[Dev] Adding Tor Browser to Nonprism repository

Hi Parabola developers. I was thinking that it would be a good idea to add Tor browser into the Official repos. I know that nonprism is for replacing packages without services under global data surveillance programs, so maybe it could be added to PCR. It would be a good idea, the packages are in

[Dev] Parabola OpenRC

Hi Parabola community. I have planned a project, as the title says, for creating a Parabola OpenRC installation. My idea is very simple, I´m not thinking on creating Parabola ISOs with OpenRC (but would be a good idea), just creating a base groups that installs OpenRC from PCR instead of Systemd

[Dev] New GPG key

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, I've created a key for this email, which is the one I plan to use. Please, sign it so I can use it. Thanks! P.S: I'm not sending id_rsa.pub because that's the SSH key, which is already registered, so I send the signed file only to register the

Re: [Dev] [consensus][due: 2017-05-01] Emulatorman's expulsion

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 My answer will be simple: you have done a lot for Parabola and its community, you deserve more than being expulsed. The Parabola project depends on all its hackers, from the artists to the packagers. El 10/04/17 a las 10:02, André Silva escribió: >

Re: [Dev] [Packaging] Error when compiling in clean ARMv7h chroot

if I compile it in an ARMv7h machine, would it work? Also, is there other solution? El 06/04/17 a las 10:49, Isaac David escribió: > 5 avril 2017 à 18:39, Megver83: >> hi devs, I'm having an issue when trying to compile dpkg with libretools >> for armv7h (I'm using a x86 machine).

Re: [Dev] Working out a plan of action.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 06/04/17 a las 16:23, Josh Branning escribió: > From reading, as a donor, I think some /public/ discussions are to > be had on the following. > > 1) Whether the bits and pieces for the build server are purchased > now, and in the right place.

Re: [Dev] Working out a plan of action.

El 06/04/17 a las 16:23, Josh Branning escribió: > From reading, as a donor, I think some /public/ discussions are to be > had on the following. > > 1) Whether the bits and pieces for the build server are purchased now, > and in the right place. > 1.1) If not, gc4j could kindly give a

[Dev] [Request] Create spanish-speakers users list

Hi, I wanted to propose the creation of a Spanish-speakers mailing list due to the constant talk and questions about Parabola in other forums, e.g. Trisquel's forum. And example of this is: https://trisquel.info/es/forum/instalar-interfaz-gr%C3%A1fica-en-parabola If there is a Romanian list, so

Re: [Dev] Orphan Nonprism package [icedove] marked out-of-date

upstream version depends on Debian's Icedove, not Mozilla Thunderbird El 08/04/17 a las 14:40, Parabola Website Notification escribió: > kont...@ghaglund.se wants to notify you that the following packages may be > out-of-date: > > > > > The user provided the following additional text: > >

Re: [Dev] An issue that could end up with Parabola

e past > is the past and cannot be changed) > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 12:33:40PM -0300, fauno wrote: >> Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> writes: >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >>> >>> Dear Mr. Richard Stallman: &

Re: [Dev] An issue that could end up with Parabola

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 yeah, I agree. But we did never talk about emotions and anyway, who doesn't feel hurt when getting insulted? I'll just wait for RMS's answer, to see what he decides. El 13/04/17 a las 17:23, Nicolás A. Ortega escribió: >> I think it is a big deal,

Re: [Dev] Hardware Donations Was: Re: [IMPORTANT] Goodbye Parabola

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, here's the conversation I had with emulatorman (in spanish) [13:50:06] Megver83: que planeas hacer con el hardware de Parabola que tienes? [14:46:33] emulatorman: primero, ese hardware donó Luke .R a coadde para colaborar en Parabola y en

Re: [Dev] Hardware Donations

oh, I see, yes I was aware from that (it's because of enigmail), I'll be more careful next time. Thanks for the advise. El 20/04/17 a las 17:51, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic escribió: > On 20.04.2017 23:50, Megver83 wrote: >> El 20/04/17 a las 17:40, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic escribió: >>

