Re: MQTT Streamer Code Style and Javadoc fixes (IGNITE-1747)

Raul, It wasn't easy for me to get into the way of following Ignite coding guidelines. So you're not alone :) However one day I found "ignite/idea/ignite_codeStyle.xml" file and set it in Intellij IDEA settings. Since that time coding guidelines has never worried me again. Probably this

Re: AWS Tests on TeamCity

Nick, should know the credentials. Nick, please help Raul with the setup. -- Denis On 10/29/2015 4:16 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: I'm working on upgrading the dependencies of ignite-aws, as we need the upgrade for OSGi integration. Unfortunately, it seems the AWS builds on TeamCity are

Re: [Ignite-429] facing problem with node startup

Chandresh, Just in case if you have any questions in regards to MqttStreamer tests I think you can ask Raul for guidance. *Raul*, don't you mind to help Chandresh with tests if it's required? When all the tests (including the new one) are green create a pull-request and someone from the

Re: Review the new Camel Streamer (IGNITE-1790)

Hi Raul, I'll be able to take a look at the changes. However this should happen not earlier than in the beginning of the next week. Does it work for you? -- Denis On 10/28/2015 3:51 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: Hello, I've pushed a new Apache Camel streamer in the ignite-1790 branch. Build

Re: OptimizedClassDescriptor verifyChecksum object set as optional

Hi, As I understand both servers have different implementations but the names of those implementations are the same, correct? Because otherwise I don't see how your code could get to the point of checksum validation if one implementation's name is ServiceEntity while the other's is

IGNITE-1681: loadAll threshold is not configurable for CacheStoreBalancingWrapper (MERGED)

Michael, Thanks a lot for the contribution! I've reviewed and merged your changes into the release branch. Please refer to minor comments from me left in the latest post: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1681 Look forward to new contributions from you! Denis

Re: 127.0.0.1 in VmIpFinder

The issue wasn't reproduced on my Mac running under El Captain. On 11/10/2015 3:30 PM, Denis Magda wrote: Val, I've tried to run the nodes using the configuration discussed below on OS X Yosemity. Works perfectly fine, both nodes joined the topology and see each other. Will try to check

Re: Ignite-1.5 Release

> at > > org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.datastructures.GridCacheAbstractDataStructuresFailoverSelfTest$5.apply(GridCacheAbstractDataStructuresFailoverSelfTest.java:459) > > When I run tests with TOP_CHANGE_THEAD_CNT = 1 > everything is running ok; > > > @Yakov > I made a new commit to my IGNITE

Re: IGNITE-1903: CacheStore implementation is serialised to grid clients whether they require it or not

Hi Mike, thanks for opening the ticket! I think that someone from the community will be able to address this issue in 1.6 release. In any case, I’m fully agree with Val that the easiest way to overcome this issue for now is just to add CacheStore’s class implementation to client’s classpath.

Re: IGNITE-1227 patch available

gt; <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute> - >> "2. >> Create a Patch-file". >> >> Also, I want to say +1 for an Denis's advice to use a pull-request way. >> This way has no minuses and has a lots of pluses by my opinion against &g

Re: Review the new Camel Streamer (IGNITE-1790)

Hi Raul, Is there any chance we make this contribution available as a part of the upcoming release? — Denis > On 4 нояб. 2015 г., at 17:29, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > Raul, sorry for the delay. > > I've reviewed your implementation and left minor c

Re: About Ignite-Spring with GridService issue.

Hi, You have to use @SprintResource annotation if you want to inject something from a spring application context into Ignite’s compute task. @Autowire annotation is not supported. Best regards, Denis > On 16 нояб. 2015 г., at 7:03, 姜 为 wrote: > > I found hot to fix this,

Re: [jira] [Created] (IGNITE-1916) SpringResource annotation support resourceClass

Hi, Is there any sense to extend @SpringResource annotation the way you suggest? Isn’t resourceName enough to cover all the use cases? Regards, Denis > On 16 нояб. 2015 г., at 5:41, wmz7year (JIRA) wrote: > > wmz7year created IGNITE-1916: > >

Re: IGNITE-1227 patch available

GNITE/Coding+Guidelines <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Coding+Guidelines> Regards, Denis > On 13 нояб. 2015 г., at 15:32, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > Amir, great thanks! > > If you don't mind I'll review your changes in a couple of

Manual test suites triggering on TeamCity

Community, I’ve mentioned that our ‘’pull-request based contribution” section was outdated. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-1.CreateGitHubpull-request

Re: 127.0.0.1 in VmIpFinder

Val, I've tried to run the nodes using the configuration discussed below on OS X Yosemity. Works perfectly fine, both nodes joined the topology and see each other. Will try to check on OS X El Captain a bit later. BTW, the problem may be in IPv6. I googled for post [1]. The issue discussed

Contribution merged: IGNITE-1900 Ignite JMX problem with Spring Boot

wmz7year, (BTW, what is your real name? :) ) Thanks a lot for your first contribution! It will be a part of the next release. Look forward to receiving new contributions from you in the nearest time, Denis

Contribution merged: IGNITE-1865 Need to add tests on SpringResource annotation

Roman, Thanks a lot for the contribution! Your changes merged to the release branch and will be a part of the upcoming release. Regards, Denis

IGNITE-1681: loadAll threshold is not configurable for CacheStoreBalancingWrapper

Michael, Would you mind finishing that task? You should add a couple of tests to validate that everything works is expected. I've put all the info into the ticket. Regards, Denis

Re: AWS Tests on TeamCity

r.net | twitter: @raulvk On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Nikolay Tikhonov <ntikho...@gridgain.com> wrote: Raul, AWS build on TC is broken by another reason. Admin investigates this issue. For local testing you could use AWS Free Tier. ( https://aws.amazon.com/free/ ) On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 4

Re: log4j2 garbage files

Guys, I've merged the fix into the master. Thanks, Denis On 10/30/2015 3:43 PM, Gianfranco Murador wrote: Hi Artem, I have no write permission to merge the fix On Oct 30, 2015 11:43 AM, "Artem Shutak" wrote: Hi Raul, Oh, I was sure I deleted these files. Fixed in my

Re: Request add me to development list

Hi Prabhat, Welcome on board! Please share your JIRA account with us and we will set all required permissions for it. Once it has been done you will be able to assign that ticket to you by yourself. Regards, Denis On 10/31/2015 3:42 PM, Prabhat Ranjan wrote: Hi, I work in financial

Re: Review the new Camel Streamer (IGNITE-1790)

Raul, sorry for the delay. I've reviewed your implementation and left minor comments in the ticket. -- Thanks, Denis On 10/29/2015 12:17 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: Sure, that's fine. Thanks, Denis. Regards, Raúl. On 29 Oct 2015 08:50, "Denis Magda" <dma...@gridgain.com>

Re: Integration with Spring Transaction Manager

Hello Amir, You can do it on your own. Do you have a JIRA account that was granted all required permissions? -- Denis On 11/4/2015 1:01 PM, Amir Akhmedov wrote: Hi Dmitriy, I want to give a try on this ticket. Could you assign it to me? Thanks.

Re: [GitHub] ignite pull request: IGNITE-1854

Hi wmz7year (sorry, don't know your real name), Thanks for showing the interest in Ignite and contributing to it but I'm afraid that we can't accept this particular contribution. The reason is that the checksum verification is essential for objects serialized with OptimizedMarshaller. It

Accepted patches/pull-requests from Roman, Ken & Stephen

Roman, Ken & Stephen, The following contributions done by you was reviewed, merged and will be a part of the nearest release. ignite-1153:Improve stop node message ignite-1226:Need to add method that returns names of all available caches

Re: Request add me to development list

On 2 November 2015 at 19:26, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com <mailto:dma...@gridgain.com>> wrote: Hi Prabhat, Welcome on board! Please share your JIRA account with us and we will set all required permissions for it. Once it has been done you will be ab

Re: Java 7 client using Java 7 server, or vice versa

Hi, This limitation has already been removed for the nearest release. If you work with Ignite sources then you can checkout the master branch that has the fix. Regards, Denis On 11/4/2015 1:14 PM, endian675 wrote: As mentioned on a post to the user list

Re: Ignite-1.5 Release

On 11/2/2015 8:40 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:58 AM, M G wrote: Can/will this include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1681 ? I don’t see why not. Would be nice if one of the committers could pick up the review for this patch.

Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation

+1 (binding) On 10/14/2015 1:30 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: Hi! As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly basis. The proposed policy is this: - a position of an Apache Ignite

Re: Why portable marshaller handle Date and Timestamp in the same way?

I would definitely remove such a mapping if no one explains a reason we have it. -- Denis On 10/6/2015 10:26 AM, Vladimir Ozerov wrote: Igniters, For some reason we "merged" Date and Timestamp types in portable marshaller. They are both written in the same format with the same type ID. And

PortableBuilderImpl.getField() method's inconsistent behavior for arrays of different types

Val., Alex G., Igniters, Who knows why fields of Object[] type returned from PortableBuilderImpl.getField() are wrapped by PortableBuilderReader.LazyCollection internally by the builder while String[], UUID[] and many others are processed as PortablePlainLazyValue? This leads to an

Re: TC hell

Definitely we have to change something here. I would use a manual triggering granting access through a special account available only to contributors and commiters. -- Denis On 8/27/2015 9:51 AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: Igniters, We currently have 200 builds in TC queue and it will

Re: Coding style changed!

I've updated '{ignite_folder}/idea/ignite_codeStyle.xml' to reflect the changes. -- Denis On 8/31/2015 5:48 PM, Sergi Vladykin wrote: Guys, As discussed, I changed all the imports in master to explicit ones. Settings for Idea you can see here:

Re: PortableBuilderImpl.getField() method's inconsistent behavior for arrays of different types

, Denis Magda wrote: Val., Alex G., Igniters, Who knows why fields of Object[] type returned from PortableBuilderImpl.getField() are wrapped by PortableBuilderReader.LazyCollection internally by the builder while String[], UUID[] and many others are processed as PortablePlainLazyValue? This leads

Re: Portable objects

Val, Yes, the portable API and its implementation is already a part of both master and 1.4 branches. -- Denis On 9/2/2015 11:54 PM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: Igniters, Are portable objects already migrated and will be released as a part of 1.4 (I see that APIs and configuration changes

Re: Portable objects

()/setKeepPortableInStore() - controls 'keepPortableInStore' flag. Portable API examples should be merged shortly to 1.4 branch. -- Denis On 9/3/2015 8:02 AM, Denis Magda wrote: Val, Yes, the portable API and its implementation is already a part of both master and 1.4 branches. -- Denis On 9/2

Re: Data structures with topology changes

The tests keep failing. It means that Alex's changes don't correlate with an issue I'm observing in ignite-801. Put the latest info in [1] -- Denis On 9/16/2015 8:55 AM, Denis Magda wrote: The ticket already exists [1] I've merged the latest changes from ignite-1.4 that should contain

Re: SqlQuery.pageSize is ignored in replicated cache

like this could happen because replicated cache is incorrectly expected to have the whole dataset locally. I will take a look . Sergi 2015-09-10 15:38 GMT+03:00 Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com>: Hi Sergi, I was fixing one of the many SQL query tests ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/

Re: Misleading places in cache related documentations

, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: Igniters, I've faced with some confusing places in cache related documentations. Before fixing it I want to be sure that my understanding is correct. - CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL. There is a sentence saying: /"However, cache * ato

Supporting non Oracle JVMs

Igniters, During this month we found out that Ignite doesn't work well with non Oracle JVMs and big-endian architecture. In general there three related issues: - [1] issues on IBM JDK: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1526 - [2] issue on HP JDK:

Misleading places in cache related documentations

Igniters, I've faced with some confusing places in cache related documentations. Before fixing it I want to be sure that my understanding is correct. - CacheAtomicityMode.TRANSACTIONAL. There is a sentence saying: /"However, cache * atomicity mode will be changed to {@link #ATOMIC} starting

Ignoring a node as a Service Grid deployment candidate

Igniters, Presently every node that is a part of a cluster listens for Service Grid assignment changes in order to find out whether a service has to be deployed on it or not. However, there is a possible case when a node is not considered to be a target for service A at all during its

Re: Ignoring a node as a Service Grid deployment candidate

<rsht...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: Denis, What will happen if node B becomes a deployment target due to topology changes? Thanks, Roman On Sunday, December 6, 2015 5:17 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: Igniters, Presently every node that is a part of a cluster listens

Accidental deserialization of BinaryObject key on a remote node

Igniters, I've faced with the following issue today https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2124 Could someone who is working on BinaryMarshaller presently investigate and fix the bug before 1.5 GA release? -- Denis

Re: Disabling patch-validation mechanism on TC

Removed patch-based information from the site. Placed a direct link to wiki that describes how to contribute using pull-requests instead. — Denis > On 1 дек. 2015 г., at 17:56, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > Fully support this endeavor. > > However, we ha

Re: Website links

5 г., at 10:25, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > Who can change a preselected mirror to either http or ftp by default? > > On 12/1/2015 9:07 AM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: >> You should select "Selected mirror" combobox under the table. >> >>

Re: Using HDFS as a secondary FS

rowse/IGNITE-483. > > There were plans to remove "setup-hadoop", but that is not yet done. > In any way, I 100% agree that presence of several different versions of the > documentation is quite confusing and misleading. > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Denis

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

enis,In this case I used the term "caching" in general sense, meaning saving the computed value for later. I didn't mean the Ignite cache.Sorry about the confusion.Andrey _____ From: Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015

Contributions are merged: IGNITE-2199 & IGNITE-2123

Roman, Thanks that you always find a time and keep contributing to Apache Ignite. We've reviewed and merged the following tasks. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2123 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2199 Regards, Denis

Contribution accepted: IGNITE-2192

Noam, Thanks for finding a time and contributing to Apache Ignite. Your contribution [1] has been reviewed and merged into the release branch. Regards, Denis [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-2192

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

. This is the way I should do it. It sounds like complicated for "just" getting an entry. But if you say this is the way I will do it like that. I was just think that it could be a common use case and therefore provide it as a shortcut. Thanks, Romain. Le mer. 16 déc. 2015 à 11:34, Denis

Abandoned ticket: Provide Integration with Spring Data [IGNITE-1192]

Hi Vikrant, Do you have free time to complete the integration in the nearest month? This integration is becoming quite urgent. So if you don’t have time for now someone else from the community will pick this ticket up. Regards, Denis

Re: [GitHub] ignite pull request: [Test] IgniteSemaphore's failover related tes...

Saikat, Thanks for fixing this compilation issue. I've merged the changes into the master. -- Denis On 12/13/2015 11:48 AM, samaitra wrote: GitHub user samaitra opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/326 [Test] IgniteSemaphore's failover related tests are

Re: Failed to start client node

Alex, Have you updated and pushed classnames.properties? We have to do this otherwise the end user will have the same issues in runtime. Regards, Denis On 12/14/2015 10:41 AM, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote: Thanks, Semyon. mvn clean package -DskipTests -DskipClientDocs -Dmaven.javadoc.skip=true

Re: Client connect "hangs"

Guys, There is already a configuration property that lets to complete client's launching procedure even if there is no any server node in a cluster - TcpDiscoverySpi.setForceServerMode. The only side effect of this property is that a client node will become a part of the ring. Is this

Re: Abandoned ticket: Provide Integration with Spring Data [IGNITE-1192]

I've unassigned the ticket from Vikrant. Is anyone in the community is interesting in taking over this task? -- Denis On 12/15/2015 3:36 PM, Denis Magda wrote: Hi Vikrant, Do you have free time to complete the integration in the nearest month? This integration is becoming quite urgent. So

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

Hi Romain, As the current documentation of org.apache.ignite.cache.CacheEntry states it's possible to get a reference to CacheEntry and its version only for methods that are executed over local data set stored on a node. Among such methods are invoke & invokeAll and randomEntry. You probably

Re: Need help with JIRA ticket

Hi Chandresh, Dmitriy meant that you can build such an integration on top of Ignite C++ client/implementation. Ignite C++ stuff is located in module "platforms/cpp". Python supports calls to a native layer, so you can call Ignite C++ APIs from the Python layer whenever required. -- Denis

Re: Distributed queue problem with peerClassLoading enabled

Alexey, Dmitriy, So the restriction (see discussion above) is still there in 1.5 release. If we still want to remove it then it makes sense to create a JIRA ticket. Thoughts? In addition if the restriction is removed then we have to take care of this bug that is related to unintentional

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.5.0.final RC3

+1 (binding) On 12/29/2015 1:54 PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: Dear Sirs! We have uploaded release candidate to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/1.5.0.final-rc3/ This is very important release containing initial versions of Ignite.NET and Ignite C++ and many other important

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

On 12/21/2015 11:15 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: Why it shouldn't work? If client receives an entry that has a reference to the entry with version, transferred from a server as well as a part of the re

Re: Adding tests suites for new streamers on TeamCity

Done. Roman, thanks for pointing out to this. On 12/21/2015 11:36 AM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote: Who would have enough permissions to do this? On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote: Igniters, How about adding the following test suites to "Ignite

IGNITE-1993: JDBC discovery uses non-standard SQL when creating table (not compatible with Oracle)

Hi Nigel, Is there any chance you apply review notes and complete the following contribution? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1993 Merry xmas & happy new year to you! Denis

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ignite 1.5.0.final

+ 1 (binding) On 12/25/2015 4:00 PM, Anton Vinogradov wrote: Dear Sirs! We have uploaded release candidate to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/ignite/1.5.0.final-rc1/ This is very important release containing initial versions of Ignite.NET and Ignite C++ and many other important

Re: store examples

Reviewed, looks good. On 12/18/2015 3:07 AM, Valentin Kulichenko wrote: Can you please review my changes?

Re: about apache ignite's document localization(Simplified Chinese)

Hi Yujue Li, I've added documentation for Ignite Semaphore to Distributed Data Structures section https://apacheignite.readme.io/docs/distributed-semaphore Missed documentation for MQTT and Twitter streamers will be added a bit later. I'll let you know when this happens. The rest of the

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

issue is with unwrap method. Are we all in agreement that unwrap(…) will not work on the client side? D. On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: Actually I think that Andrey's proposal on addition of IgniteCache.getEntry(k) sounds natural. Is the

Re: Missing ways to get access to Ignite CacheEntry

t do you think on this? Regards, Denis On 12/17/2015 9:09 AM, Andrey Kornev wrote: Denis,In this case I used the term "caching" in general sense, meaning saving the computed value for later. I didn't mean the Ignite cache.Sorry about the confusion.Andrey

Re: CacheEntry serialization failure

Sounds good for me. I would go for this approach. In addition if to consider your example below and the user decides to look up a field by its simple name then he/she will get nothing or exception (depending on the API), correct? As an example for this case the method will return null

Re: [GitHub] ignite pull request: Created a property to create the caches autom...

Hi Bruno, Thanks for paying interest in Apache Ignite and contributing to it. However would you mind following our contribution process described here [1] At least you should run tests checking that nothing is broken and add new tests that will validate that your changes work as expected.

