ULL) = 0
4622 13:17:16.746765 epoll_ctl(11, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 12, {EPOLLIN,
{u32=158210764, u64=158210764}}
4622 13:17:16.746833 <... epoll_ctl resumed> ) = 0
4622 13:17:16.747587 gettimeofday(
4622 13:17:16.747904 <... gettimeofday resumed> {1346217436, 747649}, NULL) = 0
4622 13:17:1
ef look, it seems not necessary. I will move it out of loop and
> test.
>
> 2012-08-28
>
> pqf
>
> 发件人：Lazy
> 发送时间：2012-08-27 21:47
> 主题：Re: Re: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
> 收件人："
：Lazy
发送时间：2012-08-27 21:47
主题：Re: Re: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
2012/8/16 pqf :
> How about this:
> 1. procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() now return a status code from PM, so process
> handler now know the spawn request is denyed or not.
> 2. i
sary to call procmgr_init_spawn_cmd()
from inside the for loop ?
>
> 2012-08-16
>
> pqf
> ____
> 发件人：Lazy
> 发送时间：2012-08-16 16:47
> 主题：Re: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
> 收件人："
: Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
2012/8/16 pqf :
> Hi, Michal
> My solution do "add availability to each class", which is the
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() call in each loop do.
> The sleep() call is intrudused for a stress test witho
2012/8/16 pqf :
> Hi, Michal
> My solution do "add availability to each class", which is the
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() call in each loop do.
> The sleep() call is intrudused for a stress test without warm up time, in
> this case, mod_fcgid will create more processes than a slow start one(each
> pr
:23
主题：Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送："pqf"
On 8/15/2012 8:23 PM, pqf wrote:
> But since someone said remove this sleep(), the server work fine without
> bottleneck(Maybe
> he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove
On 8/15/2012 8:23 PM, pqf wrote:
> But since someone said remove this sleep(), the server work fine without
> bottleneck(Maybe
> he didn't notise the warm up issue?), so I thought remove the sleep() is a
> good idea. But
> reduce the time of sleep() is fine to me too.
> Any other idea?
Can we in
间：2012-08-15 21:48
主题：Re: mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
2012/8/15 pqf :
> Hi, all
> I prefer the following solution, can anyone review it?
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() will be blocked until process manager create a new
> fcgid process, th
2012/8/15 pqf :
> Hi, all
> I prefer the following solution, can anyone review it?
> procmgr_post_spawn_cmd() will be blocked until process manager create a new
> fcgid process, the worst case is someone else take the new created process
> before I do, and I have to post another spawn command to PM
012-08-15
pqf
发件人：Mike M
发送时间：2012-08-15 04:29
主题：mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concurrent
requests to a virtualhost where the number of concurrent requests exceed
the number o
Hi， Mike
It's really a problem...I will take a look and find a solution for it
2012-08-15
pqf
发件人：Mike M
发送时间：2012-08-15 04:29
主题：mod_fcgid concurrency bottleneck, issue#53693
收件人："dev"
抄送：
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concu
Ahoy!
With mod_fcgid I've observed a performance bottleneck in which concurrent
requests to a virtualhost where the number of concurrent requests exceed
the number of available fcgid-spawned processes result in a significant
delay in responding to requests.
Details of this situation, how to repro
13 matches
Mail list logo