Re: [Dev] Hardware Donations Was: Re: [IMPORTANT] Goodbye Parabola

El 20/04/17 a las 17:40, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic escribió: > P.S. Megver83 your e-mail client breaks the links. I don't know if you > are aware of that. really? what links? I use Icedove --- SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org Kontalk: +56 9 5630 2363 Tox: megve...@to

Re: [Dev] Line wrapping (was Re: Hardware Donations)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 what do you mean with "Paste as Quotation"? I've it in spanish, but doesn't sound familiar to me. El 20/04/17 a las 20:20, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) escribió: > On 04/20/2017 10:59 PM, Megver83 wrote: >> oh, I see, yes I was aw

Re: [Dev] My SSH key is untrusted?

I was reading in forums, looking for the solution in sky, soil and sea :D that in the SSH server our public keys (from ~/.ssh/id_*.pub) have to appear in the ~/.ssh/autorized_keys file from the server. AFAIK, you have to have physical access to the server for doing that, unless someone still can

Re: [Dev] Unknown monetary donations

its credentials. > > It isn't under my control since I left Parabola group in > Liberapay. Megver83 and g4jc have its credentials for now. [0] > > [0]:https://liberapay.com/Parabola/ > > > > ___ Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.par

Re: [Dev] I'm willing to start packaging again

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 I think you are also experimenting what Isacdaavid, Ovruni and me are experiencing, we are unable to access to SSH or yours is another issue? I have not read all the emails, since they are *many* Regards, Megver83. El 21/04/17 a las 05:25

Re: [Dev] Unknown monetary donations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 of course I need help, I have no experience with liberapay. How do I send an invitation? El 21/04/17 a las 14:13, André Silva escribió: > On 04/21/2017 05:10 PM, Megver83 wrote: >> Really? so it's adhocratic? :P > > Yes, y

[Dev] An issue that could end up with Parabola

[1] https://lists.parabola.nu/pipermail/dev/2017-April/004935.html Regards, Megver83 - -- SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org Kontalk: +56 9 5630 2363 Tox: EF62A7ABCFADD97088FFE925A2F17F0711B49CAC155871B9823A9E9D0D4F9A38077AB0FA 3791 GNUSocial: @megve...@gnusocial.net Dia

Re: [Dev] An issue that could end up with Parabola

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 13/04/17 a las 12:20, Megver83 escribió: > I knew you were going to answer that, and I'm not the community, > but you neither. What did you spectated? that we ask the same > people who attacked Emulatorman and others? > > "W

Re: [Dev] An issue that could end up with Parabola

7 a las 12:14, fauno escribió: > Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> writes: >> so we chose you. > > who is we? you are the whole of the parabola community now > perhaps? > > nice attempt at turning the tables guys > > > > ___

Re: [Dev] [IMPORTANT] What happened to some images in ParabolaWiki?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 18/04/17 a las 20:12, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic escribió: > Please pay attention! I believe coadde is vandalizing the wiki: > > https://wiki.parabola.nu/index.php?title=Get_Parabola=revision ff=18819=18642 > > Coadde has deleted both the artwork

Re: [Dev] [IMPORTANT] What happened to some images in ParabolaWiki?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Correction: they will upload them again to ParabolaWiki with some some fixes. El 20/04/17 a las 10:53, Megver83 escribió: > Hi, yesterday I talk with Emulatorman and Coadde and asked them > about the deletion of the artwork, according t

[Dev] [Packagers] We have to distribute the maintenance of hacker fellows' packages

will maintain the rest of packages from [libre] and [nonprism], also the fellows' [pcr] packages. I don't know if maybe we can make a list of packages? because they are many, and we cannot just let them outdated. Regards, Megver83 - -- SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org

Re: [Dev] [Packagers] We have to distribute the maintenance of hacker fellows' packages

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ok, I'll make it later, when I have it, I'll tell you. El 20/04/17 a las 12:34, fauno escribió: > Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> writes: >> Hi devs, as you know, Emulatorman maintained *many* packages, >> including c

Re: [Dev] [IMPORTANT] What happened to some images in ParabolaWiki?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 20/04/17 a las 13:35, Tiberiu-Cezar Tehnoetic escribió: > On 20.04.2017 17:38, Megver83 wrote: >> El 20/04/17 a las 10:53, Megver83 escribió: >>> El 20/04/17 a las 10:39, Quiliro escribió: >>>> El Thu, 20 Apr 201

Re: [Dev] Request to become a packager

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 20/04/17 a las 15:21, fauno escribió: > i'm currently preparing for flisol. Me too! - -- SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org Kontalk: +56 9 5630 2363 Tox: megve...@toxme.io GPG: 6DB9C4B4F0D8C0DC432CF6E4227CA7C556B2BA78

Re: [Dev] I want to become a parabola hacker!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Excellent! these are good news. Which rols to you want to take? or you prefer us to choose it for you? Then send us your ssh key and sign, and optionally a profile of you and a photo, see this example[0] Regards, Megver83 [0] https

Re: [Dev] Request to become a packager

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 awesome, really, 2 people in one day willing to keep Parabola alive and asking for that :D If you want to become a packager, you need that 3 devs sign you, I'll add your profile to the git repository. Can you tell us your skills? please? El

Re: [Dev] Unknown monetary donations

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ok, now I see how it works, don't worry. El 21/04/17 a las 14:18, Megver83 escribió: > of course I need help, I have no experience with liberapay. How do > I send an invitation? > > El 21/04/17 a las 14:13, André Silva escribió: >

Re: [Dev] I want to become a parabola hacker!

later > starting to do some work on libretools / packaging infrastructure > things. > > Does that sound reasonable? > > Best, Andreas > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 02:15:47PM -0300, Megver83 wrote: >> Excellent! these are good news. Which rols to you want to take? >>

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

I'm not sure about this migration. I remember that when I used Trisquel's abrowser, it was very buggy and many users complained (up to now). I do not know if Trisquel's version is the latest, if that is the case, I oppose to this migration. However, it could be added to [libre-testing] to

Re: [Dev] [Packaging] Error when compiling in clean ARMv7h chroot

so then I should install Parabola with Systemd in a SD Card, because I've Parabola with OpenRC in my BPi :P Thanks anyway, I'll use the BPi whenever I've problems when packaging for ARM El 06/04/17 a las 18:54, Isaac David escribió: > > Le jeu. 6 avril 2017 à 9:30, Megver83 a écrit : &

[Dev] What happened to some images in ParabolaWiki?

Hi, I noticed that some images changed https://wiki.parabola.nu/Parabola_Presentation_%28Espa%C3%B1ol%29 or disappeared https://wiki.parabola.nu/Get_Parabola What happened? -- SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@diasp.org Kontalk: +56 9 5630 2363 Tox: megve...@toxme.io GPG:

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

+1 for iceweasel. El 24/04/17 a las 11:24, Bill Auger escribió: > +1 for preserving iceweasel > > otherwise i wil note that abrowser in the trisquel8 release > candidate is v52.0.2 - the pre-packaging prep script can be read > here >

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [iceweasel-l10n-es-ar] marked out-of-date

Added to my packages TODO list El 24/04/17 a las 13:35, André Silva escribió: > On 04/24/2017 03:58 PM, Parabola Website Notification wrote: >> The user provided the following additional text: >> >> Please wait until the official release of Firefox 53 on Debian >> SID repo. Actually, the

Re: [Dev] If you are having problems with "David P. <megve...@openmailbox.org>" keys

. regards, Megver83. El 24/04/17 a las 18:39, jc_gargma escribió: >> SigLevel= Never > > With respect, installing without a valid signature doesn't sit well > with me, especially when combined with refreshing gnupg keys over > http. > > I took a roundabout route to ensu

[Dev] Cleaning up [pcr]

Hi, I'll go direct to the point. The [pcr] repository has many packages that haven't been upgraded for ages, however, they are not marked as outdated. Some of those unused packages are not even compiled (they are only in the abslibre), I found a few when I began to adopt some packages which even

