Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

23, 2023, at 12:20, Hailey Ni wrote: > Hi Ron, > > I've added the "Rejected Alternatives" section in the KIP. Thanks for the > comments and +1 vote! > > Thanks, > Hailey > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:33 AM Ron Dagostino wrote: > >> Hi Hailey. I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

Hi all, This voting thread has been open for over 72 hours and has received enough votes. Therefore, the vote will be closed now. +3 binding votes +1 (non-binding) KIP-992 has PASSED. Thanks all for your votes Hanyu On Fri, Nov 3, 2023 at 5:10 PM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Thanks for the

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

;https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14681#discussion_r1378591228 for context). Since the change itself was already reviewed and approved I'm skipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote right away, but of course I'm open to feedback and can create a discussion thread if

Re: [VOTE] KIP-982: Enhance Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to Access SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer

Hi Contributors, I kindly request your valuable input on KIP-982, which is currently open for voting and review. At present, we have one binding +1 vote and one non-binding +1 vote. Please take a moment to review the KIP and cast your vote, as your expertise and contribution would greatly help

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

, so for them it's different, but still, > >>> they > >>>>> don't need public access because they can extend `ProducerConfig`, > too > >>>>> for this case). -- To me, this falls into the category "simple thing > >>>>> should

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

for this case). -- To me, this falls into the category "simple thing >>>>> should be easy, and hard things should be possible). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

wrote: Hi Hanyu, Thanks for the KIP this LGTM. +1 (binding) Thanks, Bill On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to start a vote for KIP-992: Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery. Sincerely

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

ring the PR review process (see this thread <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14681#discussion_r1378591228> for context). Since the change itself was already reviewed and approved I'm skipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote right away, but of course I'm open to feedback and c

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

ally > > > > clear to me. If the goal is to allow third party applications to > > > customize > > > > the logging behavior, why is the method protected instead of public? > > > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > > > On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

havior, why is the method protected instead of public? > > > > > > Ismael > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 9:55 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman < > > sop...@responsive.dev> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Hey all, >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

> a KIP during the PR review process (see this thread > >> <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14681#discussion_r1378591228> for > >> context). Since the change itself was already reviewed and approved I'm > >> skipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vot

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

wrote: Hey all, This is a trivial one-liner change that it was determined should go through a KIP during the PR review process (see this thread <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14681#discussion_r1378591228> for context). Since the change itself was already reviewed and approved I'm skippi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs

gt; > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jakub Scholz wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I would like to start a vote for the KIP-978: Allow dynamic > reloading of > > > > certificates with different DN / SANs > > > > < > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263429128 > > > > > > > > > . > > > > > > > > Thanks & Regards > > > > Jakub > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

t; Thanks for the KIP this LGTM. > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng > > wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

eviewed and approved I'm > skipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote right away, but of > course I'm open to feedback and can create a discussion thread if there is > need for it. > > The change itself is simply adding the `protected` modifier to the > ProducerConfig constr

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

ipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote right away, but of course I'm open to feedback and can create a discussion thread if there is need for it. The change itself is simply adding the `protected` modifier to the ProducerConfig constructor that allows for silencing the config l

Re: [VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

should go through > a KIP during the PR review process (see this thread > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14681#discussion_r1378591228> for > context). Since the change itself was already reviewed and approved I'm > skipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote righ

[VOTE] KIP-998: Give ProducerConfig(props, doLog) constructor protected access

ipping the discussion thread and bringing it to a vote right away, but of course I'm open to feedback and can create a discussion thread if there is need for it. The change itself is simply adding the `protected` modifier to the ProducerConfig constructor that allows for silencing the config logging. Thi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

gt; > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote for KIP-992: Proposal to introduce IQv2 > Query > > Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery. > > > > Sincerely, > > Hanyu > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:00 AM Hanyu (Peter)

