William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[ ] +1 to release as 2.3.1-beta
With +1's recorded from chrisd, trawick and wrowe, the package is
released as-beta (due principally to the more experimental auth issues
and terse documentation).
I've staged the release, and in response to the details from Rainer,
I
Rainer Jung wrote:
Some people seem to indicate, that the implementation of pgp is safer,
on the other hand md5sum etc. have a builtin check option (-c), so you
can run them directly against the checksum file to compares the checksum
in the checksum file with a freshly computed checksum of
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:25 +0200, ext Graham Leggett wrote:
Brian J. France wrote:
Jari is the original author of mod_dav_acl, which requires patches to
httpd to work. I need the same functionality added to httpd to get a
mod_dav_acl type module working, so I have split up his patch
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 18:42 +0200, ext Julian Reschke wrote:
Brian J. France wrote:
...
There is one draw back to this patch in that there could be duplicated
values in the headers. Both mod_dav_acl and mod_caldav want to add the
REPORT in the Allow header, so it would show up twice in
Jari Urpalainen wrote:
What comes to having included these with httpd, I'm in the
process of asking permission from my company the change the license to
APL
APL? We presume you mean AL (or ApL) ;-)
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
First comment to list in general: any comments on what needs to be done to get
the OCSP stapling patch accepted?
I had been under the impression, from reading the bug commentary too many
times, that it was not vetting the CA chain from root to cert.
It seems I
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Bill,
Mario just told me that there's no mod_ftp Win32 binary yet:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/mod_ftp/
maybe you can one upload?
I generally roll binaries closer to the release date, and right now,
we are evaluating one particular set of compile warnings. As soon
On 16 Sep 2009, at 06:38, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Sep 16 05:38:09 2009
New Revision: 815611
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815611view=rev
Log:
Generated new content
Ouch! What is generating new content in transitional HTML,
incorporating a bunch of crap that
Hi,
I use mod_dav of Apache to build a WebDAV server, and use MapNetworkDrive of
WindowsXP to build a connection to the WebDAV server.
There is a large file (about 100MB) on the WebDAV server.
When I try to get the properties (right click the large file) of the large file
or delete the large
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:09:23AM +0300, Jari Urpalainen wrote:
I'll assume that you don't need here the content which is included
within mod_dav_acl package at sf.net ? Otherwise you are certainly free
to use it anyways you like. Patch contains mostly some hooks to
mod_dav, but since i'm not
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 11:39 +0200, ext Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 10:09:23AM +0300, Jari Urpalainen wrote:
I'll assume that you don't need here the content which is included
within mod_dav_acl package at sf.net ? Otherwise you are certainly free
to use it anyways you like.
Jari Urpalainen wrote:
Ok, here's the patch (which I'm authorized to submit). And yes you can
apply the Apache License, Version 2.0 or what is the official name.
Excellent, thank you for the running round - this clears Brian to keep
submitting patches based on this one.
Regards,
Graham
--
In my module I do not modify any data sended from server to client.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_r* then firstly are sended data and then
HTTP relevant code.
Sample code is:
/*
* Procedure for sending data from server to client side
* Instead of ap_rvputs like functions should be used
Petr Hracek wrote:
In my module I do not modify any data sended from server to client.
Unfortunatelly when I am using ap_r* then firstly are sended data and
then HTTP relevant code.
That's because you've made the same mistake in this code that you made
in the previous code you posted:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
First comment to list in general: any comments on what needs to be done to
get
the OCSP stapling patch accepted?
I had been under the impression, from reading the bug commentary too many
times, that it was not vetting the CA chain from
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:38:50PM +0100, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
I may have missed something here but the OCSP stapling code doesn't appear to
be
in trunk. The patch in:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43822
doesn't apply cleanly any more, though the changes needed
Sorry it was my fault.
I have corrected them to r-output_filters now.
But situation is the same. Data are send but java aplication which receiving
data
sended over ap_pass_brigade does not receive anything. It seems that between
apache and java aplication are lost is there any posibility how to
Petr Hracek wrote:
Sorry it was my fault.
I have corrected them to r-output_filters now.
But situation is the same. Data are send but java aplication which
receiving data
sended over ap_pass_brigade does not receive anything. It seems that
between apache and java aplication are lost is
While we're discussing voting, I've been looking at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html
Under Apache HTTP Server Committers it says these volunteers may cast
binding votes on any technical discussion.
Under Voting, it says the only binding votes are those cast by active
members of the
On 16 Sep 2009, at 15:10, Dan Poirier wrote:
While we're discussing voting, I've been looking at
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/guidelines.html
Under Apache HTTP Server Committers it says these volunteers may
cast
binding votes on any technical discussion.
Under Voting, it says the only
This has the potential for breaking existing configs by forcing the admin to
remove some ignored directives they've coded in a vhost.
The affected directives are BusyScanInterval, DefaultMaxClassProcessCount,
DefaultMinProcessCount, ErrorScanInterval, IdleScanInterval, IdleTimeout,
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Please object now if you want to allow affected existing configurations
to continue to work. We can probably change the hard failure to a warning.
As this is a beta, let's just break the config, we should put something very
clear in README about this.
On 16.09.2009 17:18, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This has the potential for breaking existing configs by forcing the
admin to remove some ignored directives they've coded in a vhost.
The affected directives are BusyScanInterval,
DefaultMaxClassProcessCount, DefaultMinProcessCount, ErrorScanInterval,
Nick Kew wrote:
On 16 Sep 2009, at 06:38, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Wed Sep 16 05:38:09 2009
New Revision: 815611
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815611view=rev
Log:
Generated new content
Ouch! What is generating new content in transitional HTML,
Looking over the mod_ftp documentation, I don't see a way to do this,
but maybe I'm just missing it.
Can I arrange for anyone logging into the mod_ftp server to start out in
some subdirectory of the document root? I want a fixed directory, not
something that depends on their user name.
For
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 16.09.2009 17:18, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This has the potential for breaking existing configs by forcing the
admin to remove some ignored directives they've coded in a vhost.
The affected directives are
Dan Poirier wrote:
Looking over the mod_ftp documentation, I don't see a way to do this,
but maybe I'm just missing it.
Can I arrange for anyone logging into the mod_ftp server to start out in
some subdirectory of the document root? I want a fixed directory, not
something that depends on
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Sep 16 20:59:22 2009
New Revision: 815962
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=815962view=rev
Log:
sort server config fields first by scope then by name of
corresponding directive
perhaps gratuitous or
Hi Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I mentioned on another thread; the builds are very closely related,
so it's
pretty simple to check them out side by side or put them into the same
server.
Most defiantly when it comes to building them and I now understand that
Guenter Knauf wrote:
ftp_commands.c: In function ‘common_list’:
ftp_commands.c:694: warning: suggest parentheses around within ||
As we worked out, the distinction made no effective difference, but...
ftp_protocol.c: In function ‘ftp_read_line’:
ftp_protocol.c:244: warning: comparison is
Gregg L. Smith wrote:
This is not what I was implying, sorry if it came out that way and I
know it got jumbled into the thread. I was more trying to address the
lack of interest. Remember, your email covered two things really, voting
and lack of interest to vote.
Maybe I see things too
31 matches
Mail list logo
