[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990206#comment-12990206
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-383:
I will probably turn out to be a design preference of
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Andi Vajda wrote:
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Wylie, Brian wrote:
Mistype (exceptions.xml) - (extensions.xml)
This is about trunk or 3.x ?
Not the same thing, trunk is highly unstable and PyLucene is not following it
too closely. What used to be trunk at the Lucene project
Seems like we don't respect segments that don't return hits for a
certain query
Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
===
--- lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java (revision
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2609:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2609.patch
Fix some more Ant targets and adds javadocs-test-framework and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2609:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2609.patch
Last patch had misplaced text outside a target.
Generate jar
committed a fix in revision 1066764
simon
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Seems like we don't respect segments that don't return hits for a
certain query
Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990027#comment-12990027
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2609:
---
Hi Shai, patch looks fine (applies only to
Hey folks,
we had some issues / test failure with the newSearcher due to the
initial value of TopDocs#maxScore. It is initialized to NaN which
outrules anything if we do Math.max(current, topDocs.getMaxScore());
and topDocs.totalHits == 0. I added a conditional as a quickfix but I
think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-2609:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2609.patch
Patch fixes the manifest issue Uwe raised. I exposed a title
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990038#comment-12990038
]
Salman Akram commented on SOLR-1604:
Reminder! Any updates regarding integration with
Thank you Jens - that has worked perfectly. And with a little modification,
my query now looks like this:
q=+(CookBook foo bar) rating_value:1^0.1 rating_value:2^0.2 ...
Many thanks for your invaluable help!
Seb
--
View this message in context:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Toke Eskildsen updated LUCENE-2369:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2369.patch
Maintenance patch bringing the code up to date with Lucene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990060#comment-12990060
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2346:
---
{noformat}
String id = (String)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reassigned SOLR-96:
-
Assignee: Uwe Schindler
Solr should support alternate charsets for XML update messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-96:
--
Attachment: SOLR-96.patch
Here is a patch to fix this.
The whole problem *everywhere* in solr (even for
Woah!
(by the way, Hudson is now renamed to Jenkins).
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
---BeginMessage---
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-96:
--
Fix Version/s: 4.0
3.1
Solr should support alternate charsets for XML update messages
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-190?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler closed SOLR-190.
--
Resolution: Duplicate
Duplicate of SOLR-96.
Encoding declaration of POSTed XML documents is ignored
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990104#comment-12990104
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-96:
---
Just a comment for Robert:
RFC-3023 say, text/xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990104#comment-12990104
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-96 at 2/3/11 2:12 PM:
---
Just a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990107#comment-12990107
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-96:
-
Thanks Uwe, I can only trust the XML policeman here!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990111#comment-12990111
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-96:
--
Thanks Uwe, patch looks good!
Solr should support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-96:
--
Attachment: SOLR-96.patch
DocumentAnalysisReqHandler had the same problem, tis patch fixes this. It also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990114#comment-12990114
]
Ivan Zlatev commented on LUCENENET-383:
---
This issue is still present in the 2.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990117#comment-12990117
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-383:
Hi Ivan,
Can you send a *small* test case (without
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved SOLR-96.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed trunk revision: 1066819
Committed 3.x revision: 1066823
Solr should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated SOLR-96:
--
Attachment: SOLR-96-3.x.patch
Here the patch for 3.x as reference (AnalysisRequestHandler was fixed,
I think Float.NEG_INF is good?
Mike
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
we had some issues / test failure with the newSearcher due to the
initial value of TopDocs#maxScore. It is initialized to NaN which
outrules anything if we do
Hi all,
Just a couple of questions that have arisen.
1. For handling non-distributed update requests (shards param is not present
or is invalid), our code currently
- assumes the user would like the data indexed, so gets the request
handler assigned to /update
- executes the request
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:41 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Woah!
Yay :)
(by the way, Hudson is now renamed to Jenkins).
Yes, see eg here:
http://pelegri.wordpress.com/2011/01/29/jenkins-hudson-is-now-officially-independent/?utm_source=twitterfeedutm_medium=twitter
At some
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
I think Float.NEG_INF is good?
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that's what it was for much of the past.
-Yonik
http://lucidimagination.com
-
To
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990123#comment-12990123
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2843:
bq. Thank you. I will use the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1076:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.1
I think we can do this for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2897:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.1
I think we can do this for
Use InputStream and not Reader for XML parsing
--
Key: SOLR-2347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Uwe Schindler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990132#comment-12990132
]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-2347:
-
To again post the most important info from XML
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2886:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2886_simple64_varint.patch
New patch, including Robert's patch,
I think we should even go one step further and make NaN an illegal
value for maxScore. I think we should add an assert in the setter and
the ctor. Objections?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:12 AM, Michael McCandless
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
can you please backport to branch_3x too? there are the same problems
there, including a test method in TestSort that i had to completely
@Ignore!
I will check that - but it seems that if we go for a different default
in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990143#comment-12990143
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2886:
OK I committed the two new
Hello,
Per Shai's previous note, we decided we wanted to work towards a 3.1
release (he mentioned a target date of march 1, don't think this will
happen)
Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
on
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
I think we should even go one step further and make NaN an illegal
value for maxScore. I think we should add an assert in the
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length the
list of issues
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990155#comment-12990155
]
Ivan Zlatev commented on LUCENENET-383:
---
I will extract a small test case from my
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/4447/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery.testIgnoreSpanScorer
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are still open files: {_4.prx=1,
_4.fdx=1, _4.frq=1,
Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
both?
Upayavira
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:00 -0500, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Per Shai's previous note, we decided we wanted to work towards a 3.1
release (he mentioned a target date of march 1, don't think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990172#comment-12990172
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2346:
From the email thread:
{quote}
One problem is that
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
on bugs
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:12 +, Alex Cowell
alxc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Just a couple of questions that have arisen.
1. For handling non-distributed update requests (shards param
is not present or is invalid), our code currently
* assumes the user would like the data indexed, so
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
both?
its all the same now
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/4448/
1 tests failed.
FAILED:
org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery.testIgnoreSpanScorer
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are still open files: {_0.tis=1,
_3.frq=1, _3.tvd=1,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990185#comment-12990185
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2346:
---
Right, I agree solr should work with a non-UTF8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990186#comment-12990186
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2903:
--
When the IntBuffer is produced by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990191#comment-12990191
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2345:
---
Hi Bill,
Can you clarify what you are
FYI - I am about to commit a fix for those failures.
The problem is that the settings for field sort scoring are not
propagated to the subs
Index: lucene/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/IndexSearcher.java
===
---
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/4451/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.search.payloads.TestPayloadTermQuery.testIgnoreSpanScorer
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are still open files: {_g4.frq=1,
_e9.tvd=1, _g2.tvf=1,
ported to 3x in revision 1066904
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
committed a fix in revision 1066764
simon
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
Seems like we don't respect segments that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990214#comment-12990214
]
hao yan commented on LUCENE-2903:
-
I think essentially the above step also need to do
Not sure I get to vote, but a big +1
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Ryan McKinley ryan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
both?
its all the same now
+1
Committed revision 1066904.
simon
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 7:10 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
FYI - I am about to commit a fix for those failures.
The problem is that the settings for field sort scoring are not
propagated to the subs
Index:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990217#comment-12990217
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2878:
-
{quote}
How does/should scoring work?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990221#comment-12990221
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2751:
-
Robert, I committed a fix with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990227#comment-12990227
]
Hsiu Wang commented on SOLR-236:
I applied the SOLR-236-1_4_1-paging-totals-working.patch to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990260#comment-12990260
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2903:
--
The conversion is done in place, no data is
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Wylie, Brian wrote:
Mistype (exceptions.xml) - (extensions.xml)
This is about trunk or 3.x ?
Not the same thing, trunk is highly unstable and PyLucene is not following
it too closely. What used to be trunk at the Lucene project is now the
so-called 3.x branch,
I just verified, at this moment, the HEAD of the 3.x branch
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/pylucene/branches/branch_3x/
builds and passes all tests.
Andi..
On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Wylie, Brian wrote:
Mistype (exceptions.xml) - (extensions.xml)
On 2/3/11 11:29 AM, Wylie, Brian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990319#comment-12990319
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2751:
-
I think we are good to resolve this? I
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
both?
Both: because our development is merged, I think it makes sense to
merge release engineering too.
The users can be mostly unaware of this: for example
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or
both?
Both: because our development is merged, I think it makes sense to
merge release
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2208?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990342#comment-12990342
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2208:
-
Hi Hsiu, thanks for uploading a patch to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990365#comment-12990365
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2903:
Hmm the last patch still seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-2339:
---
Summary: No error reported when sorting on a multiValued field (was: No
error reported when sorting on a
: Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
: in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
: on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length the
: list of issues in JIRA (unless these issues are bugs!).
+1
Looking over the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990378#comment-12990378
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2339:
Committed revision 1067030. - trunk
Still working on the
non-contiguous LogMergePolicy should be careful to not select merges already
running
Key: LUCENE-2904
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2904:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2904.patch
Patch.
LogMP now skips any segments that are
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base
: in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus
: on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Cameron updated SOLR-236:
-
Attachment: SOLR-236-1_4_1-NPEfix.patch
Uploading SOLR-236-1_4_1-NPEfix.patch as a simple patch for the
Build: https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/4477/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 59 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
Issue is:
Checking for files containing nocommit (exits build with failure if list is
non-empty):
./solr/src/test/org/apache/solr/BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java
--
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, 28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
Apache Hudson Server hud...@hudson.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-2339.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 1067042.
backported to 3x
No error reported when sorting on a
: Checking for files containing nocommit (exits build with failure if list is
non-empty):
: ./solr/src/test/org/apache/solr/BaseDistributedSearchTestCase.java
my bad ... on it.
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1057?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated SOLR-1057:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1057.patch
A new patch. To respond Ryan's requirement, I added the following
Wrong matches count with groupped results
-
Key: SOLR-2349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2349
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 4.0
Environment: windows
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990439#comment-12990439
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2886:
-
We are still not using 2 of the simple64
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990444#comment-12990444
]
Prasad Deshpande commented on SOLR-2346:
I agree, I was just trying to decode the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990455#comment-12990455
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2345:
-
Here is more info:
id=56
store=43,-96
store=42,-97.5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990456#comment-12990456
]
Bill Bell commented on SOLR-2155:
-
Instead of geodist() would you create a new one, or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Prasad Deshpande updated SOLR-2346:
---
Environment: Solr 1.4.1, Packaged Jetty as servlet container, Windows XP
SP1, Machine was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2346?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990444#comment-12990444
]
Prasad Deshpande edited comment on SOLR-2346 at 2/4/11 5:23 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell resolved SOLR-2317.
-
Resolution: Fixed
See SOLR-2156
Slaves have leftover index.x directories, and leftover files in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990477#comment-12990477
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-2843:
Michael, I think I'll use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12990480#comment-12990480
]
hao yan commented on LUCENE-2903:
-
Yes. Other PFOR impls (FrameOfRef and
93 matches
Mail list logo
