On 8/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/25/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did put it in the m1-rsync repo [1] and it seems to have been
mirrored on ibiblio [2] but last time I checked I couldn't get it into
another m1 build so I might need to ping the Maven folks
On 8/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rwinston
Date: Sat Aug 26 02:36:36 2006
New Revision: 437134
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=437134view=rev
Log:
Update copyright dates
snip/
Thanks for the diligence, but we don't update copyright dates for the
sake of it
On 8/26/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/26/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that.
You're welcome. And it's fixed, thanks to Carlos. :)
snip/
Ah, even better, thanks again! (and thanks Carlos).
-Rahul
http://www.ibiblio.org/maven2/commons-scxml
This is a vote for releasing Commons JEXL 1.1 based on RC1.
RC1 has been available for more than two weeks. It (with release
notes, code signing keys, site etc.) is here:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/jexl/
---
[ ] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I oppose
On 31 Aug 2006 13:31:36 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed build logs:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20060831/pipeline.log
snip/
Looks like the chmod changes didn't work as planned.
BTW, many thanks for your continued efforts towards setting up the
Ran the usual gamut of checks, looks good to me.
snip/
---
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
snap/
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thanks to everyone's feedback so far. Sorry, I was away over the
weekend, couldn't reply sooner. Consolidating couple of replies in
one:
On 9/3/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good to me. +1 assuming build has been tested on 1.2, which is
what the jar manifest specifies.
snip/
On 9/6/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/5/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I'm happy for the checkstyle report/config to be fixed post 1.1 release.
I don't see this as showstopper either - as stated above, I am +1 with
release as is and understand Rahu's
On 9/6/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Site:
- site/index.html: the menu has as second item a reference to javadoc-1.0,
which should be now 1.1 (and is a dead-link anyway)
- site/index.html: the link in the menu to the examples should better point
to the viewcvs.cgi version
This VOTE has passed.
Result: 5 +1s. No other votes.
+1:
Rahul Akolkar
Dion Gillard
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
I plan to cut the release this weekend.
Thanks to everyone who took time to comment / vote.
-Rahul
On 8/29/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote
I'm trying to cut the 1.1 release. Was expecting a jexl/ directory in
/www/w.a.o/dist/j/c/ , but there isn't.
Indeed, most of the download mirrors are 404'ing for the 1.0 distros:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_commons-jexl.cgi
Nothing on archive.a.o either. Anyone know
On 9/9/06, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
I am not ready to vote yet on this until there is a discussion about what this
release means. Will commons-net-2.0 become the official release, with
previous versions relegated to backward compatibility support? If so, this
may be
On 9/10/06, Steve Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Continuing the discussion:
1. Regex support is in 1.4. It's only because we were trying to stay 1.2/1.3
compatible that we couldn't use it. That's a small point. I doubt we want to
have (say) a 1.4.2 branch that requires 1.4 after having
.
o [JEXL-6] Unary minus was only working for integer values.
o [JEXL-5] Method matching problem.
-Rahul Akolkar
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/11/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woohoo!!
snip/
Thanks to you for all the work that went into it!
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 9/9/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for releasing version 1.3 of Commons Configuration based
on the second release candidate
snip/
---
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
snap/
I
On 9/16/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 9/9/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for releasing version 1.3 of Commons Configuration based
on the second release candidate
snip/
---
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
On 9/20/06, Sweetland, Jesse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The attachment didn't seem to come through correctly. Here is it is inline:
snip/
Please use JIRA [1] for reporting bugs/enhancements and providing patches.
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira
On 9/22/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've rolled an RC2, and based on the comments for RC1 it seems like
it's worth taking a stab at a release vote on this one.
The relevant files are available at:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc2/
snip/
Sigs, sums look
On 9/24/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/22/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've rolled an RC2, and based on the comments for RC1 it seems like
it's worth taking a stab at a release vote on this one
On 9/25/06, Simon Kitching (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks good to me. I´d be happy for this to be committed.
I guess you'll be asking about when a new Digester release is due next? :-)
snip/
Spot on :-)
It's probably a good time; a couple of minor bugfixes/enhancements have been
On 9/27/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another try to get it right :)
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang-2.2-rc3/
(ignoring the various javadoc symlinking I'll need to do before the
real site release)
[X] +1
[ ] -1
snip/
As an aside, I've noticed similar behavior
On 9/29/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is SVN down? I am getting the following error:
snip/
Looks fine to me.
-Rahul
Gary
Problems reported while synchronizing SVNStatusSubscriber. 0 of 1
resources were synchronized.
An error occurred synchronizing /Apache Jakarta Commons
On 10/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think I've found a bug in this otherwise excellent package but can't
find anywhere to report it. I followed the homepage links to Bugzilla
and signed up there but the first page requires me to choose a product
and neither commons nor
On 10/11/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Remove unused import of UnsupportedEncodingException and modify javadoc
references to that class to use fully qualified name.
I wouldn't exactly describe it as unused, as it was used by the javadoc.
I guess our
Anyone know what these are about?
TIA,
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 10/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/14/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know what these are about?
There was a mail sent to JIRA admins about this ... guess it might have
needed wider distribution.
For a fairly long period of time, replies to JIRA's
On 10/16/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/16/06, Dion Gillard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm -1 on it as it stands, as I have a few problems with the proposed POM:
Ok, you have just convinced me that it is better to make the next
release of commons-fileupload without waiting
Why is this (see email subject) called commons-proper POM?
One related comment inlined below --
On 10/12/06, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as already discussed on
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11601226581
I would like to see a release of the parent POM for the
On 10/20/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are just moving to JDK1.5 at work, and I too judge that the time is
about right for this. I don't know how much time I'll be able to spend
on it though. We'll have to see.
There is a clear difference of approach, however, with some
On 10/20/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
collections5 ? (don't like collgenerics)
I think we should try not to put the technology into the name, nor the
target jvm version number.
Think about something like collections5 4.0 somehow strange, no?
- like java2 1.3.0 ;-)
On 10/20/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
collections5 ? (don't like collgenerics)
I would have suggested collections5 or collections15, but as has already
been pointed out, this is a little strange when JDK6 is about to come
out. Naming after
of [collections], and then copy from
there.
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
collections5 ? (don't like collgenerics)
I would have suggested collections5 or collections15, but as has
already been pointed out, this is a little strange when JDK6 is about
to come out. Naming after the feature seems to make more
On 10/22/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
[X] +1 Accept the Mantissa codebase into commons-math
[ ] +0 OK...
[ ] -0 OK, but I have the following concerns...
[ ] -1 No,
On 10/23/06, James Carman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomcat has been able to do this without any real problems.
snip/
Because now (TC6, some in 5.5, maybe other branches too) they've
package renamed dependency artifacts (digester, logging, dbcp -- and
even hinted at JDT ;-).
-Rahul
Why
On 10/24/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/23/06, Tyler Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think a very significant part of this problem is just the profusion
of jars anyway. The real incompatibility you're worried about is when
two projects are using different versions of
On 10/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Having said that, its not me thats going to be doing the work, but it
does seem valuable to discuss port vs. refactor rather than refactor
being a defacto decission and just having an argument on package
names.
snap/
:-)
Its not
On 10/29/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
This proposal is about making upgrades *predicatable* at the expense of
a small amount of pain. I know that most of us don't really like it, but
I contend that there is no alternative other than to inflict pain on
users of commons
On 10/30/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i've taken a good look at the code base, tidied up some legal issues and
some bad speiling. looks good. so, i've created a minimal release plan
here: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Betwixt/0.8ReleasePlan.
unless there are any
On 10/31/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jochen, any reason for the change from 'commons' to 'commons-parent'?
I find mention of the phrase on the list but I can't find a
notification of the change being made (probably dumb searching on my
part).
snip/
On 11/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/31/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jochen, any reason for the change from 'commons' to 'commons-parent'?
I find mention of the phrase on the list but I can't find
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM).
Since JCL is the bottom rung of the ladder, we should do our bit and
move as one (i.e. if a component wants to up the
.
But thats an aside. Don't let the m2 situation distract you from the
essense of the vote below.
-Rahul
Hen
On 11/1/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0
Realized I didn't post a closing time, I'll wrap this up Saturday 4th
around 2 PM New York time.
And, if its any surprise ...
[X] +1 Sounds reasonable
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 Sounds unreasonable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 11:59 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since most variants are point releases (1.0,
1.0.2, 1.0.3, 1.0.4 being popular ATM
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 15:26 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I wasn't implying we require JCL 1.1 now, but that when we do, we
diligently upgrade with each new release (for those
Don't mean to be terse, just lack of time.
On 11/1/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/1/06, Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Rahul,
Allow me to look at the situation from a different angle. I think what
is definitely missing is a more formal and a clearly
On 11/3/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There has been reltively little feedback on these backwards incompatible
changes. Do I assume (by lazy consensus) that [collections-generics]
will be seriously backwards incompatible? Can I commit changes? Are we
agreed on the strategy
This vote has failed.
-1 bayard, +1 rahul. No other votes.
