[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028642#comment-13028642
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2493:
-
I also reviewed other places where luceneMatchVe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2493:
Attachment: SOLR-2493-3.x.patch
Patch for 3.x and 3.1 branch.
> SolrQueryParser constantly parse lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2493:
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.2
3.1.1
> SolrQueryParser constantly pars
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-2493:
Attachment: SOLR-2493.patch
Patch for trunk, 3.x/3.1 is similar, will attach after merge.
> SolrQue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned SOLR-2493:
---
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> SolrQueryParser constantly parse luceneMatchVersion in solrconfig. L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sami Siren updated SOLR-2481:
-
Component/s: contrib - DataImportHandler
> Add support for commitWithin in DataImportHandler
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028620#comment-13028620
]
Sami Siren commented on SOLR-2493:
--
Trunk version of Solr has this same problem too, I jus
Hi Uwe,
Sorry, I only saw your email today, busy lately with college homeworks.
I was planning to submit patches to Lucene (through JIRA/email?). Do you have
something else in mind?
Regards,
Vinicius Barros
--- Em dom, 1/5/11, Uwe Schindler escreveu:
De: Uwe Schindler
Assunto: RE: I was ac
SolrQueryParser constantly parse luceneMatchVersion in solrconfig. Large
performance hit.
-
Key: SOLR-2493
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2493
Pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028570#comment-13028570
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3065:
Yeah there is an element of truth to that except
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3067?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028545#comment-13028545
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3067:
-
Hi Robert, can you provide more information on
Lucene test cases do not properly close input and output instances
--
Key: LUCENE-3067
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3067
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028540#comment-13028540
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3065:
--
bq. I then deprecated all the Fieldable meth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028526#comment-13028526
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3065:
The Field/Fieldable/AbstractField problem is wha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028496#comment-13028496
]
Adrian Nistor commented on LUCENE-3066:
---
Hi Michael,
Thanks for the super fast rep
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Nistor closed LUCENE-3066.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
> NullPointerException when calling sizeInBytes and setHasVectors conc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028483#comment-13028483
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3065:
Ugh! Field/Fieldable/AbstractFi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028480#comment-13028480
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3066:
SegmentInfo is not actually thre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028454#comment-13028454
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-3065 at 5/3/11 10:01 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) updated SOLR-2399:
Attachment: SOLR-2399.patch
> Solr Admin Interface, reworked
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028454#comment-13028454
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
There is still a problem - first the good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028439#comment-13028439
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
bq. Right, so if you loo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028429#comment-13028429
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-2399:
Right, so if you look at the names of toke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2492?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2492:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2492.patch
This patch increments the # deleted documents once for each call to
$deleteDo
DIH does not commit if only Deletes are processed
-
Key: SOLR-2492
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2492
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: contrib - DataImportH
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028419#comment-13028419
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
bq. Stefan - I only look
NullPointerException when calling sizeInBytes and setHasVectors concurrently.
-
Key: LUCENE-3066
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3066
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Nistor updated LUCENE-3066:
--
Attachment: Test.java
> NullPointerException when calling sizeInBytes and setHasVectors concur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028417#comment-13028417
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-2399:
Stefan - I only looked at the screenshot y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028416#comment-13028416
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Mike: One thing about the bitmask and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028412#comment-13028412
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-3065:
--
bq. I'll take a crack at it... but I don't t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2491?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
James Dyer updated SOLR-2491:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2491.patch
This patch fixes the problem & includes a unit test. This patch simply remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028408#comment-13028408
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
bq. If so, can you take a crack at it? Th
spellcheck.maxCollationTries breaks when using FieldCollapsing
--
Key: SOLR-2491
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2491
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Compone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028406#comment-13028406
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
{quote}Rather then use:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028404#comment-13028404
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3065:
Uwe: I agree, I'll use BytesRef
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028402#comment-13028402
]
Stefan Matheis (steffkes) commented on SOLR-2399:
-
bq. Thanks for doing all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028399#comment-13028399
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
bq. Is there some reason...?
