Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-22 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 4:31 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I am also re-asserting (as I have asserted in the past) that the Maven artifacts are *optional*. We've discussed

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-22 Thread Robert Muir
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:34 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.orgwrote: Likewise: If i feel like releases should always include a picture of a monkey holding the New York times on the day the release is made, then i should contribute a patch that causes the build to generate a picture

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: - ''Note: You need committer rights to create a new Lucene release.'' + This page is to help a Lucene/Solr committer create a new release (you need committer rights for some of the steps to create an official release).

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Robert Muir
sounds like we might need to create an official release policy, vote on it, and commit it. On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: - ''Note: You need committer rights to create

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: - ''Note: You need committer rights to create a new Lucene release.'' + This page is to help a Lucene/Solr committer create a new release (you need committer rights

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: It does not list iron-clad requirements - it is there simply to help. Again, I disagree.  Having done a number of releases, it would simply be impossible without it

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: It does not list iron-clad requirements - it is there simply to help. Again, I disagree. Having done a number of

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:  And it certainly isn't up to you alone to decide by placing it on the Wiki as a trivial update. Most of the updates to that page were made w/o consensus, just as mine was. It's a guide - nothing more. Again, if you

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: And it certainly isn't up to you alone to decide by placing it on the Wiki as a trivial update. Most of the updates to that page were made w/o consensus, just as

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: While, yes, I will agree it is not

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Grant

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 2:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Yonik

Re: [Lucene-java Wiki] Trivial Update of ReleaseTodo by YonikSeeley

2010-09-20 Thread Yonik Seeley
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: On Sep 20, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: I am also re-asserting (as I have asserted in the past) that the Maven artifacts are *optional*. We've discussed maven not being mandatory before: