Re: Apache 3.0

On Apr 15, 2008, at 6:53 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Paul Querna wrote: For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: I came away with one question... if you read the slides

Re: Apache 3.0

William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Paul Querna wrote: For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: I came away with one question... if you read the slides you should understand Roy as pointing out the relative pea

Re: Apache 3.0

Paul Querna wrote: For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: I came away with one question... if you read the slides you should understand Roy as pointing out the relative peaks and valleys in traffic, co

Re: Apache 3.0

Paul Querna wrote: For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: I've got a couple of naive questions about 3. My apologies.. but i'm only looking at the slides, not the speech itself. What will the role of

Re: Apache 3.0

On Apr 13, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Just out of curiosity... will 3.0 still be a fresh start or will the core of 2.3 be used? Well, the existing code is a server framework that runs millions of websites and has received a lot of battle-testing. I don't see us not taking th

Re: Apache 3.0

On Apr 13, 2008, at 8:50 AM, Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Just out of curiosity... will 3.0 still be a fresh start or will the core of 2.3 be used? My slides are intended to be motivational, not definitional. The only thing known about 3.0 is that it won't be compatible with 2.x. Other than that (th

Re: Apache 3.0

Just out of curiosity... will 3.0 still be a fresh start or will the core of 2.3 be used? On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > > > For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: > >

Re: Apache 3.0

On Apr 12, 2008, at 7:10 PM, Paul Querna wrote: For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: heh, good thing I managed to get the Internet connection to work long enough for the upload. The only reply

Re: Apache 3.0

Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Although dropping back to waka/http is an other options but I think some users will be dissapointed. Why run 4 different daemons while one will do? (ok I can think of a lot of reasons but I can think of some no to do it either.) Because then you'll be like inetd, and

Re: Apache 3.0

The slide showing the protocols httpd supports is kind of dead on. Personaly I like it that I'm able to serve http, ftp,... with one server package. If this is they way to go I think in 3.0 a entire new design would benifit and remove a lot of workaround in forcing the protocols to work with the

Apache 3.0

For those who were not there, slides from Roy's keynote at ApacheCon EU: The only reply I can really come up with is: Patches Welcome. I don't agree with, or disagree with all of the topics Roy discusses, and I do think we should foc

BOF Interest at December ApacheCon? "Apache 3.0 Wishlist"

I'm considering hosting a BOF in December, if a number of you would be interested, to discuss the desires of developers both within and around the Apache Web Server. I want this to be more open than the hackathon (which is good) so that we get some of our visiting module authors, power users and s