Probably of interest to Solr devs as well, FYI.
Cheers,
Chris
Begin forwarded message:
From: Yiyu Li yiy...@usc.edu
Date: April 29, 2012 4:34:46 PM PDT
To: sis-...@incubator.apache.org
Subject: A way to connect Solr to SIS
Reply-To: sis-...@incubator.apache.org
Dear All,
This is Yiyu
Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2011 6:18 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Cc: yo...@lucidimagination.com; solr-u...@lucene.apache.org
Subject
on the issue. You should not consume token streams on
construction.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov]
Sent: Saturday
Hi Everyone,
I've got an Analysis question related to both Lucene and Solr (sorry for the
cross posting).
i've created a custom analysis chain part of a field type for the title field
in my schema representing Businesses.
I've created an addition field called title_sort where I copied the
Hi Yonik,
On Sep 2, 2011, at 7:47 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
I'm left with childrenshospitallosangeles as a single token resultant from
the chain.
So, when I go to sort the titles in Solr, I use
On Sep 2, 2011, at 8:53 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
I think in spelling this out though, I might have elaborated my problem.
Since
the method I call in the constructor for my CombiningFilter is
super(mergeStreamTokens(in))
where mergeStreamTokens is a static method, I think I
Wow, Grant, that looks awesome, great job on the new site!
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:46 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I've ported the large majority of our old, crappy website to the shiny new
ASF CMS. Not only is this easier to maintain b/c we no longer need Forrest,
but it also
Hi Ryan,
On Apr 3, 2011, at 12:50 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
2. 3rd party tools -- In general people working on complex geographic
problems use JTS and other LGPL tools. There is some great work
happening at Apache SIS now, but it is a long way from being a viable
ASL alternative.
Thanks
Hi David,
On Feb 12, 2011, at 4:38 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org) wrote:
I'm tempted to also bring up my distaste for the next version of Solr being
3.something instead of 1.5 (in fact I just did) but I'll just leave it at
that. AFAIK that battle was lost months ago.
:) You're not alone in
On Jan 17, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
On 1/17/2011 at 1:53 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
I don't think any user needs the ability to run an ant target on
Lucene's sources to produce maven artifacts
I want to be able to make modifications to the Lucene source, install Maven
snapshot
CHANGES file:
LUCENE-2658: Exceptions while processing term vectors enabled for
multiple fields could lead to invalid ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions.
JIRA description:
LUCENE-2658: TestIndexWriterExceptions random failure: AIOOBE in
ByteBlockPool.allocSlice
So you see the story, i hit
Would you mind naming these Apache projects? I'd like to take a look.
Tika, Nutch, OODT.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B,
Hi Mark,
RE: the credit system. JIRA provides a contribution report here, like this one
that I generated for Lucene 3.1:
http://s.apache.org/BpL
Just click on Reports Contribution Report in the upper right of JIRA on the
main project summary page.
We've been using this in Tika since the
:
On 12/5/2010 at 12:19 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Mark,
RE: the credit system. JIRA provides a contribution report here, like
this one that I generated for Lucene 3.1:
My concern
Yet another way would be to declare the problem non-existent and screw our
users by insulting them with a honking great mass of changes without any
indication about what they are or how they are inter-related. (You won't be
surprised at this point, I think, by my -1 to this.)
Right, I'm
Hi All,
FYI, Apache SIS [1], currently Incubating, is working on building an ASLv2
licensed library comparable to JTS or GeoTools. You'll notice that most of the
GIS related libs out there are GPL or LGPL (or at least I did), so I decided to
do something about it.
If anyone else is interested
Hi Robert,
I can help a little here. Check out this guide:
http://maven.apache.org/guides/mini/guide-central-repository-upload.html
The long and the short of it is that there are several canonical Maven repos
that are sync'ed to Ibiblio and Maven central. Apache has one (through
Hi Folks,
You may have noticed over the past few days a bunch of Spatial related
contributions, in particular:
SOLR-2073 Geonames.org UpdateProcessor for Spatial
SOLR-2074 GeoRSS ResponseWriter
SOLR-2075 SpatialQParserPlugin and HostIP adaptor
SOLR-2076 Spatial example schema updates
SOLR-2077
Marvin, report looks good +1 from me (I signed off on the wiki too).
