Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49, PASSED

2021-09-15 Thread ste...@eissing.org
> Am 15.09.2021 um 10:12 schrieb Dennis Clarke : > > On 9/15/21 04:04, ste...@eissing.org wrote: >> According to , I declare >> this vote as PASSED with 8 +1 and a single -1. >> >> I will stage the release tarballs for propagating through the mirrors

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49, PASSED

2021-09-15 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 9/15/21 04:04, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > According to , I declare > this vote as PASSED with 8 +1 and a single -1. > > I will stage the release tarballs for propagating through the mirrors > and announce the release of 2.4.49 tomorrow. > > Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49, PASSED

2021-09-15 Thread ste...@eissing.org
According to , I declare this vote as PASSED with 8 +1 and a single -1. I will stage the release tarballs for propagating through the mirrors and announce the release of 2.4.49 tomorrow. Thanks for all the people who helped in making and testing this!

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-14 Thread Steffen
All fine on windows till now. Only waiting for a full-cycle test mod_md. PS. Thanks Stefan, but I hope not a release every month or two/three, cost too much of my cycles/free time. On 10-9-2021 17:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-14 Thread ste...@eissing.org
Currently, we have 8 +1 votes and a -1, non binding, on OpenSSL 3.0 compatibility. I will give this another day and plan to conclude the results tomorrow. Many thanks to all the people testing this candidate! Cheers, Stefan > Am 13.09.2021 um 22:31 schrieb Christophe JAILLET > : > > Le

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-13 Thread Christophe JAILLET
Le 10/09/2021 à 17:23, ste...@eissing.org a écrit : Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: [X] +1:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-13 Thread Joe Orton
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 05:23:53PM +0200, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-13 Thread Giovanni Bechis
On 9/10/21 17:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: > [ ]

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 9/12/21 22:41, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 9/12/21 07:55, Bernard Spil wrote: reply to self again ... Looking in trunk I see modules/ssl/ssl_private.h : struct SSLSrvConfigRec { SSLModConfigRec *mc; ssl_enabled_tenabled; const char *vhost_id; const unsigned char

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 9/12/21 07:55, Bernard Spil wrote: > ERR_GET_FUNC was blocking this for me on FreeBSD 13 with OpenSSL 3.0 from > ports. > Warning in build logs, but failure at runtime > > ssl_engine_init.c:1375:22: warning: implicit declaration of function > 'ERR_GET_FUNC' is invalid in C99

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 5:24 PM ste...@eissing.org wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All my testing passed on debian(s) 11 and 10. Thanks again Stefan for

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Carsten Reith
Hi, no problems found on Debian 11. 5.10.0-8-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 5.10.46-4 (2021-08-03) x86_64 GNU/Linux OpenSSL 1.1.1l 24 Aug 2021 (Library: OpenSSL 1.1.1k 25 Mar 2021) Server version: Apache/2.4.49 (Unix) Server built: Sep 13 2021 00:03:20 Server's Module Magic Number: 20120211:116

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Eric Covener
+1, thanks again for RM'ing and the release improvements. AIX/xlc/ppc64 100% on httpd-framework albeit not the greatest module coverage on my new system Files=139, Tests=7027, 231 wallclock secs ( 1.82 usr 0.43 sys + 45.99 cusr 20.74 csys = 68.98 CPU) Result: PASS On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 11:24

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Noel Butler
On 11/09/2021 01:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: [ ] +1: It's not

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 2:07 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 3:02 AM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > > On 9/12/21 02:36, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > > On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > > >> Hi, all; > > >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Eric Covener
On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 3:02 AM Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 9/12/21 02:36, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > >> Hi, all; > >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >> > >> I would

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Bernard Spil
ERR_GET_FUNC was blocking this for me on FreeBSD 13 with OpenSSL 3.0 from ports. Warning in build logs, but failure at runtime ssl_engine_init.c:1375:22: warning: implicit declaration of function 'ERR_GET_FUNC' is invalid in C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] &&

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 9/12/21 02:36, Dennis Clarke wrote: > On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: >> Hi, all; >>Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ >> >> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release >> this

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-12 Thread Dennis Clarke
On 9/10/21 11:23, ste...@eissing.org wrote: > Hi, all; >Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: > [ ]

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as httpd-2.4.49

2021-09-10 Thread ste...@eissing.org
Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.49-rc1 as 2.4.49: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's