Based on the copyright/licensing exception I noted earlier today, I have to
vote -1. I'd expect the incubating rat tool could have caught this, but it
is principally invoked against incubating candidates.
Now that the mod_md config changes are in place, I suspect we are ready for
a second attempt.
On Nov 25, 2017 09:13, "Daniel Ruggeri" wrote:
As a side note, I'm experimenting with ways to capture build and test
output as well as relevant system info related to a tested version of
httpd. Here's the current format I am using in YML (can be seen here for
this build: http://people.apache.org
Morning,
As a FYI on this, we got it built under our platforms and had no immediate,
glaring issues. We didn’t do our full fledged tests as we have to do a lot more
work to support our 2.5 version of templates and such.
I hope this helps!
—
Jacob Perkins
Product Owner
cPanel Inc.
jacob.perk
Daniel, I am very much interested in a smooth and more automated
release process. However, I am very unfamiliar regarding what is
all involved and cannot judge if it is complete. You'd probably
want Jim's input on this.
Cheers,
Stefan
> Am 09.12.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri :
>
> With a
With about a month of time the vote has been running and just a single
+1 (my own), I'm of the opinion that this release has died on the vine.
I am sensitive to the fact that this is the holiday season, so I will
keep it open only a few more days so folks can pipe up if they are still
testing or ne
I'm over due for this vote since I've been playing with docker containers,
automating the build/testing process and flying all over the place... but:
+1
Completed the test cases for the following built from the latest available
sources of each dependent library:
system:
kernel:
name: Linux
Just to clarify one aspect you asked about;
On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
is also http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ as you can see from the contents
of that URL (this is automatic, as is www.apache.org/dist/httpd from the
> Till now I was assuming that we should get a trunk and a 2.5.0-alfa repo.
No, not expected yet.
I still see only a trunk repo in svn, which is now labeled as
2.5.0-alfa, and I see the tags/2.5.0-alfa repo.
Till now I was assuming that we should get a trunk and a 2.5.0-alfa
repo.
Does not build on windows, for example .mak files are missing and
cmake/dsp. etc not up to date.
Attac
Hi, all;
Please find the proposed 2.5.0-alpha release tarballs and signatures
at the following location. This release candidate was tagged from trunk
as of r1814469:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/
I'd like to call a vote to release this alpha candidate. Please do note
- this i
10 matches
Mail list logo