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/8/10 4:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 11:25:20AM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Here are some examples of OODT ones that we've filed so we can get an idea
:
FYI, the Lucy SVN area has been created in the Incubator in r982976, r982977,
r982978 and r982980.
Hoss, can you remove the Lucene copy?
Cheers,
Chris
On 8/5/10 9:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hi Marvin,
There is an action item under Mentors
Hi Marvin,
There is an action item under Mentors:
Tell Mentors to track progress in the file
'incubator/projects/{project.name}.html'
/me clears throat.
Mentors, please track progress in the file 'incubator/projects/lucy.html'.
/me marks said action item as completed.
(apologies for the cross posting)
All, FYI below is some information on two special sessions of AGU this
December in San Francisco, CA. The first involves open source software and
remote sensing. If you are using any Apache software in the area of remote
sensing, you might consider submitting to
On 7/30/10 9:55 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 08:31:27PM -0700, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Thanks, Peter for the email. I kind of guessed it was more related to
KinoSearch.
Since Lucy is about to assimilate the KinoSearch code base, they are now
Guys:
Can you enlighten me as to what this has to do with *Apache* Lucy? And
furthermore, what it has to do with the *Incubator podling*?
Thanks,
Chris
On 7/29/10 6:40 PM, Peter Karman pe...@peknet.com wrote:
Marvin Humphrey wrote on 7/29/10 8:37 PM:
Peter,
I'm willing to go with making
Hi Marvin,
Thanks. Comments below:
Did you file a JIRA issue in the INFRA space to roll up all the other issues
like mailing lists, SVN, etc. Looks like you found the one I did for Tika -
why not just create something similar? If you already have, can you pass
along the ticket key so I (and
Hi Marvin,
Maybe just #1, which I've already claimed -- let's not duplicate. :)
I'm not proposing too. But I'm proposing rather than one Death-star like
issue to rule them all, how about some separate traceable activities that
you can farm out and not be the single point of failure on?
Wow, seriously
On 7/25/10 6:11 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_l...@fucit.org wrote:
: Yeah not sure myself. I'll send an email to gene...@incubator asking if
: there is anything that needs to be done on that end. The reason I ask is
: that e.g., if we wanted to update our incubator website,
Hi Marvin,
On 7/25/10 9:10 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
I suspect that we will need guidance from legal affairs with regards to
Zettair
and possibly the others if we are to continue under the name Lucy. Mentors,
what do you suggest as a next step?
I would recommend
Ehrm,
Guys, I would recommend just filing INFRA requests here [1]. INFRA can set up
all the mailing lists below for you and are the only ones with Apache karma
necessary to do so.
I'd be happy to file the tickets, if you guys are OK with that.
Cheers,
Chris
[1]
+1, sounds good to me to have the additional lucy-issues@ lists per the
specification you mention below, Marvin...
Cheers,
Chris
On 7/24/10 10:16 AM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
Greets,
Lucene sub-projects traditionally have all JIRA notifications sent to the dev
list.
Marvin,
Did you file a JIRA issue in the INFRA space to roll up all the other issues
like mailing lists, SVN, etc. Looks like you found the one I did for Tika - why
not just create something similar? If you already have, can you pass along the
ticket key so I (and others) could monitor it?
I just encountered something similar in OODT-ville, and the answer I got
back from INFRA was that they were going to phase out the current way that
JIRA is administered and move towards ³roles² rather than ³groups² in JIRA.
See here [1] for an explanation.
I think we can add people to the
Thanks Hoss!