[Dev] Update ParabolaPackages Pad

Hi all, I'm just remembering packagers to take a look at https://pad.kefir.red/p/ParabolaPackages (if they haven't) and add themselves to packages that have been adopted and adopt the ones that haven't. Cheers -- GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Dev] Cleaning up [pcr]

El 10/07/17 a las 14:37, fauno escribió: > bill-auger writes: > >> this seems like a good time to ask why exactly does parabola need both >> "Community" and "PCR" - i undestand the distinction of "Community" and >> "AUR" in arch but in parabola these seem to be

Re: [Dev] libretools 20170709.1 release announcement

it installs the documentation > there; before the default was `/usr/share/doc/` and it installed > the documentation files to `$(docdir)/libretools/`. > > - Localization into different languages: > >* The package has mostly been localized in to Spanish. If you have

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [kio] marked out-of-date

El 10/07/17 a las 18:13, Parabola Website Notification escribió: > jc_gar...@iserlohn-fortress.net wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * kio 5.35.0-1.parabola1 [libre] (i686): > https://parabolagnulinux.org/packages/libre/i686/kio/ > * kio

Re: [Dev] Calamares Installer (Parabola rebranded) almost ready

: > Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> writes: > >> Before I started with the branding, I look for the issue in the bug >> tracker and found your version of Calamares for Parabola. I've not >> compiled it, but I could do soon, to compare yours and mine fork. >> A

Re: [Dev] Calamares Installer (Parabola rebranded) almost ready

+1 El 06/07/17 a las 16:20, Winter Taylor Jones escribió: > We could make two versions of the ISO, one that is manual install, like > Arch, and one that has a graphical installer, such as Manjaro. > > > On 07/06/2017 12:03 PM, Josh Branning wrote: >> See, I'm in two minds. On the one hand there

Re: [Dev] Strange libremakepkg error

El 27/06/17 a las 21:21, Luke Shumaker escribió: > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017 21:14:04 -0400, > Luke Shumaker wrote: >> >> On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 14:45:00 -0400, >> Megver83 wrote: >>> | /usr/sbin/librechroot: line 69: Binary: command not found >> >> For some r

Re: [Dev] Non-free JS at parabola.nu

IMO LibreJS doesn't do a good job. There's a lot of libre JS that is blocked, so personally I don't trust it too much. Do you really think we would run nonfree JS? Anyways, we can check just to be sure... El 06/07/17 a las 02:23, qsentine...@riseup.net escribió: > Dear everyone, > > there seems

Re: [Dev] Call for translations of libretools

can translate to French/Dutch, but sadly I'm having trouble right at the > start.. > http://termbin.com/psx1 > > On Wed, 5 Jul 2017 19:02:11 -0400 > Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > >> I'll be translating for Spanish, I've cloned the repo with ssh, it's

Re: [Dev] Parabola as an option for Purism Librem laptops

Well, that's good news. Do you plan to offer only FSF-endorsed distros as options or any other FSDG distro? e.g. Hyperbola, Uruk, LibertyBSD, EterTICs, which follow the FSDG but aren't yet approved by the GNU Project. El 05/07/17 a las 08:24, Mladen Pejaković escribió: > Hello Parabola community!

Re: [Dev] Orphan Kernels package [linux-libre-grsec-knock] marked out-of-date

we do not support grsecurity anymore, these kernels still appear in the website but for ARM since the database synchronization for armv7h is disabled. Would be good to put a note about that, because it may cause confusion and anyone could think that we do not maintain ARM packages. El 03/07/17 a

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [unar] marked out-of-date

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 In fact I was having an issue with a GNUStep lib that unar required, which is from an older version, and solved it by symlinking the new lib with the old lib name and dir. El 26/04/17 a las 12:21, Luke Shumaker escribió: > On Wed, 26 Apr 2017

Re: [Dev] My SSH key is untrusted?

