On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Kean Johnston wrote:
> On 2016-07-01 5:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-ab_sni.patch.
>
> This line worries me:
>
> +#if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT) && defined(SSL_set_tlsext_host_name)
>
>
On 2016-07-01 5:22 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
http://home.apache.org/~ylavic/patches/httpd-2.4.x-ab_sni.patch.
This line worries me:
+#if !defined(OPENSSL_NO_TLSEXT) && defined(SSL_set_tlsext_host_name)
That assumes that SSL_set_tlsext_host_name will always be implemented as a
macro by OpenSSL,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:05 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Yup, no extra steps for correct behavior.
>
> I'd support a ''surpress SNI' flag, and/or an explicit SNI arg, much like
> openssl s_client -- just for testing. But that should be the exceptional
> case.
Done, so that
Yup, no extra steps for correct behavior.
I'd support a ''surpress SNI' flag, and/or an explicit SNI arg, much like
openssl s_client -- just for testing. But that should be the exceptional
case.
On Jul 1, 2016 8:33 AM, "Reindl Harald" wrote:
Am 01.07.2016 um 15:23
Am 01.07.2016 um 15:23 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>>
>>> The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H
>>> "Host: ..." if
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
>>
>> The -I does not take any argument, it tells ab to use iether the -H
>> "Host: ..." if any, or the host from the given URL otherwise
>
> but why is there a param
Am 01.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
Is it correct ? It does not look good to me.
-while ((status = apr_getopt(opt,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
> On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>>
>> Is it correct ? It does not look good to me.
>>
>> -while ((status = apr_getopt(opt,
>>
On 1 July 2016 at 11:18, Pietro Paolini wrote:
>
>
> On 30 June 2016 at 19:55, Yann Ylavic wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the
On 30 June 2016 at 19:55, Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
> wrote:
> >
> > I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the problem is still there,
> has
> > it been fixed in newer version ? is there a workaround
Am 30.06.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Yann Ylavic:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
wrote:
I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the problem is still there, has
it been fixed in newer version ? is there a workaround for that ?
SNI handling just added
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:21 PM, Pietro Paolini
wrote:
>
> I have built the httpd-2-.4.20 tarball but the problem is still there, has
> it been fixed in newer version ? is there a workaround for that ?
SNI handling just added to ab in http://svn.apache.org/r1750854.
It
You might want to try adding the ppa by ondrej to your apt-get source and
install a newer apache and opensll from there. That should give you an ab with
openssl 1.0.2 linked.
https://launchpad.net/%7Eondrej/+archive/ubuntu/apache2
> Am 30.06.2016 um 19:21 schrieb Pietro Paolini
Hi all,
I apologise in advance, if this is not the right place where to post such
question.
I have tried to use the ab tool which comes with the apache package of my
Ubuntu 14.04 distro to stress test a web server, such server lies behind a
CDN and the use of the TLS Server Name Indication is
15 matches
Mail list logo