Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.64.0

+1 thanks and kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2024 21:50 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.64.0 A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.64.0 release is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.62.0

[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.62.0 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2024 22:57 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.62.0 Please vote on releasing this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.58.0

+1 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 06:01 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.58.0 EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments. A candidate for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.20

+1 thanks and kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Friday, October 6, 2023 06:24 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.20 EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments. A candidate for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.11

[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.11 thanks and kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 12:43 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.11 A candidate for the Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.18

+1 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 10:08 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.18 A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.21.18 release is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.54.0

+1 thanks a lot angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2023 18:56 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.54.0 A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.54.0 release is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16

hi julian +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Friday, July 14, 2023 07:38 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16 A candidate for the

Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer

} } } else { LOG.warn("Unused policy " + policy.getClass().getName()); } } Best Regards. Jorge El jue, 1 jun 2023 a las 8:43, Angela Schreiber () escribió: > Hi Jorge > > I would recommend sticking with JCR/Jackrabbit API again, but I admit that > I am

Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer

:) Thank you. I have a question, I have some other similar code that gets the entries (List). In that case I guess I should still use cast to ImmutableACL? Regards. Jorge El jue, 1 jun 2023 a las 2:19, Angela Schreiber () escribió: > Hi Jorge > > Yes, that has changed with OAK-10135

Re: Moving to Oak 1.50 or newer

Hi Jorge Yes, that has changed with OAK-10135 for consistency reasons. Instead of casting to a spi class (ImmutableAcl) or checking for that one, I would suggest you verify that the given effective policy is a JackrabbitAccessControlPolicy.

[jira] [Created] (JCR-4934) Principal documentation does not mention GroupPrincipal

Angela Schreiber created JCR-4934: - Summary: Principal documentation does not mention GroupPrincipal Key: JCR-4934 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4934 Project: Jackrabbit Content

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.52.0

+1 kind regards and thanks a lot for take care of the release angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 18:52 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.52.0 A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.52.0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.10

+1 thanks for taking the time to cut the release! angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2023 07:03 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.10 A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.20.10 release is available at:

Re: Referential Integrity of Access Control Policies

Hi Konrad There exists no automatic cleanup for access control entries bound to a specific principal or path. If the tree where the policy is stored gets deleted (or any of it's parents for that matter) the policy node will be removed. This may or may not be the access-controlled tree where

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-683) Import of Authorizable node with acHandling=IGNORE should preserve existing rep:principalPolicy child node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713915#comment-17713915 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-683: - [~madamcin], thanks for the additional explanation. i

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-683) Import of Authorizable node with acHandling=IGNORE should preserve existing rep:principalPolicy child node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713420#comment-17713420 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-683: - one more note: this bug report doesn't specify where

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-683) Import of Authorizable node with acHandling=IGNORE should preserve existing rep:principalPolicy child node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-683?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17713414#comment-17713414 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-683: - hi [~kwin], i would need to take another look

Re: How to check if user is anonymous

Hi Konrad There is no public API to check that as it is an implementation detail that the unauthenticated guest session is in oak backed by a user. So, I suspect the question you want to have an answer for is whether a given JCR session is an unauthenticated guest session or not. Is that

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-700) package creation fails for node names that are valid in Oak, but invalid in Jackrabbit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-700?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17706110#comment-17706110 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-700: - [~reschke], the proposal sounds reasonable to me

[jira] [Moved] (JCR-4916) Locking issue when editing a document by WebDAV with LibreOffice

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber moved OAK-10165 to JCR-4916: - Key: JCR-4916 (was: OAK-10165) Affects Version/s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.15

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.15 all checks ok kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2023 10:01 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.15 A candidate for the

Re: OAK-7182: Make it possible to update Guava

ciao julian the plan sound reasonable to me it's overdue that we get this done, so any progress is good IMHO. kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Monday, February 6, 2023 11:51 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: OAK-7182: Make it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0 all checks ok kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 12:12 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0 EXTERNAL: Use

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0 Release Plan

@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0 Release Plan EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments. On 19.01.2023 14:25, Angela Schreiber wrote: > Hi Julian > > I would like to include one more fix and verify a couple of things for 1.48.0 > Unless it is

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.48.0 Release Plan

Hi Julian I would like to include one more fix and verify a couple of things for 1.48.0 Unless it is super urgent, I would suggest postponing it for one week. Please let me know if that would work. Kind regards Angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Thursday,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.14

+1 angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Monday, January 16, 2023 16:41 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org ; resc...@apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.14 [X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.14 [INFO]

Re: Authorisation Restrictions: When are those evaluated?