: constant ::Fixnum is deprecated I always get it when running meta-check. All this are minimum errors BTW. El 21/04/17 a las 15:37, Luke Shumaker escribió: > On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 13:21:26 -0400, > Isaac David wrote: >> Le ven. 21 avril 2017 à 12:03, Megver83 a écrit : >>> our public

Re: [Dev] Forward: Re: [RFC] Deprecate Parabola Iceweasel in favor of Triquel Abrowser

htforwand to integrate the > changes to the new version. > > I'll try and get an updated pkgbuild ready today. > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 10:04:47AM -0300, Megver83 wrote: >> I can confirm this, at least point nº1, as emulatorman still >> keeps it in AUR, we

Re: [Dev] If you are having problems with "David P. <megve...@openmailbox.org>" keys

good to know my friend ;) El 24/04/17 a las 15:30, G. Sebastián Pedersen escribió: > On 24-04-2017 11:18 AM, Megver83 wrote: >> Last thing, this wiki page is very useful >> >> https://wiki.manjaro.org/index.php/Pacman_troubleshooting#Errors_about_Keys >> >> >&g

[Dev] what if we let the autobuilder to compile the kernels?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi lukeshu, is the autobuilder already compiling packages? I saw some commits made by it. We could set it up to compile linux-libre{-lts,-pck,-apparmor, etc} every time the variables in the PKGBUILD from abslibre change (e.g. pkgver, pkgrel, etc),

Re: [Dev] [SOLUTION] packager gpg key expired

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 sth. important: for this to work, it is necessary to run pacman-key - --refresh-keys El 28/04/17 a las 15:31, Megver83 escribió: > Now yes! > > El 28/04/17 a las 15:26, André Silva escribió: >> On 04/28/2017 05:13 PM, Megver83 w

Re: [Dev] [SOLUTION] packager gpg key expired

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 You're right. Emulatorman: could you update your key, please? El 28/04/17 a las 13:19, fauno escribió: > Megver83 <megve...@openmailbox.org> writes: > >> To *temporally* solve this users can disable SigLevel in >> /etc/pacm

Re: [Dev] [SOLUTION] packager gpg key expired

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 hummm, looks like it didn't work for me, I even refreshed the keyring. El 28/04/17 a las 14:01, André Silva escribió: > On 04/28/2017 04:27 PM, Megver83 wrote: >> You're right. Emulatorman: could you update your key, please? > &g

Re: [Dev] [SOLUTION] packager gpg key expired

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ok, forwarded! El 28/04/17 a las 14:01, André Silva escribió: > On 04/28/2017 04:27 PM, Megver83 wrote: >> You're right. Emulatorman: could you update your key, please? > > I've updated it, check if works well and let me know! >

Re: [Dev] credits page

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 https://www.parabola.nu/people/hackers/ https://www.parabola.nu/people/support-staff/ https://www.parabola.nu/people/hacker-fellows/ https://www.parabola.nu/people/artists/ El 27/04/17 a las 16:08, fauno escribió: > Robert Alessi

Re: [Dev] If you are having problems with "David P. <megve...@openmailbox.org>" keys

Well, if that doesn't solve the issue, see https://forum.manjaro.org/t/invalid-or-corrupted-package-pgp-signature/324/3 El 24/04/17 a las 10:48, Megver83 escribió: > Hi, for some reason my key became untrusted (at least for me), so > if you are also having that problem, here's what I did to

Re: [Dev] If you are having problems with "David P. <megve...@openmailbox.org>" keys

"manjaro" with "parabola", and after doing all that, set SigLevel to Required DatabaseOptional as it was in the beginning. El 24/04/17 a las 10:48, Megver83 escribió: > Hi, for some reason my key became untrusted (at least for me), so > if you are also having that

Re: [Dev] I want to become a parabola hacker!

://www.parabola.nu/people/hackers/ and/or https://www.parabola.nu/people/support-staff/ you should ask lukeshu to do it, also ask him to give you the dev credentials to log in to https://www.parabola.nu/login/ Cheers! Megver83. El 21/04/17 a las 04:22, Andreas Grapentin escribió: > > m

Re: [Dev] credits page

That said, I can understand that putting up such a page may not be > practical nor desirable. > > Best, > > Robert > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 04:13:49PM -0300, Megver83 wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 >> >> https://www.parabola.nu/people/ha

[Dev] How can I enable SPIdev on Parabola ARM?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, I want to flash libreboot with my Banana Pi M1, but I haven't found a way to enable the /dev/spidev* devices. I've tried enabling spidev and spi-sun4i modules, but nothing. In some forums, it tells me to edit the famous /boot/config.txt

[Dev] Wiki page of Pacman Troubleshooting (because of the recent problems with devs keys)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi everyone, I just wrote https://wiki.parabola.nu/Pacman_troubleshooting so for the ones who have problems with keys see https://wiki.parabola.nu/Pacman_troubleshooting#Errors_about_Keys This should also appear in Parabola news, since the commands

Re: [Dev] [SOLUTION] packager gpg key expired

To *temporally* solve this users can disable SigLevel in /etc/pacman.conf It is not a very secure alternative but there's no other way until we compile emulatorman's packages. Can the autobuilder just rebuild a new release? El 28/04/17 a las 05:12, Andreas Grapentin escribió: > > The PGP key of

Re: [Dev] atom text editor

t; Dev@lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev Do you have the PKGBUILD? -- ~Megver83 SIP: megve...@sip.linphone.org XMPP: megve...@jabjab.de Tox: megve...@toxme.io GPG: 0x227CA7C556B2BA78 GNUSocial: @megve...@quitter.cl Diaspora*: megve...@diasp.org Pump: megve...@da

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [icedove] marked out-of-date

rsion 55.0.1 is still pendent and reported in > bug report system. > > ___ > Dev mailing list > Dev@lists.parabola.nu > https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev > FYI Mensaje reenviado Asunto: Re: Ping Fecha: Mon, 14 Aug

Re: [Dev] [PATCH] Fix calibre 2.84.0 PKGBUILD and patches

And this also works for the latest version? https://download.calibre-ebook.com/2.85.1/ El 14/05/17 a las 16:34, nos...@curso.re escribió: > - PKGBUILD file would not apply the patches and resulted in nonfree > calibre - libre.patch would not apply cleanly (sha512 sum > recalculated) > > (You can

Re: [Dev] Request for repositories

Hi! I just uploaded it to [pcr] for both 64 and 32 bits. Commit: https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/commit/?id=b497b008c4b48c57eb79e394419fa6961b3214c8 El 12/05/17 a las 13:41, usua...@cock.li escribió: > Friends Gnu Parabola Community > > I send a cordial greeting to all, thank them and

Re: [Dev] Request for repositories

OK, I'll deal with that tomorrow maybe. El 12/05/17 a las 20:45, Omar Vega Ramos escribió: > Hello > >> I just uploaded it to [pcr] for both 64 and 32 bits. Commit: >> https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/commit/?id=b497b008c4b48c57eb79e394419fa6961b3214c8 > >> > I deleted the pseint package,

Re: [Dev] EOMA68 cards for the arm port - Was: the future of arm support

want to do this. Regards, Megver83 El 11/05/17 a las 09:19, fauno escribió: > Andreas Grapentin <andr...@grapentin.org> writes: > >> The emoa68 guys have replied, asking how many cards we need. is >> one card per hacker enough, or do we want some spares? >> >&g

Re: [Dev] Fwd: Re: Article: Chromium's subtle freedom flaws

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Now, I've a question, as qt5-webengine is based in Chromium, is it "Googled"? Because in that case it'd be a security flaw I think. El 09/05/17 a las 13:10, Nicolás A. Ortega escribió: > On Tue, May 09, 2017 at 12:44:07PM -0300, M

Re: [Dev] Missing free firmware

Similar to you, my wireless card also stopped being detected :( El 09/05/17 a las 18:34, Joseph Graham escribió: > carl9170 firmware is Free Software but Parabola has removed it from > linux-libre-firmware > > This means my wireless card cannot work (even though it works fine > in Trisquel). I