Solr did its
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028398#comment-13028398
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3065:
{quote}
Thats easy to understand
PropertiesRequestHandler; encode line.separator
---
Key: SOLR-2490
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2490
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: web gui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028397#comment-13028397
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Aboutthe patch: Maybe the byte[] returning
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028395#comment-13028395
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
{quote}
Spookily, nothing failed in Solr..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3065:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3065.patch
Patch against 3.x.
I moved the to/from byte[] methods
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Digy updated LUCENENET-413:
---
Attachment: MediumTrust.2.9.4g.patch
MediumTrust.2.9.4.patch
> Medium trust security issu
Medium trust security issue
-
Key: LUCENENET-413
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-413
Project: Lucene.Net
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
Environment:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Dawid Weiss
wrote:
> It's similar to operator priorities -- I just like to
> have explicit brackets instead of relying on my degenerating memory...
I don't normally do this (adding ()'s around operators just to be
sure) but I think I will now start doing so!
Thanks Shai and Mike!
I'll keep an eye on LUCENE-1076.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 11:15 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: MergePolicy Thresholds
Thanks Shai!
I'm way behind on my 3.x backports
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028354#comment-13028354
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3065:
---
Ideally this could be done with the schema
On May 3, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I don't like that approach. Two years from now, if indeed your vision becomes
> the reality (obviously, not everyone think like you), what would o.a.solr
> mean? Who will remember that 'suggest' (just picking an example) came from
> Solr? Who'd c
NumericField should be stored in binary format in index (matching Solr's format)
Key: LUCENE-3065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3065
Project: Lucene -
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On May 3, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> Isn't this the future we are working towards?
>
> No, not really. Others perhaps, but not me. I'm on board with some modules. I
> do think there are tradeoffs when considering them a
On the namespace, since Yonik seems concerned about it, and others
aren't (I think?), why don't we leave everything factored out of Solr
under the under org.apache.solr namespace?
Anyone object to that approach?
I don't like that approach. Two years from now, if indeed your vision
becomes the real
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028327#comment-13028327
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3023:
This cutover to concurrent flush
On May 3, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Isn't this the future we are working towards?
No, not really. Others perhaps, but not me. I'm on board with some modules. I
do think there are tradeoffs when considering them and considering Lucene and
Solr. I'm happy to take everything
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028316#comment-13028316
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2487:
-
+1 +1 +1 +1 ...
> Do not include slf4j-jdk14 ja
On the namespace, since Yonik seems concerned about it, and others
aren't (I think?), why don't we leave everything factored out of Solr
under the under org.apache.solr namespace?
Anyone object to that approach?
My only concern is that this sends the message that the module depends
on Solr bu
Isn't our end goal here a bunch of well factored search modules? Ie,
fast forward a year or two and I think we should have modules like
these:
* Faceting
* Highlighting
* Suggest (good patch is on LUCENE-2995)
* Schema
* Query impls
* Query parsers
* Analyzers (good progress h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028300#comment-13028300
]
Jan Høydahl commented on SOLR-2487:
---
@Hoss
Your concerns are easily solved by documentati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028283#comment-13028283
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2487:
bq. It would be sufficient to have the jdk-logging binding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3028?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3028.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in RT
> IW.getReader() returns inconsistent reader on RT Branch
Thanks Shai!
I'm way behind on my 3.x backports -- I'll try to do this soon.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> I uploaded a patch to LUCENE-1076.
>
> Tom, apparently the patch I've attached before cannot be used, because there
> are depende
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028256#comment-13028256
]
Yuriy Akopov commented on SOLR-236:
---
Thanks, Stephen. So it isn't just me doing something
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028252#comment-13028252
]
Stephen Weiss commented on SOLR-236:
Yes, I've had this too:
https://issues.apache.org/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028248#comment-13028248
]
Yuriy Akopov commented on SOLR-236:
---
Hi and sorry for breaking the silence.
