each request. It seems like if there

Re: svn commit: r1200993 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/docs/manual/platform: windows.html.en windows.xml windows.xml.ko

On Nov 11, 2011, at 9:48 AM, cove...@apache.org wrote: > - INSTALLDIR (default "ProgramFilesFolder\Apache > Software Foundation\Apache2.2\") > + INSTALLDIR (default "ProgramFilesFolder\Apache > Software Foundation\Apache2.3\") Shouldn't those things be something like '2.4' on the bra

Re: [VOTE] Formal deprecation of 2.0.x branch

On Nov 11, 2011, at 8:49 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Stealing a plan executed by Colm for 1.3, I'd like to propose that > we set a two week window following committers' return-from-ApacheCon > to execute any backports "of general interest" and apply important > fixes/backports to pregsub all

Who's at the Hackathon?

Folks, The httpd table now has: Jeff Trawick Jean-Frederic Leclere Stefan Fritsch Rainer Jung and myself Who else is at the conference? Anybody joining tomorrow? Rainer brought a Euro power strip, so this table's going to be right popular. (: S. -- scte...@apache.orghttp://www.

Re: Survery: how do you use httpd?

On Oct 31, 2011, at 12:56 AM, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > On 31 October 2011 18:24, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 10/31/2011 2:19 AM, Sander Temme wrote: >>> Dear Apache developers/users, >>> >>> I have created a quick survey to see how YOU use Apac

Survery: how do you use httpd?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Apache developers/users, I have created a quick survey to see how YOU use Apache and what is important to you: http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/HFGDY3C It's only eight questions, and there's only one matrix! Shouldn't take but a minute to fil

Re: 2.0.65 and 2.3.15-dev

On Oct 27, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Still hoping to get these out, esp getting the ball rolling for > an actual 2.4.0 GA by ApacheCon… > > There is a "hold up" due to an issue which may need to be > fixed/addressed and that's the reason for the delay... Thanks Jim, I was just c

Re: Next update

On Aug 31, 2011, at 7:20 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > We must advise that 1.3 is not affected, per our further research, > although we can note that the default configuration (MaxClients etc) > may already be inappropriate in any number of distributions, and > remind administrators to tune th

Re: Half-baked subprojects

On Aug 11, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote: >> +1 to "component" of libapreq2 under apache-httpd2. Is that an infra >> ticket or do some folks here have access? > > Done. IMHO the PMC chair should have the Bugzilla karma to do this. > If you don't have it, please ask infra to gra

Reminder: TAC Assistance to ApacheCon NA 2011 closes July 8th

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Just a friendly (and final) reminder that applications for financial help to attend ApacheCon NA 2011 in Vancouver close this coming Friday 8th July (2200 BST : UTC+1). Financial assistance is available for Travel (planes, trains, whateve

Travel Assistance applications now open for ApacheCon NA 2011

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Apache Software Foundation (ASF)'s Travel Assistance Committee (TAC) is now accepting applications for ApacheCon North America 2011, 7-11 November in Vancouver BC, Canada. The TAC is seeking individuals from the Apache community at-large --users,

Re: about ApacheBench

On Apr 23, 2011, at 6:48 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 4/23/2011 8:10 AM, Atsushi Ishii wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It's first time to post here. >> Recently, I'm developing new function regarding ApacheBench(ab). >> Present ApacheBench supports only single URL. >> New function which I'm developin

Presentations on 2.4 in Vancouver?

All, Are any of you planning to submit a session proposal for ApacheCon in Vancouver that covers 2.4? Surely it will have been released by then... Perhaps a session on what's New and Important? Or one on migrating from legacy releases to the latest, greatest? We have until the end of next

Re: problem w/ apache 2.2.3 under redhat 5.6 (kernel 2.6.18)

ibe to the list, so answers by direct mail is preferred. Thank you, Martin -- Sander Temmescte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: STATUS proposal for 2.2.x

nk patch was applied in > r1039304. Committed in r1043835. Haven't reviewed it. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: [RELEASE CANDIDATE] libapreq2 2.13 RC

fails: configure looks for apr-util which does not exist. I don't see this as a blocker. +1 S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: Proposed: PKI Authentication for secure web access

;> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/ssl/ssl_howto.html#allclients >> >> Issac >> > > -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: [RFC] Error directive to generate custom error messages from httpd.conf

writing a config snippet to be installed along with some > application/module/static files could add a config time check using > IfModule and use the Error directive. > > Were you thinking of something else? That sounds familiar, yes, S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP

Re: [RFC] Error directive to generate custom error messages from httpd.conf

NIT_TAKE1("UnDefine", unset_define, NULL, RSRC_CONF, > "Undefine the existence of a variable. Undo a Define."), > +AP_INIT_RAW_ARGS("Error", set_error, NULL, OR_ALL, > + "Generate error message from within configuration"), > AP_INIT_RAW_

Re: Patch for mod_ssl

"(theoretically shouldn't happen!)"); > +"(SSLEngine On should go in the VirtualHost, not in global > scope.)"); > ssl_die(); > } > } > > > > -- > Rich Bowen > rbo...@rcbowen.com > > -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: ApacheCon httpd MeetUp

On Oct 23, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Sander Temme wrote: > As part of ApacheCon in Atlanta, the HTTP Server Project will have a MeetUp. > This MeetUp is freely accessible for all. If you're in Atlanta, whether for > ApacheCon or because you live there, please join us to discuss the

ApacheCon httpd MeetUp

m TBD Please let us know if you would like to come. S. - -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMw4cZAAoJEJu4Y7D1G7i

Re: [vote] bump mod_ftp rev for next tag?

On Sep 24, 2010, at 11:02 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > [ ] Vote on a 0.9.7 tarball as beta or GA > [+1] Bump to 1.0.0 and vote on tarball for GA -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A View my availability: http://tungle.me/sctemme

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.3.8 (alpha)

On Aug 28, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Sander Temme wrote: > Decent tests. Even more decent: Linux surtur 2.6.32-24-generic #41-Ubuntu SMP Thu Aug 19 01:38:40 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux All tests successful. Files=91, Tests=3362, 79 wallclock secs ( 2.31 usr 0.40 sys + 40.61 cusr 6.00 c

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.3.8 (alpha)

ot; \ "--enable-proxy-connect=shared" \ "--enable-proxy-ftp=shared" \ "--enable-proxy-http=shared" \ "--enable-proxy-fcgi=shared" \ "--enable-proxy-ajp=shared" \ "--enable-proxy-balancer=shared" \ "--enable-ssl=shared" \ "--enable-optional-hook-export=shared" \ "--enable-optional-hook-import=shared" \ "--enable-optional-fn-import=shared" \ "--enable-optional-fn-export=shared" \ "--enable-dialup=shared" \ "--enable-suexec=shared" \ "--enable-dav-lock=shared" \ "--enable-lua=shared" \ "--enable-slotmem-plain=shared" \ "--with-ssl=/usr/local" \ "CFLAGS=-DDEBUG -O0 -DDYNAMIC_MODULE_LIMIT=128" \ "$@" -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: [PRERELEASE TARBALLS] httpd-2.3.8

s reasoning, we should put libz in the dependencies since mod_deflate is part of the default "most" complement. However, unless someone (not me) comes up with the autofoo to build libz in absence of a viable installed copy, we can let the mod_deflate autoconf soft fail like it does tod

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.2.16

t; On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 11:45 AM, Paul Querna wrote: >> Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.2.16 are available at: >> <http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/> >> >> Your votes please; >> >> +/- 1 >> [ ] Release httpd-2.2.16 >> >> Vote clos

Re: 2.3 upgrade on apache.org

eem rational to leave such an unintuitive choice up to > the > novice/beginning user. > > Comments? > > -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: A 2.3.7 this month?

off 2.4.x. +1. What constitutes internal testing? Paul's work to upgrade www.a.o? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: A 2.3.7 this month?

Would OSCON be a good moment to branch 2.4.x? Or aren't we there yet? Are the issues between us and branching in STATUS? S. -- Sander Temme san...@temme.net Sent from my phone On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > Hi, > > what do you think about releasin

Re: STATUS: * RFC 2616 violations.

On Jun 4, 2010, at 9:07 AM, Igor Galić wrote: > n.b.: I only have commit on docs, so I couldn't actually put that in place Committed in r951477. Thanks for going through these. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: What's next for 2.2 and 2.3/trunk?

