Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-18 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > "In 4.0, you must indicate if you modified the material and retain an > indicat

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-16 Thread IngeGNUe
On 06/16/16 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > Quoting part of a statement corr

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-16 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] Quoting part of a statement correctly is legitimate because that practice is necessar

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-16 Thread Luke
On 06/16/2016 06:06 AM, Julie Marchant wrote: > On 06/16/2016 05:27 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote: >>> People could always try and twist our words even with the proper licensing. >> Sure, but with the proper licensing (NoDerivs), it's easier to enforce >> it, because it's easier to prove that t

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-15 Thread Isaac David
Le mar. 14 juin 2016 à 22:16, Isaac David a écrit : essentially the same Luke Shumaker's latest version I mean "same as Luke Shumaker's" ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-13 Thread coadde
On 06/13/2016 06:40 PM, coadde wrote: > On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: >> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] >> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] >> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's ex

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-13 Thread coadde
On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > The invariant sections in m

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread Isaac David
Le jeu. 9 juin 2016 à 18:54, Luke a écrit : On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote: On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"? +1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the Social Contract. If FSF and Arch Team is

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread Crazytoon
El 10/06/16 a las 05:56, coadde escribió: > On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote: >> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400, >>> Richard Stallman wrote: > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name > given

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-10 Thread coadde
On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400, >> Richard Stallman wrote: >>> > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name >>> > given to it by its developers. >>> >>> In this case, y

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-09 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > > What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"? It avoids endorsing the error,

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-09 Thread Crazytoon
El 09/06/16 a las 20:46, André Silva escribió: > On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >>> >>> In som

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-09 Thread Luke
On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >>> >>> In some wo

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-09 Thread coadde
On 06/09/2016 08:46 PM, André Silva wrote: > On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >>> >>> In some wo

Re: [Dev] [GNU-linux-libre] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

2016-06-09 Thread André Silva
On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote: >> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good >> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they >> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead. >> >> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux'