On 8/14/2012 10:56 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> It's also been a bit over 6 mos since we released 2.2.22, and there are
> obviously some who can't yet upgrade waiting for binary modules. So I'm
> proposing to T&R 2.2.23 at the same point this Friday. It will close
> the one security issue tha
On 8/14/2012 4:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
Sorry to hear, hope she is recovering :(
> I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
+1 - I'll address anything wrong for mak/dep files. Jeff's brilliant
catch of that regression in core.c to the w
Hi， Mike
It's really a problem...I will take a look and find a solution for it
2012-08-15
pqf
发件人：Mike M
发送时间：2012-08-15 04:29
主题：mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concurrent
requests to a vir
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:21 PM, wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Tue Aug 14 21:21:02 2012
> New Revision: 1373121
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1373121&view=rev
> Log:
> add back the DefaultRuntimeDir/DEFAULT_REL_RUNTIMEDIR stuff
> that is not in 2.4.x
>
> The trunk patches for these
slotmem handles this well, afaict ;)
On Aug 13, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> PR 53040 reveals, that mod_socache_shmcb has an alignment problem. One of
>> the three structs mapped into shm contains an apr_time_t membe
With my Mom's hospitalization and stuff, this kinda slipped...
I propose this Friday: Aug 17th.
Any conflicts??
On Aug 7, 2012, at 9:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm proposing a T&R of 2.4.3 for this Friday (the 10th)... I'll
> be RMing.
>
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concurrent
requests to a virtualhost where the number of concurrent requests exceed
the number of available fcgid-spawned processes result in a significant
delay in responding to requests.
Details of this situation, how to repro
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:19:47PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> I went the "choose right alignment" way now:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/mod_socache_shmcb-alignment.patch
>
> It actually wasn't that complicated.
Alignment problems never die with that code!
+1, that looks good, mi
