Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

--- 4/3/2024 7:56 AM 101376 mod_dav.so >>> -a 4/3/2024 7:56 AM 51200 mod_dav_fs.so >>> -a 4/3/2024 7:56 AM 23552 mod_dav_lock.so >>> +++ >>> >>> DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT is in ./modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h line 1826 >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+++ DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT is in ./modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h line 1826 Steffen On 2024/04/03 12:26:09 Eric Covener wrote: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+1: macOS 14.4.1/Xcode 15.3, CentOS8, Ubuntu 18.04LTS, 20.04LTS, 22.04LTS > On Apr 3, 2024, at 8:26 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > Hi all, > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) > > Please find below the proposed release t

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:12 AM Eric Covener wrote: Proceeding with release now, thanks everyone for testing. > FYI I plan to call this in about an hour with the following binding +1: > covener, icing, jorton, thumbs, gbechis, jfclere, ylavic, minfrin -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

FYI I plan to call this in about an hour with the following binding +1: covener, icing, jorton, thumbs, gbechis, jfclere, ylavic, minfrin -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

wrote: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+++ DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT is in ./modules/dav/main/mod_dav.h line 1826 Steffen On 2024/04/03 12:26:09 Eric Covener wrote: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:52 PM Steffen Land wrote: > > -1 > Get an error: > > Error C2065 'DAV_WALKTYPE_TOLERANT': undeclared identifier mod_dav_fs > C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\dav\fs\repos.c 1599 Are you compiling with an old "mod_dav.h" somewhere in the -I[nclude] path?

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

> C:\VS17\Win32\httpd-2.4\modules\dav\fs\repos.c 1599 > > Steffen > > On 2024/04/03 12:26:09 Eric Covener wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) >> >> Please find below

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

5 instead of 2.4.x...) > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: > [ ] +1: It's not just

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

Thanks! Am 03.04.24 um 21:13 schrieb Eric Covener: On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Eric Covener wrote: On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rainer Jung wrote: Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: 2.4.58:

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 3:03 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:54 PM Rainer Jung wrote: > > > > Minor nit: the format of the SHA hash files has changes. Example: > > > > 2.4.58: > > > > fa16d72a078210a54c47dd5bef2f8b9b8a01d94909a51453956b3ec6442ea4c5 > > *httpd-2.4.58.tar.bz2 >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

SHA2-256(httpd-2.4.59-rc1.tar.bz2)= > ec51501ec480284ff52f637258135d333230a7d229c3afa6f6c2f9040e321323 It looks like the release tools are trying to strip that but maybe no longer matching? https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/dev-tools/release/common-lib.sh

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

to check scripted with commandline tools. Am 03.04.24 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 03 Apr 2024, at 13:26, Eric Covener wrote: > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! +1 on RHEL9. Regards, Graham --

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

+1 CentOS 6 CentOS 7 AlmaLinux 8 AlmaLinux 9 Ubuntu 20 Ubuntu 22 Thanks for RM’n. Regards, Cory McIntire | Release Manager cory.mcint...@webpros.com<mailto:cory.mcint...@webpros.com> | cPanel – a webpros company From: Eric Covener Date: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 at 07:26 To: Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 2:26 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All good from my testing on debian(s). Thanks Eric!

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 4/3/24 14:26, Eric Covener wrote: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Build and tested in fedora 39 and windows server 2019 (VS17 2022 Cmake). -- Cheers Jean-Frederic

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On 4/3/24 14:26, Eric Covener wrote: Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:16 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > > > Am 03.04.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener : > > > > Hi all, > > > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of > 2.4.x...) > > > > Please fin

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 08:26:09AM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 a

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

> Am 03.04.2024 um 14:26 schrieb Eric Covener : > > Hi all, > > (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

> I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59: my +1 (AIX/xlc/ppc64) Only familiar t/ssl/proxy.t client auth issues with a openssl11 server

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as httpd-2.4.59

Hi all, (After only minor embarrassment of patching tags/2.4.55 instead of 2.4.x...) Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a SHORTENED VOTE to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.59-rc1 as 2.4.59

FYI preparing a release mid-week

I will be RM'ing a httpd release mid-week. -- Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Will apreq 2.18 still be released? On 16/02/2024 09:44, Joe Orton wrote: Joe, you've been warned before to moderate your language. This ends now. It is completely unacceptable to insult other members of the community like this one time, let alone repeatedly. It is unproductive, unprofessional,

