Hey Justin,
Can you clarify a few things?
- On the first point, the only thing I see is zstd, which we do not, in
fact, ship the library itself, just the jni bindings. Was there anything
else you saw?
- On the second point, I checked the src download from the RC and afaict we
use this header and
+1 (binding)
This will be a nice improvement. From the discussion thread it's clear this
is tricky to get right, nice work!
On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 8:16 AM Andrew Schofield
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> This is now looking very nice.
>
> Andrew Schofield
>
> On 19/05/2020, 16:11, "Randall
+1 (binding), though there is definitely still some compatibility risk --
regardless of updates, people are going to have apps that may need other
updates but upgrading between scala versions is still too painful for too
long to warrant the effort to update. But in that case they probably aren't
+1 (binding)
A couple of comments on the details:
- I think this might be the first time we're adding a new message type to
the config topic. Might be worth noting that (somewhat unfortunately) we
currently log unknown keys as an error. Kinda unclear whether it should be
an error or warn (since
+1
-Ewen
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 10:33 AM Harsha wrote:
> +1 (non-bidning)
> - Download artifacts, setup 3 node cluster
> - Ran producer/consumer clients
>
> Thanks,
> Harsha
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019, at 5:54 AM, Andrew Schofield wrote:
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - Downloaded the artifacts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7813?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7813.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3.0
Issue resolved by pull request
+1 (binding)
-Ewen
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 2:04 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Excellent work, Konstantine!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:05 PM Konstantine Karantasis <
> konstant...@confluent.io> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jason!
> > That makes perfect sense. The change is reflected in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7834.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.1.2
I was going to make a related comment about connect.protocol. Even if we
have the config, we should default it to compatible given v0 state is small
and we believe v1 is better and people should migrate to it.
While I like getting rid of configs, not sure whether we should remove it
here. If we
> It allows _all_ existing clients of the class, e.g. those in Apache
Kafka or in applications written by other people that use the class, to get
this functionality for free, i.e. without any code changes. (I realize
this is probably where the 'unexpected effects' comes from).
> Personally, I
+1 (binding)
My only final comment would be that the topic.creation.enable setting could
potentially be left out. We're still backwards compatible with what we
promised before (or at least compatibility is debatable). You could enforce
not being able to create topics with ACLs anyway, so avoiding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7461?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7461.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7503.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.2
2.1.1
Hey Ryanne,
Sorry, late to the game here.
On the ACL management, can you explain how things are supposed to work when
you need to migrate to the new cluster? Or is this purely for a mirroring
but not DR and failover cases? In particular, the rules outlined state that
only MM2 would be able to
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the KIP. A few comments.
To me, biggest question here is if we can fix this behavior without adding
a config. In particular, today, we don't even set the client.id for the
producer and consumer at all, right? The *only* way it is set is if you
include an override in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7551.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Merged [https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5842,] my bad
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7620?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7620.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.2
2.1.1
re: AdminClient vs this proposal, one consideration is that AdminClient
exposes a lot more surface area and probably a bunch of stuff we actually
don't want Connectors to be able to do, such as deleting topics. You can
always lock down by ACLs, but what the framework enables directly vs
requiring
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7560?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7560.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.2.0
Issue
+1
-Ewen
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 10:10 AM Manikumar wrote:
> We were waiting for the system test results. There were few failures:
> KAFKA-7579, KAFKA-7559, KAFKA-7561
> they are not blockers for 2.0.1 release. We need more votes from
> PMC/committers :)
>
> Thanks Stanislav! for the system
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6490.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Closing as this is effectively
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-5117.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7476.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
0.10.2.3
Chris,
Can you point at the starting point for your Connector? Happy to do a quick
review of code.
I'll admit, I'm a bit confused by the PLC4X positioning -- it seems to
claim to be universal IoT protocol, but then I see, e.g., nothing about
MQTT on the front page, a protocol that Kafka Connect
Hey all,
Sorry I haven't been closely following the threads on this, but I think I
can provide a bit more color.
Jakub, re: general policy, I'll take the blame that the relevant "rejected
alternatives" section in the KIP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7460?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7460.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.1
Ewen Cheslack-Postava created KAFKA-7461:
Summary: Connect Values converter should have coverage of logical
types
Key: KAFKA-7461
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7461
Project
Ewen Cheslack-Postava created KAFKA-7460:
Summary: Connect Values converter uses incorrect date format string
Key: KAFKA-7460
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7460
Project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7434.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.1
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-4932.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 4438
[https://github.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7353?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7353.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7242.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.1
Issue
First, I agree, updating that list would be a good idea. It's likely it
will always be a little divergent from any new additions -- the last update
was probably when the KIP page was originally created, before either
Connect or Streams existed.
However, note that we also document the exact set of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7225.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Kafka Connect ConfigProvider not invoked before validat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7228.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> DeadLetterQueue throws a NullPointerExcept
Generally +1 (binding)
It would be helpful to just provide the full, updated interfaces in the KIP
and mark things as new with comments if needed. I had to go back and read
the discussion thread to make sure I was understanding the intent correctly.
Damian -- if we make that Optional, shouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7068.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7047?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7047.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Reviewer: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
Fix Version/s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7039.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7056?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7056.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7009.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
0.11.0.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7031.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7043.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
Issue resolved by pull request
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-7003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-7003.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.1.0
2.0.0
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6997.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 5139
[https://github.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6981?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6981.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Issue resolved by pull request 5125
[https://github.com
+1 (binding)
Just follow up on the existing version of the KIP, so nothing new here.
Possibly a bit disruptive given how quick the 1.0 -> 2.0 jump happened, but
it's the right time to remove it.
-Ewen
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 8:13 AM Viktor Somogyi
wrote:
> +1
Sorry for the delay, didn't see this until now. I've given you edit
permissions on the wiki.
-Ewen
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 2:21 PM McCaig, Rhys
wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Would someone be able to provide me with Confluence permission in order to
> write a KIP for the below
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-5807.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Issue resolved by pull request
+1 (binding)
-Ewen
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:29 AM Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Randall Hauch wrote:
>
> > I'd like to start a vote of a very straightforward proposal for Connect
> to
> > add converters for the basic primitive
On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 6:20 AM Randall Hauch <rha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Considering this KIP is straightforward, what do you think about kicking
> off a vote? Or does it need more discussion time?
>
> Regards,
> Randall
>
> > On May 18, 2018, at 4:30 PM, Ewen Chesl
Hey all,
I think think this is a great discussion, and is helping to clarify the
real pain points as well as explore a few more options than just what was
initially proposed.
Stephane, I think why you're ending up in "grand redesign" state is because
you're highlighting (and the KIP's motivation
e limited enough to just be an
enum. Not sure if anyone has use cases for larger positive values.
-Ewen
>
> Best,
>
>
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:28 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Arjun,
> >
> > Understood on retries
+1 binding. I had one last comment in the DISCUSS thread, but not really a
blocker.
-Ewen
On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:48 AM Matthias J. Sax
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> On 5/21/18 9:30 AM, Randall Hauch wrote:
> > Thanks, Arjun. +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
Arjun,
Understood on retries vs tolerance -- though I suspect this will end up
being a bit confusing to users as well. It's two levels of error handling
which is what tripped me up.
One last comment on KIP (which otherwise looks good): for the tolerance
setting, do we want it to be an absolute
rdes is useful, so
> I've kept all 5 converters in the KIP.
>
> Interestingly, perhaps the short and int converters (with the reduced
> ranges) are not necessarily that useful for keys either.
>
> Regards,
>
> Randall
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6566.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> SourceTask#stop() not called after exception raised in p
A few more thoughts -- might not change things enough to affect a vote, but
still some things to consider:
* errors.retry.delay.max.ms -- this defines the max, but I'm not seeing
where we define the actual behavior. Is this intentional, or should we just
say that it is something like exponential,
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Ewen
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:16 PM Ted Yu wrote:
> +1
> Original message From: Gwen Shapira
> Date: 5/17/18 12:02 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-285: Connect Rest
Yup, thanks for the changes. The 'health' package in particular feels like
a nice fit given the way we expect it to be used.
-Ewen
On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 7:02 PM Randall Hauch wrote:
> Looks good to me. Thanks for quickly making the changes! Great work!
>
> Best regards,
>
>
Thanks for addressing this Robert, it's a pretty common user need.
First, +1 (binding) generally.
Two very minor comments that I think could be clarified but wouldn't affect
votes:
* Let's list in the KIP what package the ConfigProvider,
ConfigChangeCallback, ConfigData and ConfigTransformer
Just a couple of minor points that don't really affect the implementation:
* For nulls, let's just mention the underlying serializers already support
this. I'm actually not sure why they should/need to, but given they do,
let's just defer to that implementation.
* I'm not sure where Float and
Hey,
Sorry for the late follow up. I just had a couple of minor questions about
details:
* Some of the public API being added is under a runtime package. But that
would be new for public API -- currently only things under the runtime
package use that package name. I think changing the package
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-5141.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
Not sure of the fix
for
> > different types of consumers, and they would go ahead and learn about the
> > other three prefixes and set them there.
> >
> >
> > I agree that four prefixes would be more confusing, but if we think use
> > case 1)'s popularity is much larger tha
I think this model is more confusing than it needs to be.
We end up with 4 prefixes despite only have 3 types of consumers. We have
prefixes for: "base", "main", "global", and "restore". However, we only
instantiate consumers of type "main", "global", and "restore".
Until now, we've only had two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6728.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.1
1.2.0
Issue
+1 (binding)
The incompatibility is unfortunate, but seems unlikely to cause a problem
in practice. Let's just make sure there's a note in the upgrade notes about
the incompatibility when we have a PR for this.
-Ewen
On Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 10:22 AM, Jun Rao wrote:
> Hi,
Regarding the flexibility question, has someone tried to dig up the
discussion of the new consumer APIs when they were being written? I vaguely
recall these exact questions about using APIs vs configs and flexibility vs
bloating the API surface area having already been discussed. (Not that we
The log is showing that the Connect worker is trying to make sure it has
read the entire log and gets to offset 119, but some other worker says it
has read to offset 169. The two are in inconsistent states, so the one that
seems to be behind will not start work with potentially outdated
this is opt-in, and that by default
> > nothing will change?
> >
> > Randall
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:18 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> e...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Vincent,
> >>
> >> I think with the ad
Responses inline.
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Matt Farmer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We’ve been experimenting recently with some limited use of Kafka Connect
> and are hoping to expand to wider use cases soon. However, we had some
> internal issues that gave us a well-timed
Ewen Cheslack-Postava created KAFKA-6676:
Summary: System tests do not handle ZK chroot properly with SCRAM
Key: KAFKA-6676
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6676
Project: Kafka
> > avoid a lot of pain. Thanks for reviving it Ewen.
> > >
> > > -Jay
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <
> > e...@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'd like to kick off voting f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5999?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-5999.
--
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
Closing as Invalid
I can only speak to my view on it, but I view logical types as truly
generic. The point is that they can be handled as the underlying type
safely, processed as such as needed, but if the logical type is properly
preserved they can properly translate through as the more "complicated"
type.
