Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
Am 09.02.2018 um 21:21 schrieb Roy T. Fielding : >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Eissing >> wrote: >>> Am 09.02.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Daniel : >>> >>> I'm getting lost. >>> >>> What would VirtualServer tag mean

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Roy T. Fielding
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> Am 09.02.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Daniel : >> >> I'm getting lost. >> >> What would VirtualServer tag mean exactly? >> >> Thanks in advance and apologies for my slowness :) > > The

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 09.02.2018 um 16:12 schrieb Daniel : > > I'm getting lost. > > What would VirtualServer tag mean exactly? > > Thanks in advance and apologies for my slowness :) The intention of VirtualServer is to solve common properties for a range of VirtualHosts. It's a level

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Daniel
I'm getting lost. What would VirtualServer tag mean exactly? Thanks in advance and apologies for my slowness :) 2018-02-09 13:42 GMT+01:00 Stefan Eissing : > > >> Am 09.02.2018 um 13:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : >> >> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:04

Re: 2.6/3.0 yet again...

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
+1 This sounds like a good way forward. > Am 09.02.2018 um 14:10 schrieb Jim Jagielski : > > > >> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> >> Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this >> was just a

2.6/3.0 yet again...

2018-02-09 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Feb 9, 2018, at 12:04 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > > Since you won't permit 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, we can presume this > was just a strawman? > That is a false statement. If enough people wanted 2.6/3.0 to come into existence, it would have. All I want

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 09.02.2018 um 13:25 schrieb Yann Ylavic : > > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> >> >>> Am 06.02.2018 um 08:13 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : >>> >>> Forgive the top-post, Gmail app sucks.

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 09.02.2018 um 13:28 schrieb Eric Covener : > >> That is one possible way to address this. However, since VirtualHost >> requires at least one address, this would be confusing: >> >> >> ServerName example.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What would NNN be or

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Eric Covener
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Stefan Eissing > wrote: >> >> >>> Am 06.02.2018 um 08:13 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : >>> >>> Forgive the top-post, Gmail app sucks. >>>

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Eric Covener
> That is one possible way to address this. However, since VirtualHost requires > at least one address, this would be confusing: > > >ServerName example.org > > > > > > > What would NNN be or what would it mean? Would it also be inherited by the > nested vhosts? This is

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Yann Ylavic
On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote: > > >> Am 06.02.2018 um 08:13 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : >> >> Forgive the top-post, Gmail app sucks. >> >> Thanks for taking the time for tl;dr - it sums up the current situation >> really

Re: The Case for Managed Domains

2018-02-09 Thread Stefan Eissing
> Am 06.02.2018 um 08:13 schrieb William A Rowe Jr : > > Forgive the top-post, Gmail app sucks. > > Thanks for taking the time for tl;dr - it sums up the current situation > really well. > > I pointed out some months ago that the matching foo in vhosts is weak, since >