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Joe, you've been warned before to moderate your language. This ends now. It is completely unacceptable to insult other members of the community like this one time, let alone repeatedly. It is unproductive, unprofessional, and in violation of the ASF code of conduct. I've taken the decision as

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

The mediocre talent pool in this community doesn’t mind the code duplication of having many different form data parsers inside a common code base because, really, collaboration and common cause is not your thing. So live it up with the user base while they ponder your architectural rationales

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Stupid shit like this is everyone's problem: https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/161454 Hating me for solving it cleanly is par for the course for the current httpd committer community. On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:41 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > Back in the day, httpd was a celebrated

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Back in the day, httpd was a celebrated integration point for dozens of apache projects. Literally the flagship of the organization. It's also why people were judicious about what to include in core, versus codebases remaining elsewhere in the org as third party modules. Of course at this point,

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

The proof is in the pudding, as it were. There's prima facia evidence in this very thread that he lied about ever running the test suite for apreq, because Joe wouldn't have had to patch it for him 8 months later had he ever bothered in the first place. But when everyone around you is no better

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

> And because you are such a prima donna Yann Yann is an amazing programmer and super easy to work with. Maybe it's hard to tell from the backseat.

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

iki >> <https://sunstarsys.com/orion/features> >> >> 954.253.3732 >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 7:03 PM Frank Gingras wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:47 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: >>

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

>> Nobody gives a flying f what you released from trunk. I personally will >>> be dead and buried before you release httpd 3.0. So like you I don’t give >>> a damned what you do with it. >>> >>> I just want the warfare against existing libapreq2 use

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

body gives a flying f what you released from trunk. I personally will >> be dead and buried before you release httpd 3.0. So like you I don’t give >> a damned what you do with it. >> >> I just want the warfare against existing libapreq2 users to cease and >> desist. >&

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 5:47 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > Nobody gives a flying f what you released from trunk. I personally will be > dead and buried before you release httpd 3.0. So like you I don’t give a > damned what you do with it. > > I just want the warfare against existing

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Nobody gives a flying f what you released from trunk. I personally will be dead and buried before you release httpd 3.0. So like you I don’t give a damned what you do with it. I just want the warfare against existing libapreq2 users to cease and desist. If there are known vulnerabilities

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

only ever been in one alpha release, and predates the regression. I'll keep any advice about an apreq release to myself, good luck and please be mindful of the CoC https://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Let's be honest for once Yann. You came up with this hairbrained patch over 2 years ago right here: https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1895107 Yet the first time anyone actually ran the unit tests for apreq was during the 2.17 release process **8 months later**. And because you

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

You mean the 2.17 release, where Joe Orton actually patched the test suite out of your coercion? Great engineering. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=1903489 Joe Schaefer, Ph.D. <https://sunstarsys.com/orion/features> Orion - The Enterprise Jamstack Wiki <https://sunstarsys.

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

er community), by spitting your venom on everyone here (and in all the forums) and nothing else. You, as a member of the httpd team, could have fixed it and started/encouraged a new release with the one-liner fix, yet your first/primary point was to insult others for having touched your (alphally

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

> >> >> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:25 PM Eric Covener wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:45 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> > >>> > Assuming Google hasn't found any more fuzzing vulnerabilities with >>> apreq, we should call the subprojec

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

er releasing it, rolling any >> new efforts into httpd's internal copy of the codebase for the next major >> release of httpd. >> > >> > Sound like a plan? I can get the ball rolling on the RM process >> assuming I still have working login (or can reacquire it vi

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Schaefer wrote: > > > > Assuming Google hasn't found any more fuzzing vulnerabilities with > apreq, we should call the subproject done after releasing it, rolling any > new efforts into httpd's internal copy of the codebase for the next major > release of httpd. > > > >

Re: release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 1:45 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > > Assuming Google hasn't found any more fuzzing vulnerabilities with apreq, we > should call the subproject done after releasing it, rolling any new efforts > into httpd's internal copy of the codebase for the next major release

release apreq 2.18 and mothball the project

Assuming Google hasn't found any more fuzzing vulnerabilities with apreq, we should call the subproject done after releasing it, rolling any new efforts into httpd's internal copy of the codebase for the next major release of httpd. Sound like a plan? I can get the ball rolling on the RM process

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

> Am 25.10.2023 um 16:56 schrieb David Zuelke : > > FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the latest > version. Not in my browser. And it was so already on release day. Something in your infrastructure delivering you old content? > > - Da

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

FYI, the https://httpd.apache.org front page still lists 2.4.57 as the latest version. - David On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 5:09 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes > up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

> Am 19.10.2023 um 13:27 schrieb Rainer Jung : > > Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev: >> Hi all, >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> https://dis

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

Am 16.10.23 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

On 10/17/23 20:58, Yann Ylavic wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian 12 and 13

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

With 8 +1 votes and no counters, this seems a go. If nothing else comes up, I'll do the release tomorrow noonish. Thanks all for the testing! Cheers, Stefan > Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 5:10 PM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! Tested on Debian 12 and 13. Thanks for RMing Stefan!

