+1 from Eclipse Tycho, no regression found by build+automated tests
compared to 3.8.2:
https://ci.eclipse.org/tycho/job/tycho-build-with-maven-snapshots/122/console
+1 from Eclipse m2e, no regression found by build+automated tests compared
to 3.8.1 and confirmed issue that prevented from adopting
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:36 AM Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> I agree with Bernd, checksums are there to validate the consistency of the
> artifact, nothing linked to security.
>
Ensuring user gets a consistent artifact as desired -and not a malicious
forged one- is 1 aspect of security.
On
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 8:41 PM Bernd Eckenfels
wrote:
> There is no Security risk with weaker checksums since the checksums are
> not used for security. An attacker who messes with your binaries can also
> mess with the checksum files.
In our case, we have the checksum files that are served
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 2:10 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
Hi Michael,
>
> this is an overly complex topic I'd like to explain.
> First of all Wagon is not involved in this. It does the physical
> transport. The payload is opaque. SHA, MD5 aren't verifying any
> signatures, it is
d I create a
new one?
Thanks in advance
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/eclipseide> developer, for Red Hat
Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:51 PM Oliver Drotbohm wrote:
> I have a bit of a hard time constructing the state I run into when Maven
> is actually run in my project: all compile time dependencies available via
> getArtifacts() but the complete list of declared ones available in
>
MavenPlugin.getMavenProjectRegistry().getProject(pomFile.getProject()).getMavenProject(monitor)
Hi,
I don't know for sure, but your reasoning sounds good. So please try
submitting a PR and we'll see if this change breaks things.
Cheers,
+1 from m2e.
We tried using 3.8.2 internally and found it broke some tests (so we did
stick to 3.8.1), while our first attempt with 3.8.3 was successful so it's
good for m2e adoption (details at
https://github.com/eclipse-m2e/m2e-core/pull/326 ).
Hi,
Any news here?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 2:08 PM Mickael Istria wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In Eclipse m2e, we're seeing a minor yet annoying bug since we migrated to
> indexer 6.0; our test suite has unveiled the error since then but we were
> managing to ignore it for a long t
On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:01 PM Michael Osipov wrote:
> It should not change. The bundled code contain two plugin groups:
>
>
? Is
this intentional or should it be seen as a bug (I personally don't mind,
both are fine to me)? Is there some issue or discussion that mentions that
change I could link in our code for reference?
Thanks in advance
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/eclipseide> dev
try to help with to
facilitate it?
Thanks in advance
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/eclipseide> developer, for Red Hat
Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
I
On Tuesday, August 25, 2020, Manfred Moser wrote:
> And the VS code integration from Red Hat might also do something along
those lines.
It embeds and uses m2eclipse.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Develope
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 4:10 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> 1. Is there an API somewhere for locating the local maven repository
> that is often but not always stored in ~/.m2/repository?
>
I didn't find a good code for that. It looks like MavenCli and related
classes are doing most of the
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 2:40 PM Nick Stolwijk
wrote:
> Hi Mickael,
>
Hi,
I was wondering if you send this intentionally to the dev mailinglist? I
> think this is better suitable for the user mailinglist, also you have a
> much broader audience there.
>
To be honest, we're not much looking for
-maven
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi,
Community support is always an interesting question as there is no support
contract to define what "support" means ;)
IMO, the community does at least support the latest release. Then if some
community members can work on supporting older ones, that's good, but IMO
it doesn't have to be the
in advance,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi,
Since things work with plain Maven, such questions would better be directed
to the m2e-...@eclipse.org mailing-list.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:35 PM Elliotte Rusty Harold
wrote:
> There seems to be something I'm missing about importing projects into
> Eclipse.
How do you perform this
+1.
Works for Eclipse Tycho:
https://ci.eclipse.org/tycho/job/tycho-build-with-maven-snapshots/49/
Works for Eclipse m2e: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/149057/ &
https://ci.eclipse.org/m2e/job/m2e-gerrit/530/ ( tests failures are not
regression and are caused by default XSD URL moving for http to
Hi all,
What's the status here? Any ETA for 3.6.3 release?
Cheers
+1 from m2e and Tycho POV. Both have already require Java 8 for several
versions anyways, so the target audience is definitely already away from
Java 7.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6765 is resolved; any
change a 3.6.3 releases happens soon so consumers won't face the pomless
bug anymore; and the Maven contributors can start having fun on a 3.7?
Cheers
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packa
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 5:37 PM Mickael Istria wrote:
> I believe this reveals that some of the important Tycho tests are not
> performed against latest Maven snapshots.
>
After a fix, the failures with polyglot build using more recent version of
Maven are now surfacing.
Too bad we di
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 5:35 PM Karl Heinz Marbaise
wrote:
>
> > now that Maven 3.6.2 is out for a couple of weeks, it seems like we
> > didn't face real regressions.
> > The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
>
> Feedback of Michael Istria states different? Or do I miss a
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 2:04 PM Robert Scholte wrote:
> The only one might be tricky is the issue related to Tycho.
What issue is this? Tycho integration-tests are being run against Maven
snapshots daily and no issue was spot nor report on Tycho side as far as I
know.
Thanks a lot for this effort in establishing metrics, which are also very
easy to grok.
The evolution of heap allocation in Maven are pretty impressive in the most
postive way! Thanks and congrats to everyone involved!
3350905e97177978724eed0698de3
> sha512:
>
> d7fdafbc16bd547bc3c2513255df375c2a616b04d414c2ffd7d9deb9931fab5db4c7ac912cc4bb0d96d0a083560b3cc1848ea9eecc3aeb4e4c5184329a7ead5b
>
> Git tag:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven.git;a=commit;h=40f52333136460af0dc0d7232c0dc0
+1 from Eclipse m2e (test change: https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/142991/ ,
test build: https://ci.eclipse.org/m2e/job/m2e-gerrit/479/ )
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:01 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> Want to announce you about a new issue in the Resolver.
> @Herve @Sylwester I found you in the history. Can you comment author's
> changes?
Is it a regression compared to last release? If not, I don't think it
should be made a blocker for
Have things improved so the release can now be planned soon?
Hey all,
Any news here?
IDE and Eclipse
Tycho) ?
Thanks in advance
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:37 AM Stephen Connolly <
stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote:
> however
> because of architectural history, Eclipse (last time I checked... some
> years ago) had issues keeping the main and test classpaths separate
This was fixed last year, during development
in improving Maven
for some other reasons, that kind of negativity in the community would make
me give up contributing. You should probably spend time learning the value
of a community and how to improve it instead of bugging it, that would be
very profitable to Maven project.
--
Mickael Istria
Hi,
This seems like https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=547340 .
Please try updating to a more recent build of Eclipse m2e (using
https://download.eclipse.org/technology/m2e/snapshots/1.12.0/latest/ p2
repo), and if you see further issues with that version, please reopen the
m2e bug
d transitive dependencies. We
don't want m2e to tweak the dependencies and we want m2e to not ship CVEs.
So we think.it's better to fix CVEs upstream and we imagined Maven would be
glad welcoming CVE fix contribution like people expect from any serious
project.
>
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https
People who don't want to update are the ones who have to pay the effort,
not the project that tries to ship a security fix.
The simplest past forward is the one provided by Tony. Customers who don't
want to use it can remain on previous version of the archetype plugins.
Other proposals to fix it
I think an infra that wants to prevent adopters for giving feedback on
snapshots is harmful for an open-source project. Are alternatives like
Sonatype OSSRH considered for replacement?
Concretely, m2e can now pretty easily test against Maven snapshot:
https://git.eclipse.org/r/142991 . This should allow m2e to detect and
report Maven issues sooner, and to adopt newer Maven shortly after release
as we can span integration effort all along the development phase instead
of starting
Thanks a lot!
I think it would be worth a dedicated announce post on the mailing-list or
other community channels (blog, twitter...).
Ok, here is my proposal: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/250
Why is the CI stuff in a dedicated repo and not on the main repo? Could we
try to change it? That would make Maven more "normal" and more accessible
in term of contribution.
I found https://github.com/apache/maven/blob/master/Jenkinsfile in the main
repo. What is the purprose of this file vs the
Up!
What's blocking for publication of snapshots from master to some snapshot
repo? I'd gladly try to help.
IMO, if some patch managed to get to master, it's worth being released,
even if IT test fail.
So I would make the first step being a `mvn deploy` of what[s in master,
before running other tests.
I think this would be much simpler, allow community to test some "master"
snapshot even if it's bugged
wnload latest snapshot dist from our Jenkins build
> from master branch [1]
>
> Sylwek
>
> [1]
> https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-
> box/job/maven/job/master/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
> org/apache/maven/apache-maven
>
>
> czw., 9 maj 2019 o 14:
of Maven
delivery?
Thanks in advance,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:20 PM Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> It has a typical long build time, but not a very complicated setup
> (e.g. the depth of nested projects is about 3 max)
I think Maven should aim (and generate dummy projects for
testing/benchmarking) for even more complex projects.
Eclipse m2e would love to get snapshots available to ease adoption of new
Maven release (we could automate a CI build checking compatibility with
Maven and prepare necessary fixes in m2e as they are developed in Maven
instead of having to wait for the release).
Cheers,
Hi,
Unfortunately, we won't have the opportunity to try it in m2e before the
deadline for voting as it seems like some recent changes would require
adaptation in m2e (or it's some other bug in m2e that needs to be fixed
before we can try this 3.6.1 RC).
https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/133590/ shows
gt; >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 22.03.19 09:25, Michael Osipov wrote:
> > > > Am 2019-03-22 um 08:37 schrieb Mickael Istria:
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >>
> > > >> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 6:34 PM Hervé BOU
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 6:34 PM Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> We're working on it, it should happen quite soon, but no date is really
> guaranteed: as you can see from Jira issues to be resolved [1], we're
> near...
At this point, since there are some blockers issues that have been fixed
and
for the release?
Thanks in advance.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi again,
The (hopefully) final patch to make save GBs of RAM in m2e was merged in
Maven earlier today.
I'd like m2e CI builds to be able to test against it. Can someone please
publish the current master as SNAPSHOT ?
Cheers,
Hi,
master seems by far enough to me, and I think support for specific other
branches should be considered in another future step if it happens to be
requested one day.
About nightly, I think it's usually not such a good rule. I wrote about it
some time ago when I started to deal with release
Hi,
Eclipse m2e, as a consumer of Maven as a library, would love to see the
latest HEAD from master published automatically as SNAPSHOTs soon after
every change is made. This seems like a requirement to enable continuous
feedback from m2e to Maven.
Publishing some other branches or commits
Hi all,
Final update about m2e coverage of Maven project: the full test suite now
reports coverage and reports are still visible at
https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=m2e-covering-maven=coverage
. This can help to identify, by comparing it with plain Maven coverage
reports, which area of
her
human effort.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
in advance
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
On Sun, Jan 6, 2019 at 8:32 PM Tibor Digana wrote:
> I meant Bitcoins. Without network access bitcoins can be loaded but nobody
> can use them. An access to Workspace and archived artifacts should be
> disabled for users.
That would be sad since those are actually super helpful when trying to
Hi all,
I've configured the CI job https://ci.eclipse.org/m2e/job/m2e-core-tests/
so that it automatically reports to SonarCloud how m2e tests cover
maven-core code:
https://sonarcloud.io/component_measures?id=m2e-covering-maven=coverage
Note that not all tests are included, only a small subset
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 8:11 AM Olivier Lamy wrote:
> No way. Apache Infrastructure is a shared infrastructure. There are NO
> dedicated machine for any projects.
>
I guess you mean physical machines here, don't you?
I don't think physical machines are what matters, but having an infra that
can
Hi,
I think this discussion is diverging into "trying TravisCI for some
plugins" and is loosing focus on the initial question of how to improve the
build+test flow to get faster feedback as a contributor or as a reviewer.
Can the GitHub PR builder plugin be enabled on Maven Core ? Committers
he software is built and
where the code is hosted isn't important. So no issue if it's on ASF
Jenkins and hardware, but for PR trials, it seems like a constraint it'd be
sane to get rid of.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
deve
, and only drawback of
being discoupled from a specific infra (is it really a drawback?)
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
On Sat, Dec 29, 2018 at 12:01 PM Hervé BOUTEMY
wrote:
> But in both cases, currently, there is no automatic GitHub PR integration:
> Maven committers need to create a branch in the official repository to
> benefit
> from ASF Jenkins build
>
Ah ok, I wasn't aware the GitHub repo was "unofficial"
Maven already enables some important success criteria,
> > like being on GitHub. So I'm confident things can and will improve to
> grow
> > the community.
>
> Over the time it already evolved/grown in several aspects. Maybe not in
> the speed we wish it had...
> But it ta
volution; and I don't have the impression current Maven community is big
and agile enough to sustain big changes.
That said, I think Maven already enables some important success criteria,
like being on GitHub. So I'm confident things can and will improve to grow
the community.
Cheers,
--
Micka
and will be more productive next time, and I ship a "more
complete" work by myself without requiring committers to provide
extra-patches.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
show_bug.cgi?id=542555 can be a
solution for m2e. I'll keep you in touch when this is done.
>
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi all,
In my intent to improve m2e, I realize that one key criteria of
sustainability for m2e project is the ability to interact well with Maven
project (interacting more with the community, trying snapshots, identifying
breaking or major issues, consolidating the non-CLI usage of Maven as
Ok, my bad, thanks for the hint.
I think there is a difference between scheduling tasks (one is after the
other) and assuming that 2 tasks that are ready can run in parallel.
Adding scheduling data would be helpful and get rid of the concept of
phases, for sure; but we also -and more importantly- need the existing
mojos to be
Hi,
> any way we move that topic forward beginning of next year?
I guess providing patches would be the best way ;)
I'm coming late in this discussion and I'm a newcomer on that list, so I
could miss context. This could relate to an effort we are doing in Eclipse
IDE (and Eclipse m2e) to run
be targeted for review (and if everything is
fine, merge) as part of next release.
Thanks in advance.
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/eclipse-packages/>
developer, for Red Hat Developers <https://developers.redhat.com/>
Hi guys,
Another kind of projects (after IDEs) that may be affected by this issue
and receiving out of date MavenProject from Project.build(...) can be for
example CI systems (
Hi guys,
Thanks for your answer. I like the proposal of the system property to
disable this bug. Let's continue discussion on the Jira ticket.
Cheers,
closely from Maven snapshots and staging builds to
report such issues earlier and have the opportunity to prevent regressions
to happen in Maven.
We'll probably share more messages about it in the next weeks/months.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
Eclipse IDE <https://www.eclipse.org/downloads/ecli
Groovy as a replacement of Freemarker or Velocity).
Project home is here:
https://github.com/gstring-maven-plugin/gstring-maven-plugin
Mailing-list is:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gstring-maven-plugin
Feedback and contributions are hightly welcome.
Cheers,
--
Mickael Istria
80 matches
Mail list logo
