William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2008-10-14 23:06
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I noticed a few little things building 2.2.10 with VC9 on Windows:
* the windows source .zip is missing most of apr-iconv - only the .mak
and .dep files are present.
With
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tdonovan
Date: Wed Oct 15 05:24:25 2008
New Revision: 704883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=704883view=rev
Log:
Windows: add apr_dbd_odbc project to Visual Studio workspace .dsw file
Hmmm? Guess I'm confused, we trigger _try_dbd in Makefile.win for
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Nicob wrote:
Hello,
I'm actually trying to setup a SSL reverse-proxy based on Apache 2.x and
mod_ssl and it seems there's a bug in the verification of the CRL.
If a CA changes its keys before expiration, the CRL is now signed by
Graham Leggett wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
None ;)
64K comes from its usage for max AJP packet size.
8K is minimum/default AJP packet size. However, larger then 64K sizes
are probably usable for setting non-ajp buffer sizes
(think this is propagated down to the socket layer)
So, in any way the
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Where is the 64k limit enforced? in mod_proxy_ajp?
By the AJP protocol.
What I meant was, what the can the user expect to happen if they choose
a limit greater than 64k? There is no enforcement of range in the
set_io_buffer_size() function apart from the lower
Graham Leggett wrote:
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Where is the 64k limit enforced? in mod_proxy_ajp?
By the AJP protocol.
What I meant was, what the can the user expect to happen if they choose
a limit greater than 64k? There is no enforcement of range in the
set_io_buffer_size() function
Graham Leggett wrote:
Hi all,
According to the docs at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/mod/mod_proxy.html#proxyiobuffersize,
the default value is ProxyIOBufferSize 8192, which so far is correct.
The docs then say The size must be less or equal 65536.
There doesn't seem to be anything
Mladen Turk wrote:
Nope, it'll silently ALIGN(ProxyIoBufferSize, 1024)
from 8K to 64K regardless of ProxyIoBufferSize provided
So would it be accurate to say if AJP is used, the ProxyIOBufferSize is
set to 64k, and the value for ProxyIOBufferSize is ignored?
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
On 10/15/2008 07:39 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
I guess this leaves us to the question whether we need to be able to set
connectiontimeouts below one second.
Right now we are using a simple atoi for parsing those
config values. Some more advanced function for parsing the
Mladen Turk wrote:
None ;)
64K comes from its usage for max AJP packet size.
8K is minimum/default AJP packet size. However, larger then 64K sizes
are probably usable for setting non-ajp buffer sizes
(think this is propagated down to the socket layer)
So, in any way the docs should be updated
Graham Leggett wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Nope, it'll silently ALIGN(ProxyIoBufferSize, 1024)
from 8K to 64K regardless of ProxyIoBufferSize provided
So would it be accurate to say if AJP is used, the ProxyIOBufferSize is
set to 64k, and the value for ProxyIOBufferSize is ignored?
Nope.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This would be similar what we have for parsing some
file sizes across the conf (1024, 1K, 1M, ...)
I'm not aware of any standard defining that, but
since we underneath use apr_time anything
from 1us should be valid time (weather it makes
sense is a different story).
Mladen Turk wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This would be similar what we have for parsing some
file sizes across the conf (1024, 1K, 1M, ...)
I'm not aware of any standard defining that, but
since we underneath use apr_time anything
from 1us should be valid time (weather it makes
sense is a
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:55 AM, Lars Eilebrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The first odd thing is that I would have expected that Apache
uses all child processes about equally. Especially I would
have expected that there are at least 25 threads for the second
process in state _ (waiting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: These revisions cause conflicts for every single file they
patch
+ please provide a patch that works with 2.2.x.
Two of the three files are CHANGES and ap_mmn.h, which will conflict by
definition. The third is a one line change to Makefile.in,
On 10/15/2008 01:55 PM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to debug a performance issue on an Apache infrastructure
using 2.2.9 as reverse proxies. The Apache servers don't do much
except for ProxyPass'ing data from others backend servers, and
caching the content using mod_mem_cache.
Hi all,
I was asked to clarify the case with the ProxyIOBufferSize, where the
documentation and the code don't agree.
According to mod_proxy.c, the effective size of the buffer is the
greater of AP_IOBUFSIZE or the user specified value:
psf-io_buffer_size = ((s AP_IOBUFSIZE) ? s :
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Hm. Doesn't this require a minor bump? We add the contents of mod_rewrite.h
to our public API now.
Initially I though no, as technically nothing has changed, although now
that I think about it again you are right, it should get a minor bump.
And if we add to our
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
Hello Mr Henson,
2008/10/15 Dr Stephen Henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:41 PM, Nicob wrote:
[...]
While I haven't reviewed this specific patch I have a general comment.
There is currently some questionable behaviour in
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Is it really a good idea to use mod_mem_cache? Keep in mind that
mod_mem_cache uses local caches per process and cannot use sendfile
to send cached data. It seems that mod_disk_cache with a cache root
on a ram disk could be more efficient here.
No, it really isn't a
On 15 Oct 2008, at 14:41, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 10/15/2008 01:55 PM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
I'm trying to debug a performance issue on an Apache infrastructure
using 2.2.9 as reverse proxies. The Apache servers don't do much
except for ProxyPass'ing data from others backend servers, and
Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
...
CRL refresh has some performance issues particularly in multi-process
servers. For example a CRL might be 500K or more and be reloaded on each
new connection. OpenSSL 0.9.9 does have some reload support though. If
CRL processing was delegated to OpenSSL it would
On 10/15/2008 08:25 PM, Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Is it really a good idea to use mod_mem_cache? Keep in mind that
mod_mem_cache uses local caches per process and cannot use sendfile
to send cached data. It seems that mod_disk_cache with a cache root
on a ram disk could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ rpluem says: The patch to ap_mmn.h does only contain the comment, but does
+ not change the #define. Once this is fixed I am +1.
Fixed.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* This should be 2.2.10 instead of 2.2.9
Shall I pull this down onto minotaur or will you?
S.
--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic
Tom Donovan wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
.msi*'s to direct at /dist/httpd/binaries/win32/, -symbols.zip*'s to
direct
at archive.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/symbols/, and the usual
httpd-2.2.10-win32-src.zip* files are all in the usual /dev/dist/
location.
*
On 10/15/2008 09:27 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
On Oct 15, 2008, at 11:33 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* This should be 2.2.10 instead of 2.2.9
Shall I pull this down onto minotaur or will you?
Already svn up'ed on minotaur and visible on live site
in the meantime.
Regards
Rüdiger
Lars Eilebrecht wrote:
The second odd thing is that the connections/threads in W state
seem to be hanging, i.e., no data is being transferred over the
connection and these threads/connection time out after about 256
seconds. However, the general Timeout setting is 30s so why
isn't the
On Oct 15, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Shall I pull this down onto minotaur or will you?
Already svn up'ed on minotaur and visible on live site
in the meantime.
Mild cache busting action in my browser makes me see this, too.
Thanks,
S.
--
Sander Temme
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Something else to try is to look at the ProxyIOBufferSize parameter.
The proxy reads from the backend in blocks, and as soon as a block is
not full (ie it's the last block), the proxy will complete and terminate
the backend request before sending the last block on to the
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: tdonovan
Date: Wed Oct 15 05:24:25 2008
New Revision: 704883
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=704883view=rev
Log:
Windows: add apr_dbd_odbc project to Visual Studio workspace .dsw file
Hmmm? Guess I'm confused, we trigger
31 matches
Mail list logo
