Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-20 Thread Jeongkyu Kim
2010/2/19 Ivo Hinkelmann : > Hi, > > JiHui Choi wrote: >> >> I checked and committed all fuzzy strings in svx / source / cui.po. >> I'm not sure that is the cause or not, though. > > yes it was! > Ivo, Thanks for your confirmation. It is comforting that we found the cause of the problem. >> >> I

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, JiHui Choi wrote: I checked and committed all fuzzy strings in svx / source / cui.po. I'm not sure that is the cause or not, though. yes it was! I'm really sorry about this happening, but would you check Korean translation and rebuild please? If you do that, I'll appreciate to you so mu

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Ivo Hinkelmann
Hi, JiHui Choi wrote: I checked and committed all fuzzy strings in svx / source / cui.po. I'm not sure that is the cause or not, though. yes it was! I'm really sorry about this happening, but would you check Korean translation and rebuild please? If you do that, I'll appreciate to you so mu

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread JiHui Choi
I checked and committed all fuzzy strings in svx / source / cui.po. I'm not sure that is the cause or not, though. I'm really sorry about this happening, but would you check Korean translation and rebuild please? If you do that, I'll appreciate to you so much. (BTW, I may have to make screenshots

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread JiHui Choi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Rafaella Braconi wrote: > We'll look into this. > Now I found there are some fuzzy strings in svx / source / cui.po. As my known, we don't need to translate this file, but I'll check and commit all fuzzy strings. Thank you, Rafaella and all. :) -- Regards, JiHui

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Rafaella Braconi
Hello, Rafealla. I don't file any issue about this yet. In fact, I found many untranslated strings in RC1, but I thought there were a mistake, so it would be fixed. Since I knew almost strings are translated. However, in RC5, I've installed today, they are still English. Now I can't list them,

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread JiHui Choi
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:09 PM, Rafaella Braconi wrote: > can you be a bit more specific about which strings you see untranslated? Did > you file an issue for this? > Hello, Rafealla. I don't file any issue about this yet. In fact, I found many untranslated strings in RC1, but I thought there we

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Rafaella Braconi
Hi JiHui Choi, On 02/19/10 07:15, JiHui Choi wrote: In korean edition rc5, there are some untranslated strings, even though almost strings are translated in Pootle. Would you(anyone) check this please? can you be a bit more specific about which strings you see untranslated? Did you file an

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-19 Thread Marcus Lange
JiHui Choi wrote: Hi, In korean edition rc5, there are some untranslated strings, even though almost strings are translated in Pootle. thanks for looking into this. Would you(anyone) check this please? @Ivo: Please can you investigate? Best regards Marcus -

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-18 Thread JiHui Choi
In korean edition rc5, there are some untranslated strings, even though almost strings are translated in Pootle. Would you(anyone) check this please? -- Regards, JiHui Choi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@l10n.openof

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Alexandru Szasz wrote: Pe 12.02.2010 11:36, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi Alexandru, I cannot find "ro" builds for full installation. Only langpacks were available for RC 1-5. Maybe you have looked on builds provided from someone else in the community? There never were builds for full installatio

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Alexandru Szasz
Pe 12.02.2010 11:36, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi Alexandru, I cannot find "ro" builds for full installation. Only langpacks were available for RC 1-5. Maybe you have looked on builds provided from someone else in the community? There never were builds for full installation, probably because the

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi Alexandru, I cannot find "ro" builds for full installation. Only langpacks were available for RC 1-5. Maybe you have looked on builds provided from someone else in the community? Best regards Marcus Alexandru Szasz wrote: Pe 02.02.2010 15:08, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi, the first part

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-12 Thread Alexandru Szasz
Pe 02.02.2010 15:08, Marcus Lange a scris: Hi, the first parts of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 have been uploaded to the mirror network. The version will install as OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 (build OOO320_m12). Hi, It seems that the Romanian locale (ro) is not in this RC, although it was in R

[l10n-dev] Re: [releases] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Solaris Sparc/x86 and Windows langpacks were uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Now also complete Linux x86-64 and Windows with JRE was uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, in the meantime also the source tarballs are ready and were already uploaded. 12560444c8a1d2eec4b68fe80472f1c9 OOo_3

[l10n-dev] Re: [qa-dev] Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Now also complete Linux x86-64 and Windows with JRE was uploaded. Marcus Lange wrote: Hi all, in the meantime also the source tarballs are ready and were already uploaded. 12560444c8a1d2eec4b68fe80472f1c9 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_binfilter.tar.bz2 a6bd39d5d56776eb70151fe0e924b5d7 OOo_3

Re: [l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi all, in the meantime also the source tarballs are ready and were already uploaded. 12560444c8a1d2eec4b68fe80472f1c9 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_binfilter.tar.bz2 a6bd39d5d56776eb70151fe0e924b5d7 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_src_core.tar.bz2 586d4c9607a992169820fcccb1f5cc00 OOo_3.2.0rc5_20100203_

[l10n-dev] OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 (build OOO320_m12) has been uploaded

2010-02-02 Thread Marcus Lange
Hi, the first parts of OOo 3.2.0 Release Candidate 5 have been uploaded to the mirror network. The version will install as OpenOffice.org 3.2.0 (build OOO320_m12). To get the more important builds first (until the Windows build gets signed), I've started with Linux Intel and Mac OS. The sour