Re: [HEADS UP] Apache Karaf 4.4.7 release

also working on Jetty 12 conversion for ActiveMQ, so landing those around the same time would be handy. Thoughts? Matt Pavlovich

Re: [HEADS UP] Apache Karaf 4.4.7 release

Hey JB- The Spring dependencies are a couple revs back. I just pushed up a couple PRs to rev the Spring ServiceMix Bundles to be current for 5.3.x and 6.1.x. How do you feel about doing a ServiceMix Bundles release ahead of Karaf 4.4.7? Thanks, Matt > On Jul 1, 2024, at 12:30 AM, Jean-Baptist

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf runtime releases and roadmap

Hi JB- Makes sense, I figured I’d make the pitch for the pax-* merger in that there is a lot of good use cases, stability and performance scenarios already handled there. I look forward to assisting with the new karaf-* services. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 11, 2024, at 3:45 AM, J

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf runtime releases and roadmap

o give us an opportunity to see how this gels before finalizing what is supported in Karaf 5 (jetty, tomcat, etc). Thoughts? Matt Pavlovich

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf runtime releases and roadmap

demand / usage of Undertow. 4. Configuration and Encryption service (and encryption of config keys and values) as first-class services instead of jasypt add-on. (JDK crypto out-of-the-box). My $0.02. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jun 4, 2024, at 4:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.6 release

+1 (non-binding) - Download distribution - Tested installing various features Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 9, 2024, at 8:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.6 release to your vote. > > This release is a maint

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to GitHub Issues/Actions

A little late but thought I’d put in my $0.02 +1 for GitHub issues. There are APIs avail to migrate, so I”m not super concerned about lock-in. Also, there is thing saying we can’t use GH actions and Apache Jenkins CI at the same time. GH actions seem to have more runner nodes vs Apache Jenki

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate to GitHub Issues/Actions

+1 > On Nov 21, 2023, at 3:12 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys > > Any comments on that one ? > > If there are no objections, I will move forward with that. > > Regards > JB > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 9:27 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I would like to

Re: Karaf + SOAP + JDK 21

Hi Mark- Glad to hear it’s working for you! -Matt > On Nov 15, 2023, at 3:58 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > Hi Matt - that's both sad, and great to hear. > > Updated the dependency and working like a charm. Cheers! > > On 16/11/23 3:44 am, Matt Pavlovich wrote:

Re: Karaf + SOAP + JDK 21

collapsed into a single repo ‘jaxb-tools' See version: 4.0.0 https://github.com/highsource/jaxb-tools/ Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov 15, 2023, at 3:10 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote: > > and updated cxf-codegen-plugin to 4.0.3. Interestingly, I couldn't find any > suitable re

Re: The meaning of karaf-bom

, etc karaf-bom-test (import karaf-bom, add test jars, etc) Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 28, 2023, at 8:57 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > I like the proposal of having different BOMs different of the use (for > instance Quarkus has two different boms: one for appl

Re: [INFO] main branch has been updated to 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT

Hi JB- For Jakarta-based Karaf, should we go ahead and call it Karaf 5.0.0? -Matt > On Sep 21, 2023, at 10:45 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > now that we released Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 and 4.3.10: > - I updated main branch to use 4.5.0-SNAPSHOT branch > - I created karaf-4

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.10 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Sep 14, 2023, at 11:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.10 release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing fixes and dependency updates. > Especially this release includes: > - fix race condit

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Sep 12, 2023, at 10:06 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > After long weeks of wait, I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.4 > release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing fixes and dependency updates. > Especially this release in

Re: [VOTE] Accept karaf-camel as new Apache Karaf subproject

d packaged as bundles? Hi Andrea- This is really the gist of my inquiry — What is the level of effort involved in maintaining OSGi metadata for Camel? From the high level it appears to be handled automatically at this point. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich

Re: [VOTE] Accept karaf-camel as new Apache Karaf subproject

aintaining OGSI metadata in Camel a concern? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Karaf subprojects Roadmap

Hi François- I recall the discussion about removing the OSGi support from Camel, but I do not see it listed on the ROADMAP to Camel 4 link. Did OSGi header support for camel jars officially get dropped? Seems like such a minor thing to keep around. -Matt > On Jan 9, 2023, at 3:19 AM, fpapon

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.9 release

+1 non-binding > On Jan 10, 2023, at 11:41 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.9 release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency > updates and fixes. > Especially, this release includes: > - fix th

Re: Issue with KARAF 4.4.1 And OpenJDK 11 (JAX-WS)

You need to install a bundle that provides javax.ws interface and implementation. Are you using Apache CXF? The CXF feature has xml-specs feature that it installs by default that covers this for you. -Matt > On Dec 7, 2022, at 1:33 AM, Vamsikrishna Koka > wrote: > > Hi Team, > > I have trie

Re: [VOTE] Adopt new Apache Karaf "generic" logo

+1 cool! > On Nov 15, 2022, at 2:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As discussed on the other thread, here's a vote for the new Karaf logo > proposal. > > As a reminder, this logo is the generic one, used on the main > karaf.apache.org website. Each Karaf subproject (Minho, O

Re: [DISCUSS] Adopt new Karaf logo

-1 (non-binding) My $0.02 — 1. The cloud logo is not friendly to be turned into a font 2. I prefer the alternative hexagon logo is simpler (even if similar to others) and better suited for the things logos are used for — stickers, font, ascii art, etc. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Nov

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.8 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Oct 19, 2022, at 7:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.3.8 release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency > updates and fixes. > Especially, this release includes: > - new f

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.2 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Oct 18, 2022, at 11:04 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf OSGi runtime 4.4.2 release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency > updates and fixes. > Especially, this release includes: > - new

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Karaf Minho in Apache Karaf

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, JB! > On Oct 13, 2022, at 1:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As discussed on the mailing list, I would like to start a formal vote > to accept Apache Karaf Minho in Apache Karaf. > > The proposal is: > - create karaf-minho repository on github > - u

Re: [DISCUSS] Accepting K5 in the Karaf ecosystem

simple is best! Boot, Blend, etc. Perhaps whittle it down to 2 or 3 ideas? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Oct 6, 2022, at 8:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > It sounds good too ! > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 3:57 PM Jamie G. wrote: >> >>

Re: Board report for September 22

+1 looks good > On Sep 11, 2022, at 12:23 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I prepared the board report for September 22: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports > > Please take a look and let me know if I missed anything. > I would like to send the

Re: Jasypt update or replace?

JB/FP- Sounds good. With Shiro being an Apache project, that should help with integration into Karaf. Its not a high-priority on anyone’s radar, but jasypt is slowly aging on us dependency and with integrations. Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 18, 2022, at 7:25 AM, Jean-Baptiste Ono

Jasypt update or replace?

Karaf (maybe ActiveMQ as well)? Thanks, Matt Pavlovich

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Jul 10, 2022, at 12:24 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.1 release to your vote. > > This release is a maintenance release bringing a lot of dependency > updates and fixes. > Especially, this release includes: > - fix on th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.16 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Jun 10, 2022, at 8:11 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As requested by some users, I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.16 > release to your vote. > > This release includes important updates, especially Pax URL 1.11.15. > > NB: 4.2.16 should be the last rele

Re: The state of Pax Web

app servlet functionality. Thank you, Matt Pavlovich From: op...@googlegroups.com on behalf of Grzegorz Grzybek Date: Friday, April 29, 2022 at 4:36 AM To: OPS4J , Karaf Dev Subject: The state of Pax Web Hello I'm planning to release Pax Web 8.0.3 with 6 issues fixed, incl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.7 release

+1 (non-binding) Downloaded, started and installed a few bundles Installed ActiveMQ 5.17.0 broker and verified Thanks JB! Matt Pavlovich > On Apr 19, 2022, at 8:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.7 to your vote. >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.0 release

Excited about getting going w/ Karaf 4.4.x and Pax Web 8! +1 (non-binding) > On Apr 19, 2022, at 1:24 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.4.0 release to your vote. > This release is a new milestone, starting the 4.4.x series. > > This release inclu

Re: Apache Karaf board report for March 22

+1 looks good. I see you have the note about all CVE’s are clear. Maybe add a specific line item to mention log4shell related issues have been addressed? (Log2j, reload4j, etc) Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 1, 2022, at 4:43 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I pre

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Karaf 4.4.0 release

+1 for v4.4.x and to have latest pax web > On Feb 3, 2022, at 2:45 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi, > > I will ping you tomorrow about Pax Web 8.0.1 and will help on some issues. > > +1 to include Pax Web 8.0.1 in Karaf 4.4.0. > > Regards > JB > > On 03/02/2022 18:07, Grzegorz Grzybek

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.15 release

+1 installed various features— CXF 3.3.9, war, jetty, ActiveMQ 5.16.3 and verified things looked good > On Jan 11, 2022, at 2:59 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf 4.2.15 to your vote. > > This version includes: > - upgrade to Pax Logging 1.11.13 upgrading t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Change log4j2 default config to xml (or json)

5:41, Jean-Baptiste Onofre a > écrit : > >> By the way, just a reminder: a good point about properties format in >> pax-logging-log4j2 service is that it doesn’t require extra dependency. >> Using xml/json format needs additional dependency/packages/bundles in the >

[PROPOSAL] Change log4j2 default config to xml (or json)

I’ve created a proposal JIRA KARAF-7307 (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7307 ) to track any specifics. As the subject mentions— I think it would be beneficial to users to change the default configuration for log4j2 to XML (or maybe

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.14 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Dec 20, 2021, at 4:48 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf 4.2.14 to your vote. > > This version upgrades to Pax Logging 1.11.12 with: > - logback 1.2.9 fixing CVE-2021-42550 > - log4j 2.16.0 fixing CVE-2021-45105 > > Please take a look o

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Dec 19, 2021, at 3:33 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.5 to your vote. > This release includes Pax Logging 2.0.13 update: > - with logback 1.2.9 upgrade, fixing CVE-2021-42550 > - with log4j 2.17.0 upgrade, fixing CVE-2

Re: Logback CVE-2021-42550

PR created for pax-logging against main: https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425 <https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/pull/425> > On Dec 17, 2021, at 9:23 AM, Matt Pavlovich wrote: > > I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While sig

Logback CVE-2021-42550

I summarized notes on the Logback CVE-2021-42550 . While significantly less critical, we probably need to consider another round of releases to address and bring in logback 1.2.9. notes here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-7299 Th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.13 release

+1 (non-binding) > On Dec 16, 2021, at 8:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi all, > > I submit Apache Karaf 4.2.13 to your vote. > > This version includes 8 fixes and improvements. Especially, it includes Pax > Logging 1.11.11 update, upgrading to log4j 2.16.0 fixing CVE-2021-44228 and

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release (take #3)

+1 (non-binding) > On Dec 14, 2021, at 10:43 PM, JB Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 to your vote (take #3). > > This release includes dependency upgrades, fixes, and improvements, > especially: > > - upgrade to Pax Logging 2.0.12, upgrading to log4j2 2

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.4 release

+1 (non-binding) [x] Verified sha512 sum [x] Started, added staging repo, installed a few features including ActiveMQ 5.16.3 [x] Verified ssh acces Thanks JB! Matt Pavlovich > On Dec 6, 2021, at 10:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Kara

Re: Preparing Karaf runtime 4.3.4

Sounds good, JB. Thanks! > On Oct 12, 2021, at 7:43 AM, JB Onofré wrote: > > Hi guys > > I’m working on Felix FileInstall release fixing the first losing issue. I > will include couple of other important fixes. > > I would like to submit Karaf 4.3.4 to vote during the week end or early next

Re: Main updated to 4.4.0-SNAPSHOT and karaf-4.3.x branch

+1 looking forward to all the pax-web 8 goodies =) > On Sep 21, 2021, at 1:44 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I have almost finished the main branch update with: > > - OSGi R8 (Felix Framework 7.0.1) > - remove of OSGi cmpn and use of single spec bundle now (recommended now)

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 release

+1 - Installed, started and ran smoke tests - Verified JMX MP with authentication (after adding the jmxmp jar to lib/boot) Thanks JB! > On Sep 2, 2021, at 3:33 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 to your vote. > > This release includes bu

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.3 release

Robert- Install the pax-web feature. It installs 9.4.43.v20210629: 75 │ Active │ 30 │ 9.4.43.v20210629 │ Jetty :: Server Core The release notes show multiple Jetty versions, b/c jetty is releasing so fast there are multiple merges to upgrade jetty. -Matt Pavlovich > On Sep 2, 2021,

Re: Pax Web 8 - 2 more tasks before GA

Awesome! > On Aug 31, 2021, at 1:41 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > I'd like to present the state of Pax Web 8. I hope to release Pax Web > 8.0.0.GA in mid-September. > > I maintain a todo.txt[1] file where I present the issues I'd like to > implement in given milestones. > > The p

Re: State of Pax Web 8

Great work! Thank you for all the effort you’ve put forth On Jul 27, 2021, at 1:00 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:  Hello I'd just like to let you know that everything is under control and I didn't abandon the effort. I've added a todo.txt file[1] to Pax Web's main branch (I didn't create sepa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.2 release

+1 (non-binding) Booted offline (no access to any mvn repo or network) Enabled and tested JMXMP Installed pax-jetty and scr features Thanks, Matt Pavlovich > On May 9, 2021, at 12:18 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.3

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.3.1 release

+1 - Downloaded and started unix dist release (no errors, no ‘online’ artifacts required) - Added dist repo as a mvn repo - Installed a few karaf features successfully (scr, etc) Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 29, 2021, at 8:14 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 release

+1 (non-binding) - downloaded and started - confirmed jmxmp w/ SASL Plain works - confirmed ssh client Thank you! Matt Pavlovich > On Mar 9, 2021, at 5:56 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache Karaf runtime 4.2.11 to your vote. > > This r

Re: Board report March '21

Report looks good, thanks JB > On Mar 5, 2021, at 1:54 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I prepared the Karaf board report for this month: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/Board+Reports > >

Re: OPS4J projects migration from OPS4J (cloud) Jira to GitHub issues

Thanks! > On Feb 25, 2021, at 3:41 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > I'm proud to announce that I've just finished the migration of OPS4J Jira > issues to GitHub. We were discussing this ~half a year ago. > > For each Jira issue I've migrated: > - description and comments preserving h

Re: Coming releases

Hey JB- I would appreciate it if you’d get a minute to look at the JMXMP patch I provided (KARAF-6888) for inclusion in 4.2.11. Thanks, Matt > On Feb 18, 2021, at 6:17 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Quick update about the releases. > > Aries Proxy and Blueprint releases ar

Re: Migration of OPS4J projects from Jira to Github

Grzegorz- Nice work! I think having the projects on GitHub will reduce efforts of the core contributors and will make it more accessible for new contributors as well. -Matt Pavlovich > On Feb 9, 2021, at 7:44 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote: > > Hello > > Thanks to Jürgen Schmid

Re: Coming releases

Thanks for the update JB! Let me know if there is anything I can assist with. -Matt > On Feb 8, 2021, at 10:55 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Just a quick update about the release schedule: > > - Apache Karaf Decanter 2.7.0 will be on vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >

Re: [X-Mas Gift] Panel discussion about Karaf 5

Yep! This would be great, please include me on the invite. > On Dec 15, 2020, at 11:32 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Maybe some of you know that I started to work on Karaf 5. > > I have something that it’s almost "usable". > > Before sending a global discussion thread on t

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming terms

e ActiveMQ one for instance). > > Regards > JB > >> Le 27 juil. 2020 à 20:46, Matt Pavlovich a écrit : >> >> JB- >> >> Are you referring to ‘Karaf Cave’ or ‘Karaf Runtime’? >> >> I think with Karaf Runtime locking, the warm boot tends to be to not have

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming terms

means that the instance is not "active", but actually, in the case of > Karaf, it’s active and replicate the "master/active". > > That’s why I proposed primary/secondary. We can also use active/replica if > you think it’s more accurate. > > Regards > JB

Re: [PROPOSAL] Renaming terms

? master -> ‘active’ slave -> ’standby' -Matt Pavlovich > On Jul 27, 2020, at 1:21 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I would like to propose new wording in some Karaf designs: > > - In Karaf runtime, I would like to rename master/slave to primary/

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

Right, I meant to suggest defining a standard convention is useful to provide clarity. > On May 7, 2020, at 11:09 AM, Steinar Bang wrote: > >>>>>> Matt Pavlovich : > >> Have you looked at using local-repo? > > I don't think it matters too much wher

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

problem, but it doesn’t help a lot for resolution. > > The resolution state at build time would simplify and speed up a lot the > bootstrapping. > > Regards > JB > >> Le 6 mai 2020 à 20:05, Matt Pavlovich a écrit : >> >> >> >>> On May

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

> On May 6, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Steinar Bang wrote: > >> 2. Improve build tool (part of devx) for build time resolution > > Hm... can this be used to fill up the system directory when creating a > docker image on top of the official image? > Have you looked at using local-repo? We’ve had goo

Re: [HEADS UP] Three new features proposal this week

Long time user, non-committer chiming in. 1. +1. I’ve got some dev cycles to pitch in on this. 2. Suggest: Add a jsonType field to fully qualify the version of the feature file in JSON, since last I checked JSON doesn’t have a standardized namespace mechanism (ie. jsonType=“org.apache.karaf.fea

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Karaf Runtime 4.2.8 release (take #2)

Thank you everyone! > On Jan 23, 2020, at 2:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > this vote passed with the following result: > > +1 (binding): Grzegorz Grzybek, François Papon, Freeman Fang, Jamie > Goodyear, Achim Nierbeck, JB Onofré > +1 (non binding): Romain Manni-Bucau,

Re: [DISCUSS] Gogo commands completion data

+1 etc/scripts +1 being able to use element On 10/12/16 10:57 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: I'm working on trying to nicely integrate gogo commands. The new gogo-jline bundle has a very nice way to allow external configuration for command completion. For example, one need to execute the script a

Seeking karma

esting Wiki and Jira karma (just to assign myself tickets). Thanks! Matt Pavlovich