Jason,
Have you found some time to look ?
I have created a resources plugin branch [1] which use the new component.
Thanks,
--
Olivier
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/branches/MRESOURCES-56/
2008/2/28, Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You just have to make sure that the p
I will be out of the office starting 25.02.2008 and will not return until
03.03.2008.
I will respond to your message when I return.
I'm so glad to know that. Can we block these messages?
-Original Message-
From: Julia Antonova [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 8:55 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Julia Antonova/Tumlare is out due to sick leave.
I will be out of the office starting 25.0
I'll write something up about the ordering of processing in the wiki
so that we don't lose it in the ether. Probably won't happen today but
later Sunday night.
On 1-Mar-08, at 5:52 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Jason,
Have you found some time to look ?
I have created a resources plugin branch [1]
I'm sorry.
I've uploaded the gpg signatures and will call a vote on the artifact..
Milos
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there some reason you're not using the release plugin for this?
>
> Also, it looks like 1.0 was put into rsync'd repository, but
Hi,
Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
The background for the release:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Toolchains
Unfortately I've messed up and released the bits already. As
instructed by Wendy
+1 from me.
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
> The background for the release:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> http://docs.codehaus.org/disp
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Milos Kleint <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please vote on the maven-toolchain 1.0 artifact.
> The background for the release:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/maven-dev/200802.mbox/[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Too
It's a bit tricky. I suggest we vote on what got synced out. If for
any reason the release must be pulled it can be and the next one will
need to be version 1.0.1 or something.
I'l take a look today/tomorrow.
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 9:12 AM, Tomasz Pik wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 8:33
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good thing
to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
- Brett
On 02/03/2008, at 10:17 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
It's a bit tricky. I sugge
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
We should practice what we preach,
On Saturday 01 March 2008, Jason van Zyl wrote:
> On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> > Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
> > integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
> > thing to me).
> >
> > Is this release needed any more Milos? Sho
On 02/03/2008, at 11:00 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we jus
On 02/03/2008, at 11:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract
mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just told
someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change or pull
mistakes.
Change, no - but surely we
On 1-Mar-08, at 4:07 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/03/2008, at 11:00 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 1-Mar-08, at 3:22 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good
thing to me).
Is t
On 1-Mar-08, at 4:10 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
On 02/03/2008, at 11:07 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
We should practice what we preach, in that no one else can retract
mistakes and it should stay and Milos release it again. I just
told someone on the repo-maintainers list they couldn't change o
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&styleName=Html&version=13994
The remaining issues in JIRA are feature requests.
Staging repo:
http://people.apache
+1
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 7:20 PM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the 2.0.9
> release as well.
>
> We solved 6 issues:
>
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&styleName=Html&version=13
+1
--jason
On Mar 2, 2008, at 10:20 AM, Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready to be released. This is needed for the
2.0.9 release as well.
We solved 6 issues:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11540&styleName=Html&version=13994
The remaining issues
+1
I was sure I was going to have to give a -1 because MSHADE-9 was marked
"Not reproducible", but I too can't reproduce it using this version; I
think/hope that this is because we upgraded our version of asm and that
took care of it. :-)
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi,
The Shade plugin is ready
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 12:22 AM, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, now I'm confused... looking at commits it's being re-
> integrated into the trunk and branches (Which seems like a good thing
> to me).
>
> Is this release needed any more Milos? Should we just pull it out?
Yes
21 matches
Mail list logo