On Jun 3, 2010, at 8:45 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 6/3/2010 9:59 AM, Sander Temme wrote: >> >> On Jun 3, 2010, at 7:15 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>>> PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility should not be >>>> a p

Use cases for httpd?

e than we might think. We could launch an e-mail discussion, or setup a Survey Monkey (but keep it SHORT!!!) or something like that. Thoughts? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: What's next for 2.2 and 2.3/trunk?

ing trunk either, due to our track record ;) Are we ready to freeze the API? I think that's our Alpha -> Beta transition point. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: FC5A 6FC6 2E25 2DFD 8007 EE23 9BB8 63B0 F51B B88A

Re: Module build defaults for trunk

> individual modules. > > I wonder whether some notion of "most" would be a better build default - but > maybe not enabling the built modules by default. > > So there would be "most" (default), "all" and "minimal". > > Before act

Re: What's next for 2.2 and 2.3/trunk?

think we have enough to release for users to chew on: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html PHP should largely move to FastCGI, so module compatibility should not be a problem. Any idea about other popular modules? WSGI? mod_perl? Are they ready for HEAD? S. -- Sander Temme

Re: Fast by default

proving the documentation is especially good, since it ships with every server. I believe you have already started working on that: good idea. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: Alpha of 2.3.6 next week

Jim, 2.3.6 will be tagged next week. 2.3.7 will follow afterwards. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: RFC: drop support for OpenSSL < 1.0 in trunk/2.3?

gt; allows for 0.9.[87] varieties... Would it reduce the complexity of the autofoo behind it enough to justify the increase in complexity for the user^Wbuilder? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: Alpha of 2.3.6 next week

ast alpha? I'm sorry, I've had blackouts covering this list. What were their concerns? Were they discussed on this list? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: RFC: drop support for OpenSSL < 1.0 in trunk/2.3?

-free with OpenSSL >= 0.9.8 > - support and build with OpenSSL >= 0.9.7a, albeit with (harmless) > compiler warnings about argument const-ness all over the shop > - drop support for OpenSSL < 0.9.7a > - drop support for non-OpenSSL/derivatives of OpenSSL +1 across the board. S.

Re: Fast by default

him to lay any golden performance eggs. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: RFC: drop support for OpenSSL < 1.0 in trunk/2.3?

who issues the FIPS standards. When this is ready to be merged to httpd and apr, it's ready. Not before, there is a security policy document for openssl's implementation which must be adhered to." Using FIPS 140-2 certified hardware to protect the RSA private keys for websites generally happens mostly transparently through OpenSSL Engines, of which I can tell you that one, CHIL, works perfectly fine in 1.0.0. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: [PATCH] Support compiling httpd against APR/apr-util 1.x when buildconf against 2.x/trunk

=== > --- buildconf (revision 949455) > +++ buildconf (working copy) > @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ >$apr_src_dir/build/find_apr.m4 build > if [ $apr_major_version -lt 2 ] ; then > cp $apu_src_dir/build/find_apu.m4 build > +else > +

[Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010

accepted, and will close on the 7th July 2010. Good luck to all those that will apply. You are welcome to tweet, blog as appropriate. Regards, The Travel Assistance Committee. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

[Travel Assistance] - Applications Open for ApacheCon NA 2010

accepted, and will close on the 7th July 2010. Good luck to all those that will apply. You are welcome to tweet, blog as appropriate. Regards, The Travel Assistance Committee. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: svn commit: r945879 - /httpd/test/framework/trunk/t/modules/info.t

On May 23, 2010, at 7:13 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > This seems to fail with non shared builds of mpms: How can the Test framework find out whether the MPM has been built shared? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

nd send the result to the list. If the backported patch materially differs from the revision changes in trunk, I'd suggest either publishing a patch against 2.2.x HEAD somewhere (anywhere) or attaching it to your patch for STATUS. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Stop accepting PRs for 1.3?

Crowd, Since we have released our last release, how about we close the Apache httpd-1.3 product in Bugzilla for entering new bugs? Say the word and I'll click the clicky in the Bugzilla admin. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

UTF-8 strings through ap_log_cerror()?

Folks, Referring to this exchange: http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-us...@openssl.org/msg60934.html the culprit calling X509_NAME_oneline() is obviously us, around ssl_engine_kernel.c: 1318 in 2.2.x-head. While this code has moved to ssl_engine_log.c in trunk, we're still calling the dep

Re: [Survey] Maintained builds - was Re: httpd trunk, apr/apu 1.4 branches and Linux

le-optional-hook-import=shared" \ "--enable-optional-fn-import=shared" \ "--enable-optional-fn-export=shared" \ "--enable-dialup=shared" \ "--enable-suexec=shared" \ "--enable-dav-lock=shared" Note that this can also pull in an included OpenSSL, but quietly falls back on the system copy if none have been installed under $prefix. I guess I could do this vpath, and I should be able to independently vary the httpd --prefix so I can build multiple httpds when experimenting. But this works. The module complement is what the perl-framework needs. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: HTTP trailers?

coding? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Re: FixedInTrunk keyword?

. S. > Thank you for your time answering my simple question > -Daniel Ruggeri > > -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF

Reminder: ApacheCon NA 2010 HTTP Server Track Call for Participation

ccept session proposals: it merely makes recommendations to the Planning Committee. Key Dates: April 4, 2010: Call for Participation closes May 17, 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection notification November 1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! Sander Temme A

Reminder: ApacheCon NA 2010 HTTP Server Track Call for Participation

ccept session proposals: it merely makes recommendations to the Planning Committee. Key Dates: April 4, 2010: Call for Participation closes May 17, 2010: Speaker Acceptance/Rejection notification November 1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! Sander Temme A

Re: Nod to 2.0, one more time?

2.3 beta and further from any more improvements to 2.0. +1 > Opinions? Volunteers? If there are no objections and no volunteer, > its something I'm happy to do later this week. I'll review the set > of ssl patches tomorrow. I don't think I'd RM but I'll endeavor to

ApacheCon NA 2010 HTTP Server Track Call for Participation

ember 1-5, 2010: ApacheCon NA 2010 We look forward to seeing you in Atlanta! Sander Temme Apache HTTP Server Track Coordinator -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLpxTlAAoJEJu4Y7D1G7iKB64QAKNCzqAor7FYgGZ6pOQfx1Ww 23BnJ8T2TWoMjav31McX7GgMaZK9b5

Re: What happened to mod_lua?

although it seems that documentation is a work in progress. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: State of mod_lua?

your own curiosity (which is a perfectly valid reason), why invent another one? Or am I misreading you? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Fwd: Cron /root/bin/bugcron.sh

Begin forwarded message: > ASF Bugzilla is running its weekly stats at Sun Feb 7 23:08:02 UTC 2010 <..> > 65 bugs for Apache httpd-1.3 Now that we have lowered the boom on 1.3, shall we close it out for new bugs? Anyone have an opinion on the existing open bugs? Uproot them or let the

Re: [VOTE] 1.3.42 release candidate

On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:03 PM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Sander Temme wrote: >> On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: >> >>> There is a 1.3.42 release candidate for testing, and voting, at; >> >> What happe

Re: [VOTE] 1.3.42 release candidate

ror] error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log) -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.5-alpha

Monday January 25 2010. > > This includes a bundle of APR 1.4.2, and APR-Util 1.3.9. I see 4x +1 (Paul, Jeff, Gregg and myself) and no -1s... shall we toss this over the wall? What do we need to do to achieve our goals with this Alpha? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 4

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.5-alpha

On Jan 21, 2010, at 2:34 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > +/- 1 > [+1] Release httpd-2.3.5 as Alpha Sigs good, it unpacks, builds and runs. Set it free. Give the packagers and 3rd party module developers something to play with (PHP5 for instance, does not build). S. -- Sander Temm

Re: next alpha, this Wednesday?

On Jan 20, 2010, at 9:42 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 1/20/2010 10:01 AM, Sander Temme wrote: >> >> And the %lld printf formatter on MacOSX... small, but it does break a test. > > That's fixed on the branch, or no? About to tag 1.4.2. I'm about to get on

Re: next alpha, this Wednesday?

g 1.4.2 [essentially 1.4.1 less > that broken commit] before lunchtime tomorrow. As 1.4.1 saw no -other- > objections than this problem observed at SVN, there's almost no reason > it won't be approved. And the %lld printf formatter on MacOSX... small, but it does break a test. S

Re: next alpha, this Wednesday?

G. Do we have an APR to roll into a *-deps, or are we canning the notion of *-deps until such things solidify? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

We're on Slashdot

http://apache.slashdot.org/story/10/01/12/1359206/Apache-May-Stop-13-20-Series-Releases Quoting this article from Australia: http://www.techworld.com.au/article/332190/apache_mulls_end_1_3_2_0_releases Note: no buzz whatsoever about 2.4. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4

Re: [VOTE] 1.3.42 release candidate

On Jan 8, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Sander Temme wrote: > On Jan 8, 2010, at 4:29 AM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > >> There is a 1.3.42 release candidate for testing, and voting, at; >> >>http://people.apache.org/~colm/1.3.42/ > > Not seeing gpg sigs or md5s on th

Re: [VOTE] 1.3.42 release candidate

s). > > Apache httpd 1.3's "./configure" script does not work with some > versions of "dash". Please change the hash-bang line to execute a > bourne-compatible shell, such as "/bin/bash" on platforms affected. > > Many thanks in advance for your he

Re: httpd meetup/hackathon, January?

gt; meetup/hackathon the week of January 27th 2010, in Silicon Valley. >> >> Alternative is the week of January 13th -- would this earlier date >> change the ability of anyone to attend? > > no difference to me I'd prefer the later time slot. S. -- Sander Temme sct

Re: httpd meetup/hackathon, January?

On Dec 7, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Paul Querna wrote: > I was thinking it might also be a good time to get some httpd'ers > together and spend a day finishing 2.4, and cross-pollinate ideas with > the TS developers. +1 Count me in. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.4-alpha

On Nov 30, 2009, at 1:12 PM, "William A. Rowe Jr." clan.net> wrote: Paul Querna wrote: Test tarballs for Apache httpd 2.3.4-alpha are available at: Your votes please; +/- 1 [-1] Release httpd-2.3.4 as Alpha for shipping the package httpd-2.3.4-deps; 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.4-alpha

pull in from a non-OS location. Whether we should include appropriate versions of libraries like libz and pcre in our Deps tarball is another discussion... S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.4-alpha

+/- 1 >> [ ] Release httpd-2.3.4 as Alpha >> >> Vote closes at 18:00 UTC on Monday November 30 2009. > > I could use an extra couple of hours. Who else is still playing or > about to start? I've had my look and my say, but yes if others are willing to spend

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd 2.3.4-alpha

g to add to http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/new_features_2_4.html to tell our user community why this is interesting? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: A fundamentally secure Apache server, any interest?

and available expertise frequently cause ideas like this to fall by the wayside. Fundamentally, booting web heads from a read-only medium like an optical drive or PXE is a sound idea. Any initiative, installation method or distribution that makes this easier to manage might increase adoption. S. I

Re: Obsolete modules in 2.3

d about it. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: mod_fcgid: add mod_status support?

et me know. +1 See mod_ssl.c:314, ssl_scache.c:228 and ssl_scache.c:199 in trunk to see how mod_ssl does it. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: ssl related test failures

this. Same here. perl-framework insists on reconfiguring, recompiling and re-keying every time I run it on my Mac. It reconfigures when I don't want it to, and I can't make it reconfigure when I do want it to. I don't have the perl-fu, time or energy to figure this out. S

Re: intend to roll 2.3 alpha on Wednesday

. S. Otherwise +1. Regards, Graham -- -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: ssl related test failures

Tests: 72 Failed: 72) Failed tests: 1-72 t/ssl/verify.t(Wstat: 0 Tests: 3 Failed: 1) Failed test: 2 Can somebody verify that this is a problem in trunk and not with my perl-framework setup? Thanks. Stefan -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8

Pull mod_unique_id out of default build?

ts to an apparent client remote_ip, , , most) Thoughts? S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [VOTE] release httpd mod_ftp-0.9.5 beta?

So, rather than threatening to get rid of the module, I move to fold it into trunk. S. -- Sander Temme scte...@apache.org PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: ApacheCon opportunities

On Aug 20, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Paul J. Reder wrote: On 08/20/2009 12:00 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Hardening Enterprise Apache Installations Against Attacks by Sander Temme Heh... Couldn't you just buy Sander a beer and ask him nicely not to attack your Apache installation?

  1   2   3   4   5   >