re those evaluated? EXTERNAL: Use caution when clicking on links or opening attachments. Thanks Angela for the response and happy new year to you as well > On 10. Jan 2023, at 10:27, Angela Schreiber wrote: > > the current restriction API does not allow to limit to/for certain

Re: Authorisation Restrictions: When are those evaluated?

hi konrad happy new year and sorry for the delay in responding! restrictions are part of the permission evaluation. so read operations will respect restrictions upon access of items and write operations are checked by the PermissionValidator (i.e. during commit). there are one or two limited

Re: Unresolved Conflict Question

://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/786. Best Regards. Jorge El mar, 15 nov 2022 a las 7:52, Angela Schreiber () escribió: > hi jorge > > imho this would be a great addition to the oak documentation e.g. linked > into the section https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/dos_and_donts.ht

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.14

hi julian [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.21.14 thanks for taking the time to cut the release kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Saturday, December 3, 2022 13:59 To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache

Re: Unresolved Conflict Question

hi jorge imho this would be a great addition to the oak documentation e.g. linked into the section https://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/dos_and_donts.html would it be possible for you to create ticket and a PR for oak-doc? kind regards angela From: Jorge

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4860) jcr-commons in 2.20 can not be used with Oak 1.22.x

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17621183#comment-17621183 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4860: --- [~reschke], the second variant looks better to me... but i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0

+1 kind regards angela From: Marcel Reutegger Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 5:16 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.44.0 release is available at:

Re: OAK-9712: blob-cloud-azure instead of segment-azure?

hi regarding missing license headers: would it be an option to run the check as part of the default build? i usually build oak multiple times before pushing any changes and having the license header check included would help me. wdyt? angela From: Miroslav

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.5

[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.5 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Monday, March 7, 2022 6:41 PM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.5 A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.20.5

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.11

[x ] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.11 kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2022 7:39 AM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.11 A candidate for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.26

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.26 all checks ok kind regards angela From: Miroslav Smiljanic Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 10:46 AM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.26

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.10

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.10 all checks ok kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 11:55 AM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.10 [X]

Re: Property "rep:fullname" on rep:User nodes

Hi Konrad The default value doesn't make sense IMHO and should not have been added in the first place. It is however covered by the node type of users/groups as they allow for arbitrary properties being written below the user node (or some subtree for that matter). I would be a bit reluctant

Re: Oak-it-osgi module

” classifier)? Regards, Carlo From: Angela Schreiber Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 08:43 To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module Hi Carlo The oak-it-osgi module is IMHO not particularly well maintained and I would rather add the tests to the very modules the belong

Re: Oak-it-osgi module

Hi Carlo The oak-it-osgi module is IMHO not particularly well maintained and I would rather add the tests to the very modules the belong to. Kind regards Angela From: Carlo Jelmini Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 4:15 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4759) Check the existence of child nodes matching a pattern

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17476187#comment-17476187 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4759: --- [~joerghoh], thanks a lot for the ticket. such an extension

Re: Check if a node has children NOT matching a pattern

Hi Jörg Thanks a lot for reaching out. IMHO it makes sense to have this reported as feature request for jackrabbit-api as there is no easy way to extend the existing JCR Node API contract. There already exists a JackrabbitNode interface in oak-jackrabbit-api, which we could use to add the new

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4758) Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17475275#comment-17475275 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4758: --- [~reschke], thanks a lot for applying the patch. much

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4758) Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber updated JCR-4758: -- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) proposed patch attached. > Implem

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4758) Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber updated JCR-4758: -- Attachment: JCR-4758.patch > Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollect

[jira] [Updated] (JCR-4758) Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4758?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber updated JCR-4758: -- Fix Version/s: 2.22 > Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollect

[jira] [Created] (JCR-4758) Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit

Angela Schreiber created JCR-4758: - Summary: Implement JackrabbitAccessControlEntry.getPrivilegeCollection in jackrabbit Key: JCR-4758 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4758 Project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0 kind regards angela From: Miroslav Smiljanic Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 1:04 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.42.0 Hi All, A candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.6

[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.6 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Monday, November 22, 2021 12:44 PM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit FileVault 3.5.6 A candidate for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22 kind regards angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Monday, November 15, 2021 2:44 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.22 A candidate for the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.25

hi nitin [x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.25 thanks and kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 1:48 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.25 A candidate for

Re: trunk compile fails

Hi Marco I just ran the oak build again and it passed. However, I vaguely remember having seen that very test failing in the past. Would you mind creating a JIRA ticket? I think it makes sense for the segment teams to take a look. Kind regards Angela From:

Re: Permission to start Project Cumulus as a Jackrabbit sub-module

hi marcel, hi andrei all fine with me. starting in the sandbox and take it from there sounds reasonable. kind regards angela From: Marcel Reutegger Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2021 7:17 PM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re: Permission to start Project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.9

