On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group
ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Brand [mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch]
Sent: Sonntag, 29. April 2012 09:59
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1
-Original Message-
From: Kaspar Brand [mailto:httpd-dev.2...@velox.ch]
Sent: Sonntag, 29. April 2012 09:59
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1 reverse proxy
Whether that is desired or not probably depends on a judgement of
possible use cases
On 23.04.2012 17:11, Michael Weiser wrote:
I don't think so: I'm not directing the Proxy to connect to a different
host. I just make it send different SNI data to the configured backend
server and accept a different CN in the server's certificate.
I guess it boils down to the question of what
Hello Karspar,
Hi all,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:16:51AM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
So implementation-wise this will most likely have two parts of code:
1. Determining the hostname to put into SNI data depending on
ProxyPreserveHost somewhere in the reverse proxy module.
2.
On 16.04.2012 16:47, Michael Weiser wrote:
So implementation-wise this will most likely have two parts of code:
1. Determining the hostname to put into SNI data depending on
ProxyPreserveHost somewhere in the reverse proxy module.
2. Putting that value into the SNI data in mod_ssl's
you think?
Best regards,
Zisis
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 7:26:19 PM
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
My plan is 2 pronged... to see if r1297560 is enough
It would be nice to have a customizable slotmem-prefix and/or target
directory for shm files. What do you think?
Best regards,
Zisis
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 7:26:19 PM
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:01:11AM +0200, Michael Weiser wrote:
A solution might be something like:
ProxyPass / https://www.example.com:12443/ no-sni
ProxyPassReverse / https://www.example.com:12443/ no-sni
, disabling SNI towards the backend server.
Or can I tell the 2.2.14 apache
On 04/16/2012 12:45 PM, Michael Weiser wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
ProxyPass(Reverse) configuration itself. This way even name-based
virtual hosts should work behind the reverse
Hi there,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
ProxyPass(Reverse) configuration itself. This way even name-based
virtual hosts
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Michael Weiser
mich...@weiser.dinsnail.net wrote:
Hi there,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 01:45:16PM +0200, Peter Sylvester wrote:
that makes mod_ssl put the content of the host header into the sni data
structures instead of the hostname from the URL used in the
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:02:00PM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
This could be a side-effect of ProxyPreserveHost On since only with
ProxyPreserveHost On does it make any sense anyways. With
ProxyPreserveHost Off, the SNI data should contain the hostname from the
ProxyPassReverse
running with the new httpd 2.4.1,
that aborts now with worker slotmem_grab failed.
When looking at mod_proxy_balancer:
It looks like each balancer creates the SHM for its number of workers (1
in my case) using its unique -sname. After that, each worker grabs a
slot from this.
I have several
Hi Igor,
Hi Daniel,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:56:12AM -, Igor Gali? wrote:
Then it looks like mod_proxy_http determines the value for
proxy-request-hostname from the remote URL in ProxyPass, but is
passing on the Host header from the original request.
That would imply
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Jie Gao j@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Hi All
Would it be possible to expand the scope of ProxyPreserveHost to Location?
Regards,
Jie
I don't understand; ProxyPreserveHost affects the proxying apache
server, and controls whether it rewrites the 'Host' header
.
Original Message
Subject:[users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1 reverse proxy
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:11:50 +0200
From: Michael Weiser mich...@dinsnail.net
Reply-To: us...@httpd.apache.org
To: us...@httpd.apache.org
[...]
[Fri Apr 06 11:23:55
Subject: Re: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1 reverse proxy
X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.0.0_GA_3077 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0
(Linux)/7.0.0_GA_3077)
- Original Message -
On 07.04.2012 00:34, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
I wanted to bring this up here - seems like a few things are going
Subject: [users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1 reverse proxy
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:11:50 +0200
From: Michael Weiser mich...@dinsnail.net
Reply-To: us...@httpd.apache.org
To: us...@httpd.apache.org
[...]
[Fri Apr 06 11:23:55 2012] [error] Hostname www.example.com provided
I wanted to bring this up here - seems like a few things are going on
that are confusing to me. I'll try to look into it when time becomes
available, but I thought someone might have an opinion off the bat.
Original Message
Subject:[users@httpd] SNI with apache 2.4.1
In the httpd 2.4.1 announcement: .There is not yet a Windows binary
distribution of httpd 2.4, but this is expected to be remedied soon as various
dependencies graduate from beta to GA.
Users reading this as that 2.4.1 is not working at all on Windows, and holding
even to try it.
btw
Steffen [mailto:i...@apachelounge.com] wrote on 2012年3月8日 20:29
In the httpd 2.4.1 announcement: .There is not yet a Windows binary
distribution of
httpd 2.4, but this is expected to be remedied soon as various
dependencies graduate
from beta to GA
Hi Bing,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 15:56, Bing Swen bs...@pku.edu.cn wrote:
There will ben Windows source files for us to test.
The source files are the same. Just the line endings are different.
With the lineends.pl you can change that easily
srclib\apr\build\lineends.pl
Cheers
Mario
On 3/8/2012 6:29 AM, Steffen wrote:
I am not aware of current versions of the dependencies that have issues:
apr-1.4.6-P1
apr-util-1.4.1 apr-iconv-1.2.1 pcre-8.21 lua-5.1 libxml2-2.7.8 openssl-1.0.0g
zlib-1.2.6.
In fact, it works like a charm.
Nor am I (aware of issues), however expat
On 3/8/2012 12:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I hadn't worked out yet the right
approach to the windows .mak files, what with the separation of httpd and
its dependencies. Let me spend my weekend messing with the details.
Hasn't this already been done? Or, am I missing something? Granted I
On 3/8/2012 11:47 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 3/8/2012 12:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I hadn't worked out yet the right
approach to the windows .mak files, what with the separation of httpd and
its dependencies. Let me spend my weekend messing with the details.
Hasn't this already been
@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 7:26:19 PM
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
My plan is 2 pronged... to see if r1297560 is enough and if
allowing a slotmem override is even needed (or wanted) ... ;)
On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Zisis Lianas wrote
[snip]
So to sum up: all uses of DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR I can see at the
moment
are overwritable by configuration. A runtime configurable runtime
directory would not be a critical feature but make it easy to move
all
these objects in a common directory not known at build time.
[snip]
This
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Zisis Lianas zisis.lia...@consol.de wrote:
Hi Jim,
for me/us it's needed, because we operate with multi-instancing.
e.g.:
Apache installation directory (ServerRoot) is /opt/http-2.4.x/
(belonging to apache:apache). This installation only provides the
httpd
- Original Message -
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Zisis Lianas zisis.lia...@consol.de
wrote:
Hi Jim,
for me/us it's needed, because we operate with multi-instancing.
e.g.:
Apache installation directory (ServerRoot) is /opt/http-2.4.x/
(belonging to apache:apache). This
I'll work on it... I already have a version for slotmem, but
a generic solution it best, I agree. But what do we call it?
DefaultDir?
On Mar 7, 2012, at 5:17 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
[snip]
So to sum up: all uses of DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR I can see at the
moment
are overwritable by
I agree that ServerRoot should not be touched or changed, but
it begs the question how do we differentiate between what
is ServerRoot relative and what is DefaultRuntimeDir ?
I guess docs that mention what modules use DefaultRuntimeDir is
sufficient? Or maybe we just call it something like
- Original Message -
I agree that ServerRoot should not be touched or changed, but
it begs the question how do we differentiate between what
is ServerRoot relative and what is DefaultRuntimeDir ?
I guess docs that mention what modules use DefaultRuntimeDir is
sufficient? Or maybe
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:37 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I'll work on it... I already have a version for slotmem, but
a generic solution it best, I agree. But what do we call it?
DefaultDir?
As I mentioned yesterday, I have thrown together the code for the API
and directive and
2012/3/7 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
I knew this is going to be my favourite part of this discussion ;)
So far, DefaultRuntimeDir sounds most reasonable (to me)
I'd like it green! But seriously, doesn't this directive change the
runtime directory from the default to something not the
Yeah, it's pretty ez actually... ap_scratch_space (or whatever) which is
an extern. And then the changes from DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR to
ap_scratch_space except for the initial setting of ap_scratch_space
to it. Some places will need a strcat instead of using cpp string
concat, but not too bad at
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:59 AM, Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/3/7 Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org:
I knew this is going to be my favourite part of this discussion ;)
So far, DefaultRuntimeDir sounds most reasonable (to me)
That's what I have (along with
On Windows this happens, too when not running as Adminstrator. Running
the same config as Administrator it works smoothly.
[Tue Mar 06 09:53:59.734436 2012] [proxy_balancer:emerg] [pid 7064:tid
356] (OS 5)Access forbidden : AH01179: balancer slotmem_create failed
[Tue Mar 06 09:53:59.735436
-
Von: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2012 19:15:03
Betreff: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
What system is this... I'm assuming that your shm impl does an
actual file connection for the shm instance
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
OK... What I'll do is add a directive which provides a
default location for slotmem file...
Uhh, that seems as endless as per-mutex directives.
Is slotmem not using DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR already? (not perfect,
but a good
Sounds reasonable.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2012 14:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer
(AH01179)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j
@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer
(AH01179)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
OK... What I'll do is add a directive which provides a
default location for slotmem file...
Uhh, that seems as endless as per-mutex directives
Yeah, that seems better, ala ./modules/cache/mod_socache_dbm.c
On Mar 6, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:56 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
OK... What I'll do is add a directive which provides a
default location for slotmem file...
Uhh, that seems
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Yeah, that seems better, ala ./modules/cache/mod_socache_dbm.c
On behalf of anyone else reading this thread, here's the idiom from
mod_socache_dbm.c:
#define DEFAULT_DBM_PREFIX DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR /socache-dbm-
...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297560view=rev
On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Yeah, that seems better, ala ./modules/cache/mod_socache_dbm.c
On behalf of anyone else reading this thread, here's the
: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2012 5:21:22 PM
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297560view=rev
On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10
: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1297560view=rev
On Mar 6, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Yeah, that seems better, ala ./modules/cache/mod_socache_dbm.c
before config was parsed.
Have a rainy day ;)
Regards,
Rainer
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:traw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Dienstag, 6. März 2012 14:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer
(AH01179)
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012
On 3/6/2012 6:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I like the idea even if the current problem will be fixed without. I
think the locations of all created or read file can be influenced by
configuration except for some implicit files in
DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR, which is a build time setting. So being able
On 07.03.2012 02:01, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 3/6/2012 6:32 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
I like the idea even if the current problem will be fixed without. I
think the locations of all created or read file can be influenced by
configuration except for some implicit files in
DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR,
- Original Message -
Am 04.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Igor Galić:
Hey folks,
or rather: Jeff :)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1
you are aware that PHP 5.4.0
Which does not work for 2.4.1 Windows, see my other post.
Windows users has to load the handler form AL.
-Original Message-
From: IgorGalić
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 2:50 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: httpd 2.4.1 vs mod_whatkilledus
- Original Message -
Am
Hi,
I think there is an issue in mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer
with httpd 2.4.x when building and installing as root, but trying
to run httpd as standard unix-user.
Scenario:
my httpd is installed as 'root' in /root/httpd-2.4.1/, permissions
root:root/0755. When I create a 'user
Rüdiger
-Original Message-
From: Zisis Lianas Sent: Montag, 5. März 2012 16:47
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer (AH01179)
Hi,
I think there is an issue in mod_slotmem_shm / mod_proxy_balancer
with httpd 2.4.x when building
, but trying
to run httpd as standard unix-user.
Scenario:
my httpd is installed as 'root' in /root/httpd-2.4.1/, permissions
root:root/0755. When I create a 'user' httpd.conf and load slotmem_shm_module,
proxy_module, proxy_http_module and proxy_balancer_module and do some
balancer configuration
I can reproduce this on SuSE Linux Enterprise 11sp1 (x86_64,
2.6.32.12-0.7-xen) and Ubuntu 11.04 (x86_64, 2.6.38.x).
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Gesendet: Montag, 5. März 2012 19:15:03
Betreff: Re: httpd 2.4.1 and mod_slotmem_shm
On 04 Mar 2012, at 3:35 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
mod_whatkilledus.c:240:43: error: 'conn_rec' has no member named 'remote_addr'
No need to wait for Jeff :)
Look for remote_addr on the page below, and make the changes described:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/developer/new_api_2_4.html
Hey folks,
or rather: Jeff :)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1:
/opt/bw/share/apr/build/libtool --silent --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99
-prefer-pic -march=corei7 -maes -O3 -g
Am 04.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Igor Galić:
Hey folks,
or rather: Jeff :)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1
you are aware that PHP 5.4.0 currently does not support Apache 2.4
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Igor Galić i.ga...@brainsware.org wrote:
Hey folks,
or rather: Jeff :)
try again :)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1:
/opt/bw/share/apr
04.03.2012 02:35, schrieb Igor Galić:
Hey folks,
or rather: Jeff :)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1
you are aware that PHP 5.4.0 currently does not support Apache 2.4?
see
:)
I'm finally getting around to updating my stack to httpd 2.4.1
(and PHP 5.4) and some things are breaking.
mod_whatkilledus doesn't build with 2.4.1
you are aware that PHP 5.4.0 currently does not support Apache 2.4?
see php-devel list on release day of %.4
With 2.4.1 I see:
httpd -t -D DUMP_MODULES and
httpd -t -D DUMP_MODULES
Are not showing any ouput here, 2.2.22 fine.
httpd –V etc. is fine.
Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal
I entirely agree with you on your comment.
2012/3/1 Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com:
Why even bother... I simply posted a comment and moved on.
On Feb 28, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Bing Swen wrote:
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com
Some Nginx people just made a performance test with Apache 2.4.1 at
http://blog.zhuzhaoyuan.com/category/c10k/
Were the Event_MPM configuration parameters somewhere close to optimal?
Regards,
Bing
Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] wrote on 2012年2月24日 20:57
w00t!!!
On Feb 23, 2012
See attached file.
buildaix.patch
Description: Binary data
what the patch lacks is deleting the old README (now named README.aix, and
the file aixproto.ksh)
The tar file I used to copy to my svn area is attached. My apologies for
the confusion, if any.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:16 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
See attached file.
On 28 Feb 2012, at 12:22 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
what the patch lacks is deleting the old README (now named README.aix, and
the file aixproto.ksh)
The tar file I used to copy to my svn area is attached. My apologies for the
confusion, if any.
I've added the patch you sent, and the tar
yes. And also for httpd-2.2.22 - attached, apr ones coming.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 28 Feb 2012, at 12:22 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
what the patch lacks is deleting the old README (now named README.aix,
and the file aixproto.ksh)
The tar
On 28 Feb 2012, at 12:43 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
yes. And also for httpd-2.2.22 - attached, apr ones coming.
Thanks for this, I've committed this in r1294380.
Regards,
Graham
--
Hi,
that bug is reported. https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52402
There is no solution with vhosts yet.
Cheers
Mario
Hi Mario,
Thanks for the hint - this seems indeed to be a duplicate: Two creations
of 's96f9938e_mycluster' - second grab fails.
I will now monitor that.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure about the ap_proxy_share_balancer/_worker(),
attach(), and the reference by conf-id semantics. Wouldn't a simple
w00t!!!
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:26 PM, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote:
Hi all,
I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
2.2.3) with nginx.
I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812
I feel bad about writing
2.4.1 Throughput compared with nginx
w00t!!!
On Feb 23, 2012, at 5:26 PM, MATSUMOTO Ryosuke wrote:
Hi all,
I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
2.2.3) with nginx.
I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812
Hi together,
I'm trying to get my reverse-proxy running with the new httpd 2.4.1,
that aborts now with worker slotmem_grab failed.
When looking at mod_proxy_balancer:
It looks like each balancer creates the SHM for its number of workers (1
in my case) using its unique -sname. After that, each
Hi all,
I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
2.2.3) with nginx.
I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812
I feel bad about writing this article in Japanese in my hurry ;)
Regards,
--
MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1229
could you write it in English?
2012/2/24 MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
2.2.3) with nginx.
I used httperf benchmark 0.9.0 to measure thethroughput.
http://blog.matsumoto-r.jp/?p=1812
I feel bad about
Google Translate :-)
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:06, dreamice dreamice.ji...@gmail.com wrote:
could you write it in English?
2012/2/24 MATSUMOTO Ryosuke matsu1...@gmail.com
Hi all,
I evaluated the throughput of Apaceh 2.4.1. I compared apache(2.4.1,
2.2.3) with nginx.
I used httperf
Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still
limited to the winnt MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows
/far /behind other platforms when it comes to threads required for a
given load?
I guess it doesn't matter *that* much until the event MPM and mod_ssl
On 2/22/2012 9:21 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does the event MPM work on Windows? Or is Apache on Windows still limited to
the winnt
MPM? If so, doesn't this leave Apache on Windows /far /behind other
platforms when it
comes to threads required for a given load?
No / Yes / Compared to event -
However, it should be straightforward to apply event mpm logic to the
Windows MPM, more using completion contexts rather than poll. Any true
completion-oriented async winnt mpm should be expected to outperform
a poll based model, though YMMV.
IIRC there is a bugzilla patch for a complex
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.1 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the GA release of version 2.4.1 of the Apache HTTP
Server. This version of Apache HTTP Server is the first GA release of
the new 2.4.x branch.
Apache HTTP
Hi Infra,
I know there's always to much to do, but any chance we can update
www.apache.org to 2.4.1 now that 2.4 is GA?
AFAIK Joe's latest problem observation with 2.3.16 was fixed in
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1236351view=rev
before cutting 2.4.1.
Thanks in advance should you find
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was
already not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an
HTTPS listener right?
On 2/18/2012 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/20/2012 8:04 AM, Jess Holle wrote:
Ok, issues with all mod_ssl would be a big problem.
If you needed to do DisableWin32AcceptEx, though, then something was already
not quite right.
What you mean by mod_ssl on a port, though? You just mean running an HTTPS
listener right?
Platform specific ... documentation.
Should I be thinking about writing something for AIX here, as I get it
finished. Or is the README file going to be sufficient?
I am working on it, just don't expect it yesterday :)
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On
The draft Announcement is in ./dev/dist/ as requested by
Bill, who also indicated he would update it to add in the
Windows bits...
On Feb 18, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
On 2/18/2012 12:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
It's quite certainly GA for windows.
Unless you wish to run
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 13:56, Daniel Ruggeri drugg...@primary.net wrote:
I haven't done much building on Windows. Does anyone have a good
link/suggestions to
begin producing httpd builds with openssl/openldap included?
I'll send you a quick how to.
Cheers
Mario
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well
as I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
Other question, while asking - what is lua support? How
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 17:22, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
this is very specific to Windows build. But if you want to see it. See
the second post in this topic[1]
I am investigating howto build httpd
On 18 Feb 2012, at 6:22 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
If this is generic to builds, I would appreciate the HOWTO (link) as well as
I am investigating howto build httpd with ldap support on AIX.
One path is with openldap, other is with with itdsclient (IBM Tivoli
Directory Server) support.
You
With the voting ending, I see the following results:
+1 (binding): jorton, sf, kbrand, rjung, minfrin, jim
+1 (non-binding): Noel Butler, Steffen, mturk, Gregg Smith, Mario Bland,
+0:
-1:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
I will move
Congrats folks, way to go!
- Original Message -
From: Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:42 AM
Subject: [RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache httpd 2.4.1
With the voting ending, I see the following results:
+1
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
Congratulations, very excited to soon have 2.4 in production!
Cheers
Tom
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
On 2/17/2012 9:13 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA
, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote:
As such, I call the vote as PASSING and that httpd 2.4.1 will
be released as GA.
Congratulations, very excited to soon have 2.4 in production!
Cheers
Tom
On 2/17/2012 10:38 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/17/2012 3:15 PM, Jess Holle wrote:
Does this mean the Windows-specific issues have been resolved?
Or that this is a non-Windows GA?
No, the Windows specific issue (PR 52476) has not been solved.
So it's GA for all but Windows.
It's quite
[X] +1: Good to go
Alomost all stuff is working well on Windows. It can't hurt to get
more user feedback now.
Introducing event mpm as no longer experimental on *nix system is also
very nice.
Mario
On 13.02.2012 14:56, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.1 GA.
NOTE: The -deps tarballs are included here *only* to make life
easier
On 2/15/2012 1:03 PM, Gregg Smith wrote:
On 2/13/2012 5:56 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The 2.4.1 (candidate) tarballs are available for download and test:
[X] +1: Good to go, with noted exception of remaining AcceptFilter issue
non-binding of course
Builds fine in IDE for me, tested on XP
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