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

Hi Hanyu, Thanks for the KIP this LGTM. +1 (binding) Thanks, Bill On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:07 PM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I would like to start a vote for KIP-992: Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query > Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery. &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

Hello everyone, I would like to start a vote for KIP-992: Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery. Sincerely, Hanyu On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:00 AM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-

[VOTE] KIP-992 Proposal to introduce IQv2 Query Types: TimestampedKeyQuery and TimestampedRangeQuery

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-992%3A+Proposal+to+introduce+IQv2+Query+Types%3A+TimestampedKeyQuery+and+TimestampedRangeQuery -- [image: Confluent] Hanyu (Peter) Zheng he/him/his Software Engineer Intern +1 (213) 431-7193 <+1+(213)+431-7193>

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

Thanks everyone. Now that everyone who commented on the discussion has voted, I think we can close this vote as one touchdown with a missed field goal to zero (5 binding, 1 non-binding). Cheers, Colt On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 5:35 AM Bruno Cadonna wrote: > Hi Colt and Eduwer, > &g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

A last reminder :( On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:25 PM Jack Tomy wrote: > Hey contributors, > > Please vote or veto the proposal. > > Please don't ghost. Humble request. > > Thanks > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:23 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > >> Bumping up. >&g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

rutschy wrote: Hi, thanks again for the KIP! +1 (binding) Cheers, Lucas On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 9:13 AM Colt McNealy wrote: Hello there, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-988 (co-authored by my friend and colleague Eduwer Camacaro). We are hoping to get it in before the 3.7.0

Re: [VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

, 2023 at 10:05 AM Krishna Agarwal < krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official > docker image for Apache Kafka. > > KIP - > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-975%3A+Do

Re: [VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

s. +1 (binding). > > > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:36 PM Krishna Agarwal < > > krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official > > docker > > > image for Apac

Re: [VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

t; Hi, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official > docker > > image for Apache Kafka. > > > > KIP - > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-975%3A+Docker+Image+for+Apache+Kafka > > > > Discuss

Re: [VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Thanks for the KIP Krishna - looking forward to this. +1 (binding). On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:36 PM Krishna Agarwal < krishna0608agar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official docker > image for Apache Kafka. >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Thanks for the KIP! Great idea, well thought out and much needed. +1 (binding) On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 06:36, Krishna Agarwal wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official docker > image for Apache Kafka. > > KIP - > > https://cwiki.

Re: [VOTE] KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs

; > > Thanks for the KIP. > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jakub Scholz wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote for the KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading

[VOTE] KIP-975: Docker Image for Apache Kafka

Hi, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-975 which aims to publish an official docker image for Apache Kafka. KIP - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-975%3A+Docker+Image+for+Apache+Kafka Discussion thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread/3g43hps2dmkyxgglplrlwpsf7vkywkyy Regards

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

McNealy wrote: Hello there, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-988 (co-authored by my friend and colleague Eduwer Camacaro). We are hoping to get it in before the 3.7.0 release. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-988%3A+Streams+Standby+Task+Update+Listener Cheer

Re: [VOTE] KIP-967: Support custom SSL configuration for Kafka Connect RestServer

t; I also like that we're able to clean up some connect-specific > functionality and make the codebase more consistent. > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Greg > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:03 AM Taras Ledkov wrote: >> >> Hi Kafka Team. >> >> II'd

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

> > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > thanks again for the KIP! > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Lucas > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-982: Enhance Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to Access SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer

Hi all, Bumping up this vote thread We have one binding +1 vote and one non-binding +1 vote so far. Thanks, Raghu On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 5:04 AM Manikumar wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Manikumar > > On Fri, Oct 20,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs

Hi Jakub, thanks for this KIP. +1 (non binding) Thanks Fede On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:45 PM Manikumar wrote: > > Hi, > > Thanks for the KIP. > > +1 (binding) > > > Thanks. > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jakub Scholz wrote: > > > Hi all, > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs

Hi, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding) Thanks. On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:37 AM Jakub Scholz wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to start a vote for the KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of > certificates with different DN / SANs > < > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/

[VOTE] KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs

Hi all, I would like to start a vote for the KIP-978: Allow dynamic reloading of certificates with different DN / SANs <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=263429128> . Thanks & Regards Jakub

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

Hi Ron, I've added the "Rejected Alternatives" section in the KIP. Thanks for the comments and +1 vote! Thanks, Hailey On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 6:33 AM Ron Dagostino wrote: > Hi Hailey. I'm +1 (binding), but could you add a "Rejected > Alternatives" sect

Re: [VOTE] KIP-967: Support custom SSL configuration for Kafka Connect RestServer

) Thanks, Greg On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:03 AM Taras Ledkov wrote: > > Hi Kafka Team. > > II'd like to call a vote on KIP-967: Support custom SSL configuration for > Kafka Connect RestServer [1]. > Discussion thread [2] was started more then 2 month ago and there was n

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:56 AM Lucas Brutschy > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > thanks again for the KIP! > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Lucas > > > > > > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

0 AM Federico Valeri wrote: > > +1 (non binding) > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash > wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55 Hailey Ni wrote: > > > > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

+1 (non binding) Thanks. On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 9:48 AM Kamal Chandraprakash wrote: > > +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55 Hailey Ni wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow user

Re: [VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! On Mon, Oct 23, 2023, 12:55 Hailey Ni wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to independently > stop KRaft processes. > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+ind

[VOTE] KIP-979 Allow independently stop KRaft processes

Hi all, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-979 that will allow users to independently stop KRaft processes. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-979%3A+Allow+independently+stop+KRaft+processes Thanks, Hailey

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

gt; > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Lucas > > > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 9:13 AM Colt McNealy > wrote: > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-988 (co-authored by my friend and >

[VOTE] KIP-967: Support custom SSL configuration for Kafka Connect RestServer

Hi Kafka Team. II'd like to call a vote on KIP-967: Support custom SSL configuration for Kafka Connect RestServer [1]. Discussion thread [2] was started more then 2 month ago and there was not any negative or critical comments. [1]. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-967%3A

Re: [VOTE] KIP-982: Enhance Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to Access SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer

Hi, Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding) Thanks, Manikumar On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 4:26 AM Raghu B wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-982, which proposed enhancements to > the Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to allow access to SslPrincipalMapper and > Ker

Re: [VOTE] KIP-982: Enhance Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to Access SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer

Hi Raghu, Thanks for the short KIP. +1(non-binding) On Thu, 19 Oct 2023 at 23:56, Raghu B wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to start a vote on KIP-982, which proposed enhancements to > the Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to allow access to SslPrincipalMapper and > Ker

[VOTE] KIP-982: Enhance Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to Access SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer

Hi everyone, I would like to start a vote on KIP-982, which proposed enhancements to the Custom KafkaPrincipalBuilder to allow access to SslPrincipalMapper and KerberosShortNamer. This KIP <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-982%3A+Access+SslPrincipalMap

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

+1 from me. On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 1:56 AM Lucas Brutschy wrote: > > Hi, > > thanks again for the KIP! > > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Lucas > > > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 9:13 AM Colt McNealy wrote: > > > > Hello there, > > > &g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

u (Peter) Zheng > wrote: > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote for KIP-985 that Add reverseRange and > > reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2. > > > > Sincerely, > > Hanyu > > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

Seems late. But +1 (non-binding). Thanks for the KIP! Hao On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:27 AM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: > Hi all, > > This voting thread has been open for over 72 hours and has received enough > votes. Therefore, the vote will be closed now. > > +3 binding vot

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

Hi all, This voting thread has been open for over 72 hours and has received enough votes. Therefore, the vote will be closed now. +3 binding votes KIP-985 has PASSED. Thanks all for your votes Hanyu On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:25 AM Walker Carlson wrote: > +1 (binding_ > > Thanks! &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

ng wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I would like to start a vote for KIP-985 that Add reverseRange and > > > reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2. > > > > > > Sincerely, > > > Hanyu > > > > > > On Fri, Oc

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP! On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 2:31 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > On 10/13/23 9:24 AM, Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > I would like to start a vote for KIP-985 that Add reverseRange and &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

+1 (binding) On 10/13/23 9:24 AM, Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: Hello everyone, I would like to start a vote for KIP-985 that Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2. Sincerely, Hanyu On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:15 AM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: https://cwiki.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

for this KIP is 3.7.0 Thanks, Yash On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 7:39 PM Mickael Maison wrote: > +1 (binding) > Thanks for the KIP > > Mickael > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:05 AM Yash Mayya wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Bumping up this vote thread - we have two b

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

+1 (binding) Thanks for the KIP Mickael On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:05 AM Yash Mayya wrote: > > Hi all, > > Bumping up this vote thread - we have two binding +1 votes and one > non-binding +1 vote so far. > > Thanks, > Yash > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:57 PM Greg

Re: [VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

Hi, thanks again for the KIP! +1 (binding) Cheers, Lucas On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 9:13 AM Colt McNealy wrote: > > Hello there, > > I'd like to call a vote on KIP-988 (co-authored by my friend and colleague > Eduwer Camacaro). We are hoping to get it in before the 3.7.0 rel

Re: [VOTE] KIP-714: Client metrics and observability

The vote for KIP-714 has now concluded and the KIP is APPROVED. The votes are: Binding: +4 (Jason, Matthias, Sophie, Jun) Non-binding: +3 (Milind, Kirk, Philip) -1 (Ryanne) This KIP aims to improve monitoring and troubleshooting of client performance by enabling clients to push metrics

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

Hi all, Bumping up this vote thread - we have two binding +1 votes and one non-binding +1 vote so far. Thanks, Yash On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:57 PM Greg Harris wrote: > Thanks Yash for the well written KIP! > > And thank you for finally adding JSON support to the standalone mode >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-953: partition method to be overloaded to accept headers as well.

Hey contributors, Please vote or veto the proposal. Please don't ghost. Humble request. Thanks On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 7:23 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > Bumping up. > > On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 9:34 AM Jack Tomy wrote: > >> Hey Ismael, Sagar and everyone, >> >> So

[VOTE] KIP-988 Streams StandbyUpdateListener

Hello there, I'd like to call a vote on KIP-988 (co-authored by my friend and colleague Eduwer Camacaro). We are hoping to get it in before the 3.7.0 release. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-988%3A+Streams+Standby+Task+Update+Listener Cheers, Colt McNealy *Founder

Re: [VOTE] KIP-714: Client metrics and observability

l to understand why sometimes commit > > >> fails/client not making progress. > > >> 2. Client connection: If the client selects the "wrong" connection to > > push > > >> out the data, I assume the request would timeout; which should lead to > > &g

Re: [VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

Hello everyone, I would like to start a vote for KIP-985 that Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2. Sincerely, Hanyu On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:15 AM Hanyu (Peter) Zheng wrote: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-985:+Add+reverseRange+and+reve

[VOTE] KIP-985 Add reverseRange and reverseAll query over kv-store in IQv2

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-985:+Add+reverseRange+and+reverseAll+query+over+kv-store+in+IQv2 -- [image: Confluent] Hanyu (Peter) Zheng he/him/his Software Engineer Intern +1 (213) 431-7193 <+1+(213)+431-7193> Follow us: [image: Blog]

Re: [VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

s > > > > > > > > On 10/6/23 2:50 AM, Alieh Saeedi wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > > > >> > > > >> Since KIP-960 is reduced to the simplest IQ type and all further > > > comments > > > >> are related to the following-up KIPs, I decided to finalize it at > this > > > >> point. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> A huge thank you to everyone who has reviewed this KIP (and also the > > > >> following-up ones), and > > > >> participated in the discussion thread! > > > >> > > > >> I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. > > > >> > > > >> Best, > > > >> Alieh > > > >> > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

wrote: > > >> Hi everyone, > > >> > > >> Since KIP-960 is reduced to the simplest IQ type and all further > > comments > > >> are related to the following-up KIPs, I decided to finalize it at this > > >> point. > > >> > > >> > > >> A huge thank you to everyone who has reviewed this KIP (and also the > > >> following-up ones), and > > >> participated in the discussion thread! > > >> > > >> I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. > > >> > > >> Best, > > >> Alieh > > >> > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-714: Client metrics and observability

eselecting another node as you > mentioned, > >> via the least loaded node. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> P > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:40 AM Andrew Schofield < > >> andrew_schofield_j...@outlook.com> wro

Re: [VOTE] KIP-714: Client metrics and observability

.@outlook.com> wrote: Hi Philip, Thanks for your vote and interest in the KIP. KIP-714 does not introduce any new client metrics, and that’s intentional. It does tell how that all of the client metrics can have their names transformed into equivalent "telemetry metric names”, and then potent

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

Hi all, Thanks for the votes! I'll cast a final +1 myself and close the vote out. This KIP passes with the following +1 votes (and no +0 or -1 votes): • Greg Harris (binding) • Yash Mayya (binding) • Federico Valeri • Mickael Maison (binding) • hudeqi • Hector Geraldino • Chris Egerton (binding

Re: [VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

> >> > >> A huge thank you to everyone who has reviewed this KIP (and also the > >> following-up ones), and > >> participated in the discussion thread! > >> > >> I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. > >> > >> Best, > >> Alieh > >> >

Re: [VOTE]KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

Oct 4, 2023, at 17:44, Jun Rao wrote: >> > Hi, Calvin, >> > >> > Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me too. >> > >> > Jun >> > >> > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:28 PM Justine Olshan >> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Thanks Cal

Re: [VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

the following-up ones), and participated in the discussion thread! I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. Best, Alieh

Re: [VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

in advance for taking the time to vote. Best, Alieh

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

Good stuff, +1 (non-binding) from me as well De: dev@kafka.apache.org A: 10/09/23 05:16:06 UTC-4:00A: dev@kafka.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect Hi Chris, +1 (non binding) Thanks Fede On Sun, Oct 8, 2023 at 10:11 AM Yash Mayya

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

> > +1 (non binding) > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 7:57 AM Chris Egerton wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP, Yash! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 01:12 Yash Mayya wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

This is super useful for pipeline setup! +1 (non binding) On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 7:57 AM Chris Egerton wrote: > Thanks for the KIP, Yash! > > +1 (binding) > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 01:12 Yash Mayya wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to start a vot

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, at 18:30, Igor Soarez wrote: > Hi Colin, > >> I would call #2 LOST. It was assigned in the past, but we don't know where. >> I see that you called this OFFLINE). This is not really normal... >> it should happen only when we're migrating from ZK mode to KRaft mode, >> or going

Re: [VOTE]KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

; > wrote: > > > >> Thanks Calvin. > >> I think this will be very helpful going forward to minimize data loss. > >> > >> +1 from me (binding) > >> > >> Justine > >> > >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Calvin Liu >

Re: Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

Hi Chris, +1 (non-binding) Finally, there is no need to use external intrusion tools to change the log level of kafka connect online! Thanks for the KIP! best, hudeqi

Re: [VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

Thanks for the KIP, Yash! +1 (binding) On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 01:12 Yash Mayya wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to start a vote on KIP-980 which proposes allowing the creation of > connectors in a stopped (or paused) state. > > KIP - > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

hange is > > > the right choice here, and using the config topic for intra-cluster > > > broadcast is better than REST forwarding. > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Greg > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 6,

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

gt; > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:05 AM Chris Egerton > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-976, which augments the existing > > dynamic > > > logger adjustment REST API for Kafka Connect to ap