It was suggested I should just dig in, which I shall, as time permits.
-Rahul
On 11/1/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of cross-commons, the JCL deps are all over the place. Which
is probably OK for now, since
I scraped an alternative view of our repository, one where the
dependency is king, and our components are but minions:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/DependencyCheck.html
At times, our trunks recommend differing major versions of our own
components. Minor mishaps aside. IMO, thats a
check in?
snip/
I only have a XP ThinkPad this weekend, so I hacked a Java class. Its
now posted here:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/DependencyCheck.java
-Rahul
Hen
On 11/4/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I scraped an alternative view of our repository, one where
On 11/4/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As this is a 'new' project, I propose that we:
- remove all @author tags - this complies with previous ASF board
suggestions
snip/
IMO new code should not contain author tags, gets tedious in many
ways. You may want to stop accepting
On 11/4/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just as an fyi - I'm running the nightly builds on a home machine to
get a more recent snapshot out than the backups gave us. It's chugging
away at the moment, so we'll see how it goes.
On 11/6/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
This is a new vote following up on the failed vote [1] that was held
previously.
As far as I can tell, all the issues that were raised in the earlier
vote has been addressed. So please cast your votes.
snip/
Comments / questions:
On 11/4/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt
snip/
Think we can upgrade a couple of our own dependencies. Give me 48
hours to try things locally.
-Rahul
- robert
On 11/7/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
a) IMO it needs a ASLv2 header
This seems to have been fixed now.
b) Incorrect URL at ${pom.url} (we need to remove proper/)
I've taken care of this.
c) The svn log is confident [1] the antrun bit is needed
On 11/7/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/dbutils-1.0-to-1.1-jardiff.html
It doesn't look that bad - jardiff complains that we've moved a method
into a superclass in a
On 11/6/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/4/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-betwixt
snip/
Think we can upgrade a couple of our own dependencies. Give me 48
hours to try things locally.
snip/
With r472693 [1
On 9/25/06, Simon Kitching (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
It's probably a good time; a couple of minor bugfixes/enhancements have been
made that deserve release (see RELEASE-NOTES.txt).
snap/
Coming back to this thread, couple of quick comments before we hit an
RC (no rush, but
On 11/9/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(adding commons-dev to make sure the release problem is seen)
On 11/9/06, David Delbecq [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, hitting a problem with commons discovery here, i wanted to try
and upgrade from 0.2 to 0.3 or 0.4-snapshot. However the
On 11/11/06, Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, at least the nightlies are running again ;-)
snip/
:-) Thanks!
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/14/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Let me know if I can help out with anything Maven related.
snap/
If you get a chance, can you please indicate your opinions/solutions
for the TODOs in this file (right under the ASLv2):
On 11/14/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
If you get a chance, can you please indicate your opinions/solutions
for the TODOs in this file (right under the ASLv2):
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/proper/digester/trunk/src/assembly
* To those who've put in the work: anyone willing and able to RM
digester 1.8 soonish?
* I can volunteer, probably cut the first RC within a week (anyone
not OK with the timing?)
* I'd likely do a m1 built release ATM (m2 site sticks out like a
sore thumb without Commons LnF, suspect site and
On 11/16/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/16/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* To those who've put in the work: anyone willing and able to RM
digester 1.8 soonish?
* I can volunteer, probably cut the first RC within a week (anyone
not OK with the timing
On 11/16/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On 11/16/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 22:20 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/14/06, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to try
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't be done until the release vote
actually passes, there are several 404s on the site home page (that
will get filled in)
* Going to JCL
On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't be done until
On 11/17/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 17:39 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
On 11/17/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* Going to JCL 1.1 we should be aware of MEV-392 [1], and whether
On 11/15/06, Darryl Fenwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm writing to the nag e-mail address with the (perhaps vain) hope
that someone can help me. I have followed the instructions for
building Jelly on the web page but can't get anywhere. I am
completely inexperienced with maven so perhaps I
On 11/17/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is cool - we're active enough that our internal dependencies are
now important for release prioritizing. Sure a pain - but a good sign
of activity.
So, here's the ones I know of:
Logging 1.1.1
Digester 1.8
IO 1.3
Betwixt 0.8
DbUtils 1.1
On 11/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/18/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release plugin removed the license header in this commit, and it's
deployed to the Maven repo without one:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-parent/1/
I wonder if
On 11/19/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-11-17 at 19:36 -0500, Rahul Akolkar wrote:
What work are you referring to? As a point release, we should focus on
things fixed + pom update (also fixed). What else?
I'm not aware of anything that's outstanding (exception
On 11/14/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+TODO:
+ 2. Would like binary distros to be *.zip rather than *-bin.zip, for
example
...
+assembly
+ idbin/id
The 'bin
On 11/19/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/19/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And now I remember why I wanted to retain 'bin' as the descriptor ID.
The nightly script looks for a descriptor with ID 'bin' for assembling
the binary distro (if we move to m2
Thanks for making this happen. Comments below ...
On 11/22/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rat reports for all maven-1 components:
http://vmbuild.apache.org/~commons/nightly/nightly_reports/
snip/
Does it make sense to have runs over bin builds here? What should we
pay attention
Ping this thread (say, within the next day) if you want more time.
-Rahul
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't
On 11/26/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Notes:
* The site requires manual installation of the 1.8 directory on the
webserver; since this can't/shouldn't be done until
On 11/26/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/17/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
snip/
- The release notes say the dependencies haven't changed
On 11/25/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
You might trying pinging Carlos Sanchez - hes given feedback on
improving the project.xml to help m2 in the past.
I asked Wendy Smoak (who knows way more about maven/m2 than me) to
look at these scopes and she thinks they look good.
On 11/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see it made clear in the release notes that digester 1.8 will work
fine with the same dependencies as 1.7, ie that people can upgrade digester.jar
without updating anything else. Of course we can *recommend* more modern libs,
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Vote in a day or two, please ping if you want me to wait longer.
-Rahul
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1
snip/
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
snap/
Couple of comments:
* We should recommend digester 1.7
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Follow up comment on something I missed (and will apply to Rahul's digester
release candidate as well). Are you planning on respinning the bits with
the correct version number (1.3.1 instead of 1.3.1-RC1) before the actual
vote? I
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/
Vote in a day or two, please ping if you want me to wait longer.
Looks good, all Shale's tests run with it, seems to solve
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Follow up comment on something I missed (and will apply to Rahul's digester
release candidate as well). Are you planning on respinning the bits with
the correct version number
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
* We should mark digester (and beanutils) as optional
BeanUtils is requried - its not just there for Digester, its used
internally in Validator. For digester perhaps, although
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have uploaded a new version of validator - which are the proposed
final artifacts for the 1.3.1 release if the vote passes - available
here:
http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1/
On 11/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies for another vote thread - post-thanksgiving holiday explosion.
Here's the release location:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-dbutils/1.1-RC2/
snip/
Doesn't build with 1.3 as advertised, javax.sql.DataSource is JDK 1.4
On 11/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
We should:
1) SVN tag each RC.
2) Put it up on in ~foo/component-version-rc1/
3) Create files for the actual release - ie) don't put the rc1 in the
project.xml or any of the sites.
snap/
A side-effect of this is that the identity of
Towards RC3 as 1.8:
http://people.apache.org/~rahul/commons/digester/rc3/
[ ] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Vote closes no sooner than Saturday, Dec 2nd (ping if you need more time).
TIA for your time,
On 11/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apologies for another vote thread - post-thanksgiving holiday explosion.
Here's the release location:
http://people.apache.org
On 11/29/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suspect we'll have a quota on release votes soon:
snip/
Bah, no need.
Here's the 0.4-RC1:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-discovery/0.4-RC1/
snap/
[X] +1
[ ] -1
snip/
Artifacts look OK, builds on 1.3 (and 0.4 is
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
A side-effect of this is that the identity of the distro (whether it
came from an RC or a release) is no longer in the artifact itself, but
in the location where
As a reminder, this vote closes tomorrow.
Replies to Oliver and Jörg, consolidated in one post below:
On 11/30/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
Everything looks good. There are a few pmd warnings, but I don't think
that this is an issue.
snip/
Thanks for going over the reports.
On 12/1/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rahul,
Rahul Akolkar wrote:
snip/
Thanks for looking at the site in detail. That bit is fine, its the
way the digester site is organized (the former URL will be the 1.8
Javadocs, the latter -- in its /www/jao/ home
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Successful vote for Digester 1.8 with 5 +1s, 1 +0, and no other votes.
+1:
Niall Pemberton
Craig McClanahan
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Rahul Akolkar
+0:
Simon Kitching
Thanks to everyone who participated.
-Rahul
On 11/29/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Towards RC3 as 1.8:
http
/digester/
-Rahul Akolkar
on behalf of the Jakarta Commons community
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12/6/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/6/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6 Dec 2006 11:49:56 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Failed build logs:
http://people.apache.org/~psteitz/commons-nightlies/20061206/validator.log
snip/
While m1
401 - 500 of 862 matches
Mail list logo