To me,
, Ewen Cheslack-Postava, Filipe Agapito, fredfp,
Guozhang Wang, huxihx, Ismael Juma, Jason Gustafson, Jeremy Custenborder,
Jiangjie (Becket) Qin, Joel Hamill, Konstantine Karantasis, lisa2lisa, Logan
Buckley, Manjula K, Matthias J. Sax, Nick Chiu, parafiend, Rajini Sivaram,
Randall Hauch, Robert
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-5471?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-5471.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
Updated the link
I'd like to kick off voting for KIP-186:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-186%3A+Increase+offsets+retention+default+to+7+days
This is the trivial fix that people in the DISCUSS thread were in favor of.
There are some ideas for further refinements, but I think we can follow up
gt; from such groups.
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > I agree with Jason here, but maybe itself deserves a separate KIP
> >> > discussion.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > >
> >> > > -Jason
> >> > >
&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4854?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-4854.
--
Resolution: Not A Bug
Assignee: Ewen Cheslack-Postava
This behavior
at 8:44 PM, Jakub Scholz <ja...@scholz.cz> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding) ... I used the Scala 2.12 binaries and run my tests
> with
> > > producers / consumers.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:06 AM, Ewen Chesla
filebeat is implemented using sarama last I checked, so presumably they are
on a version that doesn't know about Kafka 0.11.0.1 and therefore it
doesn't know which API versions to use.
Not sure if they support leaving it blank or exactly how the sarama config
works, but as far as I know sarama
The web page is more about general project info and might be of interest to
people beyond just developers. But I agree the wiki landing page could use
some updating. Even more than just the developer section as we're missing
several releases, the oldest ones are listed at the top, etc.
-Ewen
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6236.
--
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
Unresponsive, so we can't track this down. Please
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6239.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
> Consume group hung into rebalancing state, now str
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6439?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6439.
--
Resolution: Not A Bug
> "com.streamsets.pipeline.api.StageException:
Ewen Cheslack-Postava created KAFKA-6580:
Summary: Connect bin scripts have incorrect usage
Key: KAFKA-6580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6580
Project: Kafka
Issue
/kafka/tree/1.0.1-rc2
* Documentation:
http://kafka.apache.org/10/documentation.html
* Protocol:
http://kafka.apache.org/10/protocol.html
/**
Thanks,
Ewen Cheslack-Postava
t; >> > > Satish.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 11:30 PM, Damian Guy <damian@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > +1
> >> > > >
> >&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6503.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Issue resolved by pull request
And of course I'm +1 since I've already done normal release validation
before posting this.
-Ewen
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 10:15 AM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
> This is the second candidate for re
/documentation.html
* Protocol:
http://kafka.apache.org/10/protocol.html
Thanks,
Ewen Cheslack-Postava
om source and running the quickstart were successful on Ubuntu
> and Windows 10.
>
> Thanks for running the release.
> --Vahid
>
>
>
> From: Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
> To: dev@kafka.apache.org, us...@kafka.apache.org,
> kafka-clie...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6513?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ewen Cheslack-Postava resolved KAFKA-6513.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Issue resolved by pull request
Hi all,
I just wrote a note in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-2967
with a proposal for changing how docs are written. I want to move on this
soon if possible and normally would just leave the discussion to the JIRA,
but as I think this is something everyone has an opinion on and
.
This requires "closing" two separate staging repos to get everything
released.
If things look good now, I can update the release script/instructions to
make this clearer.
-Ewen
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 9:59 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Not sure, seem
.org/content/groups/staging/org/
> apache/kafka/kafka-clients/
>
> I don't see 1.0.1 version.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:48 PM, Ewen Cheslack-Postava <e...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
>
Hello Kafka users, developers and client-developers,
Sorry for a bit of delay, but I've now prepared the first candidate for
release of Apache Kafka 1.0.1.
This is a bugfix release for the 1.0 branch that was first released with
1.0.0 about 3 months ago. We've fixed 46 significant issues since
Ewen Cheslack-Postava created KAFKA-6536:
Summary: Streams quickstart pom.xml is missing versions for a
bunch of plugins
Key: KAFKA-6536
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-6536
1 - 100 of 1990 matches
Mail list logo