So far the pa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028246#comment-13028246
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2191:
bq. In code I write, I tend to almost never log ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028243#comment-13028243
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2487:
I like it Jan! JDK14 logging sucks, any way.
> D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028240#comment-13028240
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-2191:
Ehh... I kind of like the notion but wether it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-3054.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed trunk revision: 1099041
Merged 3.x revision: 1099045
Merged 3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3064?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-3064:
Attachment: LUCENE-3064.patch
updated patch with fixes for contrib, though highlighter still remai
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley resolved SOLR-2488.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed. Thanks Jan!
> README.TXT mixes Unix and Windows path styles
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3055?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028189#comment-13028189
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3055:
-
{quote}
Also, if reusableTokenStream is the on
I usually do an explicit check for nulls and that's why I allowed myself to
bring the issue up. It's similar to operator priorities -- I just like to
have explicit brackets instead of relying on my degenerating memory... As
for sorting, I don't like to rely on the default hashCode/equals exactly fo
I uploaded a patch to LUCENE-1076.
Tom, apparently the patch I've attached before cannot be used, because there
are dependencies (in earlier commits on LUCENE-1076) that need to be
back-ported as well. So stay tuned on LUCENE-1076 for when it is safe to use
this new MP.
Shai
On Tue, May 3, 2011
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jan Høydahl updated SOLR-2488:
--
Attachment: SOLR-2488.patch
Proposed changes
> README.TXT mixes Unix and Windows path styles
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1076:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1076-3x.patch
Patch against 3x. This is not ready to commit yet, as many tests fa
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/111/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 13339 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional comm
Remove old lucene.apache.org/solr/who page
--
Key: SOLR-2489
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2489
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.1, 3.2
Reporter: Jan
README.TXT mixes Unix and Windows path styles
-
Key: SOLR-2488
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2488
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: documentation
Aff
Do not include slf4j-jdk14 jar in WAR
-
Key: SOLR-2487
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2487
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Build
Affects Versions: 3.2, 4.0
That'd be great, thanks :)
Yes, let's iterate on the issue! But: it should still be open, I hope
(I didn't mean to close it yet, since it's not back ported)...
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Mike, if you want, I can back-port it, as I'v
Mike, if you want, I can back-port it, as I've already started this when
preparing the patch.
I noticed that you added a "throws IOE" to IW.setInfoStream -- is it ok on
3x too? It'll be a backwards change.
Maybe we should iterate on the issue? I can reopen.
Shai
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 12:36 PM,
Looks good Shai!
Comments below too:
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I looked into porting it to 3x, and prepared the attached patch. It only
> contains the new TieredMP and Test, as well as the necessary changes to
> LuceneTestCase and IndexWriter. I guess you can sta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3054?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028125#comment-13028125
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3054:
Patch looks good! I like the 2*
Hi
I looked into porting it to 3x, and prepared the attached patch. It only
contains the new TieredMP and Test, as well as the necessary changes to
LuceneTestCase and IndexWriter. I guess you can start with it (even just the
MP and IW changes) to test it on your indexes.
Mike, I saw that there we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028109#comment-13028109
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3058:
---
:-) It always confuses me, too. But if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028104#comment-13028104
]
Dawid Weiss edited comment on LUCENE-3058 at 5/3/11 8:35 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028108#comment-13028108
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3058:
-
Handslap! And this is why you should always re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028105#comment-13028105
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-3058:
---
bq. null passes all instanceofs
Definitel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028104#comment-13028104
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-3058:
-
Looks good to me. One note: possible NPE here
Fixed interface @Override
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Apache Jenkins Server [mailto:hud...@hudson.apache.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 8:44 AM
> To: dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13028078#comment-13028078
]
Jayesh K Rajpurohit commented on SOLR-2486:
---
Can you suggest some configuration t
91 matches
Mail list logo
