Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/503
cc @osma @xristy for review as main devs in this area
---
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/501#discussion_r237831448
--- Diff: jena-tdb/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb/store/GraphTDB.java ---
@@ -171,7 +171,10 @@ protected final int graphBaseSize() {
@Override
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/492#discussion_r235398663
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/build/FusekiBuilder.java
---
@@ -70,16 +69,42 @@ public static void
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/492#discussion_r235395467
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/build/FusekiBuilder.java
---
@@ -70,16 +69,42 @@ public static void
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/492#discussion_r235394477
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/auth/AuthPolicy.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/489
So basically this is just avoiding redundantly storing the literal value
multiple times.
The actual literal value is always stored at least once but may be indexed
multiple times in many non
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474
@afs Agreed, many folks are going to migrate Java 8 -> Java 11 because of
the LTS release status are are skipping interim versions
---
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/476
Fix JDK10 Build (JENA-1609)
Simplified version of PR #474 avoiding the dependency weirdness by adding
the missing dependency only for the execution of the Javadoc plugin on the
offending module
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474
I think there is a simpler solution to this, I have Jena JDBC building
locally under JDK10 and will push a new PR shortly
---
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474#discussion_r222388084
--- Diff: jena-jdbc/jena-jdbc-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -39,17 +39,28 @@
3.10.0-SNAPSHOT
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474
@afs https://github.com/rvesse/airline/blob/master/pom.xml#L495-L497 which
I discovered via JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MJAVADOC-475
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474
@afs For some projects where I have added JDK 9/10 support I have had to
create separate profiles activated by JDK version for the Javadoc plugin
because there are breaking changes between the plugin
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474#discussion_r221884001
--- Diff: jena-jdbc/jena-jdbc-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -39,17 +39,28 @@
3.10.0-SNAPSHOT
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/474#discussion_r221885106
--- Diff: jena-jdbc/jena-jdbc-core/pom.xml ---
@@ -39,17 +39,28 @@
3.10.0-SNAPSHOT
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/465#discussion_r213250204
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-access/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/access/DataAccessCtl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/465#discussion_r213249005
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/DatasetGraphFilteredView.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,159 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/463#discussion_r211191248
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/core/DynamicDatasets.java ---
@@ -56,8 +55,8 @@ public static DatasetGraph
dynamicDataset
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/459#discussion_r209539897
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/mgt/ActionDatasets.java
---
@@ -288,28 +294,77 @@ protected void execDeleteItem
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207151396
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,250 @@ public String toString
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207152306
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,250 @@ public String toString
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207148170
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/query/TestParameterizedSparqlString.java
---
@@ -1925,4 +1926,190 @@ public void test_param_string_bug_04
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207150857
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,250 @@ public String toString
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207147377
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,250 @@ public String toString
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r207150287
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,250 @@ public String toString
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/449#discussion_r206083636
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/query/ParameterizedSparqlString.java ---
@@ -1734,4 +1739,237 @@ public String toString
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/441
Improved Travis Configuration
- Skips Travis install phase
- Test on both Oracle and Open JDK
- Build full profile
- Fix environment specification
You can merge this pull request
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198545901
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +249,42 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198490652
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +249,42 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198489213
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +247,54 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198484085
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +247,54 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440#discussion_r198484184
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/syntax/TestSSE_Builder.java ---
@@ -233,4 +247,54 @@ public void testBuildExpr_14
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/440
Fix SSE parsing on table with boolean values (JENA-1566)
JENA-1566 reports an issue with round tripping through SSE of tables that
contain boolean literals i.e. `true` and `false
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/439
@afs If you want to merge this now I was about to cut the RC for 3.8.0
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/439
Do you want this in 3.8.0?
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/436
@xristy I think you can just merge as you would normally though you
probably need to be explicit about the remote and branch you are using for
remote operations:
```
> git checkout mas
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/433#discussion_r194342614
--- Diff:
jena-fuseki2/jena-fuseki-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/fuseki/mgt/ActionDatasets.java
---
@@ -351,15 +356,13 @@ private static void
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/431#discussion_r194339397
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/graph/PrefixMappingOver.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/431#discussion_r194338419
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/graph/PrefixMappingBase.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/431#discussion_r194338879
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/graph/PrefixMappingBase.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/431#discussion_r194338271
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/graph/PrefixMappingBase.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/426#discussion_r192681609
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderPlan.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/426#discussion_r192680143
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderPlan.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/426#discussion_r192680996
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderPlan.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/414#discussion_r190532549
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-dboe-transaction/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/dboe/transaction/txn/TransactionCoordinator.java
---
@@ -142,41 +141,56 @@ public
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/414#discussion_r190533210
--- Diff:
jena-text/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/query/text/TestTextTxn.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,341 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/424#discussion_r189542354
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderConst.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/424#discussion_r189542444
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderParallel.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/424#discussion_r189542491
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/loader/parallel/LoaderParallel.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/424#discussion_r189540060
--- Diff: jena-base/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/atlas/lib/Timer.java ---
@@ -69,4 +69,13 @@ static public String timeStr(long timeInterval
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/407#discussion_r183809337
--- Diff:
jena-db/jena-tdb2/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb2/store/DatasetGraphSwitchable.java
---
@@ -111,7 +112,8 @@ public Graph getDefaultGraph
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/395#discussion_r181083359
--- Diff:
jena-text/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/query/text/filter/TestSelectiveFoldingFilter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/393
+1
---
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/391#discussion_r179407258
--- Diff: jena-tdb/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/tdb/lib/NodeLib.java ---
@@ -53,26 +52,32 @@
// Characters in IRIs that are illegal and cause SSE
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/385
@xristy Yes I don't think there is any harm in supporting both the explicit
form as well as supporting literal datatypes directly
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/385
Btw as you are now a committer you can follow the instructions at
https://reference.apache.org/committer/github to get added to the Apache GitHub
org so you'll show up as `Member` and not just
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/385
Looks like a really nice extension to the current machinery!
I notice there is a unit test for the assembler support but no unit tests
for using some of these new features, would it be possible
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/370
Fix delimiter parsing logic (JENA-1497)
Logical flaws in using continue vs break inside inner loops where
causing the wrong delimiter positions to be detected and leading to
false positives
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/365#discussion_r170621100
--- Diff:
jena-rdfconnection/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdfconnection/RDFConnectionRemoteBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,324 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/366#discussion_r170616197
--- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/SysRIOT.java ---
@@ -50,14 +51,20 @@
/**
* Context key for old style RDFWriter
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/366#discussion_r170616897
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/lang/ReaderRIOTRDFXML.java ---
@@ -116,17 +154,29 @@ public void parse() {
arp.getHandlers
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/360
Make sure to use datasets transactionally (JENA-1486)
textindexer did not use datasets transactionally which could fail for
dataset implementations that require transactional usage
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/345
@afs Thanks for the more detailed explanation
+1 to merge
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/345
Does
https://github.com/apache/jena/blob/cc038809fb622779933831011909714e22ef494c/jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/algebra/optimize/TransformPromoteTableEmpty.java#L160
need to change
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/330
[WIP] Obfuscation Support
Early WIP on obfuscation support based on our internal implementation
approach. Note various TODOs here and there, I am focusing on getting the
basics working before
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/315
Reworked based on @afs's feedback in the JIRA
---
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/315
Add --stop-warnings to riot (JENA-1434)
Add the option to allow riot to abort on warnings
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/rvesse
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/308#discussion_r152523288
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/process/normalize/CanonicalizeLiteral.java
---
@@ -73,6 +76,36 @@ public Node apply(Node node
Github user rvesse closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/297
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/297
I think leaving at 2 is good, I was playing with using
`false` though obviously that lessens
the benefit. I think we can close this out though if we've delivered
noticeable improvements already
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/297
I have now changed this to dynamically set test parallelism to use 50% of
available cores
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/297
Parallelism of 2 gives similar benefits. I have a quad core machine
personally.
One possible approach is to use the `build-helper:cpu-count` plugin -
http://www.mojohaus.org/build-helper-maven
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/297
Enable parallel testing for Elephas IO (JENA-1407)
Using parallelism of 4 reduces build time for Elephas IO to
approximately 3-4 minutes in my testing. Also fixed one test
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/294#discussion_r146852236
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/adapters/AdapterFileManager.java ---
@@ -285,6 +286,12 @@ protected Model readModelWorker(Model model
GitHub user rvesse opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/294
Fix and tests for possible NPE (JENA-1405)
Fixes a possible NPE in AdaptorFileManager by aligning its behaviour
with FileManager to throw NotFoundException
Adds specific tests
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/291
LGTM +1
---
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/285
Thanks for the updates, looks good to me
We aim to release approximately every three months, the last release was
July so we are probably due another release soon. However everything is done
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/285#discussion_r144011336
--- Diff:
jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/vocabulary/FOAF.java ---
@@ -19,242 +19,282 @@
package org.apache.jena.sparql.vocabulary
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/281
+1
---
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/237#discussion_r111201417
--- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/sparql/expr/NodeValue.java
---
@@ -784,10 +786,15 @@ private static int compare(NodeValue nv1, NodeValue
nv2
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/234
Thanks for starting on this, one of the first things I thought of when you
started on the API improvements was that it would make life much easier for
components like Elephas that need to manipulate
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/230
+1 LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/219
Thanks for adding the more informative error message, the wording is
extremely clear and should avoid lots of user confusion
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/219
Is there a logical place where we could catch that specific exception and
provide a more obvious error e.g. Index format is no longer supported, please
rebuild the text index with Jena X.Y.Z or higher
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/222#discussion_r104627436
--- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/RDFParserBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/222#discussion_r104627292
--- Diff: jena-arq/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/riot/RDFParserBuilder.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,431 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212
My concern is that depending on the underlying storage of the data in the
graphs a call to `contains()` might be quite expensive and it would be more
efficient to simply call `delete()` directly
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
We should already have support for most of the trigonometric functions
built into ARQ as extension functions -
https://github.com/apache/jena/tree/59e5e06c85c98c9c65a9c1addbc4252626e9d061/jena-arq/src
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/212
I presume this was motivated by a real-world performance concern? It would
be interesting to know how much difference it makes.
My only concern is what happens when there is only a slight
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92839505
--- Diff:
jena-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/test/rdfconnection/AbstractTestRDFConnection.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92839346
--- Diff: jena-integration-tests/README.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Jena Intrgration Tests
--- End diff --
Typo r -> e
---
If your project is
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92839569
--- Diff:
jena-integration-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/jena/test/rdfconnection/AbstractTestRDFConnection.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,382 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92840442
--- Diff: jena-rdfconnection/Documentation.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+# RDF Connection : SPARQL operations API
+
+`RDFConnection` provides a unified
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92840570
--- Diff: jena-rdfconnection/Documentation.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+# RDF Connection : SPARQL operations API
+
+`RDFConnection` provides a unified
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92840274
--- Diff: jena-rdfconnection/Documentation.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+# RDF Connection : SPARQL operations API
+
+`RDFConnection` provides a unified
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92841987
--- Diff:
jena-rdfconnection/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdfconnection/RDFConnectionRemote.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92841380
--- Diff:
jena-rdfconnection/src/main/java/org/apache/jena/rdfconnection/RDFConnectionFactory.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user rvesse commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/197#discussion_r92840841
--- Diff: jena-rdfconnection/Documentation.md ---
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
+# RDF Connection : SPARQL operations API
+
+`RDFConnection` provides a unified
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/180
Looks good to me
My only concern is how Shiro behaves in a environment where each invaded
server may have a different security configuration.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151
The incorrect/ overridden plug-ins can certainly be removed. They are
probably just cruft from the early days of development.
Historically AspectJ was used in order to inject trace level
Github user rvesse commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151
@ajs6f provided that those examples are available at some point then this
is fine with me. I'm not sure how we could incorporate test cases to this
aspect because you would need an endpoint protected
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
