I'm playing around w/ a newish LB provider that balances based
on latency. I'd like to fold it in after I clean it up a bit
but it seems to me that we could also fold in the round-robin
provider in example (after a suitable cleanup) as well as add
in a simply by_random as well.
Comments?
In some cases, perhaps, but this was objection asked-and-answered so my -1
was void.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Yann Ylavic ylavic@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
New Revision: 1686248
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 5:39 PM, wr...@apache.org wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Thu Jun 18 15:39:53 2015
New Revision: 1686248
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1686248
Log:
After addressing a defect, don't discuss, this isn't a forum :)
Note the patch is updated, and delete now-irrelevant
Subj sez it all.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
+!
On Jun 11, 2015 8:22 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 9:08 AM William A Rowe Jr wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
But withholding a security fix for legacy server users? Sounds like a
way to earn distrust of the user community, not reassure them that 2.4.14
is the
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Subj sez it all.
+1
Maybe including the gcc warning silenced in r1684057 (proposed in r1686298)?
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see the
following warnings
Test build 2.4.15 (Last Changed Rev: 1686275)
--- core.lo ---
core.c:5003:1: warning: unused variable 'aplog_module_index'
On 2015-06-18 22:17, Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 18.06.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de
mailto:oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report
Since wherever AP_DECLARE_MODULE is used we don't need the
APLOG_USE_MODULE part (ie. the static declaration of
aplog_module_index), that would possibly be better to use a new
AP_DEFINE_MODULE, simply as:
#define AP_DECLARE_MODULE(foo) \
module AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA foo##_module
The
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 9:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see
the following warnings
These were not in 2.4.12 with the same compiler (and version)?
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see
the following warnings
Are you using clang for both compiles?
(I think I saw those for
On 2015-06-18 21:54, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I don't see
the following warnings
Are you using clang
Am 18.06.2015 um 21:54 schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 3:03 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de
mailto:oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2015-06-18 19:08, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Subj sez it all.
I don't know if it is worth to report this, but the on 2.4.12. I
don't see the
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Jan Pazdziora jpazdzi...@redhat.com wrote:
I'd appreciate any comments about suitability of such change, as well
as the implementation. Specifically, I'm not sure if people will
prefer the generic and currently proposed
SSL_CLIENT_SAN_otherName_n
I have a patch for this now, but discovered that mod_h2 needs some more:
In the ALPN propose callback, the module needs to know which vhost the
connection is about. And not only that, it needs the server_rec of that
to check its config. If the module is disabled in that vhost, it should
not
Hello,
I've noticed that support for getting subjectAltName entries Email and
Type landed in 2.4.13, via r1676087.
We've come across another type in subjectAltName, Microsoft Universal
Principal Name (OID 1.3.6.1.4.1.311.20.2.3) which would be useful to
retrieve from the certificate and use for
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Stefan Eissing
stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de wrote:
It retrieves SNI servername via ssl_var_lookup, creates a fake request_rec
incokes ap_update_vhost_from_headers().
Not very elegant.
a) is there another way?
Maybe define a new ap_get_vhost_from_name() and
18 matches
Mail list logo
