On 20/02/2008, at 6:33 PM, nicolas de loof wrote:
What about a Combined Plexus context, where the lookup method both
search in
the plexus components and the springFactory ?
This would make initialization more complex, but we could use @
plexus.requirement as is to get spring beans without
Could'nt Spring mimic the PlexusContainer ?
Archiva-webapp can be started with a spring context with support from
webwork/struts2 for IoC. We 'just' have to help the spring context retrieve
the components declared in plexus context files.
As spring and plexus IoC concepts are equivalent, we
I just added support for camelCase properties names using Xalan extension.
I don't know how to register a custom XpathFunction to a standard Trax
Transformer. This will be required to make code fully portable, or maybe we
can hard-code the use of Xalan in place of Trax API.
Nico.
2008/2/20,
Im having a lot of problems runnign archiva as an NT service. I am using
the latest release offered for download. What I want to do is be able to
set the JDK to use since there are about 10 applications running on the
server where I want to use archiva and not all of them are JDK 1.6
Compatible. I
The error doesn't seem to be related, but most often when I have
problems with services starting it's because the user it ends up
running as doesn't have the right permissions for it. Could that be
the case?
- Brett
On 21/02/2008, at 6:35 AM, Simmons, Robert wrote:
Im having a lot of
Nope. Running as the system user and installed from admin.
-- Robert
On 2/20/08 1:22 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The error doesn't seem to be related, but most often when I have
problems with services starting it's because the user it ends up
running as doesn't have the right
On 21/02/2008, at 1:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ instanciation-strategyper-lookup/instanciation-strategy
typo?
- Brett
--
Brett Porter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
This is way cooler than what I was doing :)
Can you replace the calls to the other factories so we can see this in
action with a spring bean and plexus component all wired up?
I wouldn't worry about the portability for now - maybe if it were
donated to Plexus itself that'd require some
you need to run with local admin ( not local system, not domain account).
Dont recall what was the problem thou, but local admin account solved my problem
-D
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Robert Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Running as the system user and installed from admin.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 1:24 PM, Robert Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope. Running as the system user and installed from admin.
(This was more Continuum, but) I've never gotten it to work running as
the system user. I've always had to create a real user with a home
directory, and
The discussions this week have been pretty healthy, releases going
smoothly, and there is user and developer interest.
Today, Continuum has graduated to be a top level project and I feel
Archiva is well on track. What do others think?
BTW, SVN lists the following committers (snipped a
Thanks Rahul.
Emmanuel
On Feb 20, 2008 4:44 AM, Rahul Thakur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have re-organised and updated content related to Continuum 2.0 Roadmap
here:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CONTINUUMDEV/Draft+-+Continuum+2.0+Roadmap
Would appreciate if others can
Great news! Congrats everyone :-)
Rahul
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual. Certainly shouldn't interrupt
the planning for the
Cool, great news.
Thanks Brett (and others)
Emmanuel
On Feb 20, 2008 9:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as
\o/ nice!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Emmanuel Venisse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool, great news.
Thanks Brett (and others)
Emmanuel
On Feb 20, 2008 9:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
Wonderful !
--
Olivier
2008/2/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual. Certainly shouldn't interrupt
the
Another feature (rather features) that i would like to see is around
Change tracking/audit.
I would like to add to the feature list - integration with some of
popular Change management/ Bug tracking systems, such that user can see
issues fixed in a build.
On a related note, I think we are
On 21/02/2008, at 9:57 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
Another feature (rather features) that i would like to see is around
Change tracking/audit.
I would like to add to the feature list - integration with some of
popular Change management/ Bug tracking systems, such that user can
see issues
Fantastic news!
Congrats everyone!
- Joakim
Brett Porter wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual. Certainly shouldn't interrupt
the planning for
Yay! Congrats everyone! :-)
-Deng
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual.
Yay! Congrats!
Cheers!
Nap
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay! Congrats everyone! :-)
-Deng
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
wow. cool ! ^_^
congrats everyone ! ^_^
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Napoleon Esmundo C. Ramirez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay! Congrats!
Cheers!
Nap
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Maria Odea Ching [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Yay! Congrats everyone! :-)
-Deng
On Thu, Feb
nice!
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual. Certainly shouldn't interrupt
\o/
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Congratulations - the board passed the resolution we submitted.
We'll have some work to do to get set up over the next month, but
other than that it's business as usual. Certainly shouldn't interrupt
the
Hi,
the Enforcer Plugin is usually executed in the validate phase and requires
resolution of dependencies. This constellation can cause build failures.
Consider an Enforcer-enabled multi-project build with a parent and two
modules A and B where B has a dependency on A such that the reactor
Hi,
I propose also to create a TLP Maven site, similar to [1]? WDYT?
Cheers,
Vincent
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/plugins/trunk/src
2008/2/19, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi
To get the latest version of maven-source-plugin into our toolchain, I'd
like to release maven
Hi Ben,
This is a good idea, can you add it to the atypical plugin use cases
page John put on docs.codehaus.org?
--Brian
-Original Message-
From: Benjamin Bentmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 7:32 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Enforcer Plugin and
Wendy Smoak wrote:
On Feb 19, 2008 1:01 PM, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The -sources jar is missing LICENSE and NOTICE files.
I dislike changing anything after a vote has started. If it had been
the main artifact I would definitely have started over with the
release and vote.
I staged Surefire 2.4.2 last night about 12 hours ago; it still hasn't
shown up on repo1.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire/
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire/
This seems longer than usual. Is the
got it, please check in 4 hours, should be fixed now
On Feb 20, 2008 9:57 AM, Dan Fabulich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Fabulich wrote:
I staged Surefire 2.4.2 last night about 12 hours ago; it still hasn't shown
up on repo1.
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dan Fabulich wrote:
I staged Surefire 2.4.2 last night about 12 hours ago; it still hasn't shown
up on repo1.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/maven/surefire/surefire/
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Surefire
Plugin, version 2.4.2.
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-surefire-plugin/
You can run mvn -up to get the latest version of the plugin, or specify
the version in your project's plugin configuration:
plugin
This is a good idea, can you add it to the atypical plugin use cases
page John put on docs.codehaus.org?
Left a comment at
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/MAVEN/Atypical+Plugin+Use+Cases
that points to this thread.
Benjamin
I think that we should be able to copy that entire file to maven-parent.
That way all our projects will share the same look.
We should probably *not* copy the links though, because the main Maven
site doesn't have any links.
If we do this can we also change the date to use the recommended
Hi,
I noticed that due to [1], the groupId for
maven-plugin-testing-harness is no more org.apache.maven.shared.
Moreover, we will do a jump from 1.1 to 2.4 [2].
Similar problems occur for maven-plugin-tools-* and only
maven-plugin-plugin is not affected by this version pb.
I propose to create a
Hi,
2008/2/20, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think that we should be able to copy that entire file to maven-parent.
That way all our projects will share the same look.
It was the goal :)
We should probably *not* copy the links though, because the main Maven
site doesn't have any
Only the first plugin configuration is applied when a plugin is used
multiple times within a profile. Following plug in configurations do
not use their specified configuration. Instead, configuration is based
on what appears to be a combination of the configuration specified in
the first plugin
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Ryan Ovrevik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Only the first plugin configuration is applied when a plugin is used
multiple times within a profile. Following plug in configurations do
not use their specified configuration. Instead, configuration is based
on what
It looks like some changes in maven-plugin-testing-harness caused
errors in the tests in the Install plugin. This is the first build
that shows the problem:
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=39712projectId=21
Could be that the tests need to be adjusted, I'm not
Yep, I think this is related to it only picking the first version it
comes across, regardless of future version declarations.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Ryan Ovrevik
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 10:25 PM
To: dev@maven.apache.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