​+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.9 kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 12:36 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.9 A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak

Re: Oak 1.6 release out of schedule

hi manfred fine with me kind regards angela From: Manfred Baedke Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 2:30 PM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Oak 1.6 release out of schedule Hi all, I'd like to release 1.6 out of schedule because I need the backport of

[jira] [Resolved] (JCRVLT-550) missing nullability annotations in security related code

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-550?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Angela Schreiber resolved JCRVLT-550. - Resolution: Invalid wrong project -> should be oak. > missing nullability annot

[jira] [Created] (JCRVLT-550) missing nullability annotations in security related code

Angela Schreiber created JCRVLT-550: --- Summary: missing nullability annotations in security related code Key: JCRVLT-550 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-550 Project: Jackrabbit

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.8

hi IMHO we should not vote on a release if everyone is requied to manually alter the check-release.sh in order to verify that the checks are ok. kind regards angela From: Marcel Reutegger Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2021 4:14 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.3

+1 all checks ok angela From: Julian Reschke Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 2021 10:50 AM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit 2.20.3 A candidate for the Jackrabbit 2.20.3 release is available at:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.40.0

all checks ok +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.40.0 kind regards anggela From: Miroslav Smiljanic Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 7:49 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.40.0 Hi All, A candidate

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.21

all checks were ok +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.21 kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 1:12 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.21 A candidate for the

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-522) rep:policy and repo:policy applied even if filter rules exclude them

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-522?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17347425#comment-17347425 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-522: - [~kwin], please note that _repo:policy_ as stated

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

plemented by Oak (and > not Jackrabbit 2)? Why not using Oak API for those use cases? Thanks for your input, Konrad On 21. Apr 2021, at 12:15, Angela Schreiber mailto:anch...@adobe.com>> wrote: hi konrad i commented on the issue. in general i agree with julian that this looks bad and

Re: Evolution of Jackrabbit API vs Oak API

hi konrad i commented on the issue. in general i agree with julian that this looks bad and i am not in favor or that proposal. kind regards angela From: Konrad Windszus Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 11:55 AM To: dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: Re:

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-515) AdminPermissionChecker should evaluate all principals bound to the Session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17325799#comment-17325799 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-515: - [~kwin], afaik there is no way to access Oak API from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7

+1 All checks ok From: Marcel Reutegger Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 12:49 PM To: Oak devs Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 Hi, A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.7 release is available at:

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4680) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315610#comment-17315610 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4680: --- [~reschke], i am not particularly familiar with the version

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-515) AdminPermissionChecker should evaluate all principals bound to the Session

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315528#comment-17315528 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-515: - [~kwin], JCR API doesn't come with an API to reveal

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4680) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315470#comment-17315470 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4680: --- [~reschke], yes i even suspect that this is not limited

[jira] [Commented] (JCR-4680) ConstraintViolationException in VersionManagerImplRestore when target node has a property definition unknown by the frozen node

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCR-4680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17315403#comment-17315403 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCR-4680: --- [~reschke], my reading of JSR283 and in particular section

Re: User created date property

Hi Jorge Your observation is correct: Authorizable.getProperty filters out properties in the jcr or rep namespace and only returns properties that could also be set using Authorizable.setProperty. If you add mix:created to a given user node (IMHO that is allowed) to have the jcr:created

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan

Am 21.01.2021 um 15:47 schrieb Angela Schreiber: > hi julian > > so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in > OAK-9324<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9324> and nor did i see it > failing in the integration. so, not sure this should bl

Re: Jackrabbit Oak 1.38.0 release plan

hi julian so far i didn't manage to reproduce the test failure you describe in OAK-9324 and nor did i see it failing in the integration. so, not sure this should block the release given that it might be limited to windows. also note: the ticket

Re: When to update the documentation

hi same here... for new features i usually refer to jira or the released version to clarify that it's not available in older versions. if i remember correctly we discussed this in the past. afaik the conclusion was back then that the documentation should reflect the latest trunk as we don't

Intent to backport OAK-8769

Hi I intend to backport task "OAK-8769 : oak-auth-ldap pom needs maintenance" to the 1.22 branch. The fix (among other things) updates the following dependencies to more recent versions: org.apache.directory.api:all-api, org.apache.mina:mina-core Let me know if you have any concerns. Kind

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17185795#comment-17185795 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-472: - [~tripod], agreed... i would suggest to resolve

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17184078#comment-17184078 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-472: - [~rombert], afaik the 'problem' is that principal

Re: [filevault] Installing users and access control entries in the same package

Subject: Re: [filevault] Installing users and access control entries in the same package Hi Angela, On Tue, 2020-08-25 at 07:39 +, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi robert > > without having a closer look, i would suspect that your repository > comes with default import-behavior c

