Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, IOTDB-300 is already fixed in 0.9.0. It is a bug introduced in 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT, therefore it is not included in the Release_Notes from 0.8.0 to 0.9.0. If I don't misunderstand, IOTDB-268 is not a blocker issue that affects the running of spark-iotdb-connector module. It is just a new feature

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-282) require "show version" query

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-282. - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.8.0) 0.9.0 Resolution: Fixed > require "show

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-307) Remove maxTombstoneTime in ChunkHeader

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-307. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-14) Concurrent Error of HashMap in StatMonitor class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-14?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-14. Resolution: Cannot Reproduce > Concurrent Error of HashMap in StatMonitor class >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-319) java deadlock (not sure how to reproduce)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-319. - Fix Version/s: 0.9.0 Resolution: Fixed > java deadlock (not sure how to reproduce) >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-308) jdk error when using Travis + Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-308?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-308. - Resolution: Fixed > jdk error when using Travis + Windows > - > >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-288) Unclear error message notification for "creating timeserie" clause

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-288. - Fix Version/s: 0.9.0 Resolution: Fixed > Unclear error message notification for "creating

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-320) [Travis] [WinOS] [ERROR] OS=Windows and the assembly descriptor contains a *nix-specific root-relative-reference (starting with slash) /

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-320. - Resolution: Fixed > [Travis] [WinOS] [ERROR] OS=Windows and the assembly descriptor contains a >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-336) Binary files incompatible between JDK8 and JDK11

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-336. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > Binary files incompatible between JDK8 and

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-283) Modify rules of datatype inference when creating schema automatically is enabled

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-283. - Fix Version/s: 0.9.0 Resolution: Fixed > Modify rules of datatype inference when creating schema

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-217) A new predicate of time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-217. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > A new predicate of time >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-343) Test method in session to help user to analyze time cost

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-343. - Resolution: Fixed > Test method in session to help user to analyze time cost >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-345) upgrade thrift from 0.12 to 0.13

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-345. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > upgrade thrift from 0.12 to 0.13 >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

+1 for release IoTDB 0.9.1 as IOTDB-300 is very important fix. And I think the blocker issue [1] should be contains in 0.9.1, or someone should check is whether a blocker issue. What do you think? Best, Jincheng @sunjincheng121 [1] [IOTDB-268] When using

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-346) StorageGroupProcessor.sequenceFileList is ordered by fileName rather than dataTime

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-346. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed > StorageGroupProcessor.sequenceFileList is

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-371) [TravisCI] Fix maven version on WinOS.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-371. - Fix Version/s: 0.10.0-SNAPSHOT Resolution: Fixed

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-366) Concurrent Error when multiple JDBC client send queries

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-366. - Resolution: Fixed > Concurrent Error when multiple JDBC client send queries >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-370) v0.10.0 JDBC Concurrent Error

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-370. - Resolution: Fixed > v0.10.0 JDBC Concurrent Error > - > >

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-364) Add IoTDBDataDirViewer Tool

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-364. - Resolution: Fixed > Add IoTDBDataDirViewer Tool > --- > > Key:

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-293) Variable naming convention

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jialin Qiao closed IOTDB-293. - Fix Version/s: (was: 0.8.0) Resolution: Fixed > Variable naming convention >

[REMINDER] JIRA should be closed after the PR is merged :)

Hi Committers & PPMC, I found that some of JIRAs have not be close even the PR already merged. The first time [1] I thought it was accidentally forgotten, just now found [2] have was also forgotten, so let me remind you here. BTW: One suggestion here is: Would be better to left some comments

[jira] [Closed] (IOTDB-365) Link to the IoTDB confluence home in Development-Contributing.md

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] sunjincheng closed IOTDB-365. - Resolution: Fixed Fixed in master: f18b9ade462d42e11ea3e9be2992b72d85addb6b > Link to the IoTDB

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi Jialin, That's nice. Thank you. Lei Rui On 12/18/2019 14:25，Jialin Qiao wrote： Hi, That's very kind of you :) I'd like to offer help and share my experience if you meet trouble when releasing. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Lei Rui 于2019年12月18日周三 下午2:13写道： Hi, I want to challenge myself to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, That's very kind of you :) I'd like to offer help and share my experience if you meet trouble when releasing. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Lei Rui 于2019年12月18日周三 下午2:13写道： > Hi, > > > I want to challenge myself to be the release manager of 0.9.1. > > > Regards, > Lei Rui > > > On 12/17/2019

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, I want to challenge myself to be the release manager of 0.9.1. Regards, Lei Rui On 12/17/2019 20:47，Jialin Qiao wrote： Hi, Change list could be inferred from merged PRs in https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pulse The second, as far as I know, there is no need to do more

Be careful to merge PRs that can not pass Travis-CI

Hi all, I find recently many PRs can not pass the CI, and some of them have been merged into the master branch... Please be careful to merge the PRs that cannot pass Travis-CI. Otherwise we can not guarantee the stability of the branch.. I think if you are sure your PR is ok and the travis-ci

Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Hi, Congratulations! And also good to see that other Apache project mentioned. Thanks, Justin

Apache IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Hi all, I wanted to pass along the news that Apache IoTDB (incubating) has won the award of "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019". Please join me in congratulating the team! -KAM Website: https://iotdb.apache.org Mailing lists: subscribe:

Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

hi, I'm very happy to be part of this great project. It's my honor On 12/17/2019 23:33, Jack Tsai wrote: Hi, So glad to see this! Great job! Best, Jack Tsai 取得 iOS 版 Outlook 寄件者: Kevin A. McGrail 寄件日期: Tuesday, December 17, 2019

Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Hi, So glad to see this! Great job! Best, Jack Tsai 取得 iOS 版 Outlook 寄件者: Kevin A. McGrail 寄件日期: Tuesday, December 17, 2019 1:06:36 PM 收件者: dev@iotdb.apache.org 主旨: Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project

Re: [News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Well done! On Tue, Dec 17, 2019, 05:38 jincheng sun wrote: > Congratulations to IoTDB community! > Thank you for sharing such exciting news Xiangdong! > > Best, > Jincheng > Twitter: https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121 > > > Xiangdong Huang 于2019年12月17日周二 下午5:48写道： > > > Hi all, > > > > I am

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, Change list could be inferred from merged PRs in https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pulse The second, as far as I know, there is no need to do more patches, cause I already cherry-pick all the bug-fix commits, but double-check is better. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Xiangdong Huang

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-370) v0.10.0 JDBC Concurrent Error

Hi, I think they are due to the same bug, which is already resolved in https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/659 . @Lei Rui could test it. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Xiangdong Huang 于2019年12月17日周二 下午8:32写道： > Hi, > > Is the issue related with

Re: [DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, +1 for releasing 0.9.1. Two concerns: > Actually, when I merge the bug-fix PRs, I also cherry-pick them into rel/0.9. Therefore, this release will be easier than 0.9.0... So, how to maintain the change list? The second is similar, how many patches should be involved into 0.9.1? Best,

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-373) [Distributed] Query coordinating

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-373: Summary: [Distributed] Query coordinating Key: IOTDB-373 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-373 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: Improvement

Re: Remove the download of 0.7.0 (pre-Apache)

Hi, +1 for that. We put the version on the website one year ago is just because we had no Apache release versions at that time. Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao 于2019年12月17日周二 下午8:20写道： > Hi, > > In

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-370) v0.10.0 JDBC Concurrent Error

Hi, Is the issue related with https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-366? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Rui Liu (Jira) 于2019年12月16日周一 上午11:28写道： > Rui Liu created IOTDB-370: >

[DISCUSS] Release of 0.9.1

Hi, After releasing 0.9.0, we fixed some bugs that will impact the user experience. It's time to release 0.9.1, a bug-fix version of 0.9.0. Is there anyone who wants to be the release manager? Actually, when I merge the bug-fix PRs, I also cherry-pick them into rel/0.9. Therefore, this release

Re: [VOTE] Enrich information of project committers in website

Hi, You can call a vote if you want but I don’t think any is needed, lazy consensus i.e. as long as no one speaks up against it it is fine to go ahead. Thanks, Justin

Remove the download of 0.7.0 (pre-Apache)

Hi, In the download page of our website, there is a 0.7.0 (pre-Apache) version, which can be removed. What do you think? Thanks, — Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院

Re: [jira] [Created] (IOTDB-369) [Query Optimization] Meet "Has not execute query" error when querying

Hi, it is quite strange ... 1. How to reproduce the issue? (I do not think a normal query will trigger the bug in 0.9.0 and 0.8.0) 2. Which version is affected? the 0.10.0-snapshot? Best, --- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院

Re: [VOTE] Enrich information of project committers in IOTDB website

+1, and I have left a few comments in the PR. Best, Jincheng Twitter: https://twitter.com/sunjincheng121 Jack Tsai 于2019年12月17日周二 下午3:56写道： > Hi, > +1 for this idea. > > Best regards, > Jack Tsai > > 取得 iOS 版 Outlook > > 寄件者: Jialin

[News] IoTDB wins the award "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019 Top 30"

Hi all, I am very glad to announce that Apache IoTDB wins the award of "The Most Popular Open Source Project Derive From China in 2019" (Top 30 for all projects and Top 3 for system softwares). The award is hosted by OSChina (https://www.oschina.net/). There were 140 thousand persons voted

[jira] [Created] (IOTDB-372) [Distributed] Support node deletion.

Tian Jiang created IOTDB-372: Summary: [Distributed] Support node deletion. Key: IOTDB-372 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IOTDB-372 Project: Apache IoTDB Issue Type: New Feature

Re: 线程插入只有布尔值的共2000w条记录查询慢的问题

Hi, Thanks for reporting issues. This is really an extreme case that only one time series is written. In this case, most data is in the write buffer and does not trigger the flush. Currently, our memory structure does not have statistics and needs to sort when query. In most cases we face, there

Re: IoTDB Meetup with RocketMQ in Dalian, China

Hi, Great! We need to let more people know the importance of IoTDB. Maybe some performance results could be shared. Thanks, Jialin Qiao Xiangdong Huang 于2019年12月17日周二 下午4:36写道： > Hi all, > > RocketMQ community invites us to host a meetup in Dalian, China next week > (Dec, 28, 2019). > > There

IoTDB Meetup with RocketMQ in Dalian, China

Hi all, RocketMQ community invites us to host a meetup in Dalian, China next week (Dec, 28, 2019). There will be a talk for IoTDB. I'd like to share a talk entitled "Apache IoTDB:Why We Need a Time Series Database", to introduce why IoTDB is need and how to integrate RocketMQ and IoTDB to solve