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

> Am 17.10.2023 um 20:37 schrieb SteffenAL : > > Found it. > > My error, had included h2_ws.h as extra library (sorry!). > > Vote now is +1 Thanks, Steffen. Good that you found the mistake. > > Steffen > >> --- Original message --- >> Su

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

Found it. My error, had included h2_ws.h as extra library (sorry!). Vote now is +1 Steffen --- Original message --- Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58 From: Steffen To: Date: Tuesday, 17/10/2023 18:29 For me still -1. Op 17 okt 2023 om 18:18 heeft Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

> - you get compiler errors on your win32 build > >>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong > >>>> > >>>> Correct? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Stefan > >>>> > >>>>> >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

u are not able to tell us what is wrong >>>> >>>> Correct? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Stefan >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Steffen >>>>> >>>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan E

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

>>> - you are not able to tell us what is wrong >>> >>> Correct? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> >>>> >>>> Steffen >>>> >>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 11:10 AM Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

gt; Cheers, >>> Stefan >>> >>>> >>>> Steffen >>>> >>>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

gt; Cheers, >> Stefan >> >>> >>> Steffen >>> >>>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>>>> het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> after fi

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

> Am 16.10.2023 um 17:08 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

e not able to tell us what is wrong > > Correct? > > Cheers, > Stefan > >> >> Steffen >> >>>> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >>>> het volgende geschreven: >>> >>> Hi all, >>>

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

s, Stefan > > Steffen > >> Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev >> het volgende geschreven: >> >> Hi all, >> >> after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: >> >> Please find below the proposed release tar

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

-1 does not build on windows. Steffen > Op 16 okt 2023 om 17:10 heeft Stefan Eissing via dev > het volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball an

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

On 10/16/23 17:08, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

+1 Built/tested on: CentOS 6 CentOS 7 AlmaLinux 9 Ubuntu 20.04 Ubuntu 22.04 Regards, Cory McIntire | Lead – cPanel Application Security Team | Release Manager – EasyApache cory.mcint...@webpros.com<mailto:cory.mcint...@webpros.com> | cPanel – a webpros company From: Stefan Eissing v

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

t; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58: > > [X] +1

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 05:08:11PM +0200, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > Hi all, > > after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > >

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as httpd-2.4.58

Hi all, after fixing my merge mistake in rc2 (sorry!), we go again: Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc3 as 2.4.58

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc2 as httpd-2.4.58

PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> after some hickups with getting the new WebSockets support to >> compile on Joe's old computers, we try again! >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc2 as httpd-2.4.58

omputers, we try again! > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc2 as 2.4.58: > [ ] +1:

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc2 as httpd-2.4.58

Hi all, after some hickups with getting the new WebSockets support to compile on Joe's old computers, we try again! Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as httpd-2.4.58

rc1 vote is cancelled. There will be a rc2 soon. Thanks for testing. > Am 16.10.2023 um 12:07 schrieb Stefan Eissing via dev : > > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I wou

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as httpd-2.4.58

t a merge machine for everyone. ^^ If someone wants to add them, I'll make an rc2 with it. Cheers, Stefan > > Regards > > Rüdiger > > On 10/16/23 12:07 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signature

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as httpd-2.4.58

First of all thanks for RM. It looks to me that we have 2 accepted backports in the STATUS that have not been merged. This seems unfortunate. Regards Rüdiger On 10/16/23 12:07 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and s

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as httpd-2.4.58

Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.58-rc1 as 2.4.58: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! [ ] +0: Let's have

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

wrote: >> >>> Your LDAP record is still present [1]. You're still on the PMC of httpd >>> and perl. Commit rights to incubator, sis, subversion. Dunno where httpd >>> went, but as a PMC member of httpd you should have commit. We can fix that. >>> >

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

tpd you should have commit. We can fix that. >> >> So should we fix this up, so you can walk through a libapreq2 release? >> >> Cheers, >> -g >> [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/joes >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:43 AM Joe Scha

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

> went, but as a PMC member of httpd you should have commit. We can fix that. > > So should we fix this up, so you can walk through a libapreq2 release? > > Cheers, > -g > [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/roster/committer/joes > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 8:43 AM Joe Schaefer wrot

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

Your LDAP record is still present [1]. You're still on the PMC of httpd and perl. Commit rights to incubator, sis, subversion. Dunno where httpd went, but as a PMC member of httpd you should have commit. We can fix that. So should we fix this up, so you can walk through a libapreq2 release

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

Because my account no longer exists? On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 1:43 AM Greg Stein wrote: > you're on the PMC. Why don't you do the tag ? > > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 4:31 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> Seems like it’s been a year since the last release, which means it’s time

Re: Time for a new libapreq2 release?

you're on the PMC. Why don't you do the tag ? On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 4:31 PM Joe Schaefer wrote: > Seems like it’s been a year since the last release, which means it’s time > for good people to take another try at releasing something nondefective. > > Here to help with the qua

Time for a new libapreq2 release?

Seems like it’s been a year since the last release, which means it’s time for good people to take another try at releasing something nondefective. Here to help with the quality control this time around. -- Joe Schaefer, Ph.D. <https://sunstarsys.com/orion/features> Orion - The Ente

Re: release?

Le 17/08/2023 à 13:42, Stefan Eissing via dev a écrit : How are people feeling about another release? Since I have tons of bugfixes in 2.4.x and some pending features to port back, I offer to RM this. We have 5 items in 2.4.x/STATUS which lack votes. Would be nice if people could find time

Re: release?

On 8/17/23 1:42 PM, Stefan Eissing via dev wrote: > How are people feeling about another release? > > Since I have tons of bugfixes in 2.4.x and some pending features to port > back, I offer to RM this. > > We have 5 items in 2.4.x/STATUS which lack votes. Would be nice

release?

How are people feeling about another release? Since I have tons of bugfixes in 2.4.x and some pending features to port back, I offer to RM this. We have 5 items in 2.4.x/STATUS which lack votes. Would be nice if people could find time to look into those where they feel comfortable to vote

mod_wasm: v0.12.0 release

Hola, We just released mod_wasm v0.12.0! This new version introduces a new directive, WasmMapCGIFileNames, providing the ability to configure CGI applications using custom guest directories, eliminating the need for

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

On 4/10/23 11:37 PM, BUSH Steve wrote: > I just downloaded the apache 2.4.57 source code and attempting to compile on > Windows, mod_rewrite.c fails with this error: > > > I fixed it for my local build by editing modules/mapper/mod_rewrite.mak and > updating the CPP_PROJ= lines to include

RE: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

/../include" /I "../../server" /I "../database" /I "../ssl" /I "../../srclib/apr/include" /I "../../srclib/apr-util/include" /D "_DEBUG" /D "WIN32" /D "_WINDOWS" /Fo"$(INTDIR)\\" /Fd"$(INTDIR)\

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 12:10 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candida

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

Le 03/04/2023 à 21:44, Christophe JAILLET a écrit : Le 02/04/2023 à 18:10, Eric Covener a écrit : Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

Good day, +1 no issues seen on Windows after include ../../server for mod_rewrite test_char.h Steffen > Op 2 apr. 2023 om 18:11 heeft Eric Covener het volgende > geschreven: > Hi all, > > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

Le 02/04/2023 à 18:10, Eric Covener a écrit : Hi all, Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as 2.4.57: [X] +1: It's

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 6:11 PM Eric Covener wrote: > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as 2.4.57: [X] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! All tests pass on Debian 11 and 12, sums and sigs OK. Thanks Eric, Yann.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

On Sun, Apr 02, 2023 at 12:10:25PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote: > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release > this candidate tarball httpd-2.

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

ErrorC1083Cannot open include file: 'test_char.h': No such file or >>> directorymod_rewriteC:\VS17\Win64\httpd-2.4\modules\mappers\mod_rewrite.c109 >>> >>> Is it ok that I include the test_char.h generated from gen_test_char.exe ? >>> >>> Steffe

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.57-rc1 as httpd-2.4.57

> Is it ok that I include the test_char.h generated from gen_test_char.exe ? > > Steffen >   >   > On Sunday 02/04/2023 at 18:11, Eric Covener wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: >> >> https://dist.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >