Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
Martin Kraemer wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:30:13AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers) *proxy_lb_workers;

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:30:13AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers) *proxy_lb_workers; +++ Yes, it breaks:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Any more info how you got it to work with apxs? ~ Jorge On 9/7/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: win32/vc8 +1 (not that it makes much of a difference at this point :)) I've gotten mod_fcgid built against it (though apxs-win32-0.6 is still not doing -llibhttpd -llibapr-1 and

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
Grrr... I tested with a compile and it worked fine, but I forgot to do a make distclean 1st. Yep. Problem is that we're leaking info in mod_proxy.h that we shouldn't :/ I'll revert until we figure out a better way to do this... On Sep 7, 2007, at 4:30 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: That is

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Hmmz still getting link errors :( --- S:\source\x86\modules\mod_fcgid.2.1apxs -llibhttpd -llibapr-1 -llibaprutil-1 -c -i -a mod_fcgid.c cl /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG-IS:\httpd- 2.2\include /c /Fomod_fcgid. lo mod_fcgid.c mod_fcgid.c link kernel32.lib /nologo

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Martin Kraemer
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 12:29:05PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think I have patched it. Could you try it? Index: modules/proxy/proxy_util.c === ... Yep, thanks, that fixes it for me too. +1 from me. Martin --

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
The site is updated and mirrors are on the final stages of syncing up. The announcement will be going out in a coupla hours. Thanks to all!

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 7, 2007, at 6:29 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think I have patched it. Could you try it? Ahh... this is much nicer that my idea of breaking out the data struct defs from the rest of mod_proxy.h And its more logical this way as well... Compiles clean... testing now. Too burned

Re: svn commit: r573555 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Mladen Turk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim /* stuff which is lb specific */ -typedef struct proxy_worker_stat lb_score; +typedef struct lb_score lb_score; +struct lb_score { +/* TODO: sync this with proxy_worker_stat */ +unsigned char data[256]; +}; The original was 1024, and now you

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Issac Goldstand
win32/vc8 +1 (not that it makes much of a difference at this point :)) I've gotten mod_fcgid built against it (though apxs-win32-0.6 is still not doing -llibhttpd -llibapr-1 and -llibaprutil-1 by default) I'm not quite sure what the original issue is there, and I've no clue how to actually use

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Sep 7, 2007, at 5:37 AM, Martin Kraemer wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:30:13AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers)

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Hmmz still getting link errors :( --- S:\source\x86\modules\mod_fcgid.2.1apxs -llibhttpd -llibapr-1 -llibaprutil-1 -c -i -a mod_fcgid.c cl /nologo /MD /W3 /O2 /D WIN32 /D _WINDOWS /D NDEBUG-IS:\httpd- 2.2\include /c /Fomod_fcgid. lo mod_fcgid.c mod_fcgid.c

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
Martin Kraemer wrote: On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 10:30:13AM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers) *proxy_lb_workers;

mod_fcgid dump files (formerly [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review)

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Well since after messing about with mod_fcgid a bit I finally got it to compile. I tried printenv.pl with this configuration: LoadModule fcgid_module modules/mod_fcgid.so Location /fcgid SetHandler fcgid-script Options ExecCGI allow from all /Location as by the doc here:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Ok basic example as stated here: http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/configuration.htm#regular%20fastcgi makes the server spit out these again: [Fri Sep 07 17:49:51 2007] [error] [client 192.168.1.4] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl if I place the same script outside of the fcgid folder it

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
I got it to compile via the included projected manually adding aditional depedancys on libhttp, libapr-1 and libaprutil-1 did the trick. Now I need to find out how it is suposed to work adn see if it works or not On 9/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote:

Apache 2.0.59 / ssl memory leak

2007-09-07 Thread Swapan Gupta
Hi, We have setup an Apache 2.0.59 along with mod_ssl and are executing a load run for Apache resources over https. We are seeing continuous memory growth in Apache process during the course of the load run. I we do a similar load run using Apache 2.0.59 over http (non-ssl), we do not see

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Didn't even notice... I usually take the tar.gz source and add in apr-iconv myself then run lineends.pl that is included in srclib/apr/build/, I also run cvtdsp.pl -2005 on there before I start. I didn't even seen a - win32-src.zip at that time. Bingo - that's how I

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
Didn't even notice... I usually take the tar.gz source and add in apr-iconv myself then run lineends.pl that is included in srclib/apr/build/, I also run cvtdsp.pl -2005 on there before I start. I didn't even seen a -win32-src.zip at that time. On 9/7/07, Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Issac Goldstand
I'll try it as soon as it shows up. William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Uh. Maybe I've lost it, but where's the source for apr-iconv in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.2.6-win32-src.zip? All I get is an .rc file and a couple of .deps and .maks I just pulled an OH

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Issac Goldstand
And Jorge, yeah. I was wondering if I was just getting a really really oddly maimed ZIP :-) William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Issac Goldstand wrote: Uh. Maybe I've lost it, but where's the source for apr-iconv in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.2.6-win32-src.zip? All I get is an .rc

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Issac Goldstand wrote: Uh. Maybe I've lost it, but where's the source for apr-iconv in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.2.6-win32-src.zip? All I get is an .rc file and a couple of .deps and .maks I just pulled an OH SHIT moment myself building on x86_64 windows... ... there are

Re: svn commit: r573505 - in /httpd/site/trunk: docs/index.html xdocs/index.xml

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Log: Let's not reference a survey that is more than a year out of date ROFL - we are at 73% if you trust http://www.securityspace.com/s_survey/data/200708/index.html while only ~51% if you trust

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Issac Goldstand
Uh. Maybe I've lost it, but where's the source for apr-iconv in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/httpd-2.2.6-win32-src.zip? All I get is an .rc file and a couple of .deps and .maks Issac

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread jean-frederic clere
That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers) *proxy_lb_workers; +++ Cheers Jean-Frederic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: jim Date: Thu Sep 6 06:46:46 2007

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
jean-frederic clere wrote: That is going to break: In mod_proxy.h: int ap_proxy_lb_workers(void); In server/scoreboard.c: +++ static APR_OPTIONAL_FN_TYPE(ap_proxy_lb_workers) *proxy_lb_workers; +++ which is fine - this is trunk. Heaven forbid we backport

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Ok basic example as stated here: http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/configuration.htm#regular%20fastcgi makes the server spit out these again: [Fri Sep 07 17:49:51 2007] [error] [client 192.168.1.4 http://192.168.1.4] Premature end of script headers: printenv.pl

Re: [VOTE] Apache 2.2.6, 2.0.61 and 1.3.39 release candidate tarballs for review

2007-09-07 Thread Jorge Schrauwen
On 9/7/07, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jorge Schrauwen wrote: Ok basic example as stated here: http://fastcgi.coremail.cn/configuration.htm#regular%20fastcgi makes the server spit out these again: [Fri Sep 07 17:49:51 2007] [error] [client 192.168.1.4

[Fwd: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43329] New: - apr_proc_create behavior change]

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
FYI - this bug appears to be the root of several modules no longer behaving as expected on Win32 platforms. It takes me back to a question I raised on apr quite a while ago, what does *unix* do with an unset child_in/child_out/child_err procattr member? If it is unset, does the child inherit the

Re: svn commit: r573688 - /apr/apr/trunk/build/fixwin32mak.pl

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Windows httpd on Studio 2005 users, you might be interested in this small hack to fixwin32mak.pl - after applying it I'm able to build against x86 or x64 cl+link with no trouble at all (other than some noisy emits that still need to be cleaned up. Bill Log: Strip out the /machine from

Re: svn commit: r573264 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/include/scoreboard.h

2007-09-07 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 09/07/2007 03:03 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 7, 2007, at 6:29 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I think I have patched it. Could you try it? Ahh... this is much nicer that my idea of breaking out the data struct defs from the rest of mod_proxy.h I do not share this view and

Apache proxy engineering specs

2007-09-07 Thread Shaw, Dan
Hello, I believe this would be a Development / Engineering question. Thank you for your help and replies ahead of time. 1. Does a apache proxy server create stateful or stateless connection upon request? a. Specifically using BizTalk - Although no need to answer

Re: Apache proxy engineering specs

2007-09-07 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Shaw, Dan wrote: 1. Does a apache proxy server create stateful or stateless connection upon request? It might help to clarify right off that RFC 2616 defines HTTP/1.1 and prior as stateless protocols. So the answer is no, any aggregation is an illusion. For stateful proxied