Re: IGNITE-944 HTTP REST log command doesn't work

Hi Saikat, thanks! I've reviewed your changes and left my review notes in JIRA. Regards, Denis On 12/29/2015 6:35 AM, Saikat Maitra wrote: Hi, I have raised a PR for the issue IGNITE-944 Http Rest command doesn't work. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/383 Can someone please review the

Re: Abandoned ticket: Implement IgniteStormStreamer to stream data from Apache Storm

PM, chandresh pancholi wrote: Hi Denis, I am really sorry for replying late. I was occupied with office work lately. Can someone from community pick this up and finish? Thanks On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com <mailto:dma...@gridgain.com>> wro

List of contributors has been updated

Igniters, I've just updated the list of Apache Ignite contributors adding the following guys to the list Roman Shtykh Igor Sapego Ilya Lantukh Michael Griggs Pavel Konstantinov Saikat Maitra Vasiliy Sisko Vladimir Ershov Vladislav Jelisavcic Nigel Westbury Undoubtedly I've forgot to add

Re: Abandoned ticket: Implement IgniteStormStreamer to stream data from Apache Storm

Roman, perfect! Please assign the ticket on yourself then. -- Denis On 12/29/2015 1:14 PM, Roman Shtykh wrote: Denis, I can probably do it next week. -Roman On Tuesday, December 29, 2015 6:45 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: Hi Chandresh, Thanks for letting us know

Re: Providing an example as part of contribution

Agree with Sergey, such a rule should be added to the to-do list of a contributor and to the check-list of reviewers. However, this must be an optional rule cause it's obvious that there is no sense to provide an example for every kind of functionality. In regards to OSGi I would add both an

Re: Disabling patch-validation mechanism on TC

Fully support this endeavor. However, we have to update not only the wiki page after that but the start contributing section as well [2] I'll try to find time and update [2] today. [2] https://ignite.apache.org/community/contribute.html#contribute -- Denis On 12/1/2015 5:39 PM, Artem Shutak

Re: Ignite-1.5 Release

On 11/17/2015 9:37 PM, Yakov Zhdanov wrote: 1. Understood 2. Well, I understand that object gets deserialized on get from cache and this most probably should not cause any issue. However, code does not look healthy and someone may think that there is an issue - field is not volatile,

Contribution merged: IGNITE-638: Implement IgniteSemaphore data structure

Vladislav, Thanks a lot for such a big contribution! Great job! I've merged it into the release branch. Regards, Denis

Re: Hello!

Hi Carlos, Welcome to the Ignite community! Please properly subscribe to the dev list (this way I will not have to manually approve your emails). All you need to do is send an email to “ dev-subscr...@ignite.apache.org” and follow simple instructions in the reply. You should get familiar with

Fwd: ignite cache get performance issue when Key, Value not exist

Igniters, This is not the first time I hear about from the community side about the performance issue Kevin is talking below. In short if a key is not located in a cache then we will go to an underlying storage. This process will be repeated all the time for the same key and this leads to

Re: Ignite MBeans for custom metrics monitoring

Hi Igor, As far as I can see we don’t have a such kind of documentation. Are you interested in preparing the one basing on the Java docs? Sure the community can assist and review your work. — Denis > On Jun 7, 2016, at 12:20 AM, Igor Rudyak wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I am

Re: Interested in this ticket IGNITE-2344

Valentin Kulichenko, As one of the maintainers of WebSessionFilter please help with the review. — Denis > On Jun 5, 2016, at 12:08 AM, Saikat Maitra wrote: > > Hello, > > I have raised the following PR [1] for the jira ticket [2]. > > > Please review the changes

Re: Docker image for Ignite 1.6.0 release pull request

Nikolay, As a maintainer of this component please do the review. — Denis > On Jun 5, 2016, at 3:18 PM, zshamrock wrote: > > Hi, guys, what about the following https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/757? > > Is already someone from DataGrid/Ignite working on

Re: Maven conflicts within ignite-core from duplicated classes

Hi Pete, CC-ing Ignite dev list to the thread as well. Igniters, up to today is there any reason why we need to include sources of Nullable JetBrain’s annotation in Ignite sources? As I see we can rather import that latest version from the maven repository

Contribution merged: Mysql support broken in 1.6, externalize sql syntax to make it configurable

Kristian, Thanks a lot for finding time to improve Apache Ignite project. Your latest contribution [1] has been just merged. Looking forward for more contributions from your side. [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/790 — Denis

Contribution merged: Fix parameter error in class GridServiceProcessor

Biao Ma, Thanks for constant contribution into Apache Ignite project. I’ve reviewed and merged one more issue that was fixed by you. Keep improving Ignite the same way! — Denis

Thanks for contribution: issue in the documentation

Biao Ma, thanks for spending your time improving Apache Ignite project. I’ve reviewed and merged the issue that has been recently fixed by you. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-3229

Re: IgniteCache.invoke on ALL keys

Pavel, Here is an example on how to execute scan queries on partitions’ owners and perform some operation for every entry https://github.com/gridgain/gridgain-advanced-examples/blob/master/src/main/java/org/gridgain/examples/datagrid/query/ScanQueryExample.java

Re: Documentation for AOP-based Grid Enabling

Hi Prachi, Great, to be honest I didn’t suspect Ignite supports this functionality. Will try my hands dirty with the examples provided in the doc in the nearest days and will provide you with a feedback. — Denis > On May 26, 2016, at 9:56 PM, Prachi Garg wrote: > >

Re: NonHeap memory usage metrics don't work as expected.

Hi Vlad, In my understanding you should include in the metrics information provided by GridCacheAdapter.offHeapAllocatedSize(). This has to be done for every offheap based cache. This information should be accumulated with the one that is already considered in GridDiscoveryManager at the time

Re: Deadlock detection usage

yan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >> Parchi, >> >> Thanks a lot for the editing! >> >> Dmitriy, >> >> Maybe it’s better to introduce a table of content

Re: Deadlock detection usage

t; Thanks. > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >> Andrey, Dmitriy, thanks for the inputs. Considered them. >> >> Finally reworked/regrouped Transactions documentation [1], added table of >> contents, made some secti

Re: Deadlock detection usage

do you think? >> >> D. >> >> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Andrey Gura <ag...@gridgain.com> wrote: >> >>> Denis, >>> >>> great doc! Thanks! >>> >>> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain

Re: IgniteCache.invoke on ALL keys

invokeAll as I > suggested above? > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > >> Pavel, >> >> Here is an example on how to execute scan queries on partitions’ owners >> and perform some operation for every entry >> &g

Re: Documentation for AOP-based Grid Enabling

Prachi, Looks good to me. If there is anyone in the community who made it hands dirty with AOP and Ignite please review the documentation from Prachi as well. — Denis > On May 27, 2016, at 2:17 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > Hi Prachi, > > Great,

Re: New contributor: Andrey Velichko

Hi Andrey, Welcome onboard! Just take a look at the ticket and provide your thoughts regarding a possible fix. If you need to discuss the fix keep using the dev list. — Denis > On Jun 15, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Andrey Velichko wrote: > > Hi Ignite Community! > > My name is

Re: New contributor: Alexander Paschenko

Hi Alexander, Welcome onboard! Just take a look at the ticket and provide your thoughts regarding a possible fix. If you need to discuss the fix keep using the dev list. — Denis > On Jun 15, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Alexander Paschenko > wrote: > > Hi Ignite

Re: Change rest-http Java to JSON null transformation logic

This looks strange. Definitely for consistency reasons it makes sense that all ‘null’ objects including string are serialized as “null”. In regards to the compatibility stuff I think it can be resolved somehow. — Denis > On Jun 16, 2016, at 12:15 PM, Alexey Kuznetsov

Merged: When multiple addresses resolve to same name, TcpDiscoverySharedFsIpFinder fails on unregister

Kristian, Thanks again for improving Apache Ignite. I’ve just reviewed and merged your pull request. https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/799/files Waiting for more contributions from your side! — Denis

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >