Re: Joshua 6.1

Il giorno mer 19 ott 2016 alle ore 14:59 Matt Post ha scritto: > - I'm happy to release the language packs with an Apache 2.0 license. > glad to hear this :) > > - It looks like there's quite a bit of paperwork involved with the > release. Is anyone available to help out with

Re: Joshua 6.1

- I'm happy to release the language packs with an Apache 2.0 license. - It looks like there's quite a bit of paperwork involved with the release. Is anyone available to help out with this or even head it up? - We ran into a hitch building language packs, but have resumed and most of them are

Re: Joshua 6.1

Hi Matt, I like the sound of this :) On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:25 AM, < dev-digest-h...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> wrote: > > From: Matt Post > To: dev@joshua.incubator.apache.org > Cc: > Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 12:58:47 -0400 > Subject: Joshua 6.1 > Hi folks, > > I think I'm

Re: Joshua 6.1

I don't see why not? > On Oct 14, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Tommaso Teofili > wrote: > > Hi Matt, > > thanks for pushing this forward, +1 from me. > One concern I have is related to the language packs licensing, can we > distribute them under AL2 license ? (as

Re: Joshua 6.1

Hi Matt, thanks for pushing this forward, +1 from me. One concern I have is related to the language packs licensing, can we distribute them under AL2 license ? (as "convenience" binaries as the official release consists of the Joshua source code). I'm asking this because in OpenNLP we have had