Re: [Dev] Still can't install libretools

El 17/05/17 a las 12:49, Jesús E. escribió: > You may be able to fix it with? > > rm -rf /etc/pacman.d/gnupg > pacman-key --init > pacman-key --populate archlinux parabola > pacman-key --refresh-keys > pacman -Suuyy Shouldn't be -Syyuu instead of -Suuyy ? > > > >

[Dev] Why is db-import-archlinuxarm disabled?

don't want an outdated platform. Regards, Megver83. ___ Dev mailing list Dev@lists.parabola.nu https://lists.parabola.nu/mailman/listinfo/dev

Re: [Dev] Fwd: Re: Article: Chromium's subtle freedom flaws

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Is this really an internal problem of Parabola? I say this because, what if other distros adopt qt5-webengine? then it will become a bigger problem not only for us, but for the other free distros too. Maybe we should discuss this with the FSF and/or

[Dev] Deletion of linux-libre-grsec

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, as most of us may know, GRSecurity is now nonfree, and even Arch Linux removed it from its repositories. Now, they have created the linux-hardened kernel --> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/linux-hardened/ which is only for

Re: [Dev] EOMA68 cards for the arm port - Was: the future of arm support

El 11/05/17 a las 17:10, Joseph Graham escribió: > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:33:36AM -0300, fauno wrote: >> when i was working on mips64el most of the work was building packages >> and making scripts to save myself the time i was spending on it :P >> > > Correct me if I'm wrong but most of the

Re: [Dev] Update people's website and

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 El 11/05/17 a las 17:13, Luke Shumaker escribió: > On Wed, 10 May 2017 21:02:33 -0400, Megver83 wrote: >> *Give the new hackers the developer credentials to log in to >> https://www.parabola.nu/login/ and django administration. >

Re: [Dev] [keepass] marked out-of-date

How could you mark a [community] package as outdated? BTW that pkg is on version 2.36 El 09/06/17 a las 18:40, Alejandro Hernández Petermann escribió: > > alejandr...@openmailbox.org wants to notify you that the following > packages may be out-of-date: > > > * keepass 2.35-2 (any): >

Re: [Dev] [Assist] linux-libre is not part of the base group anymore

El 09/06/17 a las 18:18, Isaac David escribió: > Reg wrote: >> I was installing Parabola on a new computer today and noticed that the >> linux-libre package is not included in the base group anymore. >> >> I suppose that's not intended, so I thought I'd report it. > > you are right. > > the

Re: [Dev] notsystemd v232.1 release announcement

El 18/06/17 a las 13:16, Megver83 escribió: > Ah, sth. else to point out, is the fact that as it conflicts the package > eudev-systemd (because it provides systemd) it breaks its dependency for > sddm-consolekit, I just putted --asume-installed eudev-systemd, and it > works ok

[Dev] Linux-libre-firmware 4.11 is available in [libre-testing]

Hi, just uploaded linux-libre-firmware to [libre-testing] https://repomirror.parabola.nu/pool/parabola/linux-libre-firmware-4.11_gnu-1-any.pkg.tar.xz I'll move it to [libre] when I upload linux-libre 4.11 to [libre], since it is not stable enough. Note that the firmwares are not necessarily

[Dev] Librestage stages non-tar.xz files

derstand why this happens, because then when I update the kernel it says that those files already exists in other/linux-libre/logos (the solution is to remove the 'other' directory from ~/staging/megver83/staging, but I don't want to do that *every time* I run librer

Re: [Dev] Drop linux-libre-grsec in favor of linux-libre-hardened

h are free software. Andreas Grapentin: > > what are the significant differences between grsec and hardened? > if there are none, or they are negligible, I approve of this, assuming > we come up with a good upgrade strategy for those who use grsec. > > -A > > On Thu, May 18, 2017

Re: [Dev] Librestage stages non-tar.xz files

Don't know. You're right, it's non sense to re-upload those files, not even a tarball of the patches and logos is generated (which is not necessary BTW). El 22/05/17 a las 15:43, Jesús E. escribió: > Yes, It seems unnecessary to back upload existing files. There is no way > to fix it? > > > >

[Dev] linux-libre-firmwares 4.11 is available in [libre-testing]

Hi, I just uploaded linux-libre-firmwares 4.11 to [libre-testing] as linux-libre 4.11 is not stable enough. However, as these are just firmwares, they should work well, but I didn't uploaded it to [libre] because you know, it's better to prevent than regret. Cheers. signature.asc Description:

Re: [Dev] [RFC] Splitting abslibre.git into branches

I agree, I think that each branch should have its -testing, -multilib and -multilib-testing directories too. For example, the abslibre.git libre branch should have the libre, libre-testing, libre-multilib and libre-multilib-testing directories. I liked the idea, and we could also deprecate the

Re: [Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

Isaac David: > yes, I can attest that compiling that many kernels every few weeks is > pure madness and bad for your electricity bills :) > > do you have the -j MAKEFLAG equal the number of cores in your > /etc/makepkg.conf? Yes, I do. $ cat /etc/makepkg.conf | grep MAKEFLAG #MAKEFLAGS="-j2"

[Dev] Is it possible to compile multiple packages at the same time with libremakepkg?

Hi, as a package maintainer, I was thinking on why libremakepkg can't compile multiple packages at the same time, because for me, as a maintainer of some kernels, it would be much more efficient and fast if I could do that. What I do is to compile with 2 different machines (one is x86 and the

Re: [Dev] Orphan Libre package [linux-libre] marked out-of-date

I'll do a masive update for most kernels during the weekend, and move linux-libre-firmware 4.11 to [libre] El 24/05/17 a las 02:42, Parabola Website Notification escribió: > jm.100b...@gmail.com wants to notify you that the following packages may be > out-of-date: > > > * linux-libre

Re: [Dev] we probably need a more up-to-date parabola iso

ISOs are always built from from scratch, afaik, what I do is remaster[0] them, however, I'd maintain the ISOs if I knew how to use Parabolaiso[1], in the past, Jorginho used to maintain them, maybe someone can ask him. [0] https://wiki.parabola.nu/Remastering_the_Install_ISO [1]

Re: [Dev] how to update a git package?

your changes were successfully applied in git https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/tree/libre/dbscripts/PKGBUILD El 27/05/17 a las 16:45, Joseph Graham escribió: > I tried to update dbscripts but the new package still contains the old > data. What did I do wrong? Here is the changes I made to the

Re: [Dev] Stallman's talks in Brazil and Argentina

So near from Chile, but not in Chile :P Are there going to be live transmissions? To watch him in real time. Adonay Felipe Nogueira: > Richard Stallman needs no introduction... but here is one anyway! > Richard Stallman is the author of the GNU GPL, founded the Free Software > Foundation, and

Re: [Dev] licenses package has outdated links

Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license? Only the Parabola ones, Arch ones are not under our control. Dima, did you also advised in Arch's Mailing lists? Dima Ursu: > The licenses package has and outdated link to MPL, which returns 404. > > The correct link is now -

Re: [Dev] licenses package has outdated links

the MPL Andreas Grapentin: > > do you mean the MPL or the ruby license? > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:08:00PM +, Megver83 wrote: >> Andreas, can you make a list of all packages with this license? Only the >> Parabola ones, Arch ones are not under our contro

Re: [Dev] Drop linux-libre-grsec in favor of linux-libre-hardened

This is Why I say we should remove it, but IDK if there's someone who still wants to keep it, in that case it can be moved to [kernels], but we would just let it there rotting. Marcel Röthke: > On 18.05.2017 15:26, Megver83 wrote: >> We can have both kernels too, … > > How

Re: [Dev] Fwd: Deprecation of i686

El 30/05/17 a las 12:33, Andreas Grapentin escribió: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:55:49AM -0400, Megver83 wrote: >> Hi, as you may know, in November Arch drops i686 support, and I was >> thinking about doing the same. Is not that I'm against of maintaining >> it, b

  1   2   3   >