> Am 08.03.2023 um 23:38 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 4:57 PM BUSH Steve wrote:
>
>> Please remember to send the release announcement to annou...@httpd.apache.org
>
> Maybe a moderation issue? Can anyone with the proper hat help check it
> out
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 11:02 PM BUSH Steve wrote:
> Correction!
>
> I used our test template for the rule when I e-mailed just now, but once
> it is converted to the apache httpd.conf format, the actual rule appears in
> the httpd.conf as:
>
> RewriteRule ^/zoology/animals/reset/(\d+)$ "/auth/lau
t
it might be worth updating the mod_rewrite documentation on this?
From: BUSH Steve
Sent: Wednesday, March 8, 2023 7:45 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56
I just completed upgrading to 2. 4. 56 from 2. 4. 55 and now we are having
existing origin servers, and cache poisoning.
Credits: Lars Krapf of Adobe
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:51 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56
I am going to call this one early and proceed with the release. 9 bindin
On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 4:57 PM BUSH Steve wrote:
> Please remember to send the release announcement to annou...@httpd.apache.org
Maybe a moderation issue? Can anyone with the proper hat help check it
out please?
Please remember to send the release announcement to annou...@httpd.apache.org
From: Eric Covener
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:51 AM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as httpd-2.4.56
I am going to call this one early and proceed with the release. 9
the irony! Thanks.
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 6:05 PM wrote:
>
> Author: gbechis
> Date: Tue Mar 7 23:05:49 2023
> New Revision: 1908179
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1908179&view=rev
> Log:
> typo
>
> Modified:
> httpd/dev-tools/release/README
I am going to call this one early and proceed with the release. 9
binding +1 and no other votes.
fielding, covener, icing, gbechis, ylavic, jblond, jorton, steffenAL, rpluem
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 3:18 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/5/23 10:31 PM, Eric Covener wrote
On 3/5/23 10:31 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.
+1 All looks fine on Windows.
> Op 5 mrt. 2023 om 22:32 heeft Eric Covener het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a
On Sun, Mar 05, 2023 at 04:31:34PM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Let's have a talk.
[ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong.
+1
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 10:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
+1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All checksums/sigs and tests pass (Debian 11 & 12)
On 3/5/23 22:31, Eric Covener wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
[ ] +1: It's not just
> Am 05.03.2023 um 22:31 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candida
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 4:31 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball
> On Mar 5, 2023, at 1:31 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candida
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.56-rc1 as 2.4.56:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0:
e.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 83e7062 publishing release httpd-2.4.55
83e7062 is described below
commit 83e7062476d4a912f20ab275137b9587d441fdf0
Author: Eric Covener
AuthorDate: Tue Jan 17 11:16:01 2023 -0500
p
gt; >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 11:29 AM Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 1/17/23 5:16 PM, cove...@apache.org wrote:
> >>>> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> >>>>
&
he.org wrote:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
covener pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 83e7062 publishing release httpd-2.
> This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
> > >
> > > covener pushed a commit to branch main
> > > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd-site.git
> > >
> > >
> > > The following commit(s) were a
t; The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
> > new 83e7062 publishing release httpd-2.4.55
> > 83e7062 is described below
> >
> > commit 83e7062476d4a912f20ab275137b9587d441fdf0
> > Author: Eric Covener
> > AuthorDate:
to refs/heads/main by this push:
> new 83e7062 publishing release httpd-2.4.55
> 83e7062 is described below
>
> commit 83e7062476d4a912f20ab275137b9587d441fdf0
> Author: Eric Covener
> AuthorDate: Tue Jan 17 11:16:01 2023 -0500
>
> publishing r
Vote, passes w/ 6 binding +1 and no -1:
+1 covener, jorton, icing, ylavic, jim, gbechis
I will continue the release process tomorrow.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:40 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https
Not a showstopper, but: srclib/apr/configure was again generated with
autoconf 2.70+ (2.71). This triggers a bug which is fixed in APR 1.7.x
head, but the fix has not been released as there was not APR release vor
almost 4 years now.
Since the bundled APR/APU are not actually part of the
Le 11/01/2023 à 10:05, Stefan Eissing via dev a écrit :
Nearly all mod_tls in error (likely something missing in my conf)
Not here. Do you have any more information on those failures?
Still don't have time to spend some minutes on it, but:
configure:35461: checking whether to enable mod_tl
> On Jan 10, 2023, at 8:40 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candida
On 1/10/23 14:40, Eric Covener wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as 2.4.55
+1 for release
looks fine
> Am 11.01.2023 um 15:50 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev
> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 10.01.2023 um 22:39 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
>>> :
>>>
>>> 1 issue with pytest:
>>> test/modules/http2/test_600_h2proxy.py .F
>>> (details at the end of t
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 9:51 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev
> wrote:
> >
> > > Am 10.01.2023 um 22:39 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
> > > :
> > >
> > > 1 issue with pytest:
> > > test/modules/http2/test_600_h2proxy.py .F
> > > (details at
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev
wrote:
>
> > Am 10.01.2023 um 22:39 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
> > :
> >
> > 1 issue with pytest:
> > test/modules/http2/test_600_h2proxy.py .F
> > (details at the end of the mail)
> >
> > Don't know if expected or not. Some pytest
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 2:41 PM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as 2.4.55:
+1 on Debian 11 & 12, thanks Eric for RMing.
Regards;
Yann.
I am +1 on my macOS testing of the candidate.
Addressing the findings from Christophe:
> Am 10.01.2023 um 22:39 schrieb Christophe JAILLET
> :
>
> Le 10/01/2023 à 14:40, Eric Covener a écrit :
>> Hi all,
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball
Le 10/01/2023 à 14:40, Eric Covener a écrit :
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as 2.4.55:
[ ] +1: It'
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:21:55AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:17 AM Giovanni Bechis wrote:
...
> > In file included from /usr/include/openssl/asn1.h:27,
> > from /usr/include/openssl/rsa.h:21,
> > from ab.c:169:
> > /usr/include/openss
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:17 AM Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:40:52AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:40:52AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:40:52AM -0500, Eric Covener wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candid
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:40 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.55-rc1 as 2.4.55:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:16 PM Steve Hay wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 09:58, Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for testing. The release is approved:
> >
> > PMC votes: +1 from ylavic, jfclere, jorton
> >
> > I will promote the release and annou
On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 at 09:58, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> Thanks for testing. The release is approved:
>
> PMC votes: +1 from ylavic, jfclere, jorton
>
> I will promote the release and announce it.
>
Thanks for this release. I didn't get round to uploading it to CPAN
yet, bu
Thanks for testing. The release is approved:
PMC votes: +1 from ylavic, jfclere, jorton
I will promote the release and announce it.
Regards, Joe
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 12:31:56PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote:
> Hi, I've prepared a candidate release tarball for libapreq2 v2.17 here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/libapreq/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate
On 8/18/22 13:31, Joe Orton wrote:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
Tested on fedora 36
--
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 11:32 AM Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:32 PM Joe Orton wrote:
> >
> > I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate
> > tarball as v2.17:
>
> +1 on Debian(s).
Not really related to apreq, but s
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:32 PM Joe Orton wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate
> tarball as v2.17:
+1 on Debian(s).
Thanks Joe for RMIng!
Hi, I've prepared a candidate release tarball for libapreq2 v2.17 here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/libapreq/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next week to release this candidate
tarball as v2.17:
[ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
[ ] +0: Le
Am 06.06.2022 um 16:25 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
right?
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the
With 9 +1 the voting is complete and I will make the release now.
Thanks everyone for testing!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
> Am 08.06.2022 um 09:04 schrieb Petr Gajdos :
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> [x] +1: It's not just good, it's good
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
SLE 15sp4, openSUSE 15.4,Tumbleweed
--
Have a lot of fun!
on, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>>> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build
>>>> candidates, right?
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball
On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 6:04 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Seems a lot of people are either on vacation or busy - and that is fine.
>
> Since the rc* candidates merely differed on the TCP_FLUSH defines, I tend
> to count all positive votes as still applicable!
+1 aix/xlc/ppc64
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
right?
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a
+1 All looks fine on Windows.
> Op 6 jun. 2022 om 16:25 heeft Stefan Eissing het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build
> candidates, right?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball
> Am 07.06.2022 um 12:21 schrieb Yann Ylavic :
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
>
> [X] +1: It's not just go
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 4:25 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
[X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
All good on Linux Debian(s).
Thanks Stefan for RMing!
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>>
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>>
>>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>>> t
>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
>> [X] +1: It&#x
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:25:31PM +0200, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
> right?
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist
Stefan Eissing in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:25:31
+0200):
>I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc3 as 2.4.54:
>[x] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough!
No problems encountered on Windows
Here we go again! Sorry for the repeats, but that is why we build candidates,
right?
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd
> Am 06.06.2022 um 16:11 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:09 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>
>> Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It
>> seems the correct way to handle this...
>
> Especially given limited votes, I think so.
Agreed, I cancel
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 7:09 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Guys, shall I make an rc3 with the recent apr version check changes? It seems
> the correct way to handle this...
Especially given limited votes, I think so.
ay to handle this...
>
> Cheers,
> Stefan
>
>> Am 06.06.2022 um 10:12 schrieb giova...@paclan.it:
>>
>> On 6/4/22 14:59, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>>>
2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>>
>> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
>> this candidate tarball httpd-
On 6/4/22 14:59, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over t
On 05/06/2022 06:21, Eric Covener wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM John Doe wrote:
Hi,
Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
/* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
* do we use?
*/
#define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 4:17 PM John Doe wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Eric's fix did not fix because I'm building with APR 1.7.0.
>
> In apr.hw 1.7.0 there is
> /* If we have a TCP implementation that can be "corked", what flag
> * do we use?
> */
> #define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG @apr_tcp_nopush_flag@
>
>
AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
> >
> > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
> >
> &g
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 8:59 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to
Hi all,
next attempt at 2.5.54. Thanks everyone for participating!
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.54-rc2 as 2.4.54
This vote is cancelled due to build problems under Windows.
I'll create a rc2 candidate and post that for voting soon.
Thanks everyone.
> Am 03.06.2022 um 16:57 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and si
> Am 04.06.2022 um 14:08 schrieb Eric Covener :
>
> 2.4.x ready to reroll
Nice! Thanks Eric. Will roll an rc2 in a few minutes.
Cheers, Stefan
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:36 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:11 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>>>
>>> How is the definition
2.4.x ready to reroll
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:36 AM Eric Covener wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:11 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
> >
> > How is the definition in your include/apr.h for APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG? On my
> > macOS it is:
> >
> > #define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG TCP_NOPUSH
> >
> > It m
On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 7:11 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> How is the definition in your include/apr.h for APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG? On my
> macOS it is:
>
> #define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG TCP_NOPUSH
>
> It maybe that the added lines
>
> #if APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG && !defined(__APPLE__)
>
> needs a chec
No apr.h in httpd/include. In APR yes, but not the line you mention.
I am going out of town now. Monday again.
Maybe Gregg can chime in.
> Op 4 jun. 2022 om 13:18 heeft Stefan Eissing het
> volgende geschreven:
>
> How is the definition in your include/apr.h for APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG? O
How is the definition in your include/apr.h for APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG? On my
macOS it is:
#define APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG TCP_NOPUSH
It maybe that the added lines
#if APR_TCP_NOPUSH_FLAG && !defined(__APPLE__)
needs a check for Windows too?
> Am 04.06.2022 um 12:49 schrieb SteffenAL :
>
> r1
find out more
what the offending code piece is?
Thanks,
Stefan
>
>
>
> On Friday 03/06/2022 at 16:57, Stefan Eissing wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/de
-1
Does not build :
Error C2018 C:\VC16\Win32\httpd-2.4\server\core_filters.c
638 unknown character '0x40'
On Friday 03/06/2022 at 16:57, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repo
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days (at least
up to and including Monday) to release this candidate tarball
httpd-2.4.54-rc1 as 2.4.54:
[ ] +1: It's not just
Hi,
I intend to tag a 2.4.x release candidate later today. It seems everything
is prepped, our CI is green and it has been about 3 months since the last
release.
If you see any reason we should wait, please speak up!
Kind Regards,
Stefan
Am 25.05.2022 um 14:15 schrieb Stefan Eissing:
Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
+1 and thanks!
Rainer
On 5/25/22 2:15 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
>
> it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
> Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
+1
Regards
Rüdiger
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:15 PM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
+1 thanks for proposing!
+1 ty!
On Wed, May 25, 2022, 8:15 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
>
> it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
> Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
>
> Kind Regards,
> Stefan
>
Anyone feeling release vibes in the air?
it's been a good 2.5 months and some things have accumulated.
Maybe the start of June would be a good target?
Kind Regards,
Stefan
This
Release whenever you want, my 30 years in this game shows most networks,
> including mine, are not going to touch it on a weekend anyway, so monday or
> tuesday before it hits test beds - assuming there is a real need to upgrade
> in the first place (high CVE etc), and later in
Release whenever you want, my 30 years in this game shows most networks,
including mine, are not going to touch it on a weekend anyway, so monday
or tuesday before it hits test beds - assuming there is a real need to
upgrade in the first place (high CVE etc), and later in the week before
it
On 3/11/22 6:00 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> Thank you all! With 7 +1 votes and no other, I announce rc2 has passed.
>
> I will do the release of 2.4.53 on Monday.
>
> Kind Regards and a nice weekend to you all,
You too and thanks for RM'ing.
Regards
Rüdiger
Thank you all! With 7 +1 votes and no other, I announce rc2 has passed.
I will do the release of 2.4.53 on Monday.
Kind Regards and a nice weekend to you all,
Stefan
> Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed rele
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 11:19 AM Stefan Eissing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
>
> I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
> this candidate
for a vote on the release time:
[ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
[ ] +0: do not really care
[ ] -1: better do it Monday, Admins have a life, too, you know?
Am 09.03.2022 um 17:19 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatur
On 3/11/22 1:14 PM, Stefan Eissing wrote:
> While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive.
>
> Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote on the release time:
>
> [ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
> [ ] +0: do not re
While the 72 hours have not all passed yet, the votes so far are positive.
Given that no -1 vote will come, I call for a vote on the release time:
[ ] +1: release it later today, it needs to get out!
[ ] +0: do not really care
[ ] -1: better do it Monday, Admins have a life, too, you know
+1 Windows
On Wednesday 09/03/2022 at 17:19, Stefan Eissing wrote:
Hi all,
Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release
this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.53-rc2 as
201 - 300 of 2373 matches
Mail list logo
