Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still
limited to the winnt MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows
/far /behind other platforms when it comes to threads required for a
given load?
I guess it doesn't matter *that* much until the event MPM and mod_ssl
On 2/22/2012 9:21 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still limited to
the winnt
MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows /far /behind other
platforms when it
comes to threads required for a given load?
No / Yes / Compared to event -
However, it should be straightforward to apply event mpm logic to the
Windows MPM, more using completion contexts rather than poll. Any true
completion-oriented async winnt mpm should be expected to outperform
a poll based model, though YMMV.
IIRC there is a bugzilla patch for a complex
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was
already not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an
HTTPS listener right?
On 2/18/2012 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/20/2012 8:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was already
not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an HTTPS
listener right?
Platform specific ... documentation.
Should I be thinking about writing something for AIX here, as I get it
finished. Or is the README file going to be sufficient?
I am working on it, just don't expect it yesterday :)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On
The draft Announcement is in ./dev/dist/ as requested by
Bill, who also indicated he would update it to add in the
Windows bits...
On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 2/18/2012 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's quite certainly GA for windows.
Unless you wish to run
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 13:56, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
I haven't done much building on Windows. Does anyone have a good
link/suggestions to
begin producing httpd builds with openssl/openldap included?
I'll send you a quick how to.
Cheers
Mario
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well
as I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
Other question, while asking - what is lua support? How
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
this is very specific to Windows build. But if you want to see it. See
the second post in this topic[1]
I am investigating howto build httpd
On 18 Feb 2012, at 6:22 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
You
With the voting ending, I see the following results:
+1 (binding): jorton, sf, kbrand, rjung, minfrin, jim
+1 (non-binding): Noel Butler, Steffen, mturk, Gregg Smith, Mario Bland,
+0:
-1:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
I will move the
Congrats folks, way to go!
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
With the voting ending, I see the following results:
+1
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
Congratulations, very excited to soon have 2.4 in production!
Cheers
Tom
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17,
On 2/17/2012 10:38 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
It's quite
[X] +1: Good to go
Alomost all stuff is working well on Windows. It can't hurt to get
more user feedback now.
Introducing event mpm as no longer experimental on *nix system is also
very nice.
Mario
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the
On 2/15/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP
On 13 Feb 2012, at 3:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
PM Newsgroups: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
Running Apache Lounge now with 2.4.1 Win32, so far so good.
Not using SSL, still have 2.2.22 with SSL in front as workaround.
Shall keep an eye on all, special the hanging L workers
On 2/15/2012 8:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
And to be more clear for any potential announcement;
1. AcceptFilter data [default] + mod_ssl works
(except when it doesn't - those users who previously had to
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:56:28AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to
if-statements,
why not: if Win then pick up the 2.2 code instead of new https none.
That timing is the cause looks to me a guess.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 5:04 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 8:12 AM, Steffen wrote:
Forget to be clear that SSL is still broken.
Expect that 2.4.1 is not got released as GA.
And to be more clear for any potential announcement;
1. AcceptFilter data [default] + mod_ssl works
(except
On 02/13/2012 02:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
[X] +1: Good to go
Non binding of course.
Few windows glitches, but mostly build related.
Regards
--
^TM
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers with set to data:
Bug shows when tested with server rated cards from Broadcom and Intel with
old and new certified drivers on clean 2008 R2 and SP1 and XP and with
consumer rated cards like Realtek, and that on quite some
On Monday 13 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
it is an http
design issue, seen it nowhere else.
Steffen
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr.
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 7:00 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Steffen
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 11:39 AM, Steffen wrote:
Blaming (stack) drivers with set to data:
Bug shows when tested with server rated cards from Broadcom and Intel with
old and new certified drivers on clean 2008 R2 and SP1 and XP and with
consumer rated cards like
On 2/15/2012 10:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
When any one of these were incorrectly implemented by a network stack
driver, DisableWin32AcceptEx (and now AcceptFilter none) was necessary
to work around the broken driver. That feature has always been a gross
hack around what should just
On 2/15/2012 2:08 PM, Steffen wrote:
Ever contacted the owners of a network stack driver, like Microsoft, Intel
and Broadcom ?
No. I have never encountered the bug, myself. Of course, I disable
all MS QoS magic, and won't tolerate spyware living on the network
layer, but to each their own.
On 2/15/2012 2:49 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
How did timing issues not affect the old hack, and why not use the old
known to work
hack for at least AcceptFilter none, up until some better fix is found? If
that fix is
found and cannot be implemented till 2.next, then 2.next it is.
That
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP Vista x86.
Builds fine in IDE (without crypto)
] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
On 2/15/2012 2:08 PM, Steffen wrote:
Ever contacted the owners of a network stack driver, like Microsoft, Intel
and Broadcom ?
No. I have never encountered the bug, myself. Of course, I disable
all MS QoS magic, and won't tolerate spyware living on the network
layer
On 2/15/2012 3:16 PM, Steffen wrote:
You are suggesting now that QoS and/and Spyware is the cause. None of that
here, plain
server.
Repeat:
I still think:
Hardly believe that it is a driver problem, I guess more it is an ASF
design issue, seen it nowhere else for all that years.
I
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
of the official release.
[X] +1: Good to go
[ ] +0: meh
: gmane.comp.apache.devel
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included
On Monday 13 February 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the tester. They will not be, and are not, part
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier for the
Known: my apr does not have ldap configured into it.
attached: the stderr and verbose output to tty,
new build/aix files
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org wrote:
On Feb 13, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
root@fox:/usr/local/src/httpd-2.4.1# /etc/rc.d/rc.httpd start
httpd: Syntax error on line 55 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf:
Module
On 2/13/2012 7:07 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
If you didn't have to rebuild mod_php5 between httpd 2.2 and 2.4.0,
that was our (serious) error fixed in 2.4.1. You
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 20:05 -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/13/2012 7:07 PM, Noel Butler wrote:
Builds fine on slackware, though, I did find it mildly amusing I had to
rebuild PHP.
Never had to do that before, not even with 2.4.0
If you didn't have to rebuild mod_php5 between
46 matches
Mail list logo