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17183839#comment-17183839 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-472: - [~tripod], no problem. you are welcome > Cont

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17183822#comment-17183822 ] Angela Schreiber edited comment on JCRVLT-472 at 8/25/20, 7:45 AM

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-472) Content package with principal policy fails to install when the user is in the same package

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17183822#comment-17183822 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-472: - [~tripod], afaik {{rep:principalPolicy}} is supported

Re: [filevault] Installing users and access control entries in the same package

hi robert without having a closer look, i would suspect that your repository comes with default import-behavior configuration that strictly follows JCR specification which mandates a given principal to exist when dealing with access control management. oak comes with a variety of

Re: Slow performance in AbstractNodeState.equals

28.07.2020 um 10:10 schrieb Angela Schreiber: > Hi Alexander > > Thanks for the detailed report and analysis. > May I suggest that you create a ticket at > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OAK/issues > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OAK/issues> with component &g

Re: Node type definition update

Hi Philipp Looking at the code of NodeTypeRegistry.register it also ends up calling NodeTypeManager.registerNodeTypes. Without having a closer look I would expect this to work the same. But there might be subtle differences, which I am not aware of that explain the difference. Would you be

Re: Slow performance in AbstractNodeState.equals

Hi Alexander Thanks for the detailed report and analysis. May I suggest that you create a ticket at https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OAK/issues with component documentmk providing all the details and attaching the patch? I think that's the best way to move forward. Unfortunately, I am

Re: Multiple property definition for same property

rNodeType(repositoryTypeTemplate, true); session.save(); Is there any chance you could provide a patch to fix the bug you reported? > That might help getting it addressed. > I will try to look at the source code, in case I find a solution I will let you know. Regards. Jorge El mar., 23 jun. 2

Re: Multiple property definition for same property

ideas are welcome :) Regards. Jorge El mié., 18 mar. 2020 a las 11:19, jorgeeflorez . (< jorgeeduardoflo...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Hi Angela, > thank you for your help. I created > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-8961. > > Regards. > > Jorge > > El mié., 18

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.22

hi nitin the checks were all ok when running checkout from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit however, i noticed that the verification of previous releases were executed from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/jackrabbit. is there a particular reason for cutting this

Re: backport OAK-9059 to 1.10 and 1.22

Cc: Angela Schreiber Subject: Re: backport OAK-9059 to 1.10 and 1.22 On 14.05.2020 13:13, Angela Schreiber wrote: > hi > > i intend to backport the fix for OAK-9059 to the 1.10 and 1.22 branches. the > risk should be very limited as it only requires m

backport OAK-9059 to 1.10 and 1.22

hi i intend to backport the fix for OAK-9059 to the 1.10 and 1.22 branches. the risk should be very limited as it only requires modifications to o.a.j.oak.spi.security.authorization.cug.impl.NestedCugHook. let me know i you have any concerns. kind regards angela

Re: Edit group

Hi Jorge I am glad that you found the answer, which is pretty much exactly what I would have written in reply to your original question had I seen it. Please apologize that it was totally missed. Maybe I can also point you to the oak-exercise module, which contains additional training

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JCRVLT-427) Allow installation of packages with hook for users without admin privileges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17089346#comment-17089346 ] Angela Schreiber edited comment on JCRVLT-427 at 4/22/20, 8:15 AM

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-427) Allow installation of packages with hook for users without admin privileges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17089346#comment-17089346 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-427: - [~tripod], thanks for the insight... so the problem

[jira] [Commented] (JCRVLT-427) Allow installation of packages with hook for users without admin privileges

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCRVLT-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17088620#comment-17088620 ] Angela Schreiber commented on JCRVLT-427: - [~kwin], [~henzlerg], [~tripod], i am not sure i am

Re: Multiple property definition for same property

Hi Jorge That sounds like a bug to me... after all you will not be able to set multiple properties that have exactly the same PropertyDefinition and as far as I remember it should not even be possible to create multiple properties with the same name. Can you create a bug for this in JIRA? As

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.21

Hi Julian I got the following error during step 6: [INFO] 6. Build the release candidate [INFO] [INFO]Running the Maven build: mvn clean verify -Ppedantic [INFO] [ERROR] NOT OK: mvn clean verify -Ppedantic [ERROR] [ERROR] See ./target/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.21.log for full details. and from

Re: Using Oak External User Sync for a SAML2 Use Case?

Hi Cris I think you have 2 options: * either you synchronize the users/groups in the authentication handler * or you delegate the user/group synchronization to the sync-handler At Adobe we initially used the first option and moved away from it in favor of the second option, because the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2

[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2 all checks ok kind regards angela From: Nitin Gupta Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2020 9:25 AM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.2 A candidate for the

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >