Perhaps if the SCM was GIT instead of SVN it could be faster ?
It's not a short term solution but it can be another reason to use Git ASAP.
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> thanks for the feedbacks - we are using indeed the Kohsuke's wagon but
> to dep
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Barrie Treloar wrote:
> 2012/1/16 Arnaud Héritier :
> > Thanks a lot for this hard wok Barrie
> >
> > yes it was my problem too Robert.
> > ITs are now very difficult to use/maintain and sadly are covering only
> the
> > fact
Thanks a lot for this hard wok Barrie
yes it was my problem too Robert.
ITs are now very difficult to use/maintain and sadly are covering only the
fact that what we generate is always the same and not that it is working in
eclipse.
As far as I remember this is the larger plugin we have in lines of
I agree to not hold up the 3.0.4 release as it was already in 3.0.3 thus
the problem was in the previous release process that didn't identify this
problem.
The problem of this bug is that we don't know if this bug is affecting many
plugins but it seems that it's not really the case as it is here fo
Not only properties like I explained it here :
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MRELEASE-724
Arnaud
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just found a regression:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5224
>
> I think it is seriou
nments downloads are
> scanned by AV engines. And that means that the entire file needs to be
> downloaded by that engine and then scanned, before made available to
> the repo manager. So this isn't something that the repo manager could
> fix.
>
> /Anders
>
> On Mon, Dec 12,
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Le 12 décembre 2011 16:21, Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> http://maven.apache.org/docs/3.0.4/release-notes.html
> > +1 to have it set to 5 or 10 minutes by default and with a big warning
> and
>
> I will setup to 30 minute
+1 to have it set to 5 or 10 minutes by default and with a big warning and
associated doc in the release note
Even if I understand Brian about the "why do we fix something not reported
as broken", I would better consider it as an improvement and not a fix.
Do we have to release a 3.1 just for this
yes we should have done it...
Lesson to learn for next releases ...
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> Does no one else think it reasonable to do RCs like we have been doing for
> the last 2 years?
>
> On Dec 1, 2011, at 1:20 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'd l
+1
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Anders Hammar wrote:
> +1
>
> Checksums are now created correctly when deploying a snapshot to
> Codehaus's Nexus instance.
>
> /Anders
>
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 12:08, kreyssel wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://maven.40175.
+1
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> +1
>
> On Nov 30, 2011, at 2:13 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
> > Some time ago I did a very thorough review of commons-exec as a
> replacement for executeCommandLine in plexus-utils. commons-exec is a
> relative of plexus-utils execut
To purge the local repo we have a jenkins plugin that can be used :
https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Maven+Repo+Cleaner+Plugin
(note that these days I have a doubt that it doesn't have a bug thus if we
are using it at Apache too it could help us to stabilize it :-) )
For real HTTP proxy
What I'm doing at eXo to manage such cascading releases without having a
huge manual process to keep everything up-to-date is that I have a profile
that allow to activate a group with all staging repositories. Jenkins is
allowed to take artifacts from this staging group BUT it has to delete all
loc
Just a useless thing : Could it be possible to have the feather logo
vertically centered and with the same width of the Maven logo to have it
aligned ?
My 0,0001 cents
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to release Apache Maven SCM 1.6
>
> We fixed
1.13.1 AFAIR on irc :-)
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> btw for who interested benjamin (thanks !) did a quick change on
> aether to have content length passed to wagon which fix the issue (a
> core it test has been changed to failed in case chunked is used)
>
> I'm waitin
+1 (binding)
No regression found on a large set of projects.
Thx
Cheers
Le 27 nov. 2011 à 14:38, Robert Scholte a écrit :
>
>
> Tried on several Maven and Mojo projects, all looking good.
>
>
>
> +1
>
>
>
> -Robert
>
>
>> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 00:22:11 -0200
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mave
Hi,
I'll vote a little bit later to do more tests.
Just a note about the release note, even if it isn't easier to do I think
it might be really useful to add a link to release notes of components we
upgraded like wagon, sisu or aether. I'm not sure that for all issues
solved in these projects
AFAIK we can do less things in Markdown than existing APT and others
For example Markdown doesn't allow to create tables. You have to include
pure HTML to do them.
Arnaud
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a query as I suspect markd
Could it be possible for the plugin to generate to automatically generate
lines of code to fix bugs ?? :-D
More seriously good job.
A really useful service to ease contributions for ASF (and some others)
projects.
Arnaud
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> FYI, I
+1 (binding)
Arnaud
Le 10 nov. 2011 à 16:53, Olivier Lamy a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Since last vote things have changed:
> * aether is in incubation process @eclipse
> * sisu is in incubation process @eclipse
>
> Due to the fact that those process can be long before having an
> official release fr
be patient. Sometimes
> projects get provisioned the day the request goes in, sometimes it's 2-3
> weeks. Just depends what else is going on. It's only been 8 days so far since
> I made the provisioning request.
>
> On Sep 17, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
>>
>> http://eclipse.org/proposals/technology.aether/
>> http://eclipse.org/proposals/technology.sisu/
>>
>> They will both finish on September 7th.
>>
>> When finished we'll turn out a release ASAP.
>>
>> On Aug 28, 2011, at 8:11 AM, Arnaud Héri
+1
Arnaud
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> +1
> --
> Olivier
> Le 11 sept. 2011 15:18, "Vincent Siveton" a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I like to move the Eclipse Doxia Editor to the trunk ie
> >
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/sandbox/trunk/doxia/doxia-ide/eclipse/
>
>
>
> Janet just finished the trademark review and everything is clear. Wayne
> Beaton and I both forgot about starting the trademark review and it's
> required before the project creation review can start. The project creation
> review will start next week.
>
Ok, thus the ball is on your side n
clipse, then this would be
> >> a big pro.
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Anders Hammar
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > From: Anders Hammar
> >> > Subject: R
-policies.html
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:33 AM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> +1 Non Binding.
>
> On 18/08/2011, at 9:23 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > [+1] I'm in favor to use as Maven core dependencies SISU and AETHER
> libraries
> > published under EPL 1.0 License and released under eclipse.orggovernance
>
>
talking about a Maven 3.0.4 release with "Eclipse
> Aether+Sisu" or with "Sonatype Aether+Sisu"?
>
> /Anders
>
> 2011/8/19 Arnaud Héritier :
> > I'm thinking like Jason. If we wanted we to release 3.0.4 without Aether
> we
> > should have do
I'm thinking like Jason. If we wanted we to release 3.0.4 without Aether we
should have done that 2 or 3 weeks ago (I think Wagon 1.0 was already ready
?).
I'm almost sure that Jason will convince Eclipse to keep the current
identity of these projects (at least for a period of time to let him
sched
>
>
>
> > Otoh it would require us to go through maven-core and all plugins to
> change imports. So either way is ok, but we need to know the direction.
> >
>
> I wouldn't make client code have to change anything.
>
For any thirdparty lib we are using in core, on Maven APIs
(org.apache.maven) shou
Hi all,
Thus as decided with Mark and Kristian I relaunch a new vote with a better
scope about what we are voting for.
Next releases of SISU and Aether will be released at Eclipse.org under EPL
1.0 license.
Before they were published under ASL or dual ASL/EPL licenses thus as
defined in our
gainst this very topic).
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Thu, 8/18/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Héritier
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Usage of Aether and Sisu as dependencies of maven
> core with EPL licenses
> > To: "Maven Developers List&quo
ok, you're right that it wasn't clear in vote options but I said it in the
first sentence.
It is effectively what I had in mind (EPL at Eclipse.org)
Others are agree to restart ?
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Den 17.08.2011 16:19, s
>
>
>
> That's what I was going to suggest in response to Hervé's last message.
> Instead of bumping to a new snapshot immediately, it'd be better if the CI
> system could see the staging repositories (assuming the local repos are
> periodically cleaned so any failed releases don't stick around).
>
postponed until we have a clear
> understanding how we cope with pom-4.0.1 (use of xml attributes).
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 8/16/11, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > From: Arnaud Héritier
> > Subject: Re: Apache Maven distribution with fixes
> > To: &
And thus, what's new ???
3.0.4 is again lost somewhere ...
Mark did you have the opportunity to work on the fix you wanted to ?
Arnaud
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
>
> Hervé
>
> Le jeudi 28 juillet 2011, Brett Porter a écrit :
> > On 28/07/2011, at 10:
I agree. For me it is also an erroneous copy/paste
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know what's the rationale behind the parameter
>
> http://maven.apache.org/**archetype/maven-archetype-**
> plugin/add-archetype-metadat
...)
Arnaud
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> that's bad news. Why not pull them back?
> codehaus has a nice git hosting service too...
>
> I don't like to get another area of troubles...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 8/2/11, Arnau
No Jason moved it some months ago with plexus(*) to sonatype github account
I think that codehaus SCM is closed (RO) for these projects.
Arnaud
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:50 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Just wondering about the sonatype github URL. Isn't modello still a
> codehaus project?
>
> LieG
Hi,
We should use the "Editable Email Notification" instead of the "E-mail
Notification" . The default one is very badly done for Maven projects and
will spam you for each errorneous/fixed module. The Editable is more
powerful and will notify you only once per job.
FYI, the Jenkins team was wo
+0
I think the license issue is a false problem as it is mixed with an IP issue
and in any case we'll don't get back this code inside Maven land as its
authors don't want.
The issue to control this part of code is legitimate but the only solution
is to rewrite it from scratch (again)
cheers
Arnau
Something what was denounced in the past was the mix of delivery
informations (identity, dependencies, ...) and project informations (build
configuration, build environment, team, )
delivery informations are immutable whereas for project informations it
depends. Build configuration used to crea
+1
Le 28 juil. 2011 à 16:49, Julien HENRY a écrit :
> +1 for a 2.2.1
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> - Mail original -
>> De : Stephen Connolly
>> À : Maven Developers List
>> Cc :
>> Envoyé le : Jeudi 28 Juillet 2011 16h28
>> Objet : Re: Do we want to push a Maven Release Plugin 2.2.1 to include
>From my POV it could be a good thing for users to at least push a 3.0.4
release with what Benj fixed.
If Mark is sure to be able to fix next week the bug he mentioned let's wait
him.
For Aether/Sisu and additional fixes and required dependencies I let others
active dev/pmcs decide what they want.
Thx for your work Benson
I'll read and comment your document ASAP
About new elements we already discussed to add there was the
project/build/encoding
It may me think that we need to define about the compatibility management
we'll have to setup for plugins
For now we can say that a plugin works only
1.12 is EPL only :
https://github.com/sonatype/sonatype-aether/blob/aether-1.12/README.md
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> Just reading this thread and was surprised as I wasn't aware Aether had
> gone EPL only.
>
> I was about to start a thread around getting a Maven 3.
n, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I don't seem to have karma for
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Proposals?showChildren=true#children
> .
> Can I?
>
> 2011/7/17 Arnaud Héritier :
> > For me the first thing is to push some id
For me the first thing is to push some ideas in the wiki and make them
challenged by developpers
I'm not so sure that there is a consensus and a real proposal to solve that
upgrade taking care of all use cases (previous/future versions of maven,
transitive dependencies, depMgt import, inheritence .
+1
It was said several times and many people are agree to simplify / cleanup /
improve our web site
If someone is volunteer :-)
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
> I think you'll find in the archives of this list plenty of agreement and
> thoughts about how to change /
On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin <
robertburrelldon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2011/7/11 Arnaud Héritier :
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > There is a problem of sync (I think) between xircles and Jira.
> > I just added you manually in maven-developers
Hi Robert,
There is a problem of sync (I think) between xircles and Jira.
I just added you manually in maven-developers group in Jira and I opened
an issue on codehaus side (http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/HAUS-2099)
Welcome
Arnaud
I don't have any pointer in mind except this page which doesn't say much
than a stricter validation of POM :
https://cwiki.apache.org/MAVEN/maven-3x-compatibility-notes.html#Maven3.xCompatibilityNotes-StricterPOMValidation
But that right that in maven 2 we just ignored unknown scopes while maven 3
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-it-suite/
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/core-integration-testing/trunk/core-it-suite/src/test/resources/
Is it what you are looking for ??
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Where do overal
Done
* Maven Changes Plugin 2.6 (2011-06-23)
* Maven Plugins Parent 21 (2011-06-18)
* Maven Parent 20 (2011-06-17)
Arnaud
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I've made three releases that all need to be in the board report.
>
> -
It was about to (re-)define the workflow which requires full jira admin
Arnaud
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> All committers will have access to 'edit' issues at Apache, and that's
> all you need to work with labels.
>
>
> 2011/6/19
yes label are available @ Codehaus
Arnaud
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> labels seems reasonable, assuming that Codehaus deploys them.
>
> Given the positive response to this idea, I plan to send the email
> tomorrow some time and start on MNG.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 19,
her nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the
> screen
> On 19 Jun 2011 19:53, "Arnaud Héritier" wrote:
> > Labels are now a native feature in recent releases of Jira and they are
> > really useful to tag issues for a need like this one.
> > We could
Labels are now a native feature in recent releases of Jira and they are
really useful to tag issues for a need like this one.
We could use them also to give a complexity level of the issue, ...
The need is to define them and follow a common convention
Another solution is to have a custom workflow
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:32 PM, John Casey wrote:
>
>
> On 6/9/11 6:09 AM, Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> It was like
>> that at codehaus, and it still works that way.
>>
>
> Sorry to display my ignorance, but I haven't done much with the plexus-*
> code in awhile...
>
> Other than the container,
+1
Arnaud
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We solved 5 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11139&styleName=Html&version=17146
>
> There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:
>
> http://ji
There was an integration with fisheye and our SVN before but I think that
Ben (aka Codehaus) had a lot of performances issues with it.
I found an old maven repo in fisheye but it is no more updated that's
probably why it isn't configured in the project :
https://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/maven
The only thing we should take care is to note the upgrade in the cahngelog
of each plugin updated as it could avoid the upgrade for some users using an
old maven version with Java 4 ?
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I say bop at the hi
> If I wanted to add some explanations to the core pom doc
> (http://maven.apache.org/pom.html), where does it live?
>
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/site/trunk/src/site/apt/pom.apt
Arnaud
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Greetings all. Some PMCs like to get some sort of bio from new
> arrivals, let me know if that's de-rigeur-mortis.
>
>
it's better to know each others. If you want to do it we'll read it with
pleasure.
> How lazy is consensus 'round here?
Welcome Benson
Arnaud
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 9:22 PM, John Casey wrote:
> Good to have you aboard, Benson! Welcome.
>
>
> On 6/3/11 1:22 PM, Stephen Connolly wrote:
>
>> Benson, you are a mad fool agreeing to join us, but welcome anyway!
>>
>> All, the PMC has voted Benson in as a committer.
>>
+0.
Even if it could be the best for us to have coherent systems such migration
is very difficult to do as Jira provides very few things to do such changes.
The export/import by project isn't transitive with all Jira internal
elements (users, groups, workflows, schemes ).
It is AFAIK very diff
I don't remember which level of admin I have on this instance but if we want to
allow to edit this field I think we need to edit the edition view. There is no
fine grained security settings for jira fields edition. Thus it is for all
people who can edit the issue or nobody.
Le 26 mai 2011 à 18
Done
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:07 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Hi PMC!
>
> As discussed on the list I've created a Jira requesting to collapse all our
> commit mailing lists to comm...@maven.apache.org
>
> Could any1 of the Maven PMC members please formally ACK this over in
>
> https://issues.apac
We need to ask to infra. Just create a task in INFRA Jira project.
Le 24 mai 2011 à 21:09, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> who/how is going to do this? Is this a post-commit hook in SVN we need to
> change?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Tue, 5/24/11, Arnaud Héritier wrot
+1 to merge everything into maven mls
Arnaud
Le 24 mai 2011 à 20:53, Mark Struberg a écrit :
> already changed the wagon pom deprecating the old lists (textual) and adding
> the official maven-dev and maven-users lists.
>
> Btw, what about the commit messages? Should we keep them at wagon-com
t; > old maven only ever sees pom without classifier
> >
> > 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier :
> > > It doesn't seem so easy for me.
> > > If we deploy 4.0.0 only we'll never be able to reuse new POMs in the
> > build
> > > process by inheritan
The main issue with mixins is to define in which part of
the resolution mechanism we need to apply it and all the rules to override
or add entries in the POM
We need to provide flexibility but in an understandable way.
nowadays it is already difficult sometime to know why when the POM is
resolved w
extend (without talking about a
future : how to mix..)
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 4:09 PM, John Casey wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/11 8:25 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>
>> 2011/5/24 Arnaud Héritier:
>>
>>> Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition o
I don't remember the issue number but for me the main issue with the default
http wagon is that it isn't able to deploy large artifacts and for that we
have to use the webdav wagon which isn't any more by default in the core and
which creates some others side effects for exemple if you want to do a
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 24/05/2011, at 10:12 PM, Arnaud Héritier wrote:
>
> > Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition of
> > mixins (which may be cool but not critical) did we :
> > - studied that we
Before talking about a specific change in the model like the addition of
mixins (which may be cool but not critical) did we :
- studied that we had everything necessary to manage new versions of POMs
with something a little bit dynamic inside the core and all that is
necessary on repositories side
Well see ;)
Le 21 mai 2011 à 19:28, Anders Hammar a écrit :
> But the groupId of Apache Maven plugins is "org.apache.maven.plugins". The
> code checks against "org.apache.maven.plugin"...
>
> /Anders
>
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:26, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
>
>> Excellent stuff Stephen, than
Thus for short term and doxia tools you want it @ codehaus ?
Le 27 avr. 2011 à 00:11, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> aherit...@gmail.com skrev 2011-04-26 23:21:
>> Do we continue to create them @ codehaus ?
>
> Good question.
>
>> I remember we discussed about Apache's Jira usage but I don't reme
+1
Arnaud
Le 26 avr. 2011 à 20:02, Dennis Lundberg a écrit :
> Hi
>
> Over the last weeks I've been adding and configuring our various sub
> projects on the ASF Jenkins instance in the Maven view [1].
>
> I've also renamed a couple of the jobs that was already there, trying to
> establish a c
+1
Arnaud
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Brian Demers wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 9 issues:
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12112&version=17270
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/conten
+1
Arnaud
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Evgeny Mandrikov wrote:
> +1 !
>
> Tested for SVN and Git as a part of upcoming Sonar SCM Activity Plugin.
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 22:30, Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to release Apache Maven SCM 1.5.
>>
>> We solved 32 issues :
>>
>> h
I lost my admin rights a long time ago and I'm not sure there are
always codehaus jira admins here ?
The best is to contact ben on IRC or by opening a HAUS issue
Cheers
Arnaud
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Stephane Nicoll
wrote:
> okay I have a candidate implementation based on the initial p
ok for me too.
Arnaud
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> Sorry, my misunderstanding.
>
> Looks good to me ;)
>
> Kristian
>
>
>
> lø., 19.03.2011 kl. 09.51 +0100, skrev Stephane Nicoll:
>> What other code are you talking about? The plugin on google code? The idea
>> he
Brian,
No link or reference to Apache ? :(
Arnaud
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Brian Fox wrote:
> Page is updated.
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Brian Fox wrote:
>> It should read something like either :
>>
>> bringing M2eclipse to eclipse...
>>
>> or
>>
>> bringing Maven support
+1
Arnaud
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Kristian Rosenvold wrote:
>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-009/
>
> +1
>
>
> Benjamin
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e
+1
Arnaud
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mark Derricutt wrote:
> -1 non binding - I had that null version issue earlier. Now home and will
> try to reproduce it with a currently nightly.
>
>
>
> --
> "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson,
> Porcupine Tree
>
Tested without problem on a large set of ours projects.
cheers
Arnaud
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote:
> On 26 February 2011 15:56, Anders Hammar wrote:
>
> > I'm noticing a lower memory usage (compared to v3.0.2) when building the
> > Cargo project (trunk), but can't
I didn't yet test it but it is a good direction to follow.
Arnaud
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> looks promising!
>
> I'm sure I miss big parts of the picture, but please allow me a few
> (probably dumb) questions.
>
> This means that an artifact is uniquely identified
Perhaps we should add some docs on apache site to recommend to
projects to use at least 2.2.1 or 3.0.x ?
I'm not sure we have such guidelines about Maven for Apache projects ?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Benjamin Bentmann
wrote:
> Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
>> however site-plugin-2.2 uses doxia
Welcome Evgeny !!!
Arnaud
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> welcome
>
> - Stephen
>
> ---
> Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense
> words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type o
envold
> ltheussl
> mkleint
> oching
> olamy
> pgier
> rgoers
> snicoll
> stephenc
> vmassol
> vsiveton
> wfay
>
> 2011/1/28 Arnaud Héritier :
> > ok,
> > It's annoying to not have a mapping between LDAP/SVN groups and Jira.
> > It could b
er id's and then any/all of the three of us can add the PMC to the
> project role
>
> 2011/1/28 Arnaud Héritier :
> > you can add me olivier (aheritier)
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> I have c
you can add me olivier (aheritier)
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hello,
> I have changed the subject.
> As asked by Benson, it's probably better to move MPOM from codehaus
> jira to ASF jira.
>
> So I have created a jira entry :
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/I
I agree to say "I agree" when I agree with something instead of using +1 :-)
Do you agree ?
Arnaud
2011/1/26 Tamás Cservenák
> Arnaud, what do you agree with? :)
>
> Thanks,
> ~t~
>
> 2011/1/26 A
I agree :-)
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> This may seem like a peanut issue compared to other things we have to
> discuss these days, but since so many things are coming up, I thought I toss
> it in and maybe it will get overlooked...
>
> It bugs me that ever
+1
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
>
> +1
>
> -Lukas
>
>
>
> Olivier Lamy wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I propose Evgeny Mandrikov as a new committer.
>> He as done a lot of patches for Maven SCM, he is a Mojo and Sonar
>> contributor @codehaus.
>>
>> Vote is open for 72H.
+1
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
>
> On 12/01/2011, at 11:33 PM, Tamás Cservenák wrote:
>
>> In short, it's the Maven3 model (vs Maven2.x model) + Aether (vs
>> maven-artifact 2.x) + Lucene 3.0.3 (vs Lucene 2.4.1) and MINDEXER-2 that
>> introduced some important API change.
+1
Arnaud
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Emmanuel Venisse
wrote:
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Benjamin Bentmann > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We solved 25 issues since 3.0.1:
>>
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500&version=16952
>>
>> There are
No problem with my tests.
Arnaud
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 10:20 PM, Benjamin Bentmann <
benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we're aiming at a bugfix release of Maven 3 in the next week and following
> tradition we invite interested users in taking the RC for a test drive in
> order to dete
+1
Arnaud
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Kristian Rosenvold
wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>
-
Jason can you transfer credentials for maven related projects (plexus,
modello, ...) you are moving from Codehaus to GitHub ??
I don't see any reason for us to loose privileges you gave to us previously
?
Otherwise we'll have to ask you each time we want to commit to a migrated
project and we'll lo
501 - 600 of 690 matches
Mail list logo