[VOTE] KIP-980: Allow creating connectors in a stopped state

Hi all, I'd like to start a vote on KIP-980 which proposes allowing the creation of connectors in a stopped (or paused) state. KIP - https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-980%3A+Allow+creating+connectors+in+a+stopped+state Discussion Thread - https://lists.apache.org/thread

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

ter > broadcast is better than REST forwarding. > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Greg > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 9:05 AM Chris Egerton > wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-976, which augments the existing > dynamic > &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

Hi Colin, > I would call #2 LOST. It was assigned in the past, but we don't know where. > I see that you called this OFFLINE). This is not really normal... > it should happen only when we're migrating from ZK mode to KRaft mode, > or going from an older KRaft release with multiple directories to

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

Hi David, Thanks for shedding light on migration goals, makes sense. Your preference for option a) makes it even more attractive. We'll keep that as the preferred approach, thanks for the advice. > One question with this approach is how the KRaft controller learns about > the multiple log

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

Thanks for posting these notes, Igor. I think we should definitely distinguish between these two cases: 1. this replica hasn't been assigned to a storage directory 2. we don't know which storage directory this replica was assigned to in the past I would call #1 UNASSIGNED. I see that you

Re: [VOTE]KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

too. > > Jun > > On Wed, Sep 20, 2023 at 5:28 PM Justine Olshan > wrote: > >> Thanks Calvin. >> I think this will be very helpful going forward to minimize data loss. >> >> +1 from me (binding) >> >> Justine >> >> On Wed, Sep 20, 20

Re: [VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

: > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-976, which augments the existing dynamic > logger adjustment REST API for Kafka Connect to apply changes cluster-wide > instead on a per-worker basis. > > The KIP: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-97

[VOTE] KIP-976: Cluster-wide dynamic log adjustment for Kafka Connect

Hi all, I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-976, which augments the existing dynamic logger adjustment REST API for Kafka Connect to apply changes cluster-wide instead on a per-worker basis. The KIP: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-976:+Cluster-wide+dynamic+log+adjustment

[VOTE] KIP-960: Support single-key_single-timestamp interactive queries (IQv2) for versioned state stores

! I'd also like to thank you in advance for taking the time to vote. Best, Alieh

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

Hey, just chiming in regarding the ZK migration piece. Generally speaking, one of the design goals of the migration was to have minimal changes on the ZK brokers and especially the ZK controller. Since ZK mode is our safe/well-known fallback mode, we wanted to reduce the chances of introducing

Re: [VOTE] KIP-858: Handle JBOD broker disk failure in KRaft

Hi everyone, Earlier today Colin, Ron, Proven and I had a chat about this work. We discussed several aspects which I’d like to share here. ## A new reserved UUID We'll reserve a third UUID to indicate an unspecified dir, but one that is known to be selected. As opposed to the default

Re: [VOTE]KIP-966: Eligible Leader Replicas

2 PM Calvin Liu > wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I'd like to call for a vote on KIP-966 which includes a series of > > enhancements to the current ISR model. > > > >- Introduce the new HWM advancement requirement which enables the > system > >to have mo

Re: [VOTE] KIP-951: Leader discovery optimisations for the client

Summarising, there are 5 binding votes(Luke, Jose, Jun, David, Jason), and 1 non-binding vote(Kirk). With the current status of voting, KIP is accepted. Thanks again to all reviewers and voters. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 9:37 AM Mayank Shekhar Narula < mayanks.nar...@gmail.com> wrote: &

Re: [VOTE] KIP-951: Leader discovery optimisations for the client

Thank you all for your votes, Jun, David, and Jason! On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:44 PM Jason Gustafson wrote: > +1 Thanks for the KIP > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 12:30 PM David Jacot wrote: > > > Thanks for the KIP. +1 from me as well. > > > > Best, > > David > > > > Le mar. 3 oct. 2023 à 20:54,

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >