Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Did the MNG-3586 is allready fixed or fix is delayed ? I got this mail : - Jason van Zyl updated MNG-3586: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1-alpha-1) 2.1-alpha-2 -- Very annoying bug for those of us using m2eclipse 0.9.4 and

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
Here's some tips for folks trying to debug Maven/Plexus/Plugins in Eclipse. Using m2e you can actually debug/execute plugin _inside_ Eclipse. That means the plugin executes from the workspace in-situ. Extremely handy.

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Brett Porter
I was just looking at this Henri - though I'm not longer able to compile the provided test project so it's impossible to test. Can you review the project to help make it reproducible? Thanks, Brett On 04/07/2008, at 5:12 PM, Henri Gomez wrote: Did the MNG-3586 is allready fixed or fix is

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Henri Gomez
2008/7/4 Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I was just looking at this Henri - though I'm not longer able to compile the provided test project so it's impossible to test. Can you review the project to help make it reproducible? Done. Redone the test with m2eclipse 0.9.4 (using embedded) From

Re: MARTIFACT-25 was: releasing maven artifact 3.0 alpha 1

2008-07-04 Thread Brett Porter
On 04/07/2008, at 3:40 AM, John Casey wrote: Not to distract from the higher-level discussion, but I'd like to get into the nuts and bolts of MARTIFACT-25 a bit...in case someone beats me to it. We introduced a properties file that tracks resolution attempts for artifacts that weren't

Re: MARTIFACT-25 was: releasing maven artifact 3.0 alpha 1

2008-07-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
Are you dropping new files into the local repository or integrating this as part of the metadata? Do these files only work locally? Also in the case of 2.1 we should also consider just not allowing the state where there is no POM. Consider the artifact not complete without a POM. On

Re: MARTIFACT-25 was: releasing maven artifact 3.0 alpha 1

2008-07-04 Thread Oleg Gusakov
John - are you looking into this? Need it resolved for MNG-3185 Thanks, Oleg Brett Porter wrote: On 04/07/2008, at 3:40 AM, John Casey wrote: Not to distract from the higher-level discussion, but I'd like to get into the nuts and bolts of MARTIFACT-25 a bit...in case someone beats me to

Re: Vetting issues for 2.1-alpha-XX

2008-07-04 Thread Jason van Zyl
As part of getting adequate coverage for vetting, I have just asked Nigel and Justin who watch over the Hudson instance here at Apache to setup the Maven jobs we require for validation. They are running on Solaris which will be a good compliment to what we have running at Contegix.

Maven 2.x Eclipse Plugin - MECLIPSE-388

2008-07-04 Thread Kamil
Hi Maven 2.0.9 has corrected classpath order, direct dependencies are first (and suborder is among declared entries). I think that thanks this very hopefilly improvement (bugfix imho ;)) maven eclipse plugin doesn't have to sort classpath. Generated .classpath should sorted entries amond order in

Re: [DISCUSS] Maven Team Conventions

2008-07-04 Thread Brett Porter
Just a couple of comments... code.apt: ~~ * Using SVN properties like \$Id: \$ = Is it a wanted goal for all files like java or apt? I think this is helpful, though maybe optional. I don't really think it's good for the @version tag in Javadoc though. * Indentation: Always use 2 space