I've signed and published 2.2.0 on the mirrors, and updated the downloads
page accordingly. You'll see it after the next site referesh. I left it
marked as "beta" because I wasn't sure if our vote was final or not.
If we're ready to go GA, we should probably wait until at least tomorrow to
make
+1
On 12/2/06, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this an official vote? If so...
+1
On 12/2/06, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sold. +1
>
>
> On 12/2/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think it's a good idea too.
> >
> > I could sign the 2.2.0 zip and
Is this an official vote? If so...
+1
On 12/2/06, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sold. +1
On 12/2/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it's a good idea too.
>
> I could sign the 2.2.0 zip and publish it to the mirrors. I want to add
the 2.2 PDF docs to it first th
Sold. +1
On 12/2/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think it's a good idea too.
I could sign the 2.2.0 zip and publish it to the mirrors. I want to add
the 2.2 PDF docs to it first though. Then everything for the last DAO
release (including docs) would be in one place.
Sound like
I think it's a good idea too.
I could sign the 2.2.0 zip and publish it to the mirrors. I want to add the
2.2 PDF docs to it first though. Then everything for the last DAO release
(including docs) would be in one place.
Sound like a plan?
Jeff
On 12/2/06, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I think that would be good (of course) :D.
Brandon
On 12/1/06, Clinton Begin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a great point. I've had similar discussions.
How about this: Let's do the vote for 2.2. GA right now. Assuming it
passes (I don't see why not considering how long it's been out),
That's a great point. I've had similar discussions.
How about this: Let's do the vote for 2.2. GA right now. Assuming it
passes (I don't see why not considering how long it's been out), we update
2.1.7 to 2.2 on the website by Monday.
Then, next Friday (7 days) we start the vote for 2.3 GA an
I'm fine with pushing 2.3. But, I had a conversation on the list with
someone who feared upgrading to 2.2 because it wasn't GA. This was,
apparently, a company policy. They need a feature that is available in
2.2but will not upgrade because it is not GA. If we do not make
2.2 GA then their company
My vote is to leave it the way it is. My conservative, pragmatic and
adventurous sides are all satisfied by having a single GA release as well as
the latest "Beta" release available for download. 2.2 is available in the
past releases if people want it.
Cheers,
Clinton
On 12/1/06, Jeff Butler <
I forgot about that conversation, I was thinking of this one:
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@ibatis.apache.org/msg01855.html
A great example of selective memory on my part :)
Anyway I'm open to a GA vote for 2.2 if we need to. But maybe we should let
the dust settle on 2.3 for a few days. If
To clarify, what I suggested a week or so ago was:
"We can vote for GA anytime, even after another release makes it to GA. The
beta, alpha, GA status is always flexible. We could vote for GA on 2.2.
right now actually. "
So a little closer to what Brandon is suggesting. However, I'm more
inte
We discussed this some weeks ago. IIRC, Clinton wanted to do a new release
rather than voting for GA on 2.2.
Jeff Butler
On 12/1/06, Brandon Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2 has been available for
some time and contains several bug fixes over
Curious why we are superceding 2.2 wit 2.3? 2.2 has been available for some
time and contains several bug fixes over 2.1.7. I would also say that
2.2.0could be made GA. The other thought is that there is no guarantee
that
2.3 will be GA quality after we get it out there for 2 weeks, however
unlike
Awesome stuff Jeff. Thanks for all your hard work.
Clinton
On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and
checksummed. Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist
directories, so I'm stuck right no
Rock on Jeff!
Larry
On 11/30/06, Jeff Butler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and checksummed.
Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist directories,
so I'm stuck right now. I've sent a note to infra@ and as so
Hi All,
I have everything built for 2.3, and have everything signed and
checksummed. Unfortunately, there are permission problems in the .../dist
directories, so I'm stuck right now. I've sent a note to infra@ and as soon
as they get the permission problems resolved, then I'll be able to publis
16 matches
Mail list logo