On 7/24/10 12:01 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_l...@fucit.org wrote:
Aparently i already had the neccessary karma to create the new Lucy SVN
repository, but I don't have the neccessary karma to *grant* karma, so
i've sent an email to the IPMC containing the neccessary patch...
+1...
On 7/24/10 12:22 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:58:03AM -0700, Chris Hostetter wrote:
In general I don't think there are any set guidelines on how the Jira
Roles are used (they are totally independent of LDAP and SVN perms)
so the Lucy
Hi Folks,
Okey dokey, this VOTE has passed with the following PMC binding VOTEs:
Chris Mattmann
Doğacan Güney
Julien Nioche
Dennis Kubes
I'll go ahead and push out (finally!) the Nutch 1.1 release to the mirrors
and get the monkey off my back! Thanks to all for participating in the VOTE!
Hey All,
So, I'm working on SOLR-1925 [1], and I'm asking myself again: why the use
of e.g., solr.* in the class name, as in e.g., solr.XSLTResponseWriter?
I mean I've brought this up before and I've heard the history, but in
reality they all just default to some package that's loaded via
(same reason svn uses the svn: in the properties that SVN expects to
own)
So, it's almost like a protocol or namespace more so than a class package. I
guess it's just the use of the . which is kind of confusing to me then.
The . indicates to me that it's a class I guess from an eyeballing it
Yep agreed, just me floating off in the clouds per usual...
Cheers,
Chris
On 5/29/10 9:32 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: So, it's almost like a protocol or namespace more so than a class package. I
: guess it's just the use of the . which is kind of confusing to me
Hi Itamar,
I think what you would do is throw together a proposal mentioning things
like:
* who would be the initial committers for the project
* whether those committers have Apache ICLAs [1] on file, or not
* what¹s the rationale behind the project (yours would have strong
rationale, since
Hi Folks,
I have posted an updated candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.1 release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-nutch-1.1/rc3/
The major differences between this release and rc #2 are the application of:
NUTCH-816, NUTCH-732, NUTCH-815, NUTCH-814, and NUTCH-812
this from biting us again whenever version numbers bump)
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Guys,
With r941046, I get a little further and then it dies on a different test:
[junit] Testsuite
Thanks guys!
On 5/5/10 7:04 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Erik has committed ant logic to delete old jar files... instead of manually
removing the old files, you should be able to just svn up and go!
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm
to delete old jar files... instead of manually
removing the old files, you should be able to just svn up and go!
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hey Robert,
Thanks so much for the help. I'll give it a try and report back if there's any
Nice, Jukka!
Cheers,
Chris
On 5/4/10 9:09 AM, Jukka Zitting (JIRA) j...@apache.org wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jukka Zitting resolved TIKA-419.
Hey Guys,
Checked out the latest Solr build, r941013, and unit tests aren't passing
for me:
[junit]
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations
[junit] Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.428 sec
[junit]
BUILD FAILED
]
Cheers,
Chris
On 5/4/10 12:58 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hey Guys,
Checked out the latest Solr build, r941013, and unit tests aren't passing
for me:
[junit]
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.util.automaton.TestBasicOperations
[junit] Tests
changed. Also see the
mail about refactoring to a new 3.x branch. Trunk will be 4.0 and may break
suddenly.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de http://www.thetaphi.de/
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
From: Mattmann, Chris A (388J) [mailto:chris.a.mattm
Schlining bschlin...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:42:17 -0700
To: John Caron ca...@unidata.ucar.edu
Cc: netcdf-j...@unidata.ucar.edu, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov, Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
Subject: Re: [netcdf-java] [netcdfgroup] NetCDF jars=Maven Central
On 4/26/10 7:24 AM, David M. Cole d...@colegroup.com wrote:
At 10:55 PM -0700 4/25/10, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Most folks that use Nutch are likely
familiar with running ant IMHO.
I guess then I fall into the category of not most folks. Have been
running Nutch for about 14 months and I
a TLP that you delay this release by a
few weeks and have the vote done under the auspices of the Nutch PMC?
Cheers,
Grant
On Apr 26, 2010, at 1:55 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have posted an updated candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.1 release. The
source code
Hey Andrzej,
Okey dokey, np! Let's get the patch in first :) I can cut as many RCs as needed.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/26/10 11:30 AM, Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org wrote:
On 2010-04-26 17:19, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Grant,
Thanks. I think it actually makes sense to finish off 1.1
Hi Folks,
I never heard back regarding this message. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/12/10 8:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hi there NetCDF'ers,
We've been working [1] on integrating NetCDF support into Apache Tika [2].
Tika uses Maven2 as its
currently to optimize that. netcdf-java
handles a lot of file formats, but all are assumed to be random access.
John Caron
On 4/26/2010 2:21 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Re: NetCDF jars=Maven Central Repos? Hi Folks,
I never heard back regarding this message. Any thoughts?
Thanks!
Cheers
FYI, [1] from here refers to:
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-153
On 4/26/10 6:46 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
(copying tika-dev@lucene.apache.org so that we can get some dev help in
Tika-land)
Hi John,
Thanks for the information - we have
Hi Folks,
I have posted an updated candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.1 release. The
source code is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-nutch-1.1/rc2/
The major difference between this release and rc #1 is the application of
NUTCH-812 - Crawl.java incorrectly uses the Generator API
Hi All,
The board has approved the Tika TLP. Yay!
I've started the process of moving Tika to its TLP status, and filed INFRA
issues [1] [2] and [3] for moving the mailing lists, SVN, and creating UNIX
groups respectively. If there's anything I missed, let me know.
I've asked that all current
Hi Grant,
I've attached one for Nutch from a while back that I made for a lecture I gave
at USC.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/22/10 10:56 AM, Grant Ignersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
The ASF has been asked by an Industry Analyst group (to remain unnamed at this
point) to provide
+1, thanks for pushing this forward Andrzej!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/12/10 4:32 AM, Doğacan Güney doga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 14:08, Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org wrote:
Hi,
Take two, after s/crawling/search/ ...
Following the discussion, below is the text of the
Hi Dogacan,
+1 to calling it a web search platform, since I agree, it’s not just a
crawler.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/11/10 11:40 AM, Doğacan Güney doga...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 16:32, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 6:52 PM,
Hi David,
The latest Nutch release candidate (1.1,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/nutch/tags/1.1) includes the tika-parser
plugin, which provides a JpegParser (see here: http://bit.ly/b0zRX8) that
hopefully can suit your needs.
Let me know what you think.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/10/10
Hi Andrzej,
+1, with the following amendment:
RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Lucene Nutch sub-project encumbered upon the
Apache Nutch Project are hereafter discharged.
This should read:
RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
Lucene
Thanks Julien!
OK, I'll cut the RC at some point today. Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/6/10 4:47 AM, Julien Nioche lists.digitalpeb...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris,
Just to let you know that I have committed
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-810 which was the last open issue
before the
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.1 release. The source code
is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-nutch-1.1/rc1/
See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made using the Nutch release process,
Hey Andrzej,
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/nutch/branches/branch-0.8/
That's the code that was intended to become 0.8.2 ...
However, I'm not sure whether there's any benefit in releasing either of
these. Those who really had the need to track this branch (or 0.7)
likely used the
Hey Guys,
Question. I see 2 releases that haven't been cut in JIRA:
0.8.2:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=106
80fixfor=12312064
0.7.3:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=106
80fixfor=12312176
I'm happy to cut 0.8.2
Hey All, FYI:
http://tikatoolkit.googlecode.com/files/Project_Proposal_Feb%202010.pdf
I stumbled on this while googling around for Tika articles for my CSCI 572
Search Engines class at USC this summer. Looks like some students are using
Tika in their project at Loyola University Chicago. Hope to
Hi All,
This VOTE has passed.
+1s:
Binding:
Chris A. Mattmann
Jukka Zitting
Grant Ignersoll
Uwe Schindler
Non-Binding:
Oleg Tikhonov
I'll get started pushing the releases out to the mirrors, and then send an
ANNOUNCE to annou...@.
Thanks, again, everyone!
Cheers,
Chris
to
include the sha1 of the src archive from jzitting. Will do on both, going
forward.
* +1 for having a direct link to tika-app on the website.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/1/10 11:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J
, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1s, so technically we could still do the 72 hrs and still be OK, but I'm
fine with giving folks some more time to take a look
I'm fine with closing the vote already at 72 hours since the p.a.o
outage only
to
include the sha1 of the src archive from jzitting. Will do on both, going
forward.
* +1 for having a direct link to tika-app on the website.
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/1/10 11:41 PM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J
Grant, FYI:
On 4/2/10 7:14 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
* Thanks for comments on the CHANGES from gsingers, and the mention to
include the sha1 of the src archive from jzitting. Will do on both, going
forward.
I added a stub for this in Tika 0.8:
http
, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1s, so technically we could still do the 72 hrs and still be OK, but I'm
fine with giving folks some more time to take a look
I'm fine with closing the vote already at 72 hours since the p.a.o
outage only
Welcome, Uwe!
Cheers,
Chris
On 4/1/10 4:05 AM, Grant Ignersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I'm pleased to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to add Uwe Schindler to
the PMC. Uwe has been doing a lot of work in Lucene and Solr, including
several of the last releases in Lucene.
Please
Hey Guys,
OK I'm finally getting around to this: I am going to push all the current 1.1
JIRA issues out and set their fix version to nil. Once I'm done with this,
I'll wait 48 hrs to see if there is anything that anyone really wants to get
into 1.1. So, please, take a look here [1] and make
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.7 release. The source code
is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-0.7/rc1/
See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made using the Maven2 release plugin,
Hi Simon,
Can you prepare a patch, and post it to JIRA? I'll happily take a look.
Thanks,
Chris
On 3/23/10 3:43 AM, Simon Tyler sty...@mimecast.net wrote:
I have had a further look at the nature of the failure to detect the type of
the particular file and still feel it is a bug.
This is an
What are the implications of this this new branding effort with the brands
for the existing Lucene and Solr? Will the names Lucene and Solr cease
in the mainstream in favor of a merged name?
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/22/10 11:02 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Now that Solr and Lucene live
Hi Sangri,
How big is the XML file you're trying to parse?
If you find it's large (on the order of 100s of MBs-1GBs), it's certainly
possible it could take a while (depending on your underlying machine
architecture) to parse it. If you need to increase the heap size for Tika, you
would do it
Hi Folks,
Per the existing discussions and feedback:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tika-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg01456.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/tika-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg01479.html
I'd like to call a community VOTE thread on the below board resolution to
make Apache Tika a Top Level
Oh, btw, forgot to add my +1.
Cheers,
Chris
On 3/22/10 7:43 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hi Folks,
Per the existing discussions and feedback:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tika-dev@lucene.apache.org/msg01456.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/tika-dev
Hey Andrzej,
I'd be +1 for Nutch being a TLP. I don't think it'll change much (other than to
provide more visibility/etc., and to allow more focused decision making by the
folks in the Nutch community). The infrastructure moves required to move to TLP
status are moving mailing lists, moving
On 3/18/10 11:25 AM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
3.1 may make life easy for us as developers, but is likely to be just as
cofusing to users as if we called the next version Q
We're jumping to version
: We're jumping to version 3.1 because we're releasing at the same time,
: and are based on Lucene 3.1.
You say it like it's a done deal, but I don't get the impression
that i'm the only one who thinks it's unneccessary.
+1, I'm right there with you on this Hoss.
My point is really
: Sorry about the following non serious reply:
:
: It hasn't seemed to hurt the most popular software in the world to be way
: worse than that ;)
:
: 1, 2, 3, NT, 95, 98, 98SE, ME, CE, 2000, XP, 2003, Vista, 2008, 7 (by who's
a) 2000 came out before ME
b) NT, CE, and 2003 (a server
Hi Guys,
A little late, but better than never. WDYT? I'll leave this up until next
Monday, at which point I'll call a [VOTE] thread, and then take it to the
Lucene PMC shortly thereafter (hopefully mid/late next week) so that we
could potentially make the next board meeting, if the community
Hi All,
: In the interest of moving forward, perhaps we should just focus on the
: immediate next major release - 3.1. What happens after can wait. We
: never planned for absolutely all the what if's in Solr before the
: merge - I'm not sure why we would need to now.
I suppose, but
Hi Hoss,
: (i suspect a whole lot of people who only care about the core library are
: going to really adamantly not want to have to check out all of Solr just
: to work on the core)
:
: This wouldn't really be merged development now would it?
: When I run 'ant test' I want the Solr
Hey Guys,
If you're on gene...@lucene then you've probably seen it mentioned it's
worth discussing Tika as an Apache TLP. I'd like to get the community view
on this since I think it likely makes sense:
* Nothing in Tika depends on any of the other Lucene project jars
* Tika provides
Hey Guys,
I have some extra time this weekend and early next week. Want me to be the
RM and push out a 1.1 release? Any blockers? I'm happy to do it just let me
know.
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer
Hi Martin,
I filed TIKA-376 to track this issue, and fixed it in r908050.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Chris
On 2/9/10 4:17 AM, Martin Gerhardy martin.gerha...@carus-it.com wrote:
hi
mame should be name i suppose ;)
parser mame=parse-rtf
class=org.apache.tika.parser.rtf.RTFParser
(...apologies for the cross posting...)
The Apache Lucene project is pleased to announce the release of Apache Tika
0.6. The release contents have been pushed out to the main Apache release
site and the m2 ibiblio sync, so the releases should be available as soon as
the mirrors get the syncs.
Thanks, Hoss, no problemo, appreciate it!
On 1/26/10 12:22 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Not to be a best, but there's no CHANGES.txt updates for SOLR-1516 and
: SOLR-1592. Could someone update them? A trivial patch is attached...
Sorry about that.
Every change (with
,
Chris
On 1/27/10 12:01 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
+0
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
On Jan 20, 2010, at 1:56 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.6 release
Hi Karl,
This refenrences to a mail of Tike 0.5 and not to Release 0.6 ..
Ok ?
The release # referenced in the email isn't as important as the process
described. The process has and will be used in all Tika releases 0.5+ on
forward.
Is there a site available for review as well? Not sure
Chris,
2010/1/20 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.6 release. The source code
is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-0.6/rc1/
See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents
Hi Folks,
I have posted a candidate for the Apache Tika 0.6 release. The source code
is at:
http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-0.6/rc1/
See the included CHANGES.txt file for details on release contents and latest
changes. The release was made using the Maven2 release plugin,
Hi Guys,
Not to be a best, but there's no CHANGES.txt updates for SOLR-1516 and
SOLR-1592. Could someone update them? A trivial patch is attached...
Cheers,
Chris
++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet
Dang,
Mailing list stripped the attachment. Here's a link to one:
http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/CHANGES-solr.patch
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/12/10 10:39 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
wrote:
Hi Guys,
Not to be a best, but there's no CHANGES.txt updates for SOLR-1516
Thanks Dave, sounds good. Please feel free to update CHANGES.txt and I'll move
forward with RC activities.
Cheers,
Chris
On 1/8/10 12:25 PM, Dave Meikle loo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
2010/1/8 Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov
In in the interest of living up to my
Hi Yonik,
What does this tag mean/do?
Cheers,
Chris
On 12/29/09 12:30 PM, yo...@apache.org yo...@apache.org wrote:
Author: yonik
Date: Tue Dec 29 20:30:53 2009
New Revision: 894477
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=894477view=rev
Log:
SOLR-1586: add solr-internal tag
Modified:
1 - 100 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
