[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> "In 4.0, you must indicate if you modified the material and retain an
> indicat
On 06/16/16 19:18, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> Quoting part of a statement corr
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Quoting part of a statement correctly is legitimate because that
practice is necessar
On 06/16/2016 06:06 AM, Julie Marchant wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 05:27 AM, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic wrote:
>>> People could always try and twist our words even with the proper licensing.
>> Sure, but with the proper licensing (NoDerivs), it's easier to enforce
>> it, because it's easier to prove that t
Le mar. 14 juin 2016 à 22:16, Isaac David
a écrit :
essentially the same Luke Shumaker's latest version
I mean "same as Luke Shumaker's"
___
Dev mailing list
Dev@lists.parabola.nu
https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev
On 06/13/2016 06:40 PM, coadde wrote:
> On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's ex
On 06/13/2016 05:33 PM, Richard Stallman wrote:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>
> The invariant sections in m
Le jeu. 9 juin 2016 à 18:54, Luke a écrit :
On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote:
On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
+1 I agree with your suggestion because it solves this issue for the
Social Contract.
If FSF and Arch Team is
El 10/06/16 a las 05:56, coadde escribió:
> On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote:
>> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400,
>>> Richard Stallman wrote:
> 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name
> given
On 06/10/2016 05:53 AM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote:
>> On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 22:55:26 -0400,
>> Richard Stallman wrote:
>>> > 1. In this formal context, I believe that we should use formal name
>>> > given to it by its developers.
>>>
>>> In this case, y
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > What about "Arch (the GNU/Linux distribution)"?
It avoids endorsing the error,
El 09/06/16 a las 20:46, André Silva escribió:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>>
>>> In som
On 06/09/2016 07:46 PM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>>
>>> In some wo
On 06/09/2016 08:46 PM, André Silva wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>>
>>> In some wo
On 06/09/2016 08:08 PM, Riley Baird wrote:
>> Yes, you're right in that point, however Parabola is maintaining a good
>> relationship with FSF, GNU project and Richard Stallman too and they
>> insist we use 'Arch GNU/Linux' instead.
>>
>> In some words, if we put in the Social Contract 'Arch Linux'
15 matches
Mail list logo