lds, because many TSDBs use these conceptual
> module.
> >>
> >>Some feasible schema organization ways and "select * from the table"
> results:
> >>
> >>(1) Each type of datasource is a table, which has a time column,
> some tag column
gt;>
>>Table: source2(tag1=device2)
>>time, field1, field2
>>2, 2, 2
>>
>>
>>Best,
>>--
>>Jialin Qiao
>>School of Software, Tsinghua University
>>
>>乔
: source1(tag1=device1)
>>time, field1, field2
>>1, 1, 1
>>2, 2, 2
>>
>>Table: source2(tag1=device2)
>>time, field1, field2
>>2, 2, 2
>>
>>
>>Best,
>>--
>>Jialin Qiao
>&
>
>
>Best,
>--
>Jialin Qiao
>School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
>乔嘉林
>清华大学 软件学院
>
>> -原始邮件-
>> 发件人: "Julian Feinauer"
>> 发送时间: 2019-08-14 16:10:22 (星期三)
>> 收件人: "
1=device1)
>time, field1, field2
>1, 1, 1
>2, 2, 2
>
>Table: source2(tag1=device2)
>time, field1, field2
>2, 2, 2
>
>
>Best,
>--
>Jialin Qiao
>School of Software, Tsinghua University
>
>乔嘉林
>清华大学 软件学院
>
>> -原始邮件-----
>> 发件人:
gt; 发送时间: 2019-08-14 16:10:22 (星期三)
> 收件人: "dev@iotdb.apache.org"
> 抄送:
> 主题: Re: An easier way to create time series.
>
> Hi,
>
> let me stick in hier also.
> One of the things which was at first a bit "unfamiliar" for me was this
> device focus.
&
Hi,
let me stick in hier also.
One of the things which was at first a bit "unfamiliar" for me was this device
focus.
It’s a bit to "one-dimensional" in my perspective.
Personally, I quite like how Influx does it that you have a name and can attach
tags and fields to it.
And even if we do not do
Maybe starting from a sugar, we can add some improvements gradually. Currently,
I think making timeseries creation easier should be enough. Please share if you
have some fancy ideas that can go with the introduction of "device".
Tian Jiang
At 2019-08-14 10:44:14, "Xiangdong Huang" wrote:
>Hi,
Hi,
Looks fine for me.
One question, is it just a language syntax sugar, or we can as well as
improve the schema management? Any idea?
Best,
---
Xiangdong Huang
School of Software, Tsinghua University
黄向东
清华大学 软件学院
Tian Jiang 于2019年8月14日周三 上午10:37写道:
> Greet
Greetings,
In the present version, it is a little trouble some to create a set timeseries
that has the same measurements. On the other hand, although we use the
conception "device" in the code, it is not properly abstracted.
Expected usage:
Using IoTDB in a more relational way:
CREATE DEVICE
10 matches
Mail list logo